Orzo with Minted Ricotta Recipe
Giant Eagle's Chef Crystal Baldwin is helping us get ready for Easter Sunday dinner with this great side dish!
MORE INFORMATION:
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
38 minutes ago
- The Hill
In-N-Out sues YouTuber it says posed as employee, made ‘bizarre and lewd' comments
LOS ANGELES (KTLA) — Southern California burger joint In-N-Out is not amused by a YouTuber's prank video filmed at several of its restaurants. Last week, In-N-Out filed a lawsuit against online prankster Bryan Arnett, who posed as an employee at multiple local restaurants, took orders from unsuspecting customers, and made lewd comments while wearing In-N-Out-branded clothing. In the video, which has since been restricted to private viewing, Arnett, a resident of Fillmore, is seen interacting with customers and making comments that In-N-Out says damage the chain's reputation. The pranks themselves were purportedly captured on Easter Sunday, at a time when the restaurants were closed, the lawsuit states. '[Arnett] visited multiple In-N-Out locations in Southern California … wearing afake uniform bearing [In-N-Out]'s trademarks,' a lawsuit filed last Friday in United States District Court reads. '[Arnett] made lewd, derogatory, and profane remarks, such as stating that In-N-Out had cockroaches and condoms in its food, and that In-N-Out Associates put their feet in lettuce served to customers.' The lawsuit also accuses Arnett of asking customers if they want their food made 'doggy style,' a play on the restaurant chain's famous 'animal style' menu options. He also tells one customer that they are 'only serving gay people,' which leads to the customer driving away, and asks another if they would like to try the 'monkey burger,' which comes with a 'damn-near black bun.' In one moment that the restaurant brand found particularly troubling, Arnett asks a customer if they would like to sleep with his wife and allow him to watch. 'I like watching my wife sleeping with other men. Is that something you'd be interested in?' he says in the video, as reported by SFGate. He then posted the videos to his YouTube page and his approximately 330,000 subscribers, despite warnings from In-N-Out to remove them for infringing on its company trademarks and posting without the consent of the customers who were filmed. After the lawsuit was filed, the main prank video was switched to private. On Monday, a follow-up video was posted in which Arnett commented on the filing. That video has also been taken down or removed from public viewing. This wasn't the first time Arnett has allegedly made prank videos at the expense of In-N-Out. Previous videos include him placing an employee of the month plaque with his own photo on a wall of a restaurant, and In-N-Out alleges he had previously been asked to leave one of its restaurants and refused. In-N-Out, which is seeking a lifetime ban of Arnett from its restaurants, any money made from his video, and potential financial damages incurred, called Arnett's stunt and the comments he made 'defamatory, insulting, racially insensitive, bizarre, and lewd,' and said they did not come across as jokes but instead made the restaurant chain look bad. In the since-removed follow-up video, Arnett says he is not particularly worried about the lawsuit and said, 'whatever's going to happen is going to happen.'
