Restaurant chain Xin Dau Ji closes last branch in Hong Kong
The branch, located in Kowloon Bay, was not open for business on Friday. There was a notice outside the restaurant saying, 'Internal construction ongoing,' local media outlet The Collective reported.
Ming Pao reporte d on Friday, citing a response from the Mandatory Provident Fund Schemes Authority, that the restaurant had not been paying the compulsory pension funds for around 20 workers since April.
Established in 2006, the chain was famous for traditional Chinese dishes such as roast suckling pig. Its main branch in Jordan earned one Michelin star in 2012 and 2013.
It closed its Causeway Bay branch in February 2019, HK01 reported. Other branches were also shut down over the past few years.
The restaurant chain had seven branches in Hong Kong at its peak and started to venture into mainland Chinese markets around 2022, according to a report by Chinese media outlet Sohu.
According to online information, the group currently runs a few branches in mainland Chinese cities, including Guangzhou, Hangzhou, and Nanjing.
The news came amid a strong wave of restaurant closures in Hong Kong.
It was reported on Tuesday that Metropol Restaurant would cease operations in September, after 35 years of service.
In late June, bakery chain Taipan Bread & Cakes, which created the famous snowy mooncakes, closed all its stores after 41 years in operation, reportedly owing unpaid salaries and rent.
In early June, Hong Kong catering group King Parrot informed its staff about its closure, without settling severance pay.
In May, chain restaurant Ocean Empire announced the closure of all its branches, putting an end to its 33-year history.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
5 hours ago
- RTHK
Tech hit for HK stocks
Tech hit for HK stocks The Hang Seng Index closed down 347 points, or 1.36 percent, at 25,176. File photo: RTHK Mainland stocks were mixed while Hong Kong shares lost ground on Wednesday as investors looked past concerns over US tariff threats and positioned themselves for a long-awaited bull market. In Hong Kong, the benchmark Hang Seng Index ended down 347 points, or 1.36 percent, at 25,176. Auto shares dragged the Hang Seng Index, with Li Auto down more than 12 percent as the pricing of its new launch and competition concerned investors. Tech majors traded in Hong Kong also fell, down nearly 3 percent in the largest single-day drop in more than two months. Up north, Chinese stocks closed mixed on Wednesday, with the benchmark Shanghai Composite Index up 0.17 percent to 3,615 while the Shenzhen Component Index closed 0.77 percent lower at 11,203. The combined turnover of these two indexes was around 1.84 trillion yuan, up from 1.8 trillion yuan on Tuesday. Stocks related to petroleum and ceramics led gains while stocks in the glass and auto sectors suffered major losses. The ChiNext Index, tracking China's Nasdaq-style board of growth enterprises, lost 1.62 percent to close at 2,367. The Shanghai Composite Index rose as much as 0.7 percent to its highest level since October. With this, it has climbed 20 percent from its last significant low, an accepted definition for a bull market, three months ago. Chinese and US officials agreed to seek an extension of their 90-day tariff truce on Tuesday, following two days of what both sides described as constructive talks aimed at defusing a trade war between the world's two biggest economies that threatens global growth. "Investors are increasingly insensitive to Sino-US trade talks and paying more attention to domestic issues," said Wang Zhuo, partner of Shanghai Zhuozhu Investment Management. Earlier this week, Goldman Sachs raised its target for Chinese stocks, citing "brightened prospects for a US-China trade deal". Low interest rates are nudging investors into stocks, especially high-dividend blue-chips, while China's drive to crack down on excessive competition in some industries is improving the outlook for corporate earnings, Wang said. "Now that the index is entering bull market territory, money will undoubtedly keep flowing in. I don't see signs of froth, so the bull run has legs." (Reuters/Xinhua)
AllAfrica
8 hours ago
- AllAfrica
Eye on rare earths, Trump handing Myanmar to China
The US Treasury Department's decision to lift sanctions on allies of Myanmar's military junta last Friday (July 25) marks a stark reversal of decades-long American foreign policy. These sanctions, imposed by the Biden administration on the anniversary of the 2021 coup, were a gesture of solidarity with Myanmar's pro-democracy movement and a country that has endured relentless bombing and repression at the hands of a brutal military regime. Lifting these sanctions marks the latest episode of 'Trump's craven war on Myanmar.' And they hand China yet another strategic victory in Southeast Asia. From a moral standpoint, this move is sadly unsurprising. Trump has already abandoned Ukraine to Russia's onslaught, advocated for the ethnic cleansing of Gaza and is actively dismantling what remains of American democracy. But this is not just a moral failure; it is a strategic blunder of the highest order. The rationale behind the policy shift remains opaque – the US government has offered no explanation. But the timing is curious. Just days earlier, Congress passed three bipartisan bills reaffirming support for Myanmar's resistance to military rule and pledging continued financial sanctions against the junta. Junta leader Senior General Min Aung Hlaing had also just lavished praise on Donald Trump during trade negotiations. Perhaps this is merely another instance of Trump's foreign policy being steered by personal flattery and narcissism. But the motives behind this move appear more calculated. Business lobbyists seem to have persuaded Trump that Myanmar's rare earth metals, vital for everything from smartphones to missile systems, could be a strategic asset for the US. Indeed, Myanmar has emerged as a key global supplier of these critical minerals, especially after China curtailed its own environmentally destructive mining operations and turned to Myanmar to fill the gap. But here's the catch: Myanmar's