US denies intervening in case of Israeli official accused of Nevada sex crime
Israeli official Tom Alexandrovich was arrested in Nevada before being released
*
US State Department says US officials were not involved in his release
*
Las Vegas Police announced arrest late last week after undercover operation
By Kanishka Singh and Raphael Satter
WASHINGTON, - The U.S. State Department said Monday the American government played no role in the release of an Israeli official charged with soliciting sex electronically from a minor.
Tom Artiom Alexandrovich was one of eight people charged last week following an undercover operation "targeting child sex predators," the Las Vegas Metropolitan Police said in a statement issued last week.
Alexandrovich faces a felony charge of luring or attempting to lure a child or mentally ill person to commit a sex act "with use of computer technology," according to Nevada State records reviewed by Reuters.
Israeli media said Alexandrovich, who they described as a senior department head in Israel's National Cyber Directorate, was released by U.S. authorities and is back in Israel.
Reuters could not establish why Alexandrovich was in the Las Vegas area, but at the time Las Vegas was hosting Black Hat, one of the cybersecurity industry's most prominent conferences.
The report that an Israeli official accused of a felony sex crime was allowed to return home drew a storm of speculation online.
Alexandrovich "did not claim diplomatic immunity and was released by a state judge pending a court date. Any claims that the U.S. government intervened are false," the State Department said Monday on the social media site X.
The court records show a $10,000 bond was posted at the Henderson Detention Center, southeast of Las Vegas, on August 7. Reuters could not immediately confirm his whereabouts and could not immediately locate contact information for Alexandrovich. The records indicate he is due back in court on August 27.
The Israeli Embassy in Washington and the Israeli Prime Minister's Office did not immediately return messages. Israeli media quoted the office as denying that Alexandrovich was arrested, saying only that a "state employee" was "questioned by American authorities during his stay" and he had "returned to Israel as scheduled."
Reuters could not immediately ascertain the circumstances around Alexandrovich's arrest.
The Las Vegas police statement credited the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Henderson Police Department, the North Las Vegas Police, and the Department of Homeland Security with organizing the undercover operation.
None of those agencies immediately replied to messages seeking comment on Alexandrovich arrest or release. The Nevada District Attorney's office referred questions back to the Henderson Police Department.
This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Will AI Take Away Jobs, Permanently? Yes, 70% Americans Believe So
Will AI take away jobs? Yes, permanently. 71% of Americans say they are concerned that AI will be 'putting too many people out of work permanently'.(Unsplash) That's according to more than two out of three Americans who participated in a new survery by Reuters/Ipsos. The six-day poll, which concluded on Monday, showed 71% of respondents said they were concerned that Artificial Intelligence will be 'putting too many people out of work permanently'. Some 77% of respondents to the Reuters/Ipsos poll said that they worried the technology could be used to stir up political chaos, a sign of unease over the now-common use of AI technology to create realistic videos of imaginary events. US President Donald Trump last month posted on social media an AI-generated video of former Democratic President Barack Obama being arrested, an event that never happened. The new technology burst into the national conversation in late 2022 when OpenAI's ChatGPT chatbot launched and became the fastest-growing application of all time. Big Tech heavyweights—including Facebook owner Meta Platforms Inc., Google owner Alphabet Inc. and Microsoft Inc.—soon joined the race offering their own AI products. While at present there are few signs of mass unemployment—the U.S. jobless rate was just 4.2% in July—AI is stirring concerns as it reshapes jobs, industries and day-to-day life. Americans are also leery about military applications for AI, the Reuters/Ipsos poll showed. Some 48% of respondents said the government should never use AI to determine the target of a military strike, compared with 24% who said the government should allow that sort of use of the technology. Another 28% said they were not sure. The general enthusiasm for AI shown by many people and companies has fueled further investments, such as Foxconn and SoftBank's planned data center equipment factory in Ohio. It has also upended national security policies as the United States and China vie for AI dominance. More than half of Americans, some 61%, said they were concerned about the amount of electricity needed to power the fast-growing technology. Google said earlier this month it had signed agreements with two US electric utilities to reduce its AI data center power consumption during times of surging demand on the grid, as energy-intensive AI use outpaces power supplies. The new technology has also come under criticism for applications that have let AI bots hold romantic conversations with children, generate false medical information and help people make racist arguments. Two-thirds of respondents in the Reuters/Ipsos poll said they worried that people would ditch relationships with other people in favour of AI partners. People were split on whether AI technology will improve education. Some 36% of respondents thought it would help, while 40% disagreed and the rest were not sure. The Reuters/Ipsos survey gathered responses online from 4,446 U.S. adults nationwide and had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points.
