logo
How To Align Marketing With Real Business Objectives

How To Align Marketing With Real Business Objectives

Forbes5 days ago

Christine Pilkington is the CEO and founder of Crisp, a fractional CMO and contract marketing services firm based in Vancouver, Canada.
Using data to track progress is an essential aspect of marketing. But nowadays, with the wealth of numbers available to report on just about any channel or digital behavior, measuring and optimizing for the wrong things can cost you time, effort and budget.
A rise in vanity metrics (those stats that look good on the surface but might not hold up to analytical scrutiny), such as likes, followers and impressions, might make us believe we're impacting customer behavior. However, this is often a distraction from more meaningful data points.
The good news is that there's a simple solution to the noisy reporting problem. To avoid misdirecting marketing efforts and obfuscating progress, focus on tracking and reporting the metrics that align with business goals, rather than treating metrics as an end in themselves. In other words: Collecting more data doesn't necessarily lead to generating more insights, and just because you're capturing attention, it doesn't mean you're driving the right business outcomes.
There's a common adage in the business world: 'What gets measured, gets managed.' It's often cited in pithy praise of analytics, but I believe it should also serve as a warning to those who tend to overfocus on data without the context to anchor it. What happens when you try to micromanage too many things at once? You mistake tactics for strategy and end up missing the forest for the trees.
So what should you be measuring? The specifics will differ from business to business and industry to industry, but your north star for determining key metrics should be your business goals themselves, and what is likely to indicate meaningful impact or progress toward them.
For example, a B2B company looking to grow revenue might focus on:
• Pipeline growth
• Customer acquisition cost (CAC)
• Customer lifetime value (LTV)
• Percentage of revenue attributable to marketing activities, like conferences or webinars
Meanwhile, a B2C company aiming to expand its market share would likely keep an eye on:
• Branded versus non-branded search volume
• Return on ad spend (ROAS)
• Number of orders driven by different channels and activities
This is not to recommend that you should only be monitoring three to four metrics as a business, but rather, to illustrate what kinds of things meaningfully ladder up to broader marketing and business impact. It is also useful to track additional metrics as at-a-glance pulse checks or early warning indicators. The trick is not to get too caught up in optimizing them, nor individually overemphasizing them without understanding their part in the broader story you're telling.
Although this seems relatively simple, there's another common pitfall that many companies (especially smaller ones) stumble into: not letting marketing in on business goals in the first place.
Unfortunately, marketing has developed a bit of a reputation as a cost center, rather than a revenue-generating department. This is typically because marketing isn't given a seat at the senior leadership table or privy to larger conversations about broader business vision and direction.
But when marketing is empowered to operate with a clear strategic vision in line with business goals, it's able to drive business success rather than act as a disconnected department struggling to articulate its value.
Assuming your marketing team has a solid understanding of business priorities and is measuring the right things to track their progress toward them, the last piece of the puzzle is creating a well-structured reporting system to communicate the relevant metrics and put them in context.
Every dashboard should help marketing leaders answer three key questions:
• Are marketing activities impacting revenue?
• Are we operating efficiently?
• Are these activities driving meaningful customer actions?
Reporting systems should also measure leading indicators (like web traffic, engagement or pipeline growth) as well as lagging indicators (like revenue, LTV and customer retention) to provide a full, connected picture of the marketing funnel.
Perhaps most importantly, every report should help the team guide action, not just summarize past activity. A savvy marketer should be able to read the data and translate it into next steps, whether it's adjusting the overall strategy, optimizing campaign spending or pulling the plug on an underperforming activity.
Evaluating which marketing numbers matter to the business can go a long way in transforming marketing's role and impact, but it also takes a shift in mindset to drive results. A strategic marketing department will be proactive and growth-oriented, rather than caught up in individual channels and activities.
So, before you dive into dashboards looking to weed out vanity metrics, ask yourself if the marketing department is equipped with the right information to prioritize what they need to measure—and most importantly, why.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Citi Reaffirms Buy on Broadcom (AVGO) Amid Surging AI Revenue
Citi Reaffirms Buy on Broadcom (AVGO) Amid Surging AI Revenue

