logo
Adoption of red light cameras slow in Pennsylvania even though they save lives

Adoption of red light cameras slow in Pennsylvania even though they save lives

Yahoo28-03-2025

Spotlight PA reported this story as part of The Road Ahead, an ongoing project by LehighValleyNews.com on traffic and transportation issues in Lehigh and Northampton Counties. Sign up for our free newsletters.
HARRISBURG — All Pennsylvania municipalities would be allowed to install red light cameras aimed at making intersections safer under a proposal that will be introduced as soon as this summer.
At the moment, just Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and a handful of other places in the commonwealth are allowed to use them. But even among that group, only a few have installed cameras despite evidence the devices reduce fatal crashes.
Pittsburgh is in the process of adding cameras to its most dangerous intersections, though it's run into issues finding a vendor. Smaller municipalities struggle to meet the state's requirements to get such a program off the ground, one expert told Spotlight PA.
With many issues competing for state lawmakers' attention, it remains to be seen if expanding red light cameras will rise to the top of the agenda this session. But for supporters like Eileen Miller, the issue feels pressing.
Miller's son, Paul, was killed in a distracted driving crash in 2010, and she has spent much of her time since thinking about safe driving laws. In particular, she pushed for a bill banning the use of cell phones while operating a motor vehicle. It passed last year after more than a decade of advocacy.
Between budget negotiations and elections, Miller told Spotlight PA she only had a 'short period' each year where she felt the legislature had the attention span to pass the law.
'I constantly had to be down there session after session, reminding them, emailing them,' Miller told Spotlight PA. 'Sometimes you have to be a bit aggressive.'
Efforts to expand automatic traffic enforcement have progressed in fits and starts.
Lawmakers passed a bill creating a pilot program for red light cameras in Philadelphia more than two decades ago. A handful were installed along Roosevelt Boulevard, one of the deadliest roads in the city.
The legislature later allowed Pittsburgh and larger municipalities that meet certain standards to use the cameras.
Now, state Rep. Ed Neilson (D., Philadelphia) wants all municipalities to have the option. He plans to introduce a bill as soon as this summer, he told Spotlight PA.
That legislation would also make red light camera programs permanent. Currently, programs in Philadelphia and other commonwealth locations will expire in July 2027 unless the legislature acts.
Neilson has had success with traffic safety bills before. He sponsored a bill, which became law, that permits Philadelphia to pilot automatic speed enforcement cameras in some school zones.
The city was already allowed to use speed cameras on roads including Roosevelt Boulevard, where speeding and crashes resulting in serious or fatal injuries have declined since 2020.
The law also made permanent the use of speed cameras in highway work zones.
While these kinds of measures don't typically garner much opposition, they do hit roadblocks.
State Rep. Napoleon Nelson (D., Montgomery), chair of the Legislative Black Caucus, said he generally supports enforcement cameras. But he thinks they must include data collection provisions that ensure people of color aren't disproportionately targeted.
When lawmakers were trying to pass the bill banning cell phones while driving, a version that didn't mandate racial data collection failed after the Legislative Black Caucus opposed it.
Neilson chairs his chamber's Transportation Committee, through which the bill would need to pass before it goes to the full state House. Leaders in the state House and Senate either declined to comment on the proposal or said they would review it once it is introduced.
There is evidence that red light cameras make roads safer.
A 2016 study of programs in 79 U.S. cities including Philadelphia by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety — a nonprofit funded by insurance companies and industry backers — found the cameras reduced the rate of all types of fatal crashes at intersections with signals by 14%.
Wen Hu, a researcher for the institute, told Spotlight PA that red light and speed cameras have 'proven effective in changing drivers' behaviors, reducing crashes, and injuries and fatalities caused by crashes.'
The Philadelphia Parking Authority primarily tracks the efficacy of the city's more than 100 red light cameras by seeing whether violations decrease at monitored intersections. If violations go down, that means knowing cameras are present prompts drivers to be safer, the idea goes. This metric has shown mixed results.
In a 2024 report, the authority said roughly half of the 34 locations with cameras have seen violations decrease since they were first installed. The other half had seen increases.
In total, the authority issued 39% more violations when comparing fiscal years 2023 and 2024. It attributed the increase to several factors, including the installation of more cameras, improvements to the cameras' recording abilities, and worsening driver behavior, such as cell phone distraction.
Still, some of the improvements were significant. Red light cameras at the intersection of Grant Avenue and Roosevelt Boulevard in Northeast Philadelphia, recorded 25,111 infractions in fiscal year 2006 and 6,150 in fiscal year 2024.
The cameras have 'demonstrated substantial effectiveness in improving traffic safety and compliance,' the authority wrote.
Red light cameras have opponents, including Jay Beeber, executive director of the National Motorists Association. The group opposes automated traffic enforcement and speed enforcement by radar, and supports generally higher speed limits.
Beeber argued that traffic cameras do not solve underlying problems, which he says are poor traffic engineering in areas that have high levels of speeding, drivers running red lights, and car crashes.
He thinks the data reported by the Philadelphia Parking Authority are 'cherry-picked.' The report shows only the number of violations that occurred after the cameras were installed, he said, not the number of violations before the cameras' implementation.
'If the numbers were already going down and then the cameras go in and the numbers continue to go down, then the cameras had no impact,' Beeber said.
The commonwealth currently allows red light cameras in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and municipalities that have at least 20,000 residents, an accredited police department, and are located in a large county that meets certain standards. As of 2017, 15 places met the latter definition.
Just four municipalities outside of Philadelphia had installed red light cameras as of April 2024, according to PennDOT — Abington and Montgomery Townships in Montgomery County, and Bensalem and Warrington Townships in Bucks County. Bristol Township in Bucks County approved their usage last December.
While there's a significant price tag, governments make that money back from fines, set at $100 under state law. In fiscal year 2024, Philadelphia generated $32 million in revenue from these violations.
Some of that pays for the cameras. Most goes to PennDOT, which reallocates the money to counties through grants for 'improving safety, enhancing mobility, and reducing congestion.'
The slow adoption of the cameras appears to be logistical.
Pittsburgh City Council first voted to install red light cameras in 2013, but the city didn't follow through and the ordinance expired in 2017.
Last year, the city adopted a 'Vision Zero' strategy in the hopes of eliminating all traffic fatalities, and the council voted to move forward again with red light cameras as part of that initiative. But in February, WPXI reported that only one company had bid to install and operate the cameras. New bids are due in April.
A staffer for a council member told Spotlight PA the new request has produced more bids. Vendors, they said, didn't initially apply due to a lack of details such as where the cameras would be located.
Current requirements also make it hard for smaller municipalities to take part, said Amy Sturges of the Pennsylvania Municipal League, a nonprofit that advocates for small cities and towns.
The process involves seeking approval for a plan from PennDOT and finding a vendor to install the cameras. The local police department must also seek accreditation from the Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association, which Sturges called 'lengthy, time-consuming, and expensive.'
Sturges said neither she nor the municipalities she works with oppose automatic enforcement programs. She said some have expressed interest because the state does not permit speed enforcement radar devices.
'Local police departments' current tools for speed enforcement are very limited,' Sturges said. 'Red light cameras are another option that some communities would be able to use.'
If you learned something from this article, pay it forward and contribute to Spotlight PA at spotlightpa.org/donate. Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability journalism that gets results.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump admin officials blast LA Mayor Karen Bass' response to ICE raids — as cops clash with violent protesters
Trump admin officials blast LA Mayor Karen Bass' response to ICE raids — as cops clash with violent protesters