_fitted.png&w=3840&q=100)
Miami Herald
20 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Influencer made lewd videos while pretending to be In-N-Out worker, CA lawsuit says
A social media influencer is being sued after he was accused of posting lewd and derogatory videos dressed as an employee of a popular restaurant chain. The federal lawsuit was filed by In-N-Out Burgers on June 20 in the Central District of California against Bryan Arnett. McClatchy News reached out to Arnett for comment June 24 but did not immediately hear back. Arnett is accused of impersonating an In-N-Out employee and posting videos to his social media accounts. In April, Arnett went to multiple In-N-Out locations in California, dressed as a worker with a fake uniform and recorded himself interacting with customers, according to a civil complaint. 'He made lewd, derogatory, and profane remarks, such as stating that In-N-Out had cockroaches and condoms in its food, and that In-N-Out associates put their feet in lettuce served to customers; offering food products 'doggy style'; and asking a potential customer whether the customer would sleep with his wife and allow Arnett to watch,' the lawsuit said. The lawsuit said Arnett went to the locations on Easter Sunday while the restaurants were closed, pretended to be a drive-thru associate and took customers' orders as a prank, filming them without their consent. He then posted the videos to his social media accounts and told viewers the restaurants were unsanitary and the business was 'not a welcoming or family-friendly establishment,' according to the complaint. 'In doing so, (Arnett) ensured that his remarks—from the purely defamatory to the lewd, unsettling and bizarre—did not come across as mere jokes by some unaffiliated prankster but instead reflected directly and negatively on In-N-Out,' the complaint said. In one video, Arnett told a customer, 'I like watching my wife sleep with other men. Is that something you would be interested in?' the lawsuit said. He told another customer the restaurant was 'only serving gay people' that day, according to the complaint. Arnett has 334,000 subscribers on YouTube, 276,000 followers on Instagram and 170,000 followers on Tik Tok with nearly 10 million likes. The lawsuit said Arnett 'benefits from posting videos on social media.' According to TikTok's Creator Rewards Program, eligible content creators are able to make money from posting videos. The restaurant is suing for federal trademark infringement, false designation of origin and disparagement, common law trademark infringement and unfair competition, business defamation and common law trespass. Several of the counts stem from Arnett wearing a fake In-N-Out uniform with the restaurant's logos and colors, the lawsuit said. The lawsuit is seeking an undetermined amount in damages.
New York Post
17-06-2025
- New York Post
Inside King Charles' ‘private' compromise with Prince Andrew after Trooping the Colour, Garter Day bans
King Charles and his troublesome younger brother, Prince Andrew, have reached a compromise in private, The Post understands. The disgraced Duke of York, 65, was once again excluded from Monday's Garter Day ceremony for the fourth consecutive year. The royal sit-out took place just days after this year's Trooping the Colour ceremony — an event Prince Andrew did not participate in, nor did his daughters, Princesses Beatrice and Eugenie. 4 King Charles and his troublesome younger brother, Prince Andrew, have reached a compromise in private, The Post understands. Getty Images While Andrew skipped out on the events, which are strictly reserved for working members of the Firm, it doesn't mean that his brother had excluded him altogether. According to reports, Andrew — who has been a Garter Knight since 2006 — secretly joined other members of the order for the behind-closed-doors lunch and investiture on Monday. '[Andrew] won't participate in the procession but he has been invited to the lunch and investiture,' a source told the Express. His under-wraps inclusion is seen as a compromise by both sides, the insider added. Garter Day — or Order of the Garter — was founded by King Edward III in 1348 and is the most senior and the oldest British Order of Chivalry, according to the British Museum. 4 The monarch's brother was once again excluded from Monday's Garter Day ceremony for the fourth consecutive year. Getty Images 4 Charles and Prince William are reportedly keen to limit Andrew's public appearances with the rest of the addition to the king and queen, the Prince and Princess of Wales were in attendance, alongside Knights and Ladies personally chosen by the monarch. It's been widely reported that both Charles and future king, Prince William, are keen to limit Andrew's public appearances with the rest of the royals. Since 2022, rules have been tightened so that only working members of the royal family and their young children are allowed to attend Trooping the Colour in an official capacity. Start your day with all you need to know Morning Report delivers the latest news, videos, photos and more. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters When Andrew stepped down as a working royal shortly after his friendship with convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein came to light, he was kept at an arm's length by Charles and the rest of the Windsor clan. As a result, Andrew has not taken part in Trooping the Colour and Garter Day since 2022 — the year his mother Queen Elizabeth II died. 4 Andrew's last public outing was on Easter Sunday when he joined the rest of the royals at St George's Chapel in Windsor. Getty Images Still, it's said that the monarch, 76, talks to Andrew behind closed doors, but rarely invites him to official royals events. Andrew's last public outing was on Easter Sunday when he joined the rest of the royals at St George's Chapel in Windsor.