Yahoo

time35 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Citi Reaffirms Buy on Broadcom (AVGO) Amid Surging AI Revenue

Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO) is one of the 10 best tech stocks to buy according to billionaires right now. On June 9, a Citi analyst raised his price target on Broadcom from $276 to $285 while maintaining a Buy rating. This revision follows Broadcom's second-quarter results, which showed continued strength in AI-related revenue, although overall performance was mixed, as per the analyst, due to some pressure on margins. Broadcom continues to benefit from growing demand in the artificial intelligence space, which remains a key driver of topline performance. The company reported Q2 FY 2025 revenue of $15.0 billion, up 20% year-over-year supported by strong AI semiconductor sales and contributions from VMware. Adjusted EBITDA rose 35% year-over-year to $10.0 billion, implying an EBITDA margin of 67%. A worker assembling the inner circuitry of a semiconductor product. AI-related revenue reached $4.4 billion in Q2, growing 46% year-over-year, driven primarily by demand for AI networking solutions. Management expects this momentum to carry into Q3, with AI semiconductor revenue projected to reach $5.1 billion. This growth is supported by continued investment by hyperscale customers. Looking ahead, Broadcom guided for Q3 FY25 revenue of approximately $15.8 billion and an adjusted EBITDA margin of at least 66% of revenue, which is slightly below versus Q2. However, the company's margin outlook raised some concerns. According to the analyst, an increased contribution of semiconductor sales in total sales has put pressure on profitability. In response, management has adjusted its guidance, which indicates a slightly lower margin in the near term. Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ:AVGO) is a global technology company that designs, develops, and supplies a wide range of semiconductor and infrastructure software solutions. The company's products play a crucial role in enterprise and data center networking, broadband access, storage systems, smartphones, and wireless communications. Broadcom's extensive portfolio includes solutions for data center networking, storage, and security, making it a key player in the data center ecosystem. While we acknowledge the potential of AVGO as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: The Best and Worst Dow Stocks for the Next 12 Months and 10 Unstoppable Stocks That Could Double Your Money. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio

The Alienware 16 Area-51 is one of the cheapest RTX 5080 gaming laptops — and it's near-perfect
The Alienware 16 Area-51 is one of the cheapest RTX 5080 gaming laptops — and it's near-perfect

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The Alienware 16 Area-51 is one of the cheapest RTX 5080 gaming laptops — and it's near-perfect

