Latest news with #TheRoadAhead
New European
21-05-2025
- Politics
- New European
Is Blackpool's new Reform pub all it seems?
The Daily Mail, Daily Telegraph, New Statesman and i were among those who dispatched colour writers to the town's Talbot pub following the news that the long-standing Conservative club had defected to Nigel Farage's mob and decked itself out in Reform colours ('As GB News blared from several screens inside, most pub-goers sat out on the newly-painted terrace enjoying their cheap drinks in the sun this week,' marvelled the Telegraph's Tom McArdle.) Fleet Street's finest packed their features writers off to Euston station last week with the news that the first Reform-themed pub in the country had opened its doors in Blackpool. But was all exactly what it seemed? Campaign group Hope Not Hate have done some digging and found that, while the Talbot had indeed once been a Conservative club, it hasn't been since 2012. And, having long since been rebranded, it has proved a popular destination for some characters with pretty unsavoury views – until, in several cases, they are cancelled. One such event cancelled in 2018 was The Road Ahead, a day of political speeches and entertainment 'with a focus on future politics, organising growth and leadership'. Co-owner Nick Lowe defended his bookings, saying: 'Every year people slag us off on Facebook saying it's a Nazi event, but it's not. I'm not racist. If somebody wants to book my room and I'm going to make money off it I'm going to do it. It's not against the law.' It is a mite unfortunate, then, that three of the listed speakers have since been prosecuted for actually breaking the law, through incitement to racial hatred: Jez Turner, who called for 'soldiers' to liberate England from 'Jewish control' in an address outside Downing Street, Alison Chabloz, a musician with ditties suggesting the Holocaust was 'a bunch of lies' and referring to Auschwitz as a 'theme park', and 'Rev James', actually James Costello, an unordained cleric who also goes by the name of Pontifex Maximus. The pub was also forced to cancel a music festival, Real Rebellion, last year after Hope Not Hate reported on the dubious politics of some of the bands involved. Canadian group Battlefront's tunes include Aryan Soldiers, Pride is our Will and String 'em Up, while Germans Combat BC decorated the cover of album No Apologies – No Regrets with imagery popular with the country's 1933-45 government. 'It's nowt to do with me. I just rent the room out,' Nick Lowe told the Blackpool Gazette at the time. 'I'm not racist at all but I have to make money somehow.' Now, though, he is busy entertaining the many journalists making the trip north to London to marvel at his rebranding exercise. It's an unfortunate history alright – but on the other hand, as the Telegraph points out, 'the pie and mash will only set you back £3.20, while a chicken curry can be had for £3.50 and a Sunday roast is £5'.
Yahoo
28-03-2025
- Yahoo
Adoption of red light cameras slow in Pennsylvania even though they save lives
Spotlight PA reported this story as part of The Road Ahead, an ongoing project by on traffic and transportation issues in Lehigh and Northampton Counties. Sign up for our free newsletters. HARRISBURG — All Pennsylvania municipalities would be allowed to install red light cameras aimed at making intersections safer under a proposal that will be introduced as soon as this summer. At the moment, just Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and a handful of other places in the commonwealth are allowed to use them. But even among that group, only a few have installed cameras despite evidence the devices reduce fatal crashes. Pittsburgh is in the process of adding cameras to its most dangerous intersections, though it's run into issues finding a vendor. Smaller municipalities struggle to meet the state's requirements to get such a program off the ground, one expert told Spotlight PA. With many issues competing for state lawmakers' attention, it remains to be seen if expanding red light cameras will rise to the top of the agenda this session. But for supporters like Eileen Miller, the issue feels pressing. Miller's son, Paul, was killed in a distracted driving crash in 2010, and she has spent much of her time since thinking about safe driving laws. In particular, she pushed for a bill banning the use of cell phones while operating a motor vehicle. It passed last year after more than a decade of advocacy. Between budget negotiations and elections, Miller told Spotlight PA she only had a 'short period' each year where she felt the legislature had the attention span to pass the law. 'I constantly had to be down there session after session, reminding them, emailing them,' Miller told Spotlight PA. 