logo
How the grand old dame of the US Navy navigated NZ's nuke-free policy

How the grand old dame of the US Navy navigated NZ's nuke-free policy

Newsroom16-05-2025

Analysis: Here's one for the ship spotters. One of the biggest American warships ever to visit New Zealand sailed into Wellington on Friday morning.
There are brass bands. There are flags and bunting. The 19,600 ton (17,800 tonne) USS Blue Ridge is the flagship of America's Seventh Fleet and, at the age of 56 years, is also the grand old lady of the US Navy.
(As best I can discover, the Blue Ridge is the biggest US Navy vessel to visit since the 1968 Vietnam War-era visit of the aircraft carrier USS America, which fully laden was 83,573 long displacement tons, which is 84,914 US tons, or 77,031 metric tonnes, or … oh, never mind, it was big).
The ship's leadership is scheduled to meet with Kiwi counterparts and local leaders to discuss ways of improving operational readiness, advancing future military capabilities, and enhancing the US-New Zealand bilateral relationship.
'This historic port visit by the USS Blue Ridge and our 7th Fleet team speaks to deep ties the US and New Zealand share,' says Vice Admiral Fred Kacher, commander of the US 7th Fleet. 'Our partnership is rooted in our common values and respect, and our visit here represents an important opportunity for us to further strengthen the bond between our nations and our navies.'
So, umm, the question not addressed by the US State Department press release: how are we getting around the nuke ship ban to allow US warships to visit again?
Like I say, this is one for the ship spotters.
New Zealanders had protested US nuclear-powered ships since the visits of the cruisers USS Truxtun and Long Beach in 1976. But things really came to a head when the destroyer USS Texas visited Auckland and Wellington in 1983. My recollection (but I'm damned if I can find a source to confirm this) is a protester in a kayak banging his paddle on the side of the ship and declaring gleefully, 'I can hear the nukes rattling inside!'
Kevin Hackwell went on to lead Forest & Bird, but he was a young member of the peace movement at the time. He and a friend got wind from the police, a month out, that the Texas would be visiting. So they spent that month training in the sea – and when it steamed into Wellington Harbour, they swum out from Point Jerningham.
The plan, Hackwell tells me, was to spraypaint 'Ban the Bomb' on the hull – but that proved impossible in the choppy waters. So instead, he tied a neoprene ribbon to the anchor chain.
They got spotted and had to swim away; when they got back to shore, police were waiting to arrest them.
The following year, the Fourth Labour Government was elected and soon after, David Lange banned visits from nuclear-powered or nuclear-armed ships. To America, this act of defiance undermined its strategic position in friendly ports around the world.
Although New Zealand was still willing to accept visits from non-nuclear US ships (as it always has from French and Royal Navy ships), the Reagan Administration stuck resolutely to its 'neither confirm nor deny' policy.
That's not to say there weren't attempts to send US ships to New Zealand. The US quietly negotiated to send an ageing tub named USS Buchanan. While theoretically nuclear-capable, everyone knew it didn't carry nukes. But when the New Zealand Government (in something of a communications breakdown) turned down even the Buchanan, that was the final straw.
The US barred any visits by any naval ships to New Zealand, and the visits of any New Zealand navy ships to its ports, and the Anzus alliance crumbled.
There was one more comms breakdown in 2003, that I discovered and reported as political editor of the Sunday Star-Times. The US Army landing craft USS Great Bridge, based in Guam, sought permission for a routine US$1.4m refit in a commercial dockyard in New Zealand. It was halfway down the Pacific, when an American official somewhere found out and ordered action stations.
The ship's captain was cabled and reminded of the US ban on military ship visits, and the vessel was redirected to Australia.
Subsequent diplomatic cables, published on Wikileaks, revealed American embassy discussions of the incident, and my reports.
'Milne's article posited that the US Government lost a chance to break the 20-year diplomatic stalemate, noting that PM [Helen] Clark claimed it was 'highly likely' that a request for such a refit would have been approved once it was determined that the ship fit New Zealand's anti-nuclear legislation.'
Perhaps my articles back then were overly sympathetic to the US Government – because the subsequent leaked cables to Washington DC described me as 'the respected Sunday Star-Times reporter', and my articles as 'well-balanced'. I guess you take the wins where you can get them!
Then, after years of negotiations between successive New Zealand and US governments, the long stalemate finally ended in 2012, when US Defence Secretary Leon Panetta announced he was lifting the prohibition on ship visits. And in 2016, PM John Key agreed to the arrival of the destroyer USS Sampson, for the New Zealand Navy's 75th birthday celebrations in Auckland.
The Sampson never made it to the birthday party. The Kaikōura earthquake hit, and the American ship instead detoured to the small South Island town, where captain and crew assisted with the emergency response. The first US warship visit in 30 years was not to Wellington or Auckland, but to Kaikōura.
In 2021, PM Jacinda Ardern welcomed another destroyer, the USS Howard. And this week, the biggest post-rapprochement visit of all, the USS Blue Ridge.
The difficulty is, New Zealand's nuclear-free policy hasn't changed. And neither has the American policy to 'neither confirm nor deny'.
So how have the two nations negotiated their way through this? With a lot of determination and goodwill, is the short answer – and perhaps a degree of grace and humility.
There won't be any visits from nuclear-powered aircraft carriers or submarines – New Zealand law prohibits visits from nuclear-powered vessels.
As for nuclear weapons, the law reads: 'The Prime Minister may only grant approval for the entry into the internal waters of New Zealand by foreign warships if the Prime Minister is satisfied that the warships will not be carrying any nuclear explosive device upon their entry into the internal waters of New Zealand.'
So ahead of this week's visit, we may be certain that the US sought diplomatic clearance. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs would have conducted an assessment, before advising Christopher Luxon that the Blue Ridge is neither nuclear-powered, nor nuclear-armed.
That would allow him to satisfy himself, as the law requires, that the USS Blue Ridge is compliant with New Zealand's nuclear ships ban. And the US is not required to compromise its 'neither confirm nor deny' policy.
Kevin Hackwell doesn't question the PM's assessment that the Blue Ridge isn't nuclear armed. US Navy surface ships, by doctrine, do not carry nuclear weapons.
But he got close to the US Navy once before; he doesn't think New Zealand needs to get close again. 'The US is proving to be a very unreliable ally,' he says.
'Given the stance of the US, particularly in the Asia-Pacific region against China, we should be distancing ourselves. We shouldn't be militarily aligned with them. We shouldn't be aligned with China either. New Zealand should be taking an independent foreign policy and military stance.'
To be fair, New Zealand's foreign policy remains officially independent. And what is apparent is that Luxon is taking a wait-and-see approach as tensions between the US and China, on either side of the Pacific, heighten. His initial instincts to align more closely with the US have clearly been shaken by Donald Trump's volatility on foreign policy, and his fervour for a trade war.
Luxon is right to pause and take time.
As for Hackwell, he is now 69. He lives in Wellington, but his days of swimming out to warships are done. 'I just about died last time. I got hypothermia. No, I'm not swimming out to the Blue Ridge today!'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mass evacuation after wartime bombs found
Mass evacuation after wartime bombs found