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. I wouldn't call any RTX 50-series gaming laptop cheap, but Alienware, of all brands, comes knocking with its flagship Area-51 at an alluring price point for all of its premium qualities. For a whopping $3,249 (yes, that's competitive in this market [insert cry GIF here]), the Alienware 16 Area-51 packs a punch with its Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX and Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080, supported by a bright 16-inch display, a punchy mechanical keyboard, and solid audio. While its flaws are limited, they're still flaws. The battery life could be better, the display could be OLED, and the touchpad isn't tall enough. However, its pros make a strong case for the Alienware 16 Area-51 as one of the best gaming laptops, and it looks like a straight-up spaceship. But let's see if it's right for you. Alienware 16 Area-51 Price $2,849 starting ($3,249 reviewed) CPU Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX GPU Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 (16GB) RAM 32GB DDR5, 6400MT/s Storage 1TB NVMe M.2 PCIe Gen4 SSD Display 16-inch, 2560 x 1600, 240Hz, IPS display Battery 4:10 (1:50 gaming) Dimensions 14.37 x 11.41 x 0.85~1.12 inches Weight 7.13 pounds Click to view full benchmark test results Alienware 16 Area-51 Geekbench 6 (Higher is better) 20,498 Handbrake conversion (Lower is better) 1.58 25GB File Transfer Test (Lower is better) 23.36 25GB File Transfer Test (SSD speed) 1,149 Heat (Degrees Fahrenheit) 92.9 Gaming Heat (Degrees Fahrenheit, 95 comfort threshold) 118.7 Battery life (Higher is better) 4.1 PCMark 10 Gaming Battery life (higher is better) 1.5 Display brightness (Higher is better) 516 sRGB color gamut (Higher is better) 115% DCI-P3 color gamut (Higher is better) 81.6% Color accuracy (Lower is better) 0.21 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (Higher is better) 14,073 3DMark Time Spy Extreme (Higher is better) 10,558 Assassin's Creed: Mirage (1080p, fps) 149 Black Myth: Wukong (Cinematic, 1080p, fps) 58 Cyberpunk 2077 (1080p, fps) 62.94 Far Cry 6 (1080p, fps) 121 Monster Hunter Wilds (1080p, fps) 82.82 Red Dead Redemption II (Ultra, 1080p, fps) 117 Shadow of the Tomb Raider (1080p, fps) 183 Forget about a new car; you need that down payment for the Alienware 16 Area-51. The model we reviewed costs $3,249 and is outfitted with an Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX processor, an Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 16GB GPU, 32GB of RAM, a 1TB SSD, a 16-inch, 2560 x 1600, 240Hz, LED display, and CherryMX mechanical keyboard. You can start at $2,849, dropping to an RTX 5070 Ti, upgrading to a 2TB SSD, and ditching the mechanical keyboard. However, I don't recommend this model. If you're already paying close to $3K, you might as well get the better-performing RTX 5080. There's also the RTX 5090 model, which costs $3,649. It also comes with 64GB of RAM and a 2TB SSD. The biggest issue I have with the configurations is that there are no display options outside of upgrading the webcam (which costs the same price between them, so you should get the 4K model). It would have been nice to see an OLED variant, especially since the color in this LED panel is lacking (but I'll delve into that more later). Overall, the Alienware 16 Area-51 is expensive, but surprisingly, it's more affordable than other RTX 50 series gaming laptops we've seen on the market. Image 1 of 2 Image 2 of 2 This thing looks like it's about to blast the thrusters and head to outer space. I am in love with this design. It's been said before, even I have said it, but damn does this thing look like it's about to blast the thrusters and head to outer space. From the curved edges to the sci-fi-esque vents, the Alienware 16 Area-51 stays true to its namesake. I'll admit, however, I'm not a fan of the Liquid Teal color; it just doesn't look nice. I would've preferred white or another lighter color. Despite that, the black on the hinge contrasts quite well with it, and opening up