logo
Panda-monium and press freedom: What we learned from Albanese's six days in China

Panda-monium and press freedom: What we learned from Albanese's six days in China

SBS Australia19-07-2025
It was in the heart of Beijing's old city, with the famous drum and bell towers looming over the travelling media, that the smiling eyes of the pandas were replaced briefly by raw local anger. The interaction, as Australian journalists were filming their reports of Anthony Albanese's visit to China, underscored a regular refrain from the prime minister that the two nations have "different systems". Australia and China certainly have very different views of press freedom. Australia is a democracy and China has a one-party autocracy. In Australia, we have the right to record media reports in public spaces; in China, local authorities can call the police and demand that footage be deleted.
The incident occurred despite journalists having written permission in English and Mandarin from the Chinese Foreign Ministry allowing us to film in Beijing.
After the diplomatic intervention of Beijing-based Australian government representatives, our group was able to depart on a bus without any contact with police or having to remove any footage we had collected. But at one point the leader of the local officials was shouting with his face distorted by fury, warning that we should not try leave, and that the police were on their way. As far as diplomatic incidents go, this one was relatively small-scale, and Chinese-based foreign media are used to such skirmishes, but it was a thorn in an otherwise charmed week of cultural exchange between the Australian and Chinese leaders.
SBS has been told it was noted in Canberra and was considered out of step with expectations about how the Australian media would be treated during the visit.
It wasn't the only time press expectations were limited. Inside the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, Australia's reporting contingent was preparing for the critical engagement of the campaign: the direct handshake between Albanese and Chinese President Xi Jinping. But the photographers from Australian Associated Press and Nine Newspapers were held back and only the official Australian government photographer was allowed to enter.
SBS World News ran the government-issued photo but always prefers to use the journalism, both written and visual, that comes from our colleagues — especially if they've flown halfway across the world to capture it.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese shakes hands with Chinese President Xi Jinping prior to their bilateral meeting at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing. Source: AAP / Huang Jingwen/AP Reporters were able to freely capture many other moments of the trip: the prime minister and his fiancée Jodie Haydon strolling on the Shanghai Bund with local football players, walking a cordoned off area of the Great Wall of China mulling its extraordinary history and joking about looking for a celebrant, meeting with aspiring Chinese tennis players in Chengdu, and waving at giant pandas in a local sanctuary.
The pictures were making their way to the Australian audience and to many tens of millions in China, not to mention the global audience that is hungry for contact between world leaders and China in this potential turning point in world history.
But the formal meetings with President Xi and Chinese Premier Li Qiang were considered the trip's key serious moments of statecraft. While Albanese did raise the flotilla of Chinese warships that circumnavigated the Australian coast earlier this year, he didn't get any clear assurances that there would be more notice of the ventures in future. Instead, he reported back that China intended to continue to move in international waters when required, as Australia does in contested waters off the Chinese coast. Albanese's closest supporters in Australia say the approach has been overly diplomatic and China reads it as weak. They also warn it's akin to being bullied by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
Again, Albanese had no assurances to provide about Dr Yang's future.
According to high level government sources, the Port of Darwin fracas was not formally raised, though state media outlets were making no secret of its potential to be a sticking point. Meanwhile, some in Washington seemed willing to make mischief while the prime minister was on Chinese soil. Attempting to force Australia to show its hand was a bit rich for the Pentagon, which deliberately doesn't say how it would approach any Chinese attempts to envelope Taiwan into the Chinese mainland. Albanese characterised the Taiwan section of the private bilateral talks with President Xi as reaffirming the status quo. "What we do is continue to support a One China policy. We support the status quo, by definition we don't support any unilateral action on Taiwan," he said while standing on the Great Wall of China.