Otago Daily Times

time2 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Mass evacuation after wartime bombs found

An area was cordoned off opposite Cologne Cathedral after the discovery of World War 2-era bombs. Photo: Reuters TV Thousands of people have been evacuated from central Cologne in western Germany following the discovery of three wartime bombs, in what the city authority called the largest such operation since the end of World War 2. An evacuation zone with a radius of 1000 metres was cleared from 8am on Wednesday (local time), affecting about 20,500 residents along with many workers and hotel guests in the city's old town and Deutz district. Three American bombs, each with impact fuses, were found during construction work on Monday in Deutz, a bustling area on the bank of the River Rhine. Bomb disposal experts planned to disarm the ordnance. Unexploded bombs are often found in Germany, where many major cities sustained heavy damage during the war. The evacuation area includes one hospital, two retirement homes, nine schools, and many hotels and museums. "Everyone involved hopes that the defusing can be completed in the course of Wednesday. This is only possible if all those affected leave their homes or workplaces early and stay outside the evacuation area from the outset on that day," the city authority said in a statement. The measures caused major transport disruptions in the city of over 1 million people, with Germany's national rail operator warning that many trains would be diverted or cancelled. A stretch of the Rhine would be blocked off before the bomb disposal operation begins. The Rhine, which runs from the Swiss Alps to the North Sea via Cologne, is one of Europe's key waterways for the transportation of commodities such as grain and coal. Private television station RTL, whose main office is located in the evacuation zone, interrupted its morning news programme. "We have to leave," the news anchor said, grabbing his bag as the lights were turned off.