rare earth mines are not controlled by the junta. They are under the authority of powerful ethnic armed organizations (EAOs) that govern territory along the Chinese border. The Kachin Independence Organization (KIO), one of the world's oldest rebel movements, seized what may be the world's largest heavy rare earth mines last year. This development has not gone unnoticed in Washington. Some lobbyists are now advancing two proposals: either the US should work directly with the KIO to extract these resources, or it should broker a bilateral peace deal between the KIO and the junta to enable joint exploitation. The first idea is logistically absurd. Kachin State is landlocked and surrounded by junta-controlled territory, war zones with the presence of a myriad of other armed groups, remote regions of northeastern India, and China. The second proposal is even more misguided. It reflects the worldview of DC business lobbyists, who reduce a decades-old political movement to a mere business enterprise. If the KIO were motivated solely by profit, it would have already caved to Chinese pressure for a bilateral ceasefire. It has not, because its goals are political, not commercial. The KIO has long fought for autonomy and has been a key supporter of the countrywide resistance against the junta. Short of international recognition and the sale of sophisticated weapons, the US has little to offer that would make such a deal worthwhile. Certainly not enough to risk alienating China, whose relationship the KIO depends on for survival. Meanwhile, the sharpest increase in rare earth mining is occurring in areas controlled by the United Wa State Army (UWSA), Asia's most powerful non-state army. The group, which emerged from the remnants of the Communist Party of Burma, remains armed and supported by Beijing. The idea that the US could gain a meaningful foothold in Myanmar's rare earth sector is not just naïve; it is nonsensical. Worse, it risks playing directly into China's hands. Beijing already wields enormous influence over Myanmar. The brutal USAID cuts earlier this year have further strengthened China's position to manipulate Myanmar politics. The lifting of sanctions now risks cementing this dominance. Myanmar's generals will welcome the change. They will use it to legitimize their planned sham elections and bolster their propaganda, both at home and abroad. But they will not abandon China, which remains their most reliable source of weapons, funding and diplomatic cover. Meanwhile, the country's resistance movement, now controlling more than half of Myanmar's territory, has been left in the cold. Despite promises of non-lethal aid under the Burma Act, the Biden administration failed to deliver. Western support in general has been largely symbolic, limited to patchy sanctions, humanitarian relief, and words of sympathy. And now, even that symbolic support is being rolled back. After years of empty rhetoric, Myanmar's resistance fighters have little reason to trust the West. But this latest betrayal may force them to forge closer relations with China. This won't happen overnight. Beijing remains wary of the National Unity Government (NUG), formed by ousted lawmakers from the National League for Democracy. But among Myanmar's 20-plus EAOs, which field the strongest resistance armies, the calculus might shift. Some, like the UWSA, have long-standing ties to China. Others, like the KIO, have historically looked West. But the KIO is not a monolith. Like other EAOs, it is a complex political organisation comprising leaders with differing perspectives and strategic priorities. To some KIO leaders, reports that Trump plans to partner directly with the KIO in extracting rare earth minerals will surely sound appealing. We can expect them to use it in their own diplomatic strategy, including as leverage in relation to China. Ultimately, however, the KIO understands the futility of such misguided proposals, especially when they serve to ease pressure on the junta. Here too, Trump's policy then risks sidelining pro-Western voices and empowering those who favour closer ties with Beijing. This is the real danger of Trump's foreign policy. It is not simply immoral or incoherent. But it accelerates a tectonic shift in Southeast Asia, one that will leave China stronger, the US weaker and the people of Myanmar more isolated than ever. Dr David Brenner is associate professor in international relations at the University of Sussex. He is the author of Rebel Politics and has published widely on Myanmar's conflict and ethnic armed organizations.
South China Morning Post
9 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
China to convene gathering in October to discuss next 5-year plan
China's ruling Communist Party has set a date for a key annual conclave in October, with a main focus on deliberating the next five-year plan for the country's economic, political and social goals amid continued tension with the United States. The announcement came after a meeting of the Politburo on Wednesday that set the tone for the coming fourth plenary session to be attended by more than 370 Central Committee members of the party elite. The much-anticipated plenum will be held in Beijing, according to the official Xinhua news agency. No specific date was announced. In instructions on the new blueprint's formulation, President Xi Jinping said in May that the party's central leadership was 'organising the drafting of a proposal for the 15th five-year plan'. A one-month online public consultation on the formulation of the plan was also launched in May. According to official rules, the new five-year plan covering 2026-2030 must be endorsed by a plenary session of the party, after which it will be submitted to the annual legislative session in March for a final endorsement. China continues to face external uncertainties as it remains locked in a trade and tech rivalry with the United States. While Chinese and US negotiators have reached a series of agreements to halt an all-out trade war, most observers believe a protracted trade, tech and geopolitical competition between the world's two largest economies will continue to intensify.