But Beijing's initial take was stronger.
"Albanese reaffirmed Australia's commitment to the One China policy and its opposition to 'Taiwan Independence'," it read. Later, an online version of the Chinese readout was amended to say: "he (Albanese) assured Xi that Australia adheres to the One China policy and does not support 'Taiwan Independence'". In signs considered positive for the personal relationship, the prime minister was treated to a private lunch with President Xi.
He also attended a dinner banquet hosted by Premier Li, which included performances by Chinese musicians of Australian songs by Paul Kelly, Powderfinger and Midnight Oil.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese visited pandas in a sanctuary in Chengdu during his second official visit to China. Source: AAP / Lukas Coch On trade, an issue that underpinned the whole visit, both countries spoke proudly about having open markets and the importance of trading ties, rhetoric that seemed pointed at the chaos emanating from the White House.
There was discussion about how Australia is meeting the challenges of climate change and moving to promote green steel production, as the budget-boosting iron ore industry gets increasingly jittery about high-level ore mines in Africa that are coming online and could be competitive soon.
Panda-monium Pandas are the diplomatic panacea China liberally applies across the world in countries where it's trying to soften its image. Panda-mania is understatement when it comes to the Western China city of Chengdu. From the shape of the bus stops to street sculptures and shop fronts (no matter what is being sold inside), the giant panda is omnipresent with no end of creative ways to incorporate this brand ambassador into the architecture and art of the city.
The demise of the panda population has come as the booming Chinese economy has fuelled urban sprawl and encroached on the habitat of the world-renowned bears.
Now only a couple of thousand remain in the wild and attempts to breed more are thwarted by the tiny breeding window of only three days a year. Pandas are revered and in the 40 degree Chengdu heat some tourists noted that they felt their hearts melting as they saw them for the first time among the bamboo in the enclosures at the sanctuary. This is exactly the kind of feverish adulation Albanese is keen to attach himself to, personally choosing to make the city a two-day element of this China tour.
Pandas are viral magic on social media, and the audience for these images isn't just Australian; the pictures were also broadcast on Chinese state television.
'Slow living' diplomacy The Opposition said the whole trip appeared to become "indulgent" and worried it looked too cosy with the CCP, but Albanese embraces "slow living" when it comes to diplomacy. He walked a section of the Kokoda Track with PNG leader James Marape last year. In 2022, he chose to go beyond Bali and visited Makassar in Sulawesi with then Indonesian President Joko Widodo. In June, he chose to stopover on a trip to the US in Fiji and have dinner with Prime Minister Sitiveni Rabuka, rather than the standard fly-by Hawaii refuelling option to save time. With such a buoyant majority in the lower house, this approach isn't likely to change dramatically in the short term.
It's often the tightness of the polls that makes leaders anxious about being perceived to be more focused on international jetsetting than the plight of their constituents.
The Australian diplomatic advice is that having a personal relationship means world leaders can pick up the phone to avoid misunderstandings, particularly on the military front, meaning the deterrence-based arms build-up in the region can be calibrated rather than keeping the Indo-Pacific on edge and fearing conflict. Although many key engagements have been ticked off Albanese's foreign policy to-do list, one giant item remains unresolved: the first face to face meeting with the commander-in-chief of Australia's most important security ally. Whether it happens at a meeting of Quad leaders in India, the United Nations General Assembly in New York, the G20 in South Africa or on an official visit to Washington, it's highly unlikely Australian press photographers would be barred from that official handshake. What happens after Albanese and Donald Trump grip and grin for the first time is the prime minister's biggest diplomatic test to come.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