New York Post

time3 hours ago

  • New York Post

Trump admin officials blast LA Mayor Karen Bass' response to ICE raids — as cops clash with violent protesters

Several Trump administration officials fired back at Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass Friday after she pledged to oppose federal efforts to nab illegal immigrants — as cops in her city had to use flash bangs to disperse the violent mob of protesters who descended on the arrest sites. 'We will not stand for this,' Bass said in a statement released after federal immigration authorities arrested 44 people in raids across Los Angeles. 'I am deeply angered by what has taken place,' the Democrat mayor fumed, noting that her office 'is in close coordination with immigrant rights community organizations.' Advertisement 4 Bass slammed the Los Angeles immigration enforcement raids in a social media post. AFP via Getty Images White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller quickly dismissed Bass' declaration. 'You have no say in this at all,' Miller shot back on social media. Advertisement 'Federal law is supreme and federal law will be enforced,' he noted on X. Miller was one of several Trump administration officials that took issue with Bass' statements. 'They're Illegals. Not 'immigrants.' One just tried to burn Americans alive in Boulder,' White House adviser Sebastian Gorka wrote on X, referring to Colorado terror suspect Mohamed Soliman. The Egyptian national overstayed his tourist visa before allegedly firebombing a peaceful march for Israeli hostages still held by Hamas on Sunday in a heinous antisemitic attack. Advertisement 'If you're aiding and abetting them you're a criminal too,' Gorka said in response to the LA mayor's comments. 'Are you ready to be treated as a criminal? 'Because we are ready to treat you as one if you commit a crime,' he warned. 4 Miller noted that Bass has 'no say' in federal immigration enforcement. Chris Kleponis – CNP / MEGA 4 Miller was one of several Trump administration officials who reacted strongly to Bass' statement on the ICE raids. Stephen Miller, /X Advertisement Justice Department official Harmeet K. Dhillon was stunned by Bass' understanding of the law. 'It's amazing the number of elected officials who don't grasp the basics of federalism, or federal sovereignty over immigration issues, or the First Amendment,' Dhillon tweeted. The Los Angeles immigration raids sparked protests at the arrest sites, and at least one person was taken into custody for allegedly obstructing federal law enforcement. 'Federal agents were executing a lawful judicial warrant at a LA worksite this morning when David Huerta deliberately obstructed their access by blocking their vehicle,' US Attorney Bill Essayli said in a statement. 'He was arrested for interfering with federal officers and will face arraignment in federal court on Monday.' 'Let me be clear: I don't care who you are — if you impede federal agents, you will be arrested and prosecuted.' Huerta is president of the California branch of the influential Service Employees International Union. 4 The raids sparked protests in Los Angeles. AP Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin decried the city's response to protesters' clashes with federal agents – which escalated hours after the raids. Advertisement 'Assaulting ICE enforcement officers, slashing tires, defacing buildings. 800 protestors have surrounded and breached the first layer of a federal law enforcement building in LA,' McLaughlin wrote on X. '@LAPD has not responded.' 'This violence against @ICEgov must stop.' Richard Grenell, President Trump's envoy for special missions, blamed Bass for the unrest. 'Karen Bass whipped all of this up. She attacked the rule of law. She undermined democracy,' Grenell wrote on X, sharing images of protesters attempting to block federal law enforcement vehicles. Advertisement 'The @MayorOfLA is creating chaos in LA,' he fumed. With Post wires

