logo
Kate Forbes should be chair of Highlands and Islands Enterprise

Kate Forbes should be chair of Highlands and Islands Enterprise

First though, I should say there is absolutely no reason to doubt the primary reason for her departure. Standing again means another five years as an absentee parent. I have filled that role and know that there is really no way round it. Politics, particularly with serious responsibilities, is not a family-friendly occupation.
Read More:
Dingwall, for practical purposes, is as distant from Edinburgh as from London. Ms Forbes is surely right to criticise the modesty of creche facilities at Holyrood but the reality is that attentive parenthood and seven, or even six, days a week of heavy political duties do not really mix. A choice has to be made and I respect her for making the one she has.
No matter who is taking such a decision, there are always other factors in play. If independence was round any foreseeable corner, would she stay? If the party dynamics were more congenial would it make a difference? These are all hypotheses which can be speculated upon but should not detract from straightforward acceptance of the reason given.
Why am I sorry to see her go? There are two principal reasons. First, she is patently head and shoulders above those around her in terms of ability and, heaven knows, Scotland needs people of ability – regardless of party affiliation – to be involved in its devolved affairs, whether in government or opposition.
The second runs a little deeper and more personal. There are very few at Holyrood who has any ingrained knowledge of, or care very much about, causes to which I have devoted a disproportionate part of my own political life – the land, the language and the people of our fragile periphery. Ms Forbes was a clear exception.
To most of Scotland, never mind the wider world, these are arcane matters. There is no particular reason why Ecclefechan or Easterhouse should concern themselves with crofting or ferries or Gaelic or land reform or fishing or depopulation of places which could, with wiser interventions, be lively, flourishing communities.
This is, quite reasonably, reflected in those they elect which in turn means that government as it relates to these complex, minority matters is in the hands of politicians with no particular interest or empathy. This void is eagerly filled by civil servants who share the same lack of qualifications. The result is insipid legislation and decision-making which displays no awareness of a bigger picture.
Kate Forbes was very different in these respects and I would have been very pleased to see her elected two years ago as First Minister for the duration of this Parliament. Her competence and the ability to make a difference on matters she personally cares about would have been two welcome breaths of fresh air.
The people who now sit around the Bute House table with her thought differently, from Swinney downwards, and rallied to the standard of Humza Yousaf. In other words, they did what they were told. This is the Sturgeon clone-ocracy continuing; cheer-leaders for all the wokery and Greenery that Ms Forbes stood against, from Highly Protected Marine Areas through Deposit Return Scheme to a convicted rapist in a women's prison and the madness that ensued.
Much was made of Ms Forbes' religious affiliations as if the Free Church of Scotland was some outlandish cult which ate its young, rather than having its roots in radical resistance to the power and patronage of landlordism. The irony was that those who reviled her were themselves much more cultish and gender politics was their false god until that tide turned.
McAllan, Gilruth, Constance and indeed Swinney…. When has any of them demonstrated capacity for an original thought or strain of resistance to whatever orthodoxy was prevailing at the time? In these respects, Ms Forbes was significantly different and she paid a political price. I doubt if she will look back with regret at being out of it.
Anyway, I have a suggestion which, as ever, is intended to be helpful. I cannot help noticing that there is currently a vacancy for a chair of Highlands and Islands Enterprise. It is a three day week job based in Inverness. Personally, I would have absolutely no complaint if Ministers cut through the bogus quango appointment system and offered it to Ms Forbes.
This would serve three purposes. First, it would give her a role to which her talents are well suited. Second, it would give that agency a strong voice in corridors of power, whoever happens to occupy them. Third, it would signal a return to days when people appointed to these jobs were expected to be free spirits, rather than servants of the Scottish Government.
It is 60 years this month since the incoming Labour government fulfilled a manifesto commitment to establish the Highlands and Islands Development Board, HIE's predecessor, with wide-ranging social and economic powers. For decades, one of its qualities was that the people who led it, quite irrespective of party politics, were serious public figures, expected to be thorns in the side of governments.
Under the dull, centralising mentality of SNP rule, all that has gone and HIE is, like all the other quangos, required to maintain a low profile on a shrunken budget. I doubt if Ms Forbes would settle for that which is exactly why I would recommend her appointment. I'm sure the incumbent could be persuaded to hang on for another few months.
I have no insight into Ms Forbes intentions but suspect she would be happier in a role where she can make a real difference without the encumbrance of party politics. Better still indeed if, this time next year, it is a Labour-led government she can be a thorn in the side of while the remnants of the Sturgeon-Yousaf regimes contemplate five long years of opposition.
Brian Wilson is a former Labour Party politician. He was MP for Cunninghame North from 1987 until 2005 and served as a Minister of State from 1997 to 2003.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Nicola Sturgeon opens up on suffering miscarriage and reveals 'I always felt it was a girl'
Nicola Sturgeon opens up on suffering miscarriage and reveals 'I always felt it was a girl'