the lid activates the RGB light bar embedded within the hinge, producing an aurora-esque diffused light. It looks pretty sick. (The Alienware logo lights up, too.) The interior gives off a similar vibe thanks to the numerous vents surrounding the keyboard, not to mention the RGB lighting in the keyboard, touchpad, and fans at the top of the deck. It's straight up Christmas in here. The bezels on the display are relatively thin, with the webcam on top, but I'm disappointed that there isn't a privacy shutter. Another slick design feature is the underside — it features a glass window into the internals with the RGB-lit fans. Despite the Alienware 16 Area-51 resembling a spaceship, it's tough to call it portable at 7.13 pounds and 14.37 x 11.41 x 0.85~1.12 inches. Here's how it compares: HP Omen Max 16: 5.92 pounds, 14.04 x 10.59 x 0.9~0.98 inches Razer Blade 16 (2025): 4.6 pounds, 13.98 x 9.86 x 0.59~0.69 inches Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 (RTX 5080): 5.5 pounds, 14.05 x 10 x 0.91~1.18 inches Image 1 of 3 Image 2 of 3 Image 3 of 3 To maintain its spaceship aesthetic, most of the ports on the Alienware 16 Area-51 are located on the back, with the exception of the SD card slot and headphone jack on the left. Overall, you should have everything you need here. 2x USB Type-A 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbps) 1x USB Type-A 3.2 Gen 1 (5 Gbps) 2x Thunderbolt 5 ports (for configurations with NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti and above) 1x HDMI 2.1 1x SD-card slot 1x 3.5mm headphone jack If you really need more ports, check out our best USB Type-C hubs and best laptop docking stations pages. I didn't expect the Alienware 16 Area-51 to offer great battery life I didn't expect the Alienware 16 Area-51 to offer great battery life, considering how much of a chunky monkey it is, but I'm still a bit disappointed. On the Laptop Mag battery test, which sets the laptop to continuously surf the web over Wi-Fi at 150 nits of brightness, the Alienware 16 Area-51 lasted 4 hours and 10 minutes. That's not bad per se, but the Aorus Master lasted a whole hour longer, and the Razer Blade lasted over three hours longer. There's a similar trend on the PCMark 10 Gaming battery life test, where the Area-51 lasted 1 hour and 50 minutes, while the Razer Blade and Aorus Master lasted 40 to 60 minutes longer, respectively. Click to view chart data in table format Alienware 16 Area-51 HP Omen Max 16 Razer Blade 16 (2025) Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 Battery life (Higher is better) 4.1 3.2 7.22 5.02 PCMark 10 Gaming Battery life (higher is better) 1.5 1.24 2.28 2.54 Displays designed for video games are precious to me Displays designed for video games are precious to me, and if I'm paying over $3K for a gaming laptop, it better be pretty. Unfortunately, the Alienware 16 Area-51's 16-inch, 2560 x 1600, 240Hz, LED display falls a bit short. It's plenty bright, more than its competition, and nearly as bright as the M4 MacBook Pros. However, the color is severely lacking for the price, and that's likely due to the LED panel, whereas its top rivals use OLED. I hopped into an expedition in Elden Ring Nightreign and bodied those nightmare Flame Chariots. While their flames were bright, and everything looked lively, the lack of boldness took me out of it a little. I think the issue is that the LED panel feels like I'm looking at a screen, whereas OLED feels like looking through a window. I'll say this, however: I didn't have any trouble navigating the shadowy mines. I watched the trailer for the currently bombing Lilo & Stitch film, and the night shots were clear, which is nice because I didn't need to squint. And although the day shots were really bright, those Hawaiian waters didn't look as bold as I wanted them to. According to our colorimeter, the Area-51 doesn't meet the 100% DCI-P3 color coverage that Dell claims it does (falling to 81.6%). However, it does break its claimed 500-nit display brightness. Click to view chart data in table format. Alienware 