27 killed as Israeli army opens fire near Gaza aid point
27 killed as Israeli army opens fire near Gaza aid point

NZ Herald

time3 days ago

  • NZ Herald

27 killed as Israeli army opens fire near Gaza aid point

A plume of smoke erupts as vehicles move along a road used by displaced people fleeing from Khan Yunis westwards to al-Mawasi in the southern Gaza Strip on June 3, 2025 after the Israeli military had issued an evacuation order the previous day. Photo / AFP Twenty-seven people were killed in southern Gaza on Tuesday as Israeli troops opened fire near a US-backed aid centre, with the military saying the incident was under investigation. United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres decried the deaths of Palestinians seeking food aid as 'unacceptable', and the world body's rights chief condemned

Gaza Is The ‘Hungriest Place On Earth', As Israel Continues Stranglehold On Aid
Gaza Is The ‘Hungriest Place On Earth', As Israel Continues Stranglehold On Aid

Scoop

time7 days ago

  • Scoop

Gaza Is The ‘Hungriest Place On Earth', As Israel Continues Stranglehold On Aid

'Gaza is the hungriest place on Earth,' OCHA spokesperson Jens Laerke told reporters in Geneva, stressing that it is the only defined territory in the world where the entire population is at risk of famine. ' The aid operation that we have ready to roll is being put in an operational straitjacket that makes it one of the most obstructed aid operations, not only in the world today, but in recent history,' he said. Mr. Laerke explained that out of nearly 900 aid trucks that were approved to enter from the Israeli side since the reopening of the Kerem Shalom border crossing between Israel and the war-torn enclave ten days ago, less than 600 have been offloaded on the Gaza side. An even lower number has been picked up for distribution in Gaza, he said, pointing to the 'congested, insecure' routes which humanitarians are assigned to use by the Israeli authorities, as well as 'significant delays' in the approvals. Drip-feed of desperation The OCHA spokesperson stressed that the limited number of truckloads coming in is a 'trickle'. ' It is drip-feeding food into an area on the verge of catastrophic hunger,' he insisted. Mr. Laerke added that many of the trucks were 'swarmed by desperate people' on the way. 'It's a survival reaction by desperate people who want to feed their families,' he said, adding that the aid on the trucks 'had been paid for by the donors to go to those people'. 'I don't blame them one second for taking the aid that essentially is already theirs, but it's not distributed in a way we wanted,' he explained. On Wednesday, hungry crowds overran a UN World Food Programme (WFP) warehouse in Deir Al-Balah in central Gaza, where limited stocks of wheat flour had been pre-positioned for use by the few bakeries able to resume operations. The incident reportedly left two people dead. In a statement WFP reiterated warnings over 'the risks imposed by limiting humanitarian aid to hungry people in desperate need of assistance'. 'Paid for' aid must be delivered OCHA's Mr. Laerke insisted once again on the fact that the UN and partners have 'tens of thousands of pallets of food and other life-saving assistance' ready to enter Gaza to relieve the suffering. ' The aid has been paid for by the world's donors, who expect us on their behalf to deliver it. It is cleared for customs, it is approved and it's ready to move,' he said. A new US and Israeli-backed aid distribution scheme run by a private entity called the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation started operating independently of the UN this week in the Strip. On Tuesday at least 47 Palestinians were reportedly shot and injured trying to collect aid from its distribution facility in the south, according to information received by UN human rights office, OHCHR. Aid scheme to bypass UN 'not working' In reaction to the incident OCHA head in the Occupied Palestinian Territory Jonathan Whittall warned on Wednesday that the US-Israeli distribution scheme was "engineered scarcity: four distribution hubs located in central and southern Gaza, secured by private US security contractors, where those Palestinians who can reach them will receive rations." Mr. Laerke told reporters that this 'alternative modality' is 'not working' as it does not meet people's needs. He added that it constitutes a 'violation of basic principle of impartiality', and that criteria for getting aid have to be based on need, and not the ability to walk for kilometres to a distribution point. ' It creates chaos, and it creates a situation that is extremely dangerous for people,' Mr. Laerke said. 'Even if you enter one of those distribution points, pick up a package, the minute you're out of it… Are you a target for looters again? Yes, you are.' The OCHA spokesperson reiterated calls by the humanitarian community for the reopening of all crossing points into Gaza, to enable delivery from all corridors, including from Jordan and Egypt. 'We need to be able to deliver food directly to families where they are,' as has been the case in the past, he said. Highlighting the challenges for humanitarian access, Mr. Laerke said that over 80 per cent of the Gaza Strip is currently within Israeli militarized zones or under displacement orders. Since the ceasefire between Israel and Hamas collapsed on 18 March nearly 635,000 people in the enclave have been displaced yet again.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store