'Sometimes you have to be a bit aggressive.' Efforts to expand automatic traffic enforcement have progressed in fits and starts. Lawmakers passed a bill creating a pilot program for red light cameras in Philadelphia more than two decades ago. A handful were installed along Roosevelt Boulevard, one of the deadliest roads in the city. The legislature later allowed Pittsburgh and larger municipalities that meet certain standards to use the cameras. Now, state Rep. Ed Neilson (D., Philadelphia) wants all municipalities to have the option. He plans to introduce a bill as soon as this summer, he told Spotlight PA. That legislation would also make red light camera programs permanent. Currently, programs in Philadelphia and other commonwealth locations will expire in July 2027 unless the legislature acts. Neilson has had success with traffic safety bills before. He sponsored a bill, which became law, that permits Philadelphia to pilot automatic speed enforcement cameras in some school zones. The city was already allowed to use speed cameras on roads including Roosevelt Boulevard, where speeding and crashes resulting in serious or fatal injuries have declined since 2020. The law also made permanent the use of speed cameras in highway work zones. While these kinds of measures don't typically garner much opposition, they do hit roadblocks. State Rep. Napoleon Nelson (D., Montgomery), chair of the Legislative Black Caucus, said he generally supports enforcement cameras. But he thinks they must include data collection provisions that ensure people of color aren't disproportionately targeted. When lawmakers were trying to pass the bill banning cell phones while driving, a version that didn't mandate racial data collection failed after the Legislative Black Caucus opposed it. Neilson chairs his chamber's Transportation Committee, through which the bill would need to pass before it goes to the full state House. Leaders in the state House and Senate either declined to comment on the proposal or said they would review it once it is introduced. There is evidence that red light cameras make roads safer. A 2016 study of programs in 79 U.S. cities including Philadelphia by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety — a nonprofit funded by insurance companies and industry backers — found the cameras reduced the rate of all types of fatal crashes at intersections with signals by 14%. Wen Hu, a researcher for the institute, told Spotlight PA that red light and speed cameras have 'proven effective in changing drivers' behaviors, reducing crashes, and injuries and fatalities caused by crashes.' The Philadelphia Parking Authority primarily tracks the efficacy of the city's more than 100 red light cameras by seeing whether violations decrease at monitored intersections. If violations go down, that means knowing cameras are present prompts drivers to be safer, the idea goes. This metric has shown mixed results. In a 2024 report, the authority said roughly half of the 34 locations with cameras have seen violations decrease since they were first installed. The other half had seen increases. In total, the authority issued 39% more violations when comparing fiscal years 2023 and 2024. It attributed the increase to several factors, including the installation of more cameras, improvements to the cameras' recording abilities, and worsening driver behavior, such as cell phone distraction. Still, some of the improvements were significant. Red light cameras at the intersection of Grant Avenue and Roosevelt Boulevard in Northeast Philadelphia, recorded 25,111 infractions in fiscal year 2006 and 6,150 in fiscal year 2024. The cameras have 'demonstrated substantial effectiveness in improving traffic safety and compliance,' the authority wrote. Red light cameras have opponents, including Jay Beeber, executive director of the National Motorists Association. The group opposes automated traffic enforcement and speed enforcement by radar, and supports generally higher speed limits. Beeber argued that traffic cameras do not solve underlying problems, which he says are poor traffic engineering in areas that have high levels of speeding, drivers running red lights, and car crashes. He thinks the data reported by the Philadelphia Parking Authority are 'cherry-picked.' The report shows only the number of violations that occurred after the cameras were installed, he said, not the number of violations before the cameras' implementation. 'If the numbers were already going down and then the cameras go in and the numbers continue to go down, then the cameras had no impact,' Beeber said. The commonwealth currently allows red light cameras in Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, and municipalities that have at least 20,000 residents, an accredited police department, and are located in a large county that meets certain standards. As of 2017, 15 places met the latter definition. Just four municipalities outside of Philadelphia had installed red light cameras as of April 2024, according to PennDOT — Abington and Montgomery Townships in Montgomery County, and Bensalem and Warrington Townships in Bucks County. Bristol Township in Bucks County approved their usage last December. While there's a significant price tag, governments make that money back from fines, set at $100 under state law. In fiscal year 2024, Philadelphia generated $32 million in revenue from these violations. Some of that pays for the cameras. Most goes to PennDOT, which reallocates the money to counties through grants for 'improving safety, enhancing mobility, and reducing congestion.' The slow adoption of the cameras appears to be