
Who is Ilhan Omar? and why is she so controversial?
Congresswoman
Ilhan Omar
has long been one of the most polarising figures in American politics. Her sharp rhetoric, unapologetic stance on issues like
white nationalism
and Gaza, and refusal to back down from personal attacks have made her a target of repeated smear campaigns.
The latest controversy flared after conservative activist Laura Loomer resurfaced a 2018 clip of Omar suggesting that white men in America should be profiled to address rising extremism. Vice President JD Vance condemned the remarks as 'genocidal language,' sparking a new wave of backlash. Omar, however, defended her comments, citing data from the Anti-Defamation League showing white supremacists were behind the majority of extremist murders in the US.
This incident comes just weeks after Omar drew criticism for telling a reporter to 'f off' when questioned about a deportee allegedly linked to MS-13. She later doubled down on social media, saying: 'You and all you miserable trolls can f off.'
Alongside these moments, longstanding conspiracy theories about her personal life, especially the unfounded claim that she married her brother to commit immigration fraud continue to circulate despite years of fact-checks and investigations finding no credible evidence.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
AI guru Andrew Ng recommends: Read These 5 Books And Turn Your Life Around in 2025
Blinkist: Andrew Ng's Reading List
Undo
Omar was also a prominent member of the "progressive squad" and a vocal supporter of then-Vice President
Kamala Harris
, particularly following President Joe Biden's withdrawal from the 2024 presidential race. Omar promptly endorsed Harris as the Democratic nominee, expressing her commitment to working alongside her to defeat Donald Trump in the 2025 election.
Beyond her endorsement, Omar has actively campaigned for the Harris-Walz ticket.
At a "Women of Color for Harris" event in Minneapolis, she praised Harris's leadership and shared a personal anecdote about Harris offering valuable advice on staff hiring when Omar was first elected to Congress.
Despite her endorsement, Omar has voiced concerns regarding Harris's outreach to Muslim and Arab American communities. In a discussion with journalist Mehdi Hasan, Omar remarked that Harris's efforts were "not enough," emphasizing that effective outreach requires delivering on the specific needs of these communities.
Who is Ilhan Omar?
Early life:
Born in Somalia, Omar fled civil war with her family at age eight, spending four years in a Kenyan refugee camp before settling in the US in the 1990s.
Education and career:
She moved to Minneapolis in 1997 and became a community educator, policy fellow at the Humphrey School, and aide to the Minneapolis City Council before entering politics.
Political milestone:
Elected to Congress in 2018, she became the first African refugee in the House, the first woman of colour to represent Minnesota, and one of the first two Muslim women in Congress.
Legislative focus:
Advocates for student debt relief, fair wages, immigration reform, and tackling climate change.
Committee roles:
Vice-Ranking Member of the House Budget Committee; serves on the House Education and Workforce Committee.
Caucus involvement:
Deputy Chair of the Congressional Progressive Caucus and Vice Chair of the Medicare for All Caucus.
Controversial comments:
Criticised for her remarks on white nationalism, US foreign policy, and Israel frequently drawing ire from conservatives.
Persistent rumours:
Has been the subject of a widely debunked rumour alleging she married her brother to aid his immigration claims dismissed by fact-checkers and never substantiated by authorities.
Omar's response:
Denounces the allegations as racist and Islamophobic attacks, maintaining that the focus on her personal life is politically motivated.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
Kenya police clash with protesters over blogger's death
AP image Kenyan police fired tear gas on Thursday to disperse protesters in Nairobi, angered over the death of a blogger in police custody. The demonstrations, which turned violent with reports of vehicles being set on fire, erupted a day after President William Ruto acknowledged that the blogger, Albert Ojwang, had died "at the hands of the police. " Ojwang was arrested last week in western Kenya for allegedly defaming the country's deputy police chief, Eliud Lagat. Police initially claimed he died "after hitting his head against a cell wall." Ruto says 'negligence or outright criminality' led to Ojwang's death Demonstrators in Nairobi blocked a road leading to parliament, where the national budget was scheduled to be presented. They demanded Lagat's resignation. On Wednesday, Ruto described Ojwang's death as "heartbreaking and unacceptable." "I strongly condemn the actions and omissions, including any negligence or outright criminality, that may have contributed to his untimely death," Ruto said. The Inspector General of Police Douglas Kanja has also apologised for implying that Ojwang died by suicide. Assault cited as cause of blogger's death in custody Ojwang, known for his posts on X and Facebook about political and social issues, was arrested in Homa Bay for what police said was publishing "false information," about deputy chief Laga. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Memperdagangkan CFD Emas dengan salah satu spread terendah? IC Markets Mendaftar Undo They then drove him 400 kilometers (248 miles) to Nairobi, where he later died in custody. Amnesty International and local activists have questioned the police account from the outset. An autopsy showed Ojwang's wounds, including a head injury, neck compression and soft tissue damage, pointed towards assault as the cause of death. The Independent Policing Oversight Authority has started an investigation.


