Calls for police to maintain bin strike presence
Calls have been made for the police to maintain their presence at Birmingham bin strike picket lines as collections continued to be affected.
Roger Harmer, Lib Dem leader on the city council, urged police not to wait until the city reached crisis point before stepping in.
His comments came after the number of officers sent to police the picket lines were cut and amid reports of bin lorries being blocked by striking workers at depots.
On Monday lorries were seen driving up to depot gates in Tyseley but parking up inside as striking workers stood outside. West Midlands Police said it would continue to assess the situation and ensure its presence is in line with its core policing responsibilities.
Why are Birmingham's bin workers on strike?
Bin strike exposes divide between rich and poor
I haven't had my recycling collected since January
Harmer urged West Midlands Police to have a "consistent presence" at picket lines and not to wait "until the city reaches crisis point again".
"Human-height mounds of black bags" became commonplace in the city and Harmer described it as "a national embarrassment and terrible for the city's reputation".
"The police have powers to stop strikers from obstructing working crews – they should not wait for the city to reach crisis point again before acting," he added.
However some people in the city said a crisis point had already been reached for them.
Judith Whalley told BBC Radio WM that the strike was starting to affect her ability to leave her home in Hockley.
"As it's not been collected, people are just putting more rubbish and more rubbish out," she said.
"Once again, I'm about to be trapped because it's spreading across the pavement but I can't get down the pavement on my mobility scooter.
"With the weather the way it is, [it is] really getting smelly."
However, Ms Whalley said she sympathised with those on strike: "Nobody could afford to lose that sort of money."
Lorraine Boyce, from West Heath, said her hallway was full of recycling but some people had stopped separating it.
"Probably they've got sheds or halls, full of recycling," she said.
"They've started putting that in bags so a lot more black bags have appeared.
"It's very, very depressing."
Police patrols had previously helped secure the smooth exit of trucks from depots in recent weeks by using powers under Section 14 of the Public Order Act, a law used around public gatherings.
But a force spokesperson confirmed those powers were no longer in place as the issue "does not currently meet the threshold".
It came after waste collections were disrupted on Thursday when bin lorries were blocked from leaving two depots by striking refuse workers, leading to reports of rubbish piling up in parts of the city again.
Police were parked nearby and were seen getting out of their patrol cars but they remained a distance away.
The council said it was not safe for their trucks to leave the depot due to the police no longer using their Section 14 powers.
"The gates had been locked for safety reasons, and we had already attempted to get lorries out of the depot. The gates were reopened at 8 am," it said.
Union Unite, which organised the strike, has been approached for a comment on Monday's picket lines.
The all-out strike began on 11 March in a dispute with the council over plans to downgrade the roles of drivers, which the union said would see pay cuts of up to £8,000.
This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service which covers councils and other public service organisations.
Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Why are Birmingham bin workers on strike?
PM living in 'la-la land', striking bin worker says
Bin strike policing cut as waste builds up again
Striking bin workers block depot lorries again
Bin collections not back to normal - politicians
Birmingham City Council
Unite
West Midlands Police
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Bin strike deal offer watered down, says union
A deal offered to striking bin workers in Birmingham has been watered down, their union claims. Unite has called for further negotiations with the city council after a "ball park" proposal discussed at talks with conciliation service Acas had been revised "by government commissioners and the council leader". An all-out strike in the city is now in its third month, after staff walked out on 11 March over plans to downgrade some roles, which the union says could cost workers £8,000 a year. Birmingham City Council has been approached for a response over the current deal it is offering. Talks between the Labour-run council and Unite have been taking place with the conciliation service since the start of May, after previous negotiations to resolve the strike ended without a solution. The union's latest statement accuses the authority of missing deadlines on the proposals which had been tabled on Friday evening. "After weeks and weeks of saying one thing in public and another to workers, the government commissioners finally allow a proposal to be put on the table," said Unite's General Secretary Sharon Graham. She said the offer had been watered down by the council leader and government commissioners "who were not in the negotiating room". Ms Graham said the offer would be discussed with reps over the weekend and a detailed response would be issued ahead of a reconvened Acas meeting. "The actual decision makers now need to be in the room at the further ACAS talks," she said. A court order preventing striking workers from delaying bin lorries leaving depots in the city will continue indefinitely, it was confirmed on Thursday. The union said it was preparing to challenge the injunction, but said it agreed to abide by the law on picketing. On 23 May, when the injunction was granted, the city council said disruption at depots had led to a backlog of up to 12,800 tonnes of waste. Police recently scaled down their presence on picket lines, where they had been helping to ensure bin trucks could get out of the depots, to prevent waste piling up on city streets. The West Midlands force withdrew after stating the issues did "not meet the threshold" to impose powers under Section 14 of the Public Order Act. Follow BBC Birmingham on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram. Bin strike picket court order to continue indefinitely Council gets court order over bin lorry blocking Union blames council for lack of bin strike deal Why are Birmingham bin workers on strike? Birmingham City Council Unite the Union