logistical. Pittsburgh City Council first voted to install red light cameras in 2013, but the city didn't follow through and the ordinance expired in 2017. Last year, the city adopted a 'Vision Zero' strategy in the hopes of eliminating all traffic fatalities, and the council voted to move forward again with red light cameras as part of that initiative. But in February, WPXI reported that only one company had bid to install and operate the cameras. New bids are due in April. A staffer for a council member told Spotlight PA the new request has produced more bids. Vendors, they said, didn't initially apply due to a lack of details such as where the cameras would be located. Current requirements also make it hard for smaller municipalities to take part, said Amy Sturges of the Pennsylvania Municipal League, a nonprofit that advocates for small cities and towns. The process involves seeking approval for a plan from PennDOT and finding a vendor to install the cameras. The local police department must also seek accreditation from the Pennsylvania Chiefs of Police Association, which Sturges called 'lengthy, time-consuming, and expensive.' Sturges said neither she nor the municipalities she works with oppose automatic enforcement programs. She said some have expressed interest because the state does not permit speed enforcement radar devices. 'Local police departments' current tools for speed enforcement are very limited,' Sturges said. 'Red light cameras are another option that some communities would be able to use.' If you learned something from this article, pay it forward and contribute to Spotlight PA at Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability journalism that gets results. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
09-02-2025
- Business
- Yahoo
Bill Gates says humans will not be needed for "most things" thanks to AI
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates is on a book tour for his recently released memoir, Source Code: My Beginnings. He made a stop on The Tonight Show and shared some of his thoughts on how AI will transform society in the future. Fallon asked Gates about the pros and cons of AI on Tuesday, and the Microsoft co-founder's answer gave the show host some pause after asking if humans will no longer be needed. Gates went on to explain that humans won't be used for "most things" as AI becomes more incorporated into everyday life. "Well, we'll decide," Gates said. "You know, like baseball. We won't want to watch computers play baseball. So there'll be some things that we reserve for ourselves, but in terms of making things and moving things and growing food, over time, those will be basically solved problems." That answer might have been a bit of a downer for some people, especially with the rising concerns of AI taking away jobs, which is happening already according to one study from last year. Gates did want to emphasize that once AI becomes commonplace, it will solve a variety of issues. "The era that we're just starting is that intelligence is rare," Gates said. "And with A.I., over the next decade that will become free. Great medical advice, great tutoring. And it's kind of profound because it solves all these specific problems, like we don't have enough doctors or, you know, mental health professionals, but it brings with it kind of so much change." He also gave some insight into how he thinks work should change. "You know, what will jobs be like," he asked "Should we, you know, just work like 2 or 3 days a week? I love the way it'll drive innovation forward, but I think it's a little bit unknown. Will we be able to shape it? And so, legitimately, people are like, 'Wow, this is -- this is a bit scary."It's completely new territory.'" The just over 10-minute interview didn't focus entirely on AI. Fallon spoke to Gates about his beginnings with Microsoft and how people laughed at him for saying there would be a computer on everyone's desk in the future. He also brought up how Steve Jobs said he didn't know about design and should take acid, to which he said that he did take LSD. He went on to explain that when he tripped on acid, it had him thinking about program coding and not design. Gates stepped down from his role as Microsoft CEO in 2000 and then left the company's board in 2020 to focus more on his philanthropy, but reports claim that he still has an influence within the company. Even though he's not leading Microsoft's push into AI, a blog post of his from 2023 discussed the topic of "AI agents," which he had first written about in his 1995 book, The Road Ahead. The post also clarified that Clippy, the Microsoft Office paperclip assistant, was a bot and not an agent. Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang had similar opinions as Gates on the future of AI in a recent interview, saying "A future where you're surrounded by robots is for certain." "Everything that moves will be robotic someday, and it will be soon," Huang said in a recent episode of Cleo Abram's Huge Conversations. "And every car is going to be robotic. Humanoid robots, the technology necessary to make it possible, is just around the corner." Nvidia is currently the world's top producer of AI chips.