16 Area-51 HP Omen Max 16 Razer Blade 16 (2025) Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 Display brightness (Higher is better) 516 363 372 378 sRGB color gamut (Higher is better) 115% 199.7 204% 114% DCI-P3 color gamut (Higher is better) 81.6% 141.4 144.6% 81.0% Color accuracy (Lower is better) 0.21 0.31 0.3 0.23 Nothing is more satisfying than a mechanical keyboard in a gaming laptop. Nothing is more satisfying than a mechanical keyboard in a gaming laptop. It still feels like a dream that laptops like the Alienware 16 Area-51 are rocking a CherryMX mechanical keyboard. This baby is clicky and punchy; bodying fools in Marvel Rivals felt as smooth as ever. I knocked out 83 words per minute on the typing test, which is above my usual 81-wpm average. Moving to each key felt effortless, thanks to that mechanical bounce. The 4.4 x 2.5-inch touchpad is not only colorful, but it's also glass, so it's silky smooth to the touch. It also features a mid-depth, sharp click, which is satisfying to navigate with. My only gripe is that I wish the touchpad were taller because it makes it more challenging to select a wide area. the Alienware 16 Area-51's top and bottom-firing speakers made me feel like I jumped right into the thick of combat. With two tweeters (treble) and two woofers (bass), the Alienware 16 Area-51's top and bottom-firing speakers made me feel like I jumped right into the thick of combat. Although the music performance could have been better. Dashing across Limveld in Nightreign, oppressive but present strings played in the background while the Depraved Perfumer tried to murder me. I dodged and sliced through them, and got that satisfying slash sound effect when I made impact. When I popped my ultimate ability off, it sounded a bit more muted than I would've liked, but the overall environmental sound effects played well together. It got occasionally muddy when larger bosses started chomping at me. Jumping into my long-lasting hyperfixation, I listened to 'Wouldn't You Like' from Epic: The Musical. The stringed instruments sounded gentle and full, and when Hermes came in, I enjoyed his soft vocals, but I realized they were maybe a bit too soft. The vocals didn't hit the crispness I expected. While I could distinguish most of the instruments from one another, there was some muddiness, and the percussion got snuffed a bit. But overall, it's a strong set of speakers compared with the mediocrity we usually find in even the most expensive gaming laptops. You adjust the audio via Dolby Access, with presets for Game (which I used for gaming), Music (used for music), Movie, Voice, and Dynamic (which I experimented with but wasn't a fan of). This monster doesn't need to worry about slimming down for portability's sake, so it even crushes RTX 5090 gaming laptops on some tests. Packed into the Area-51's thick chassis is the Nvidia GeForce RTX 5080 GPU with 16GB of VRAM. This monster doesn't need to worry about slimming down for portability's sake, so it even crushes RTX 5090 gaming laptops on some tests. Trying our luck with the Gaping Jaw again, my comrades and I leapt into its chaotic purple lightning storms, and the Area-51 easily maxed out the cap at 60 frames per second on max settings at native resolution. Up against the RTX 5080 in the Aorus Master and the RTX 5090 in the Razer Blade and Omen Max, the Area-51 either matched or took the crown on three major gaming benchmarks. So the Area-51 is better than the rest at playing Assassin's Creed Mirage, Black Myth: Wukong, and Far Cry 6. While the Area-51 may not have taken the lead on the rest of the gaming benchmarks, it got pretty darn close across the board. You won't be disappointed with this level of performance. And keep in mind that our benchmarks don't account for DLSS 4, so if you want to get into multi-frame generation magic, you can expect a significant increase in frames. Click to view chart data in table format. Alienware 16 Area-51 HP Omen Max 16 Razer Blade 16 (2025) Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 3DMark Fire Strike