Time of India
31 minutes ago
- Time of India
Innovation takes a backseat at small companies as tariffs become a full-time preoccupation
Toy robots that teach children to code. Sneakers made in America. Mold-resistant kitchen gadgets. The three items are among new products that have gotten stuck in the pipeline due to President Donald Trump 's unpredictable trade policies, according to the brand founders behind the stalled items. They say that instead of fostering U.S. innovation, Trump's tariffs are stifling it with extra costs and unexpected work. At Learning Resources in Vernon Hills, Illinois, Made Plus in Annapolis, Maryland, and Dorai Home in Salt Lake City, research and development have taken a backseat to recalculating budgets, negotiating with vendors and tracking shipments in the shifting tariff environment. "If we don't have enough cash to cover just the restocks of the things that we know we need, do we want to take a risk on this new thing when we don't know how well it will sell yet?" Dorai Home founder Kelsey O'Callaghan said. O'Callaghan started the eco-friendly home goods company with a stone bath mat and now offers about 50 kitchen and bathroom accessories, which are made in China with a non-toxic material that dries quickly. New launches are critical to increasing sales and attracting customers, she said. As Trump increased the tariff on Chinese goods to 20% and as high as 145% before reducing the import tax rate to 30% for 90 days, Dorai Home postponed introducing new merchandise. O'Callaghan said she had to lay off the CEO as well as the head of product development, who helped the company jump on new trends. "I haven't really put the time or the emphasis on (innovation) because I'm covering too many other people's roles," she said. The company paused shipments from China in early April but resumed some on a staggered basis after the president's rate reduction. On Wednesday, Trump touted progress in U.S.-China trade talks. With details still sketchy and a deal not finalized, entrepreneurs interviewed by The Associated Press said they viewed the tariffs war as an ongoing threat. Tariffs and American innovation The potential stunting of innovation follows an economic slowdown during the coronavirus pandemic, when companies also had to put projects on hold. Some experts think the on-again-off again tariffs may have more enduring consequences because they rewire markets and upend business strategies. "When executive attention shifts from innovation to regulatory compliance, the innovation pipeline suffers. Companies end up optimizing for the political landscape rather than technological advancement," economists J. Bradford Jensen, a nonresident senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics , and Scott J. Wallsten, president of the Technology Policy Institute think tank, wrote in an April blog post. Trump has argued that curtailing foreign imports with tariffs would help revive the nation's diminished manufacturing base. Analysts and various trade groups have warned that fractured trade ties and supply chains may depress R&D activity of U.S. tech and health care companies that rely on international partnerships or foreign suppliers. Small companies, which often drive the innovations that create jobs and economic growth, already are under strain. With fewer people on staff and tighter budgets compared to large corporations, entrepreneurs say they are spending more time on cutting costs, suspending or arranging orders, and deciding how much of their tariff-related costs to charge customers. That means they're spending less time thinking of their next big ideas. Schylling Inc., a Massachusetts company that produces modern versions of Lava lamps, Sea-Monkeys, My Little Pony and other nostalgic toys, has its products made in China. As part of its strategy to account for tariffs, the company put a group of employees on temporary unpaid leave last month to reduce expenses. Beth Muehlenkamp, who was marketing director at the company, was one of them, but now she and several others who were furloughed, were permanently laid off early this month. She noted that she and other staff members typically would have been planning products for the final months of 2026. But Schylling isn't focusing on designing new products given the unstable trade outlook. "It's really hard to focus on innovation and creativity when you're consumed with this day-to-day of how we're just going to balance the books and deal with the changing rates," Muehlenkamp said. An uneven product pipeline Even some companies that do their manufacturing in the U.S. are scaling back investments in new products. Made Plus, a Maryland company that makes athletic shoes at a small factory in the state capital, put a planned golf line on hold because two key components - a foam insole and the tread for the bottom of the shoe - currently are made in China, founder Alan Guyan said. The company customizes its shoes on demand and charges $145 to $200 a pair. The footwear is made from recycled plastic bottles with advanced knitting, 3D printing and computerized stitching techniques. It's looking into getting components from Vietnam instead of China. Embracing new technology is essential to restoring manufacturing capability in the U.S. and competing with Asia, Guyan said. But given ongoing trade frictions, he said he does not want to invest time or money evaluating the latest embroidery and knitting machines, which come from Germany, Italy, China and the U.S. "We're just battening down the hatches a little bit and just hoping that there's enough influence in the community of footwear that it will somewhat change and get resolved and we can move forward," he said of the tariff roller coaster. In contrast, many big companies are forging on. Google