Air India crash victims' families not satisfied with ‘vague' initial report
The preliminary report from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau, published on Friday, said both of the plane's fuel switches moved to the cut-off position immediately after takeoff, stopping fuel supply to the engines.
'In the cockpit voice recording, one of the pilots is heard asking the other why did he cut-off. The other pilot responded that he did not do so,' the report reads.
The London-bound Boeing 787 Dreamliner crashed into a medical college shortly after taking off from Ahmedabad airport on 12 June, killing 241 people on board.
Another 19 people died on the ground and 67 were seriously injured.
The cousin of sisters Dhir and Heer Baxi, who were flying home to London after surprising their grandmother for her birthday and died in the crash, said he was not satisfied by the report.
Ishan Baxi, who lives in Ahmedabad, said: 'We're still hoping for a more transparent and honest investigation that doesn't shy away from addressing possible mechanical flaws or lapses in protocol to avoid future potential accidents.
'I just hope the final report brings full clarity on what exactly failed and who's accountable. It shouldn't hide behind vague terms.
'More than anything, it should push for real changes so this never happens again.'
Relatives of Akeel Nanabawa, his wife Hannaa Vorajee and their four-year-old daughter Sara Nanabawa, who died in the crash, said in a statement that the report was 'the first stepping stone' and that the family were still 'working our way through the weight of our loss'.
'Moving forwards, we require honesty, transparency and an unwavering commitment to uncovering the full truth,' they said.
'We seek justice and answers, both of which are essential for us to find any sense of closure.
'We accept God's fate, but knowing what happened will help ease our hearts and allow us to begin the long journey of healing.
'Above all, we hope that by pursuing the truth, no other family will ever have to endure the shock, uncertainty, and profound sorrow that we have lived through this past month.'
A lawyer advising some of the families affected by the crash said the findings were deeply concerning.
Demetrius Danas, an aviation lawyer at Irwin Mitchell, said: 'We're continuing to speak with and advise families who've been affected by the Air India crash.
'Understandably, all they want is to be provided with answers.'
Fifty-two British nationals were killed, making it one of the deadliest plane crashes in terms of the number of British fatalities.
The preliminary report says all crew members were breathalysed on their arrival at Ahmedabad airport and found to be 'fit to operate the flight'.
No significant bird activity was detected near the flight path and the aircraft started to lose altitude before crossing the airport perimeter wall.
Investigators have identified 'components of interest for further examinations', the report says.
Fuel samples taken from tanks used to refuel the aircraft were 'satisfactory'.
The UK transport secretary, Heidi Alexander, said on Sunday that she had confidence in the investigation. 'We stand ready to assist the Indian authorities if they require that from us,' she said.
Asked whether she thought Indian authorities were doing a good job getting to the bottom of the causes of the crash, she said: 'On the basis of what I have seen so far, yes, but we do stand ready to provide any assistance. The US National Transportation Safety Board is also involved on an ongoing basis.'
An Air India spokesperson said: 'Air India is working closely with stakeholders, including regulators. We continue to fully cooperate with the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau and other authorities as their investigation progresses.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
5 hours ago
- The Independent
More than 40,000 sign petition to block Bayeux Tapestry's loan to Britain
More than 40,000 people have signed a petition to stop the Bayeux tapestry from being loaned by France to the British Museum in London. Art historian Didier Rykner launched the petition on the platform after French President Emmanuel Macron offered to loan the tapestry as part of an art exchange during a trip to London in July. But Rykner is concerned that the movement could damage the Medieval relic. "It's already very fragile. There are tears and holes in the fabric. Any movement, any vibration can cause damage," Rykner said. "You cannot use a fragile piece of art for diplomacy." The British Museum said in a statement that its conservation and collections management team is experienced at handling and caring for this type of material and is working with colleagues in France on the tapestry's display. While the origins of the 70-metre (76 yards) long Bayeux tapestry are obscure, it is believed to have been the work of English embroiderers, whose stitching tells the story of the Norman invasion in 1066 and the arrow that hit England's King Harold in the eye. In the years after William the Conqueror took the English throne, the tapestry was taken to France, where it has remained, displayed at the Bayeux Museum in Normandy since 1983 after decorating Bayeux Cathedral for seven centuries. It has been taken to Paris twice. "The last two times it was moved were first by Napoleon and then by the Germans (during the Nazi occupation). I cannot think of why you would want to be the third to move it," Rykner said. The Bayeux Museum will close for renovations for two years starting later this year, and the tapestry will need to be rehoused during that time, a representative for the museum said. The French state owns the tapestry, and France's Ministry of Culture will be responsible for coordinating the tapestry's transfer to a temporary home. It was not immediately available for comment.
