
More than 220 UK MPs urge Starmer to recognise Palestinian state
The call, in a letter signed by lawmakers from nine UK political parties, came less than 24 hours after French President Emmanuel Macron said that his country would formally recognise a Palestinian state at a UN meeting in September.
France would be the first G7 country — and the most powerful European nation to date — to make the move, already drawing condemnation from Israel and the United States.
Starmer has come under rising domestic and international pressure over recognising Palestinian statehood, as opposition intensifies to the ongoing war in Gaza amid fears of mass starvation there.
'We urge you to officially recognise the state of Palestine at the Conference next week,' the 221 UK lawmakers wrote in the joint letter, referring to a July 28-29 UN Conference co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia in New York.
'Whilst we appreciate the UK does not have it in its power to bring about a free and independent Palestine, UK recognition would have a significant impact,' it said.
The signatories, from parties including the centre-right Conservatives and centrist Liberal Democrats, as well as regional parties in Scotland and Wales, cited Britain's 'historic connections and our membership on the UN Security Council'.
They also noted the country's role in helping to create the state of Israel through the 1917 Balfour Declaration.
'Responsibility'
'Since 1980 we have backed a two-state solution. Such a recognition would give that position substance as well as living up to a historic responsibility we have to the people,' they added.
In the face of growing pressure on the issue, the UK government has maintained its longstanding stance that it supports a two-state solution to the conflict in the Middle East.
But it has insisted that the conditions are currently not right for formal recognition of a Palestinian state.
In a statement yesterday following a call about Gaza with his counterparts in France and Germany, Starmer said he was 'working on a pathway to peace in the region'.
'Recognition of a Palestinian state has to be one of those steps. I am unequivocal about that. But it must be part of a wider plan,' he added.
A number of factors could deter Starmer from making the move, including wanting to avoid angering US President Donald Trump.
The American leader, who lands later yesterday in Scotland for a five-day visit, dismissed Macron's announcement before departing Washington, saying it 'doesn't carry weight'.
The pressure around recognising Palestinian statehood has been building on Starmer's government, with nearly 60 Labour MPs reportedly urging Foreign Secretary David Lammy to make the move in a private letter earlier in July.
Meanwhile Macron raised the issue during his UK state visit this month, publicly urging London to work with Paris on a formal recognition announcement. — AFP
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Barnama
8 hours ago
- Barnama
OIC Welcomes UK's Intention To Recognise Palestinian State
JEDDAH, July 30 (Bernama-WAFA) -- The Secretary-General of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), Hussein Ibrahim Taha, welcomed the announcement by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer of his country's intention to recognise the State of Palestine next September, Palestine News and Info Agency (WAFA) reported. In a statement, Taha affirmed that this step is in compliance with international law and relevant UN resolutions, and represents historic support for the Palestinian people's right to self-determination. He stressed that recognising the State of Palestine is a political, legal, and moral duty, and constitutes a basis for achieving peace and contributes to protecting and implementing the two-state solution.


Free Malaysia Today
9 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
UK rejects claim that recognising Palestinian state rewards Hamas
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer highlighted the suffering in Gaza in a televised address yesterday. (EPA Images pic) LONDON : Britain today rejected criticism that it was rewarding resistance group Hamas by setting out plans to recognise a Palestinian state unless Israel took steps to improve the situation in Gaza and bring about peace. The sight of emaciated Gaza children has shocked the world in recent days and yesterday, a hunger monitor warned that a worst-case scenario of famine was unfolding there and immediate action was needed to avoid widespread death. Prime minister Keir Starmer's ultimatum, setting a September deadline for Israel, prompted an immediate rebuke from his counterpart in Jerusalem, who said it rewarded Hamas and punished the victims of their 2023 cross-border attack. US President Donald Trump said he did not think Hamas 'should be rewarded' with recognition of Palestinian independence. Asked about that criticism, British transport minister Heidi Alexander – designated by the government to respond to questions in a series of media interviews today – said it was not the right way to characterise Britain's plan. 'This is not a reward for Hamas. Hamas is a vile terrorist organisation that has committed appalling atrocities. This is about the Palestinian people. It's about those children that we see in Gaza who are starving to death,' she told LBC radio. 'We've got to ratchet up pressure on the Israeli government to lift the restrictions to get aid back into Gaza.' France announced last week it would recognise Palestinian statehood in September. Successive British governments have said they would recognise a Palestinian state when it was most effective to do so. In a televised address yesterday, Starmer said that moment had now come, highlighting the suffering in Gaza and saying the prospect of a two-state solution – a Palestinian state co-existing in peace alongside Israel – was under threat. Starmer said Britain would make the move at the UN General Assembly in September unless Israel took substantive steps to allow more aid to enter Gaza, made clear there will be no annexation of the West Bank and committed to a long-term peace process that delivered a two-state solution.


Free Malaysia Today
13 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Another task force set up to study Common Bar Course
The Common Bar Course is meant to provide a more practical and modern legal training programme for law graduates, similar to the Bar Training Course in the UK. KUALA LUMPUR : The Legal Profession Qualifying Board (LPQB) has formed a new task force to carry out an eight-month study on the Common Bar Course (CBC), a long-delayed proposal to replace the current legal qualifying exam known as the Certificate in Legal Practice (CLP). The task force will begin its study on Aug 1, deputy law and institutional reform minister M Kulasegaran told the Dewan Rakyat today. He said the task force would comprise experts from public and private universities, along with representatives from the Bar Council, and would design the course's syllabus, teaching methods, and assessment standards. Kulasegaran said that from July 5 to July 10, officials from the LPQB, which is headed by the attorney-general, visited the UK to study how the Bar Training Course was being run. The officials met with representatives of institutions like the UK's Bar Standards Board, Solicitors Regulation Authority, Legal Services Board, University of Law, City Law School, and Lincoln's Inn, who shared insight on course regulation, curriculum design, and student assessment. The CBC is meant to provide a more practical and modern legal training programme for law graduates, similar to the Bar Training Course in the UK. 'The current CLP exam is fully written, but the CBC will include skills-based assessments and practical training in areas like criminal litigation, advocacy, ethics, opinion writing, and conference skills,' Kulasegaran said in response to S Kesavan (PH-Sungai Siput), who had asked for an update on the CBC's implementation. In a supplementary question, Kesavan asked why the CBC had not been introduced despite being discussed as far back as 2001, and why there was no timeframe for its implementation. Kulasegaran, a lawyer by training, replied that the delay was unacceptable. 'This is a question that is always asked, why has it taken more than 25 years? Are we just reviewing and reviewing without end? We have now given a clear push to the LPQB under the Madani government. 'The implementation must be expedited for the benefit of law graduates,' he said. The CBC is a proposed training course for all law graduates, both local and foreign-trained. It is meant to replace or improve the current CLP system, which has been criticised as too academic and not reflective of real world legal practice. At present, law graduates from universities outside of Malaysia and some local private institutions must pass the CLP to qualify for pupillage and be called to the Bar.