Daily Record

time6 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Nicola Sturgeon opens up on suffering miscarriage and reveals 'I always felt it was a girl'

Nicola Sturgeon opens up on suffering miscarriage and reveals 'I always felt it was a girl' The former first minister admitted she still carried a "sense of guilt" following her miscarriage as she felt "conflicted about the pregnancy". Nicola Sturgeon was speaking with ITV News (Image: ITV News) Nicola Sturgeon has spoken in emotional detail about the miscarriage she suffered at the age of 40 in 2010. ‌ Speaking on a primetime ITV News interview tonight, the former first minister admitted she still carried a "sense of guilt" following her miscarriage as she had felt "conflicted about the pregnancy". ‌ Sturgeon, who was then serving as deputy first minister, suffered a miscarriage on December 30, 2010 and spent the morning of Hogmanay at the early pregnancy clinic at Glasgow Royal Infirmary with her husband Peter Murrell. ‌ Speaking to ITV News presenter Julie Etchingham, the ex-SNP leader said: "To this day and possibly forever, I carry a sense of guilt that I miscarried the baby because I had been conflicted about the pregnancy. It was very close to the 2011 Scottish election, the SNP would be going for reelection. "I would've been six months pregnant at the time. Will I be able to cope? "I still carry a bit of that guilt. If I had been genuinely happy with the pregnancy, if I genuinely wanted it unequivocally and unambiguously, if I hadn't had all those moments of wishing I hadn't been pregnant, would I, would the miscarriage not have happened? ‌ "Was that my punishment for not, and it's totally irrational. I get how irrational that is." The MSP, who stands from Holyrood next year, continued: "I was in the toilet. And I'm not gonna get into the graphic detail, buteffectively, and I've heard other women describe it like this as well, I, I managed to call Peter through, and effectively we flushed what would've become our child down the toilet." Etchingham responded: "You vividly imagined this baby that you lost, who she was. Just tell me that bit that you wrote about her? ‌ Sturgeon added: 'I always felt it was a girl. I can see her in my mind's eye. Dark hair, dark eyes. "She'll be 14 now. Um, so it's, it is a bizarre thing for somebody who I've never had that overwhelming maternal yearning. "I don't feel incomplete because I don't have a child. And yet that little girl, I can totally conjure up in my mind and still feel, feel a sense of loss over her and guilt. She's a part of, of my story." Article continues below

Nicola Sturgeon memoir reveals letters from Donald Trump
Nicola Sturgeon memoir reveals letters from Donald Trump

The Herald Scotland

time11 minutes ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Nicola Sturgeon memoir reveals letters from Donald Trump