BBC News
8 hours ago
- BBC News
Watch: Lemurs and Capybaras face the scales at London Zoo's annual weigh-in
Update: Date: 09:56 BST Title: Time to weigh some of the zoo's most popular residents Content: Adam GoldsmithReporting from London Zoo Next up, we're taking a detour via the capybaras. We're told these two - Gizmo and Kiwi - have become some of the most popular animals at the zoo. Our reporter Lilah will be speaking to the rodent's keeper in a moment - watch live as she gets the lowdown. Update: Date: 09:24 BST Title: Watch live as London Zoo's lemurs are weighed Content: Adam GoldsmithReporting from London Zoo The lemurs are on the scales. Repeat, the lemurs are on the scales. There's action in the enclosure as a few of the braver ring-tailed lemurs surround the Chelsea the zookeeper. You can watch the lemur weighing live at the top of the page. Update: Date: 09:20 BST Title: Lemurs up first, with the help of some snacks Content: Adam GoldsmithReporting from London Zoo First, we're visiting the ring-tailed lemurs. This group of eight are native to southern and south-west Madagascar, and are lively this morning as they climb around their enclosure. The animal's keepers have polished off a large set of scales, and are gathering the animals interested with the help of some snacks. Weighing them might take a while, and we'll update you as soon as we get some figures. We're told that these critters usually weigh-in at around three kilograms. Update: Date: 08:49 BST Title: Humboldt penguins ready for weigh-in - are you? Content: Adam GoldsmithReporting from London Zoo We're just getting set up here at London Zoo, where the Humboldt penguins are already expecting their breakfast. We'll have a live stream running through the day right here with the penguins - you can watch live at the top of the page. You can also follow our camera crew around the other residents as the weigh-in begins. First up, our guides are planning on taking us to see the ring-tailed lemurs; that should happen around 09:00 BST - animal dependent, of course. Update: Date: 08:38 BST Title: Government sets out new standards for zoos Content: Today's weigh-in is taking place after the UK government set out new standards for zoos in May. This marks the first change to zoo standards in over a decade and will come into effect from May 2027. The changes are: Zoos and aquariums now have two years to adapt to these changes. The government's animal welfare minister Baroness Hayman says that while the UK's zoos are 'world leaders' in setting the standard for how animals should be treated, these reforms now 'lay the foundation for an even stronger, even more compassionate future for all zoos and aquariums'. Update: Date: 08:13 BST Title: What is weigh-in day all about? Content: Aside from offering some great photo opportunities, weigh-in day is an essential opportunity for London Zoo to collect important data from its inhabitants. Weighing animals regularly enables the zoo to monitor the development of its animal infants, for instance, and even helps to identify pregnancies. It is also a good opportunity to cross-reference and check data that's been recorded throughout the year. Once all the data is collected, it's added to the Zoological Information Management System (ZIMS). This database is shared with other zookeepers at institutions around the world, and helps compare information on endangered or threatened species. Update: Date: 08:01 BST Title: London Zoo's annual weigh-in day has arrived Content: Adam GoldsmithReporting from London Zoo Good morning from Regent's Park as London Zoo gears up for one of the biggest events in their calendar- the annual animal weigh-in. From capybaras to camels, the zookeepers will attempt to weigh and measure over 10,000 animals to monitor their health and wellbeing, before sharing that vital data with conservation groups and sites around the world. It's a task that's easier said than done though, when you've got a population of animals across over 300 species. I'm expecting to see a fair share of innovative solutions as a result, and I've come with a carrot or two up my sleeve in the hope of tempting some of the zoo's inhabitants onto the scales. As I make my way around the zoo, you can come along too by tapping watch live at the top of the page.
