67 Years Later, the Nuclear Car is Still an Impossibility
Business 67 Years Later, the Nuclear Car is Still an Impossibility
Science fiction or just futuristic?
In 1958, an American automaker introduced the world to a ⅜-scale concept that proposed harnessing the power of the atom as a means of propelling vehicles. The Ford Nucleon was certainly an icon of its time, with styling off the pages of a sci-fi comic book, complete with a miniature nuclear reactor on the backend. The idea behind it was, to put it nicely, ambitious: a car powered by a small nuclear reactor with a range of at least 5,000 miles.
Ford Nucleon Concept Ford
Ford
The idea wasn't totally out there, believe it or not. The nuclear reactor would use uranium fission to generate power, a concept-turned-reality by the U.S. Navy. The first nuclear-powered submarine, the USS Nautilus, officially began operating in January 1955, three years before the Nucleon made its public debut. According to the Naval History and Heritage Command, in 1957, the Nautilus logged its 60,000th nautical mile. By 1961, the Navy had a dozen nuclear-powered submarines in service.
Also in 1961, the USS Enterprise became the world's first nuclear aircraft carrier. The carrier was deactivated in 2017 after 56 years in service. Per the National Museum of the U.S. Navy, the USS Enterprise is currently waiting to undergo nuclear recycling. While submarines and aircraft carriers are a far cry from a car, they serve as proof that nuclear-powered mobility is achievable.
USS Enterprise, Puget Sound, Washington, 1945
U.S. Navy Bureau of Ships
Nuclear-powered cars are still a sci-fi fantasy
A quick glimpse at the Ford Nucleon shows that the design reflected high hopes for the future of the automotive industry. It features a low-slung design with a cabin over the front wheels and a nuclear reactor in the rear. Its sleek, futuristic styling is an embodiment of the age's obsession with atomic energy and outer space. Ford may have been well ahead of our time too, given that the Nucleon still looks like something you'd only see in a sci-fi movie or video game.
Ford Nucleon Concept Ford
Ford
Fast forward 67 years, and the Ford Nucleon is still an impossibility. At the time of its conception, nuclear power was in its infancy, but Ford believed that nuclear fission would become more compact and affordable with time. In that sense, the concept was more of a vision than a realistic model designed to come to fruition within a few years.
Ford's vision didn't stop with the nuclear-powered car, though. Along with the Nucleon concept, gas stations would eventually become obsolete, replaced by recharging stations for nuclear reactors. Once the Nucleon's reactor ran out of juice, presumably after 5,000 miles, it would be swapped out for a new one. There would be more than one type of reactor, too, with options for more fuel-efficient and high-performance units.
Ford Nucleon Concept Ford
Ford
Unfortunately, the nuclear car is still little more than a glimpse of the far-off future of the automotive industry. While the public was ignorant of the harmful effects of radiation in the mid-1900s, we know better today. Modern nuclear reactors capable of producing enough power to move a vehicle require around five feet of radiation shielding material, like concrete, to protect the driver from a dangerous dose of radiation. Still, just because a car couldn't come to market at the time, that didn't stop engineers and designers from thinking ahead.
"This model is an eloquent example of the extent to which research into the future is conducted by advanced stylists of Ford Motor Company. It indicates the stylist's unwillingness to admit that a thing cannot be done simply because it has not been done," said George R. Walker, Ford Vice President of Styling at the time.
Ford Nucleon isn't the only nuclear-powered concept car
Interestingly, Ford wasn't the only automaker cooking up a nuclear-powered pipe dream in 1958. The Simca Fulgur made its debut at the 1959 Geneva Auto Show, the New York Auto Show, and the 1961 Chicago Auto Show. The Fulgur was a concept designed to give the public a glimpse into the automotive industry in the year 2000, featuring two wheels balanced by gyroscopes with voice controls and radar guidance.
1958 Simca Fulgur Concept
Chicago Auto Show
Following World War II, Simca was one of the largest automakers in France. Ultimately, the brand became defunct as an independent automotive manufacturer when it became a subsidiary of Chrysler in 1970. In 1978, Chrysler sold off its European operations to PSA Peugeot Citroën, marking the end of the Simca moniker altogether.
