State Minority Commission pulls up BMC for Jain temple demolition
'The BMC action was excessive. They should have given more time to vacate the premises after the stay order ended,' said Chetan Dedhia, vice-chairman of the Commission, who surveyed the site on Tuesday evening. The BMC action had led hundreds of members of the Jain community to undertake a silent protest march on the city's streets on April 19.
As per the survey, the BMC team reached the spot at 10 am and started the demolition at 10.15am, although the details will be confirmed after watching the CCTV footage. 'The structure was situated inside a compound; it was not in any public space. There was no issue of the temple coming in the way of any development project. Then why did the BMC act so hastily?' questioned Pyare Khan, chairman of the Commission.
On April 7, the city civil court had rejected the temple trust's plea against demolition. However, it granted interim protection from demolition for seven days for the Trust to file an appeal in HC, which expired on April 15, a day prior to the incident.
Anil Shah, a trustee of the temple, demanded that strict action be taken against all the officials involved in the demolition. According to survey, the request for police protection was made by the BMC on April 4 when the stay order was in place. 'We are investigating if any more officials were involved and we will demand action against them,' Khan said.
As per BMC records, the 2,200-sq-ft premises of the temple are categorised as a recreational ground. 'There are several discrepancies in the society, which is why it doesn't have a proper occupancy certificate,' said Swapnaja Kshirsagar, additional commissioner K East ward. 'We will issue notices to demolish all the illegal structures within the society in the next two days.'
While devotees and Rashtrasant Muni Nilesh Chandra, president of the Mahaveer Mission Trust who led Saturday's protest, demanded that the temple be reconstructed, the Commission said, 'The decision on the reconstruction can be taken only by the Bombay high court. Till then, devotees can continue worshiping at the spot, but the land will continue to remain disputed.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
37 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
ECI presser raises more questions than answers to the issues highlighted by INDIA bloc: MK Stalin
CHENNAI: Chief Minister and DMK president MK Stalin on Monday said that the press conference addressed by the full Bench of the Election Commission of India (ECI) led by CEC Gyanesh Kumar has raised more questions than answers about the Special Intensive Revision (SIR). He said the press conference raised more questions than what the INDIA Bloc had already highlighted. The CM, in his post on the X handle, asked how there could be so many deletions of eligible voters when house-to-house enumeration was taken. Pointing out that the enrolment of new voters is abnormally low now, the CM asked: " Were these young voters enumerated? Has any database been compiled to show how many youngsters who turned 18 on the qualifying date were included?". Stalin underscored that the procedure for enquiry and two appeals, along with their timelines as contemplated under the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, might exclude a huge number of voters in the forthcoming elections in Bihar. The Tamil Nadu CM also questioned if the ECI will take these practical difficulties into account while conducting the SIR in other States. The question assumes significance since the revision may start in Tamil Nadu soon. Recalling that on July 17, the DMK requested the ECI to delete the names of deceased voters from the rolls by undertaking the exercise contemplated in its notification dated May 1, the CM asked when this would be done by the Commission. The DMK president also asked the Commission what prevented the ECI from enlisting Aadhaar as one of the acceptable documents to prove a voter's claim.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
HHRC takes suo motu cognisance of employee declared 'dead' in Aadhaar records
TNN Haryana Human Rights Commission The Haryana Human Rights Commission has taken suo motu cognisance of a news report alleging that a Public Health Department employee was denied salary as his Aadhaar record wrongly showed him as "deceased." The report - published in a leading daily on August 12 - said Vijay Kumar, a resident of Valmiki Basti, Ramlila Parao in Rohtak, is alive and continues to perform his duties regularly. He has been reportedly deprived of his lawful remuneration due to the administrative lapse, it said. Upon review, the commission observed that the health department failed to update the employee's record on the Haryana Kaushal Rozgar Nigam Limited portal, despite being aware that the "deceased" status in Aadhaar was erroneous. The full bench of the commission, comprising Chairperson Justice Lalit Batra and Members Kuldip Jain and Deep Bhatia, in its order dated August 14, noted that such treatment appears contrary to Article 7 of the United Nations International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), which recognises the right to just and favourable conditions of work, including remuneration ensuring a decent living for workers and their families. The commission further noted that non-payment of wages for work performed constitutes a violation of the employee's human rights, particularly the right to livelihood and dignity as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and reaffirmed in international human rights instruments. The department's inaction amounts to an arbitrary