YouTube to be included in social media ban for under 16s after exemption reversed
YouTube to be included in social media ban for under 16s after exemption reversed

ABC News

time3 hours ago

  • ABC News

YouTube to be included in social media ban for under 16s after exemption reversed

Children and teenagers will be barred from logging in to YouTube under the incoming social media ban for under 16s after the government reversed its plan to grant the video sharing site an exemption. Rules of how the ban will operate are set to be presented to parliament on Wednesday, including details of the types of platforms that will not be captured, such as those primarily concerned with gaming, messaging, health and education. It comes days after Google, the parent company of YouTube, threatened legal action if the government scrapped its previously flagged exemption on the basis of the platform's educational uses. Over the weekend, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said a decision on whether YouTube would be included was yet to be made — despite the draft rules naming the platform as exempt — and that the government would not be influenced by threats from social media companies. "Our government is making it clear — we stand on the side of families," Mr Albanese said in a statement on Tuesday. "Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it." YouTube differs from other popular social media sites in that it doesn't require users to have an account to access most features and young people will still be able to use the site in a logged-out state after the world-leading laws come into force in December. But including YouTube in the list of social media platforms covered by the ban — which already includes apps like TikTok and Instagram — means under 16s won't be able to access age-restricted content on the video-sharing site. Former communications minister Michelle Rowland initially flagged that YouTube was likely to be exempt from the laws in November last year. But the proposed carve out was thrown into question last month when eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant — who is tasked with implementing the laws — wrote to new Communications Minister Anika Wells formally recommending it be scrapped. She cited eSafety research that found young people used YouTube more than any other social media platform and it was where they were most likely to experience harm online. "When we asked where they were experiencing harm and the kinds of harms they were experiencing, the most prevalent place where young Australians experienced harm was on YouTube — almost 37 per cent," Dr Inman Grant said. "This ranges from misogynistic content to hateful material, to violent fighting videos, online challenges, disordered eating, suicidal ideation." She also argued that YouTube had the characteristics of a platform that should fall under the ban and cautioned against naming specific platforms for carve outs. The platform's competitors had separately campaigned against its exclusion, accusing the government of making a "sweetheart deal" in private submissions. YouTube has previously argued that it is a video streaming platform, rather than a social media site, and therefore should not be captured by the ban, citing evidence that it is widely used in classrooms and by parents. Under the new laws, which are due to come into force on December 10, social media companies will face fines of up to almost $50 million for failing to take "reasonable steps" to bar under 16s from their platforms. "There is no one perfect solution when it comes to keeping young Australians safer online — but the social media minimum age will make a significantly positive difference to their wellbeing," Communications Minister Anika Wells said in a statement. "There's a place for social media, but there's not a place for predatory algorithms targeting children."

YouTube Kids to escape social media ban for children under 16
YouTube Kids to escape social media ban for children under 16

Sydney Morning Herald

time4 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

YouTube Kids to escape social media ban for children under 16

YouTube Kids will escape the federal government's teen social media ban that could serve as a model for other sites to keep offering their products, and ads, to children under the age of 16. The main YouTube platform will join Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, X and Snapchat in being caught by the ban, which is set to come into effect on December 10, after the government backflipped on its earlier plan to exclude Google's video streaming site. The government is expected to table rules in parliament on Wednesday to set which online services will be captured by the laws that were enacted with bipartisan support last year in an effort to protect children from online bullying and body image issues. Sites that are primarily intended for education, messaging, health or online gaming will be exempt. YouTube's inclusion in the ban sets the government up for a possible fight after the platform's owner, Google, sent a letter to Communications Minister Anika Wells threatening to sue if it was not given an exemption. Loading Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said restricting YouTube from use by children under 16 meant his government stood on the side of Australian families. 'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it,' he said in a statement. 'Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.'

YouTube Kids to escape social media ban for children under 16
YouTube Kids to escape social media ban for children under 16

The Age

time4 hours ago

  • The Age

YouTube Kids to escape social media ban for children under 16

YouTube Kids will escape the federal government's teen social media ban that could serve as a model for other sites to keep offering their products, and ads, to children under the age of 16. The main YouTube platform will join Instagram, Facebook, TikTok, X and Snapchat in being caught by the ban, which is set to come into effect on December 10, after the government backflipped on its earlier plan to exclude Google's video streaming site. The government is expected to table rules in parliament on Wednesday to set which online services will be captured by the laws that were enacted with bipartisan support last year in an effort to protect children from online bullying and body image issues. Sites that are primarily intended for education, messaging, health or online gaming will be exempt. YouTube's inclusion in the ban sets the government up for a possible fight after the platform's owner, Google, sent a letter to Communications Minister Anika Wells threatening to sue if it was not given an exemption. Loading Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said restricting YouTube from use by children under 16 meant his government stood on the side of Australian families. 'Social media has a social responsibility and there is no doubt that Australian kids are being negatively impacted by online platforms, so I'm calling time on it,' he said in a statement. 'Social media is doing social harm to our children, and I want Australian parents to know that we have their backs.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store