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump Pushes for Peace Summit with U.S., Russia and Ukraine
WASHINGTON—President Trump on Monday urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin to meet face to face at a peace conference he would convene in a long shot bid to end the 3½-year-long war in Ukraine. The plan represents a bold and potentially risky maneuver by Trump to move toward settling the bloody war without achieving a cease-fire first and with Kyiv and Moscow still seemingly far apart on the terms of a final deal. Trump touted the idea for the peace conference during an Oval Office meeting with Zelensky and in talks with European leaders who joined the Ukrainian president at the White House on Monday. He said he would put the idea directly to Putin in a call, and paused his meeting with the leaders to do so, according to European officials. The White House didn't respond to a request for comment. A key issue for Kyiv and their European allies is whether the U.S. is willing to extend security commitments to Ukraine as part of a settlement. Trump said that the U.S. would be involved in a potential European effort to deploy peacekeepers, but didn't specify what the American role might be. The proposal for a three-way summit came three days after Trump failed to persuade Putin to back a cease-fire at a summit meeting in Alaska and shelved his vow to impose economic sanctions on Moscow, the latest zigzag by Trump in his quest to end the conflict. Only hours after insisting in a social-media post it was up to Zelensky to end the war, Trump praised the Ukrainian leader during remarks before their private meeting, a far different than their February Oval Office meeting when Trump and Vice President JD Vance excoriated Zelensky. 'This gentleman wants it to end, and Vladimir Putin wants it to end,' Trump said with Zelensky at his side. 'We're going to get it ended.' It was unclear what concrete proposals the White House might suggest to bridge the differences between Moscow and Kyiv if a three-way meeting is convened and what role the U.S. would play to help European nations secure the peace. As part of a discussion of possible territorial concessions, Trump and Zelensky reviewed a U.S.-prepared map of eastern Ukraine showing the percentage of Ukrainian territory held by Russia. Donetsk, which Russia wants Ukraine troops to leave under its negotiating proposal and contains some of Ukraine's most robust defenses, was shown as 76% held by Russian forces. Mark Rutte, the secretary-general of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, said that the U.S. pledge to help a European peacekeeping effort was a 'breakthrough.' But Trump stopped sort of publicly promising to put U.S. boots on the ground in Ukraine while vowing some form of American support to European nations that deploy a so-called 'reassurance force' there if a peace agreement is reached. What territory Ukraine might be asked to give up was unclear, along with whether Kyiv would be asked to accept the de facto partition of its territory or Russia's legal sovereignty over areas Moscow claims to have annexed. Ukraine's Constitution forbids trading land, Zelensky said in Brussels on Sunday, and such a matter could only be discussed in the talks between Russia, Ukraine and the U.S. Despite the harmony of Monday's meetings, Trump and some European leaders differ over the urgency of a cease-fire. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron proposed in their remarks that a halt in the fighting be put in place before the prospective three-way summit. The point of such a cease-fire would be to prevent Russia from playing for time and trying to gain more ground in Ukraine while the leaders talk. But Trump insisted no cease-fire was necessary to reach a deal, adding that it would be clear within one or two weeks—or perhaps sooner—whether the gambit will go forward. Zelenksy approved the idea, saying 'we are ready' for a trilateral meeting. But the Kremlin said earlier this month that Putin would only meet with Zelensky when 'the appropriate distance is overcome.' The Russian leader has long insisted that no settlement can be agreed without addressing what he calls the 'root causes' of the conflict, his shorthand for Ukraine's drift toward the West and NATO's role in central Europe. Zelensky is likely to face White House pressure to make concessions. After meeting with Putin, Trump wrote in a social media message that Zelensky would never regain Crimea, which Russia annexed after its initial invasion in 2014. On Friday, Trump urged Ukraine in a Fox News interview to compromise with Putin because 'Russia's a very big power, and they are not.' The day began with Zelensky's meeting with Trump and Vance in the Oval Office. Vance, unlike in their February encounter, didn't chime in when the press was present. Zelensky has worked hard to repair his relationship with the White House since then, and this time, the leaders appeared at pains to turn the page. Trump noted that Zelensky had traded his signature military attire for a black suit jacket and button-down shirt. Trump looked him up and down approvingly, shook his hand and both men grinned. 'We love them,' Trump said when asked for his message to the Ukrainian people. Zelensky thanked Trump and the U.S. eight times in his opening remarks, after being accused on his last White House visit of failing to sufficiently show appreciation for U.S. assistance. Trump, who on Friday labeled Zelensky, a 'dictator,' repeatedly addressed him Monday as 'president.' For many Ukrainians, Monday's meetings started off as an uphill struggle. Before his Alaska summit with Putin on Friday, Trump said there would be 'very severe consequences' if Putin didn't agree to end the war and vowed to press for a cease-fire. But Trump has put aside the talk of imposing tougher sanctions despite Russia's refusal to agree to a fighting moratorium Trump also must navigate some hazards as he pursues a peace deal. His political base is deeply suspicious of getting the U.S. involved in foreign conflicts, and he came to power with an isolationist message. Trump's former top adviser, Steve Bannon, offered a taste of where Trump's base might go. 'These DEMON EU LEADERS coming to the White House want us funding a forever war. Fighting to the last Ukrainian,' Bannon posted on X. 'Sending 60-year-olds as cannon fodder while their kids dodge the draft. And they still want our boys and girls? NO! MAGA WILL NOT CAVE!' Write to Michael R. Gordon at and Annie Linskey at