Ultra (Higher is better) 14,073 12,734 14,024 13,695 3DMark Time Spy Extreme (Higher is better) 10,558 10,100 10,770 10,097 Assassin's Creed: Mirage (1080p, fps) 149 137 120 145 Black Myth: Wukong (Cinematic, 1080p, fps) 58 51 58 52 Cyberpunk 2077 (1080p, fps) 62.94 58.04 65.83 61.52 Far Cry 6 (1080p, fps) 121 109 97 120 Monster Hunter Wilds (1080p, fps) 82.82 76.55 70.86 85.67 Red Dead Redemption II (Ultra, 1080p, fps) 117 86.9164 Shadow of the Tomb Raider (1080p, fps) 183 175 166 185 The Alienware 16 Area-51 absolutely dominated its competition Don't think Alienware forgot about overall performance. The Area-51 is toting the Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX processor with 32GB of RAM, and it's one heck of a powerhouse. It didn't flinch when I opened a couple dozen Google Chrome tabs and a handful of YouTube videos while Nightreign downloaded in the background. The Alienware 16 Area-51 absolutely dominated its competition on the Geekbench 6 overall performance test and our HandBrake benchmark, which requires it to transcode a 4K video to 1080p. However, the Area-51 lagged a bit behind on SSD speeds, coming in third on our 25GB file transfer test, but since it's above 1 GBps, it should be good for most things. Now, even though the Area-51 is rocking fans all over the place, it still gets a bit spicy while gaming. We clocked it at 118.7 degrees Fahrenheit between the F8 and F9 keys, which is way above our 95-degree comfort threshold. Yet, it might be safe to sit it in your lap. How? The underside only reached 93.1 degrees. However, I'd proceed with caution since the underside features a glass window, which might burn if it gets too hot. Click to view chart data in table format. Alienware 16 Area-51 HP Omen Max 16 Razer Blade 16 (2025) Gigabyte Aorus Master 16 Geekbench 6 (Higher is better) 20,498 19,822 16,025 19,175 Handbrake conversion (Lower is better) 1.58 2.54 3.12 2.18 25GB File Transfer Test (Lower is better) 23.36 19.2 15.52 40.4 25GB File Transfer Test (SSD speed) 1,149 1,395 1,730 665 Heat (Degrees Fahrenheit) 92.9 88.6 97.9 94.3 Gaming Heat (Degrees Fahrenheit, 95 comfort threshold) 118.7 105.8 125.8 116.8 With an Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX processor, the Area-51 supports an NPU with 13 peak TOPS (trillion operations per second). With that, you can access your usual Copilot software, like Windows Studio Effects, Cocreate, and Live Captions. Apart from potential performance gain, there isn't any Dell or Alienware-branded software with unique AI capabilities. Like most laptop webcams, even the Alienware 16 Area-51's 4K shooter isn't great. Despite that, the webcam handles colors decently well. My blue shirt and the ensemble of colorful outfits of the My Hero Academia crew behind me popped in the image. However, its resolution didn't keep my face and hair from looking fuzzy. And the poor contrast overexposed the window and ceiling. If you plan on streaming, I recommend checking out one of the best webcams. The software you'll be using the most will be the Alienware Command Center, which features settings for performance, keyboard and chassis lighting, game aggregation, and a quick link to the Dolby Access app. There's also Dell SupportAssist, which handles your drivers, hardware scans, and warranty. The Area-51 comes with a one-year limited warranty. The Alienware 16 Area-51 is a near-perfect gaming laptop The Alienware 16 Area-51 is a near-perfect gaming laptop, boasting incredible performance, a bright 16-inch display, a great keyboard, strong speakers, and a beautiful design. But its display can't beat OLED, and we've seen much better battery life numbers elsewhere. A gaming laptop that supports both an OLED panel and significantly better battery life is the Razer Blade 16, although you'll need to pay about $1,000 more to get it. I'll pray to Cthulhu for an OLED variant of the Alienware 16 Area-51 in the future, although right now, this gaming laptop is easily one of the best we've seen this year, and its price point makes it all the more compelling.