Much more recently, the Cadillac World Thorium Fuel concept, shortened to WTF, was unveiled in 2009. It was far from the average concept car, even with the Simca Fulgur and Ford Nucleon in the running. Much like the Nucleon was a glimpse into the future, the WTF concept celebrates 100 years of Cadillac by hypothesizing what cars could look like another century into the future.
2009 Cadillac World Thorium Fuel concept
Loren Kulesus
The Cadillac WTF concept is designed to run on thorium, a nuclear fuel that's extremely dense and has a high potential energy. One gram of thorium is equal to roughly 7,500 gallons of gasoline. The concept car features four wheels at first glance. Upon further inspection, however, each wheel is actually six smaller wheels, each of which is powered by its own induction motor. According to designer Loren Kulesus, all 24 wheels would need to be adjusted every five years, but no other maintenance would be required for 100 years.
Final thoughts
The Ford Nucleon may have fallen into obscurity as a one-off concept car that may end up being an impossible dream for well beyond the foreseeable future, but it's still an iconic symbol of its time. It lives on in popular culture as the inspiration for the nuclear cars in the Fallout video game franchise. Perhaps one day cars will move under nuclear power, but whether that happens in our lifetime is up for debate. There are many major advances to be made in atomic technology before any nuclear-powered car can even begin to make the jump from concept to production.
Copyright 2025 The Arena Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This story was originally published May 6, 2025 at 5:00 PM.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jim Cramer on NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)'s Chips: 'We Only Have One Ace in Our Hand'
We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA) stands against other stocks that Jim Cramer discusses. Discussing NVIDIA Corporation (NASDAQ:NVDA), Cramer said if the president wants to win, he needs to 'show his trump card, NVIDIA'. 'So, how could the president turn around these negotiations with the Chinese? Okay, so I've been thinking about this. I always like to be constructive. I'm a constructive fella… We only have one ace in our hand, and apparently, we don't want to play it, the chips from NVIDIA. Under the previous administration, NVIDIA was allowed to sell China high-quality chips, but not their best stuff, which were reserved for America and a bizarre list of 18 friendly countries. Now, the Trump administration won't even let NVIDIA sell their second or third best stuff. As CEO Jensen Huang said on our show, it's logical to presume that China won't use these chips for the military precisely because they're American chips… A close-up of a colorful high-end graphics card being plugged in to a gaming computer. NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) develops computing, graphics, and networking technologies, including AI software, data center systems, gaming GPUs, autonomous driving platforms, and tools for digital twins and enterprise AI adoption. Additionally, the company works on customized AI solutions through collaborations. Overall, NVDA ranks 4th on our list of stocks that Jim Cramer discusses. While we acknowledge the potential of NVDA as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 20 Best AI Stocks To Buy Now and 30 Best Stocks to Buy Now According to Billionaires. Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at Insider Monkey.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Cybertruck Sales Are So Bad That We Gasped
There's little left for us to say that can further embarrass the Tesla Cybertruck, a vehicle that was supposed to be the culmination of Elon Musk's genius. And maybe this is what Musk's genius looks like. The luckless EV has faced eight recalls so far, and its trademark stainless steel panels, when they aren't flying off, have demonstrated that they're better at serving as a shiny canvas for spray paint than as the armor of an "apocalypse-proof" tank. But somehow, its already dire sales are now even worse than expected. In the entire first quarter of 2025, Tesla has managed to sell just 7,100 Cybertrucks in the US, according to registration data from S&P Global Mobility cited by the Wall Street Journal. It's an astounding and rapid plummet, when in the fourth quarter of 2024, Tesla sold close to double that amount, with roughly 13,000 Cybertrucks. A lot changed between those two quarters — like Musk embarking on a spectacular speedrun to destroy his and Tesla's image, mainly by leading the Trump administration's charge to gut the federal government. These actions, and Musk's personal espousing of far-right politics, sparked worldwide protests against him and his automaker. It has yet to recover, with Tesla's total sales in the US dropping nine percent in the first three months of this year. There are other factors at play, too, like the success of its Chinese competitors and its aging vehicle