1 of pair accused of Christmas Eve drive-by shooting pleads guilty
1 of pair accused of Christmas Eve drive-by shooting pleads guilty

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

1 of pair accused of Christmas Eve drive-by shooting pleads guilty

Jun. 6—One of two people accused of a Christmas Eve drive-by shooting has pleaded guilty. Tre'a Lynette Miller, 26, of Trotwood, pleaded guilty in Montgomery County Common Pleas Court to one count of felonious assault, according to the Montgomery County Prosecutor's Office. Miller was charged along with Jaevon Nathaniel Wells, 31, connected to a shooting early Dec. 24, 2024 near Fortman and Hackett drives. The Montgomery County Sheriff's Office said deputies were called around 5:45 a.m. and found a male victim with gunshot wounds, as well as multiple shell casings. Security footage showed that it was a drive-by shooting and identified the suspect vehicle and license plate number, the sheriff's office said. On further investigation, the sheriff's office said it identified Wells and Miller as the shooters. Both were indicted on three counts of felonious assault with three-year firearm specifications, though Wells was also indicted on one count of having a weapon while under disability. Miller is scheduled to be sentenced July 2.

Texas Ag Commissioner Warns Of Agroterrorism Threat After Fungus Smuggling
Texas Ag Commissioner Warns Of Agroterrorism Threat After Fungus Smuggling

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Texas Ag Commissioner Warns Of Agroterrorism Threat After Fungus Smuggling

Texas Agriculture Commissioner Sid Miller called for heightened vigilance following the arrest of two Chinese nationals charged with smuggling a dangerous fungus into the United States. 'I am deeply troubled by the recent allegations against two Chinese individuals for supposedly smuggling a dangerous agroterrorism agent into the United States, specifically a fungus that could cause significant damage to crops such as wheat, barley, maize, and rice,' Miller said in a news release on Friday. 'What's even more alarming is that one of the individuals reportedly has ties to the Chinese Communist Party. This raises serious questions about intent and highlights the real threats facing American agriculture and national security.' The suspects, Yunqing Jian, 33, and Zunyong Liu, 34, both citizens of the People's Republic of China, face felony charges, including conspiracy, smuggling goods, making false statements, and visa fraud, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office in Detroit, The Dallas Express reported on June 4. Court documents allege the pair smuggled Fusarium graminearum, a fungus known to cause 'head blight' in certain crops, through Detroit Metropolitan Airport, intending to research it at a University of Michigan lab. The fungus has caused billions in global crop losses and produces toxins harmful to humans and livestock, leading to symptoms like vomiting, liver damage, and reproductive issues. Miller emphasized the gravity of the threat, stating, 'Any effort to compromise our food supply or harm our agricultural commodities will be met with zero tolerance, and we are prepared to support any action that protects our producers and the integrity of our food system.' He praised the FBI, U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and other federal agencies under the Trump administration for their swift response, adding, 'We must continue to strengthen biosecurity protocols and protect our agricultural research institutions from foreign interference. Our food security is national security, and we will not let our guard down.' Authorities allege Jian, who worked in a University of Michigan science lab, received funding from the Chinese government for work related to the pathogen. Her electronic devices showed close ties to the Chinese Communist Party. Her boyfriend, Liu, allegedly admitted to smuggling the fungus to 'work on it' with Jian. 'The alleged actions of these Chinese nationals—including a loyal member of the Chinese Communist Party—are of the gravest national security concerns,' said Attorney Jerome F. Gorgon Jr. 'These two aliens have been charged with smuggling a fungus that has been described as a 'potential agroterrorism weapon' into the heartland of America.' Cheyvoryea Gibson, special agent in charge of the FBI Detroit Field Office, noted the exploitation of academic settings for illicit purposes, stating, 'These individuals exploited their access to laboratory facilities at a local university to engage in the smuggling of biological pathogens, an act that posed an imminent threat to public safety.' CBP's Director of Field Operations, Marty C. Raybon, underscored the need to protect agriculture, saying, 'Today's criminal charges levied upon Yunqing Jian and Zunyong Liu are indicative of CBP's critical role in protecting the American people from biological threats that could devastate our agricultural economy and cause harm to humans; especially when it involves a researcher from a major university attempting to clandestinely bring potentially harmful biological materials into the United States.' The investigation is ongoing.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store