Daily Mail
16 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Tenant left furious over landlord's shock $300 fee for issue that happens in almost every home: 'Excuse me?'
A tenant has sparked a heated feud with her landlord for trying to charge her $312 after a plumber discovered her hair had blocked the shower drain. Landlord Neil sent an email to renter Lauren after completing the end-of-lease inspection, informing her that he would be deducting money from her bond. 'Unfortunately, we've had to deduct £150 ($A312) due to a blocked shower drain, which our plumber confirmed was caused by hair buildup. This isn't considered fair wear and tear, so it's a tenant liability,' Neil's email read. Clearly furious with the email, Lauren replied: 'Sorry, £150 ($A312) for HAIR? You're seriously trying to charge me for having hair that falls out when I shower? 'Is that not something that happens to literally every human being?' Neil responded, insisting his charge was reasonable because the plumber had to remove, clean and reassemble the shower drain due to her clogged hair. 'We've never had this issue with other tenants. The plumber said the drain was completely blocked with hair and soap scum,' the landlord explained. 'It required removal, cleaning, and reassembly. This is excessive use and goes beyond standard cleaning. Again, not wear and tear.' Refusing to back down, Lauren fired back: 'Neil, I lived there for 18 months. I washed my hair. That's not "excessive use". That's being a clean adult. 'You think it's fine to pocket £150 ($A312) of my money because YOU didn't maintain the pipes? Let me be very clear. This isn't resolved. I'll be raising a dispute with TDS (Tenancy Deposit Scheme). And I'll be sharing this ridiculous charge far and wide.' However, the landlord was adamant that he was standing by his charge. 'You're welcome to raise a dispute. But if you'd flagged the blockage before moving out, we could've addressed it sooner. Instead, it was left for us to resolve. The charge stands,' he responded. Lauren said she never 'flagged' the blockage because she thought the water was 'draining fine' during her tenancy. 'Maybe because I cleaned the trap regularly? Maybe because I'm not a troll? Your plumber found hair... shocking! On a planet of mammals. You're charging me for being a woman who showers. See you in dispute,' she hit back in her response. It's unclear what happened between the landlord and tenant - but British property strategist Jack Rooke re-shared the email exchange on his social media channel. 'Some of the things you hear about landlords trying to get away with in disputes is crazy - but no, he's in the wrong here. He can't charge for that,' Jack said. The landlord was adamant that he was standing by his charge '£150 ($A312) deducted for "having hair". This is exactly why landlords get a bad reputation. 'Normal wear and tear is never a tenant charge. These cases only create disputes, stress, and wasted time. 'We make sure deposits are handled fairly so landlords stay protected and tenants don't feel taken advantage of. That way both sides get a fair outcome.' His video has been viewed more than 30,000 times with many siding with the renter. 'Tell the landlord where to stick it. I'll see you in court - that simple,' one suggested, laughing. 'The moment I stepped into my new rental I took photos and did a video walk through. It's clear the landlord and previous tenants didn't look after the property,' another explained. One person pointed out: 'Well I mean if the plumber charged that much then...' However, another quickly chimed in, saying: 'It's still irrelevant. The landlord eats the cost. Because whether you like it or not, it IS wear and tear.' Meanwhile, many shared their own experiences after they had money deducted from the house bond following an end-of-lease clean. 'I think I got £70 ($A145) deducted for the oven "not being clean" and that wasn't me staying up until 3am scrubbing it clean. I just paid it because I wanted out,' one said. 'We got £150 ($A312) taken from our deposit because of paint dust on one of the skirting boards. Landlords are unreal,' another shared. 'My previous landlord tried to charge me for all the existing damage to the property that was there when I moved in. Inventory and pictures for evidence in dispute and I won! Never accept a landlord taking the mick,' one revealed.