lineup, but the imploded brand reputation looms largest. And more than any other of its vehicles, the Cybertruck for one reason or another has embodied the public's souring sentiment on Musk, becoming prime targets for vandalism. They're also notoriously unreliable, sold for nothing less than $100,000 before cheaper $70,000 versions were desperately rolled out, and launched with a range over 150 miles shorter than what Musk promised. In all of 2024, the company sold fewer than 40,000 Cybertrucks. The most recent quarter's tally makes Musk previous boast that the automaker would sell up to half a million Cybertrucks per year even more ridiculous. Is it any wonder that buyers are staying away? So few people want to buy these things that in May Electrek reported that Tesla was sitting on an inventory worth $800 million of 10,000 unsold Cybertrucks — an embarrassment as much as it is a logistical headache. Dealerships have resorted to dumping their glut of the unorthodox pickup trucks in deserted parking lots. The pain isn't likely to stop anytime soon. Trump's tariffs, which factored into Musk's fallout with the president, will drive up the costs of car parts. The administration also plans to axe tax credits for purchasing EVs, demolishing a huge incentive for American consumers to buy from automakers like Tesla. More on Tesla: Terrifying Footage Shows Self-Driving Tesla Get Confused by the Sun, Mow Down Innocent Grandmother Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
You Are Completely Unprepared for What Tesla's Robotaxi Actually Looks Like
We've finally gotten a glimpse at one of Tesla's Robotaxis in action. But don't expect your socks to be blown off. As seen in a bystander's footage taken in Austin, Texas, that Elon Musk has proudly reshared, it's literally just a black Model Y with the word "Robotaxi" scrawled on the side in a painfully outdated graffiti font. The future is truly upon us. "Beautifully simple design," Musk tweeted, presumably through a pained grimace. To be clear, this isn't the Cybercab, Tesla's currently in-development car that's supposed to function exclusively as an autonomous taxi, with an extremely boneheaded design that features only two seats and no steering wheel. What we're seeing, instead, is a regular Tesla with a software update (and a mid-life crisis design flourish.) "These are unmodified Tesla cars coming straight from the factory," Musk explained in a followup tweet, "meaning that every Tesla coming out of our factories is capable of unsupervised self-driving!" The self-driving cabs are right around the corner. According to a Bloomberg report last month, Tesla plans to launch its Robotaxi service in Austin on June 12, with development reportedly ahead of schedule. Around the time of the reporting, Musk confirmed in a tweet that the automaker had completed its first test of operating a Robotaxi with no human behind the wheel on a public road. In the recent footage, there was no driver physically present, either. The cab service will start with about 10 vehicles operating in the city, according to Musk. At first, only Tesla employees will be allowed to ride in them. But Musk insisted that the service will quickly expand, if all goes to plan. In one of his trademark grand promises, the billionaire estimated that the city would be crawling with over 1,000 Tesla robotaxis "within a few months" of launching, and upped the ante further by adding that more than a million self-driving cars would be roaming American roads by the end of 2026. There are still huge question marks hovering over the entire thing. Tesla's current self-driving offerings, like its misleadingly named Full Self-Driving feature, are considered to have Level 2 autonomy. That means a human driver must be physically present and ready to take control at any moment. But Robotaxis will need to operate at Level 4 autonomy and higher, which entails they're capable of driving with no human present, though only in limited conditions. That's a concerning leap, as Tesla's safety record with its existing FSD is already questionable, and it's yet to demonstrate that it can even accomplish Level 3. The choice of location explains a lot. Texas virtually has no special regulations in place for autonomous vehicles. A prospective Robotaxi basically just has to follow the same safety requirements as any other car, along with having cameras and other data recording systems installed. And due to a 2017 Texas law, cities can't intervene by imposing their own regulations, leaving everything handled by the state. At this stage, it's also unclear how Tesla plans to teleoperate the vehicles, a term that describes the use of humans to remotely supervise or even completely control the Robotaxis as they prowl public roads — something that Tesla's competitors in the space also do, though they try to avoid talking about. Tesla has put up listings for developing a teleoperation system — but, perhaps tellingly, has avoided providing any further details. More on Tesla: Cybertruck Sales Are So Bad That We Gasped