logo
Richard Williamson, outlaw bishop who denied the Holocaust and embarrassed the Vatican

Richard Williamson, outlaw bishop who denied the Holocaust and embarrassed the Vatican

Yahoo30-01-2025
Richard Williamson, who has died aged 84, was a renegade Catholic priest who caused embarrassment to the Vatican in January 2009 when it emerged that, shortly before Pope Benedict XVI lifted an excommunication on him imposed in 1988, he had made remarks denying the Holocaust.
The British-born Williamson was a member of the ultra-traditionalist Society of St Pius X (SSPX), founded in 1970 by the French Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre in opposition to the reforms of the Second Vatican Council (1962-65), in particular the rendering into the vernacular of the Mass. When Lefebvre consecrated Williamson and three other SSPX priests as bishops in 1988 against the express orders of Pope John Paul II, the four, and Lefebvre, were automatically excommunicated.
In 2007 Pope Benedict liberalised restrictions on the Tridentine Rite in what was seen as a step towards reconciliation with the Lefebvrists, and on January 21 2009 he lifted the 1988 excommunications. Although the society's bishops remained unable to serve legitimately within the Roman Catholic Church, the Pope hoped that lifting the excommunications might enable a 'more serene' discussion with society members about doctrinal differences.
It emerged, however, that in November 2008 Williamson had claimed in a Swedish television interview (broadcast on the day the excommunications were rescinded) that the Nazis did not use gas chambers and killed no more than 300,000 Jews in concentration camps.
The Vatican claimed that it had not known about Williamson's extreme anti-Semitic beliefs despite the fact that they could easily be found on the internet – and despite the fact that one of the Lefebvrists' original bones of contention was their opposition to the Vatican II document Nostra Aetate, which repudiated the charge of deicide levelled for centuries against the Jewish people.
Nor, apparently, had Vatican officials noticed that as recently as March 2008 Williamson had described as 'authentic' the 'Protocols of the Elders of Zion', a notorious forgery originating in Tsarist Russia which purports to reveal Jewish plots to achieve world domination.
That same year the Catholic Herald had, in what Damian Thompson in the Telegraph described as 'a fruitless attempt to warn the Vatican what he was like', commissioned a front-page exposé of Williamson's anti-Semitism, including what Thompson described as 'his pathetic diatribe against The Sound of Music, of all films, for painting the German authorities in an unsympathetic light'. (Williamson had described the film as 'soul-rotting slush' and claimed that by putting 'friendliness and fun in the place of authority and rules', it invited 'disorder between parents and children'.)
The affair turned into a major public-relations disaster for the Church, attracting criticism from Jewish groups, Catholic leaders and Angela Merkel, the German chancellor. The Chief Rabbinate of Israel suspended contacts with the Vatican, and Williamson was later put on trial in Germany for publicly denying the Holocaust. He was found guilty and fined €12,000.
To begin with, Bernard Fellay, Superior General of the SSPX, stated that Williamson's statements were his alone and that the affair did not concern the SSPX as a whole. A month after the interview, however, the SSPX partly disciplined Williamson by removing him from his position as the head of a seminary near Buenos Aires, while Argentina, which has one of the largest Jewish populations in the world outside Israel, gave him 10 days to leave the country.
In a statement released by the Vatican's Ecclesia Dei commission (a body set up by Pope John Paul II to try to heal the rift with the SSPX), Williamson issued a mealy-mouthed 'apology', saying that his views on the Holocaust had been 'formed 20 years ago on the basis of evidence then available, and rarely expressed in public since'. He added: 'To all souls that took honest scandal from what I said, before God I apologise.'
He did not, however, recant his view that the Holocaust was a fabrication, and the Vatican rejected his apology, saying it did not 'seem to respect the conditions' for his readmission to the church.
But it was not until October 2012 that he was finally expelled from the SSPX, and then only for 'refusing to show respect and obedience deserved by his legitimate superiors'.
The second of three sons, Richard Nelson Williamson was born into an Anglican family in Buckinghamshire on March 8 1940 to an English father and wealthy American mother. From Winchester College he read English at Clare College, Cambridge, and after graduation became a teacher.
Williamson was received into the Catholic Church in 1971, but after a few months as a postulant at the Brompton Oratory, he left and became a member of the SSPX. He entered the society's International Seminary of Saint Pius X at Écône in Switzerland, and in 1976 was ordained a priest by Archbishop Lefebvre.
Williamson subsequently moved to the US, where he served as rector of St Thomas Aquinas Seminary, first in Ridgefield, Connecticut then, after a move, in Winona, Minnesota, remaining rector after his 'consecration' as bishop. He used this occasion as the launch pad for a vitriolic diatribe against the 'poison' at the head of the church in Rome and against a pope guilty of 'the dreadful error of ecumenicalism'. In 2003 he was appointed rector of the Seminary of Our Lady Co-Redemptrix in La Reja, Argentina.
By the time his excommunication was lifted, Williamson had been quoted as saying that Jews had made up the Holocaust, and it was alleged that he believed the September 11 terrorist attacks were part of a US government plot to ensure Jewish world domination. He also supported conspiracy theories regarding the assassination of President John F Kennedy and held extreme views on the role of women. 'A woman can do a good imitation of handling ideas, but then she will not be thinking properly as a woman,' he declared, while on another occasion he observed that 'women's trousers are an assault upon woman's womanhood'.
After his expulsion from Argentina he was reported to have contacted the revisionist historian David Irving, asking how to present his views on the Holocaust without arousing controversy.
Williamson was a vehement opponent of efforts by the SSPX to win reintegration into the Church, which he regarded as being under 'the power of Satan'. Tensions within the society rose following the lifting of the excommunications, and after a number of incidents, including calling for the resignation of Bernard Fellay as the Superior General of the SSPX, Williamson was expelled from the Society in 2012.
Refusing to go quietly, he founded 'SSPX Resistance', with himself as leader, describing it as 'a group of traditional Catholics who wish to practise their Faith without compromise to Liberalism or Modernism'. He proceeded to ordain several more bishops and in 2015 was excommunicated by the Catholic Church for a second time.
Richard Williamson, born March 8 1940, died January 29 2025
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's efforts at Alaska summit applauded by world leaders, while Russia rejoices at no longer being world's pariah: ‘A glimmer of hope has finally opened'
Trump's efforts at Alaska summit applauded by world leaders, while Russia rejoices at no longer being world's pariah: ‘A glimmer of hope has finally opened'