In 2019, a judge ruled Trump International Golf Club Scotland Ltd had to pay the legal bills incurred by the Scottish Government following his unsuccessful challenge. Ms Sturgeon has never met the US President – a fact she said she is not 'unhappy about'. Following the dispute over wind farms, the now-President also sent Ms Sturgeon cuttings of newspaper articles about the 'evils of wind power' around 2018 while building his Aberdeenshire golf course. She said he had underlined passages, writing 'CRAZY!!!!' in 'all thick black Sharpie'. While Ms Sturgeon has not met Trump, she said she received a 'green ink' letter – a term used to describe eccentric views. Read more: Nicola Sturgeon memoir: Why former first minister cried for Boris Johnson 'I hated it': Sturgeon on the SNP's #ImWithNicola branding He had taken 'umbrage' to a proposed offshore windfarm amid fears it would ruin the view from his Aberdeenshire golf course. 'He sent me cuttings of newspaper articles about the evils of wind power,' she writes. 'He underlined passages and scrawled single words followed by multiple exclamation marks in the margins – 'CRAZY!!!!' for example, all in thick black Sharpie.' Later, Ms Sturgeon had a phone call with Trump ahead of his first inauguration in January 2017. Ms Sturgeon was in her constituency office in Govanhill for the phone call and described the exchange ranking 'amongst the most absurd of my entire time in office'. She said she felt she had to 'say her piece' immediately and emphasised the need for the 'longstanding' relationship between Scotland and the US continue. But she also condemned some of the rhetoric used during his presidential campaign and said she hoped policies like a Muslim ban would not be part of his administration. She also asked about his Scottish businesses. 'I doubt he heard a single world,' she said. The President then launched into a 'monologue', according to the former first minister. Paraphrasing the President, she said he asked whether Ms Sturgeon was aware he was Scottish on his mother's side, before describing Scotland as having a 'mad obsession' with wind farms. 'Had I noticed what had happened to the US economy since his election?' she writes. 'No President had ever created since a strong economy and he wasn't even in office yet. His popularity ratings were soaring too. It was unprecedented. And his sons? Did I know he had the smartest sons any father had ever had? And so it went on.' Ms Sturgeon then said: 'When the call ended, I wondered if I had just woken from a very bad acid dream.' A few minutes after that call, Ms Sturgeon's chief of staff, Liz Lloyd received a call from President Trump's national security adviser General Mike Flynn. He was calling to 'ask Liz if it was true that the President-elect had just spoken to the First Minister, and if so, could she tell him what had been discussed? It seemed that he had known nothing about it.' The bizarre exchange comes as the President made a parting dig at Ms Sturgeon following his visit to Scotland last moth. He praised John Swinney but said he did not "have a lot of respect" for the "woman that preceded him", adding that she was a "terrible first minister".

Nicola Sturgeon admits Yes side 'was not ready' when 2014 independence referendum campaign started
Nicola Sturgeon admits Yes side 'was not ready' when 2014 independence referendum campaign started

Daily Record

time36 minutes ago

  • Daily Record

Nicola Sturgeon admits Yes side 'was not ready' when 2014 independence referendum campaign started

Nicola Sturgeon admits Yes side 'was not ready' when 2014 independence referendum campaign started The former SNP leader admitted the pro-independence campaign wasn't ready for the "scrutiny" going up by "several gears" when a referendum was agreed in 2012. Nicola Sturgeon was speaking with ITV News (Image: YouTube) Nicola Sturgeon has admitted the Yes side was "nowhere near ready" when Scottish independence referendum campaign kicked-off in 2012. ‌ A plebiscite was agreed between Alex Salmond and then prime minister David Cameron after the SNP won a majority of MSPs at the 2011 Holyrood election. It triggered a two-year campaign which culminated in the vote on September 2014, when the No side won by 55 per cent to 45 per cent. ‌ Sturgeon was a senior figure in the Yes campaign and oversaw the drafting of the Scottish Government White Paper which was supposed to sell the benefits of independence to the public. ‌ Speaking with ITV News presenter Julie Etchingham, the former first minister admitted the pro-indy campaign had been slow to start. Etchingham told Sturgeon: "You admit the SNP was nowhere near ready for it". The former first minister replied: "Uh, we weren't. We were I think, caught a bit off guard. We hadn't done, to be candid enough, of the substantive heavy lifting work - that we then, you know, did in advance of, of the vote in 2014. She continued: "We went from, you know, what had been the case, you know, we supported independence, we argued for it in a very, sort of big picture way. The other side said it was a terrible idea. But as soon as it became clear that there was actually gonna be a referendum, the scrutiny went up several gears. And that's what we weren't ready for in that moment." ‌ She also claimed almond 'hadn't read' the white paper on independence, as she spoke of her 'cold fury' with her former leader over his 'abdication of responsibility' on the key document. The 670-page long paper was prepared by the Scottish Government in the run-up to the 2014 referendum, with the aim of answering questions about independence ahead of the crucial vote. But in a TV interview ahead of the publication of her memoir Frankly, Sturgeon, who was deputy first minister at the time, insisted that Salmond 'really didn't engage in the work of the drafting or the compilation of the White Paper at all'. ‌ Speaking about her former boss, Sturgeon said: 'He was the leader, he was the First Minister, and he hadn't read it.' Joanna Cherry, a former SNP MP, responded tonight: "If Nicola Sturgeon thinks the SNP were ill prepared for the 2014 independence referendum, then why hasn't she used the last 10 years to address the issues the white paper did not adequately address? "Many of us argued strongly for this behind the scenes and she shut us down." Article continues below

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store