parent Alphabet confirmed late last month that it still planned to spend $75 billion on capital expenditures this year, with most of the money going toward artificial intelligence technology. What's next for R&D? Sonia Lapinsky, a managing director at consulting firm AlixPartners, has advised her clients to limit tariff discussions to a small group of executives and to keep their product creation cycles in motion. Businesses have an even greater imperative to come up with attention-grabbing innovations when consumers may be reluctant to open their wallets, she said. Yet smaller companies may struggle to wall off tariff discussions from the rest of the business. Learning Resources CEO Rick Woldenberg said that roughly 25% to 30% of the 350 employees at the educational toy company's headquarters, including product developers, are working at least part-time on tariff-related tasks. The company usually develops 250 different products a year and expects to get half that many off the drawing board for 2026, Woldenberg said. While exploring factories in countries besides China, he said, Learning Resources is delaying the next generation of its interactive robots that help children develop computer programming skills through games and other activities. The family-run business and Woldenberg's other toy business, hand2Mind, are locked in a legal battle with the Trump administration. The jointly owned companies filed a lawsuit accusing the president of exceeding his authority by invoking an emergency powers law to impose tariffs. A federal judge ruled in favor of the two companies last month, and the administration has appealed the decision. Woldenberg said he's ready to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court . "It's a win at the Supreme Court that we need," he said. "And so until then, there will be no certainty. Even then, if the government is bound and determined to keep us in an uncertain situation, they'll be able to do that."


Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
How Israel's Operation Rising Lion breached Iran: Mossad built drone bases and smuggled commandos into Tehran's heart
Operation Rising Lion (coined in Hebrew as Am KeLavi ) unfolded in the early hours of June 13, marking one of the most audacious Israeli military campaigns in decades. A coordinated strike by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), Mossad, and Israel's top defense industries targeted Iran 's nuclear and missile capabilities. What set Operation Rising Lion apart from Israel's previous strikes like those on Syria, Iraq, or even covert ops in Iran was its unprecedented blend of on-ground infiltration, domestic sabotage, and remote aerial precision, all timed to detonate the Iranian military infrastructure. Also read: Why Israel bombed Iran's nuclear sites and what it means Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like These Are The Most Beautiful Women In The World by Taboola by Taboola How Israel and Mossad struck deep in Iran According to Israel National News- Arutz Sheva, camouflaged weapon platforms hidden inside ordinary civilian vehicles were parked strategically across Iran. These mobile launch systems, seemingly harmless on the surface, were remotely activated at the onset of the Israeli air assault. Their purpose was to cripple Iran's air defenses and clear a path for Israeli jets to strike critical targets without resistance. Live Events Even more daring was the existence of a covert Mossad drone base near Tehran . Situated in the capital's outskirts, this hidden facility housed explosive-laden kamikaze drones that were launched toward missile sites at the Esfejabad base, one of Iran's most sensitive and strategic military locations. Elite Mossad commando teams had already entered central Iran under deep cover. These agents installed precision-guided strike systems near Iran's surface-to-air missile (SAM) batteries. As the Israeli Air Force began its assault, these hidden systems were remotely triggered, hitting their targets with pinpoint accuracy in perfect coordination with the aerial strikes. A senior Israeli source described the planning as 'bold, innovative and surgically executed.' Tehran under siege As explosions ripped through Tehran at 03:30 local time, state media reported heavy civilian casualties, including children, and focused strikes on military housing complexes. Residential zones in districts like Saadat Abad and Narmak bore the impact. Emergency sirens pierced Israeli cities simultaneously, as Iran retaliated with roughly 100 drones, almost all intercepted. Decapitation of Iran's military leadership Iran's state television confirmed the deaths of some of its most powerful figures: IRGC commander Hossein Salami, Armed Forces Chief Mohammad Bagheri, and top nuclear scientists, including Fereydoun Abbasi‑Davani. Iranian officials also reported damage to the Natanz uranium enrichment facility, though the IAEA confirmed no rise in radiation levels. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu justified the strike, citing recent Iranian efforts to 'weaponize enriched uranium,' claiming a nuclear bomb could be created 'within a few months'. The IDF echoed this urgency, framing the campaign as a preemptive move to thwart an immediate existential threat. State of emergency in Israel Israel declared a state of emergency as flights were halted and airspace locked down. Oil prices jumped, and airlines rerouted flights. Tehran, in turn, pledged 'severe retaliation,' while international voices from the UN secretary-general to Middle Eastern leaders called for restraint. Operation Rising Lion is far from over. Israel has vowed the strikes will 'continue for as many days as it takes'. Meanwhile, Iran has vowed reprisal, and military analysts warn of a tit-for-tat spiral.