deprivation of earnings, impairing the complainant's ability to support himself and his family. Reflecting on the situation, the commission recalled a sentiment from Shakespeare's famous play Julius Caesar. "The Commission is reminded of the well-known sentiment from Shakespeare's play namely Julius Caesar, wherein it is suggested that the dead may, at times, wield greater influence than the living. The present matter, however, reflects a grim inversion of that idea - a person who is unquestionably alive and faithfully performing his duties has, for official purposes, been treated as deceased. This erroneous classification has not only deprived him of his lawful remuneration but has also inflicted indigity and avoidable hardship," the commission observed. To disregard the service of a living employee in such a manner is an administrative failing that the Commission cannot overlook, reads the order. As per the order, the commission finds prima facie evidence of administrative negligence and vi-olation of the complainant's rights. "The department's own records declare the complainant 'deceased', yet his daily presence at the workplace and faithful discharge of duties bear living testimony to the contrary. This striking contradiction of acknowledging his work but denying him his wages underscores the urgency of immediate action to restore his salary, correct all records and ensure that no employee is ever again placed in such an anomalous and unjust position," the order states. The commission has called for a report on the necessary corrections to the Aadhaar record of the complainant from the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Rohtak, and the Commissioner and Secretary, Citizen Resources Information Department (CRID), Government of Haryana, before the next hearing. The HHRC has directed the engineer-in-chief, Public Health Engineering Department, Haryana, Panchkula; the Superintending Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Circle Rohtak; and Sandeep Kumar, Executive Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Rohtak, to submit a detailed report within four weeks. The officials have been asked to cover: Steps taken to correct the complainant's status in all official records, including Aadhaar; measures to ensure immediate disbursement of all pending salary dues; and departmental accountability for the delay and the hardships caused. The matter has been listed for hearing on September 23.
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
Haryana rights panel takes cognizance of employee declared ‘dead' in Aadhaar records
Chandigarh: The Haryana Human Rights Commission has taken suo-motu cognizance of a media report highlighting an incident where a serving employee of the Public Health Department, a resident of Rohtak, was allegedly denied his salary in the post-COVID period because his Aadhaar record shows him as 'deceased'. This is despite the fact that he is alive and continues to discharge his duties regularly. As a result of this administrative lapse, the employee has reportedly been deprived of his lawful remuneration for an extended period. Upon review, the Commission observed that the Public Health Department failed to update the employee's record on the HKRN portal, despite being aware that the 'deceased' status in Aadhaar was erroneous. This inaction has caused the complainant prolonged financial hardship and mental agony, undermining his right to work with dignity and creating unnecessary uncertainty. The Commission expressed concern that such errors can severely affect an individual's livelihood, confidence, and peace of mind. The full bench of the Commission, comprising Chairperson Justice Lalit Batra and members Kuldip Jain and Deep Bhatia, noted that such treatment appears contrary to Article 7 of the United Nations International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (ICESCR), which recognises the right to just and favourable conditions of work, including remuneration ensuring a decent living for workers and their families. The non-payment of wages for work performed constitutes a violation of the employee's human rights, particularly the right to livelihood and dignity as guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution and reaffirmed in international human rights instruments. The department's inaction amounts to an arbitrary deprivation of earnings, impairing the complainant's ability to support himself and his family. Reflecting on the situation, the Commission recalled a sentiment from Shakespeare's famous play 'Julius Caesar' that 'sometimes the dead may exert greater influence than the living'. However, the Commission observed that the present case revealed a stark inversion of that idea: a man undeniably alive, diligently performing his duties, is being officially treated as deceased. This erroneous classification not only deprived him of his rightful wages but also subjected him to indignity and unnecessary hardship. Ignoring the service of a living employee in such a manner is an administrative failure that the Commission cannot overlook. Finding prima facie evidence of administrative negligence and violation of the complainant's rights, the Commission directed immediate action to restore the employee's salary, correct all records, and ensure that no employee faces such an anomalous and unjust situation in the future. The Commission has called for a report on the necessary corrections to the Aadhaar record of the complainant from the Additional Deputy Commissioner, Rohtak, and the Commissioner and Secretary, Citizen Resources Information Department (CRID), before the next hearing on September 23.