I played 'Dune: Awakening' on an RTX 5090 gaming laptop — I got up to 257 fps, but there was one big problem
I played 'Dune: Awakening' on an RTX 5090 gaming laptop — I got up to 257 fps, but there was one big problem

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

I played 'Dune: Awakening' on an RTX 5090 gaming laptop — I got up to 257 fps, but there was one big problem

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Hold my spice, I'm jumping into Dune: Awakening to see if Nvidia's wild DLSS 4 claims are true, and what better device to test it on than an RTX 5090 gaming laptop? If you ever wanted an MMO survival base-building game set on Arrakis, that's exactly what you're getting. While we did get Dune: Spice Wars in 2022, Dune: Awakening is a more definitive debut for the Dune franchise simply because its genre is more popular. I played Dune: Awakening on an HP Omen Max 16 outfitted with an Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX processor, an Nvidia GeForce RTX 5090 24GB GPU, 32GB of RAM, and a 16-inch, 2560 x 1600, 240Hz, OLED display. Here's how it ran. Image 1 of 2 Image 2 of 2 I spent more time with the character creator than I care to admit, but I quickly sped through the tutorial so I could get to the online portion of the game. I drank some water, crafted a knife, and made some bandages. You know, the usual. Then I got into some knife fights where I learned how to dodge and parry, which I had no idea was a thing in this game, but now I am invested in the combat system. Fair warning, controller players — Dune: Awakening is not friendly to us. Everything from the radial wheel to the menus themselves feels like they are designed for a keyboard and mouse. Pulling up a wheel to select your quick items takes so much longer and breaks the flow of combat compared with a simple numbered button click. And the menu replicates a mouse experience except with the analog stick, and that… is slow. I hope the controller experience on console is better because the PC experience had my patience evaporating like it was left out in the desert. As far as the graphics go, I crash landed into the player-infested desert with everything cranked up to Ultra (apart from the experimental features) at a 2560 x 1600 resolution, which applies to all of the following tests below. If you remember, Dune: Awakening was among Nvidia's featured DLSS 4 titles when the RTX 50-series launched, with promises of wildly high frame rates. For those unaware, DLSS 4 is a super sampling technology that boosts visuals and performance. I have a love/hate relationship with it after my experiences in Doom: The Dark Ages and Monster Hunter Wilds, and that's because of Multi-Frame Generation. It's a technology that replicates frames with AI based on the true frames rendered on your GPU. This isn't a perfect technology, and I'll go into why later. But first, I turned off all of that. Starting raw, with no DLSS, I set the upscaler to TAA. At max settings, this got me an average of 60 frames per second while I shot my way through a bandit camp just to pilfer some scrap. That's a pretty strong opening. If you don't want to touch Nvidia's dark magic, you'll be perfectly fine with an RTX 5090. However, I enjoy playing with the DLSS 4 upscaler set to DLAA, as it uses the native resolution and enhances the visuals. It can be a little more taxing, but when I started mining for copper ore, the RTX 5090 managed a solid 63 fps. Again, that's pretty solid. This got my hopes pretty high for frame generation. Maybe I'd get the wild numbers that Nvidia claimed. And I did… but there was a catch. So whether I was avoiding the sandworm, sand storm, or trying my best to build a base that didn't look like a cookie cutter stone box, the frame generation had some trouble. But first, let's talk about performance. With DLAA, I first turned on 2x Frame Generation (FG) and then 4x Multi-Frame Generation (MFG). With FG, the RTX 5090 jumped to 88 fps while I tried my best to parry and stab an annoying bandit near my base. That's not as high of a jump as I expected. But when I flipped the switch to MFG, I got a whopping 144 fps. If you're just interested in high performance play, then you'll want to set DLSS to Ultra Performance. With no frame generation, I got 144 fps when I used my freaky Bene Gesserit compel ability on a nearby enemy. When I started dissecting a broken Ornithopter, the RTX 5090 managed 156 fps on FG. And then, when I had to outrun the sun itself because my skin was practically on fire, I got up to a wild 257 fps. Awesome, right? Wrong. You see, I noticed straight from the tutorial that Multi-Frame Generation was an issue. As I said, DLSS 4 isn't magic. The generated frames you're getting aren't perfect, so you may see some artifacts, like a pixelated asset, just for a moment. Some games hide this well, but Dune: Awakening is not one of them. Just from moving the camera around, I noticed the foliage around me become distorted. Even the ground looked like it had a hard time keeping up, with little blotches in the sand appearing. Unfortunately, this isn't the magical performance we saw in those RTX 50-series trailers. If you absolutely need the frame generation because you're on a lower spec 50-series rig, do it. But I'd avoid it for now, at least until either Nvidia or Dune: Awakening gives us an update. But overall, if you're interested in getting one of the best gaming laptops, you can expect some spicy performance without all the DLSS 4 magic. Settings Frames per second TAA 60 fps DLSS: DLAA 63 fps DLSS: DLAA, FG (2x) 88 fps DLSS: DLAA, MFG (4x) 144 fps DLSS: Ultra Performance 114 fps DLSS: Ultra Performance, FG (2x) 156 fps DLSS: Ultra Performance, MFG (4x) 257 fps

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store