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Starmer dragged into Koran-burning court case
Hamit Coskun is quite possibly Britain's most endangered man. Certainly he appears to have a death wish. In February, he took a coach to London, walked up to the Turkish consulate, pulled from his bag a Koran, and set fire to it with a lighter. A video of the incident went viral after Mr Coskun, aged 50, was violently attacked for what he insisted was a meaningful protest and what many other people would view as an anti-Islamic stunt. In the aftermath of the Koran burning, he says two Iraqi men broke into his home in Derby and threatened him with a knife and an ashtray. Police took him from his home and moved him to a safe house elsewhere in the Midlands, a nondescript terrace that I won't describe further for obvious reasons. On Wednesday, he goes on trial at Westminster magistrates' court charged with disorderly behaviour likely to cause 'harassment, alarm or distress' for setting the Koran alight. As he did so, according to the charges, Mr Coskun swore, and then shouted 'Islam is religion of terrorism' in his broken English. He is accused under the Public Order Act of being motivated 'by hostility towards members of a religious group, namely followers of Islam'. Mr Coskun remains unrepentant. He will plead not guilty and intends to go on a tour of the UK burning Korans in other cities, whether he wins or loses his case. He himself has become a cause célèbre. The Free Speech Union has taken up his case and paid for a security team as well as half his legal fees – the National Secular Society is paying for the other half. Meanwhile, an American woman who read about his arrest online plans to fly to the UK and join Mr Coskun in future Koran-burning protests. Mr Coskun's lawyers will argue that he has a human right to peaceful protest, under Article 10 of the Convention on Human Rights, to burn a Koran if he wants to. They have found an unlikely ally: Sir Keir Starmer. Almost a quarter of a century ago, Sir Keir, in his day job as a human rights barrister, successfully argued that a peace activist had the legal right to deface the Stars and Stripes flag in a protest outside a US airbase in Norfolk. In 2001, Sir Keir told the High Court: 'Flag denigration is a form of protest activity renowned the world over.' He added that the court should protect the right of his client – a 59-year-old peacenik – to stage a 'peaceful protest in a free and democratic society'. The High Court agreed with Sir Keir and quashed his client's conviction for disorderly behaviour 'likely to cause harassment, alarm and distress' – the same part of the Public Order Act under which Mr Coskun is charged. His client, Lindis Percy, would later suggest that Sir Keir had told her he had worn underpants emblazoned with the Stars and Stripes so he could show his unwavering support for her whenever he sat down wearing them. Sitting in his safe house, Mr Coskun, a father-of-three, in some ways makes for an unlikely heroic figure. He is diminutive – just 5ft 5in tall – and courageous to the point of madness. He speaks no English, talking through an interpreter via Zoom. It takes him 10 minutes to answer the question: 'How old are you?' because of a mix up over his papers at birth. He says he is officially 50 although he looks older. Mr Coskun came to the UK from Turkey two and half years ago to flee persecution. He is seeking asylum and his case is under review. He is half Armenian and half Kurdish and a committed atheist, who spent close to a decade in jail for membership of a Kurdish political party that Turkish authorities said – and which Mr Coskun denies – was a terrorist front. He was a political activist who was 'abused and tortured' in detention; on one occasion a gun was put to his neck. He had become alarmed at what he sees as the Islamification of Turkey, constitutionally a modern secular state but where, he says, recent times have seen Islamism gain a hold, stoked by Recep Tayyip Erdogan, its authoritarian president, to maintain his grip on power. It explains his decision to make the trip down to London on Feb 13. The week before, he had posted on social media his concern that the Koran was catapulting Turkey to sharia law. 'I have been studying the Koran for 25 years now,' he says, convinced it encourages terrorism. 'So on February 13 I went to London, I took the bus. At 2pm in front of the Turkish consulate. That's because Turkey has been made a base for extremism and that is why I burned the Koran,' Mr Coskun says. He packed the Koran, two lighters (so he had a spare) and then set it alight outside the consulate. All hell broke loose. A video posted on social media shows him shouting while holding the holy book by now in flames. A man comes out of a neighbouring building and asks him why he is doing it. 'Terrorist,' replies Mr Coskun. The man responds: 'You're a f---ing idot', adding: 'I'm going to f---ing kill you now.' He then disappears back inside, comes out and begins attacking Mr Coskun who is punched and pushed to the ground and then kicked – all while still clutching the Koran which continues to burn. A delivery cyclist also appears to run over Mr Coskun's hand as he lies on the ground. His attacker would subsequently plead guilty to assault. 'I don't speak English but I could tell the guy was threatening me. After a minute he came back. I was scared. But that doesn't mean I am a coward,' Mr Coskun says now. 'Then the delivery rider stamped on my hand and threw his bicycle on me before cycling off.' Mr Coskun was first taken to hospital for treatment. He was then arrested and held for 24 hours in the cells, before being summoned to court and released on bail back to his home in Derby. He woke up in the night to find two men – he says they were Iraqis – in his kitchen. 