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump's Stunning Foreign Policy
The Alaska summit between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump on Friday, followed by President Trump's meeting Monday with Volodymyr Zelensky, stunned the world. Commentators railed against what they saw as Mr. Trump's pusillanimous concessions to Mr. Putin in Alaska. They were then shocked by the U.S. president's warm welcome to Mr. Zelensky at the White House, and shocked again by the Euro-American lovefest that followed the bilateral summit. That shouldn't surprise us. The relationship between Russia and the U.S., like the one between the U.S. and Israel, is important, emotionally charged and widely misunderstood. Except for the Lend-Lease era during World War II, when American assistance was a matter of life and death for the Soviet Union, the two countries have historically not mattered much to each other as economic partners. A mix of geopolitics, culture and ideology have largely driven relations. Rivalry with Great Britain led Russia to tilt toward the Americans during our Revolution. That rivalry also helped persuade Russia to sell Alaska to the U.S. as a way of keeping Britain from adding the territory to its North American domains. Opposition to Germany's drive to dominate Europe brought the U.S. and Moscow together during the two world wars. American resistance to the Soviet Union's efforts to dominate both Europe and Asia drove the two countries into the Cold War. Currently, the geopolitical dimension of the relationship is debated in both capitals. In Washington, the bipartisan foreign-policy establishment argues that Russia's threat to the European Union and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization imperils American security. A minority view values Russia's potential as a counterweight against China more than any Russian threat to Europe. In Moscow, Mr. Putin's critics whisper that better economic and political relations with the West and especially the U.S. could help Russia deal with the greater long-term threat arising from Beijing. Culture and ideology also play a role. Except during rare periods of relatively liberal governance in Russia (the reign of Alexander II, the brief interlude between the democratic February Revolution of 1917 and Vladimir Lenin's Bolshevik Revolution later in the year, and the Gorbachev-Yeltsin era toward the end of the 20th century), autocratic Russian rulers and liberal Americans have usually occupied opposite ideological poles in world affairs. Many Americans remain skeptical both of Russia generally and of Mr. Putin personally. But some American hard-right 'postliberals' see him as an ideological ally in their battle against what they regard as the moral, intellectual and political decadence of the West. Further poisoning and polarizing the American debate over Russia policy are the controversies over Russia's alleged actions in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and the efforts of Obama administration officials to weaponize these allegations against President Trump. The geopolitics of U.S.-Russian relations are fiendishly complex. Much Western commentary on the Alaska summit reflected an assumption that the Trump administration was making massive concessions to the Russian side. That probably isn't how Mr. Putin sees things when he looks at America's Russia policy in a global context. The Trump administration's recent intervention in the Armenia-Azerbaijan dispute was a direct shot at the heart of Russian power and at Mr. Putin's strategy to recover territories controlled by Moscow in the Soviet era. By convening the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan in the White House to ratify an agreement that could end Russia's ability to block the flow of Central Asian oil and gas to Western markets, the Trump administration embarrassed Mr. Putin and threw a wrench in his plans to restore Russian power in the Caucasus. Further, the agreement potentially weakens Moscow's position across Central Asia, a region that was once part of the Soviet Union but where China now plays a growing role. The Kremlin must also analyze recent signals from the White House that Washington is interested in improving U.S.-China relations. Chinese support for Russia's war effort in Ukraine at least partially reflects Beijing's search for bargaining chips in trade negotiations with the U.S. Would a Washington-Beijing thaw that provided relief for China's troubled economy diminish Xi Jinping's enthusiasm for his Russian allies? Mr. Trump has again imposed his will on his European allies. European leader after leader effusively praised the his leadership. They clearly understand that they can affect events only by persuading Mr. Trump to take their side. 'Emmanuel,' Mr. Trump said, calling on President Macron by his first name. 'Mr. President,' the French leader responded, like a schoolboy speaking to his teacher. That's how President Trump likes his allies to behave, and although the leaders were still meeting as this column went to press, he appears to have whipped them into shape.