'One had a knife and one had an ashtray. They pushed me against the wall and they had the video of the Koran burning incident on their phone and they told me: 'If you keep doing this you will die'.' They called him an unbeliever and an infidel. Mr Coskun wisely got out of town – he says the incident in his Derby flat was 'far scarier' than the assault on him in London – and removed to the safe house that is now home. There is nothing on the walls. It is bare, bleak and miserable, with curtains covering the windows. But he remains steadfast in his mini-crusade. Win or lose Wednesday's trial, he says: 'Absolutely I will carry on burning Korans. I am an activist. I was really surprised I got charged because I really believe this country was a liberal democracy where freedom of expression existed and I was really shocked by the attitude towards me. 'Absolutely I plead not guilty. I never accept this to be a crime.' Mr Coskun insists 'I don't want to upset anyone' although it's hard to see how he squares that with burning the Koran in public. Burning any holy book must inevitably cause offence but he replies: 'There is nothing wrong in questioning a religion.' He expresses his support for Tommy Robinson, the far-Right, anti-Islam militant just released from jail for contempt of court. 'I love him,' he says. Mr Coskun denies he is a martyr, although he describes his campaign against the Koran as 'his fight'. It is, he insists, his 'democratic right' to burn the Koran if he wants to. He faces a fine if found guilty in the magistrates' court and when he walks free – convicted or otherwise – plans a Koran-burning tour of Liverpool, Birmingham and Glasgow. 'I am ready to pay the cost,' he says. 'It's OK. It's not a problem. I know what could happen to me. They are after me.' Mr Coskun shows me a message sent to him via his social media account that says: 'I will cut your throat… Just wait, you b----d.' The case in the magistrates' court will be keenly watched. It threatens to be a landmark, potentially setting some kind of precedent. Mr Coskun's lawyers will draw on Sir Keir's successful defence of Ms Percy in 2001. Lord Young of Acton, the Tory peer and general secretary of the Free Speech Union, said ahead of the case: 'In 2001, Sir Keir Starmer successfully appealed the conviction of Lindis Percy for desecrating the American flag. 'He persuaded the High Court that the denigration of an object of veneration should not be a criminal offence, and the right to peaceful protest in a free and democratic society should not be overridden by bogus arguments about the need to preserve community cohesion in a multicultural society. 'If Sir Keir was still a barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, the Free Speech Union might well have hired him to defend Hamit Coskun. But I fear he has changed his mind about this issue since becoming Prime Minister, particularly when the object of veneration is a copy of the Koran.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
'We are banging the table to say that it is Stockport's turn'
Stockport council's new leader has demanded action rather than words on the town's call for a Metrolink stop. Mark Roberts was appointed to the top job at the Lib Dem-controlled council last week, having previously served as deputy leader. The new town-hall chief said plans to expand the Metrolink network to Stockport need to move forward, urging the Labour government to 'put its money where its mouth is' to get trams rolling into Stockport town centre. READ MORE: Residents 'terrorised' and flats daubed in graffiti after teenagers tragically killed in motorbike crash in Salford READ MORE: Screams in court as Just Stop Oil activists jailed over 'audacious' Manchester Airport plot "We are banging the table to say that it is Stockport's turn,' Coun Roberts told the Local Democracy Reporting Service. 'It is only right and fair that Metrolink comes to Stockport next, and we do get warm words and I welcome them, but we do need to see action, our residents want to see action on it. 'Stockport has contributed towards Metrolink for enough years now and not seen it delivered yet.' A possible expansion of Metrolink could see Stockport get a link to the east Didsbury line in south Manchester, with the work expected to cost hundreds of millions of pounds. Meanwhile, the regeneration of Stockport has been geared towards a future tram stop, with the town's transport interchange described as being 'Metrolink ready'. Transport for Greater Manchester (TfGM) said last year that it was creating a business case for the expansion to Stockport which should be ready by this September, and that it has already awarded contracts for the design, modelling and appraisal of the construction work. Coun Roberts said the government's spending review would be a key sign of whether the plans are likely to move forward any time soon. "That's something to look out for in the spending review, about ensuring that [Greater] Manchester is given the money that it needs from a transport perspective to be able to deliver things for Stockport, and for government to put its money where its mouth is, saying it believes in this kind of stuff, which they say they do. 'Metrolink to Stockport would be a game changer. It's not just something that Stockport needs, it's what Metrolink and that transport network needs, it needs to be plugging into Stockport, and getting those benefits for the whole of Greater Manchester.' Stockport council's deputy leader, Coun Jilly Julian, added: "It's not just Stockport's turn, it's Manchester's opportunity. 'It's not just Stopfordains getting into Manchester easier, it's about Greater Manchester having better access and connectivity to Stockport, because there's a lot going on here." Local transport minister Simon Lightwood visited Stockport in February and was asked about whether the government would fund the work to expand the tram network. He said any decisions on funding future transport projects 'would be a matter for the spending review' - but added that Parliament will work with local authority leaders to look at what is possible 'within the realism of value for taxpayers.' TfGM and the Treasury were approached to comment.