New York Post

time11 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Trump's efforts at Alaska summit applauded by world leaders, while Russia rejoices at no longer being world's pariah: ‘A glimmer of hope has finally opened'

World leaders hailed President Trump's push for a diplomatic breakthrough in the deadly war in Ukraine, calling his sitdown with Vladimir Putin a 'glimmer of hope' on Saturday — a jarring contrast to the triumphant mood in Moscow at no longer being viewed as a global pariah. 'President Trump's efforts have brought us closer than ever before to ending Russia's illegal war in Ukraine,' UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a statement. 'His leadership in pursuit of an end to the killing should be commended. 6 Starmer said the world was closer than before to an end to the war in Ukraine. The reactions came after Trump debriefed European leaders, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, about his summit with Putin during a Saturday morning phone call. 'While progress has been made, the next step must be further talks involving President Zelensky,' Starmer added. 6 The German Chancellor was relieved that no land swap had been negotiated without Ukraine at the table. Leaders expressed relief that no land was negotiated without Ukrainian leaders present, after Trump last week had hinted that discussions could include 'some swapping of territories.' 'There were no territorial negotiations between Putin and Trump over the heads of Ukraine and the Europeans, said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in a video address. 'That is good news.' 'A glimmer of hope has finally opened to discuss peace in Ukraine,' rejoiced Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. 6 Meloni expressed cautious optimism after the bilateral summit. REUTERS European leaders stressed their desire to see unwavering security guarantees for Ukraine as part of a deal, including possible NATO and EU membership. 'I welcome, in this regard, the readiness of the United States to contribute,' French President Emmanuel Macron posted on X Saturday. 'It will also be essential to draw all the lessons from the past 30 years, in particular from Russia's well-established tendency not to honor its own commitments,' he added. 6 Macron expressed some skepticism at Russia's track record of honoring its committments. POOL/AFP via Getty Images Others, however were much more skeptical of Moscow's intentions. 'The results of the Alaska summit confirm that while the US and its allies are seeking paths to peace, Putin is still only interested in the greatest possible territorial gains and the restoration of the Soviet empire,' said Czech Prime Minister Petr Fiala. 'Today, it is even clearer that Russia respects only the strong, and Putin has once again proven to be a cunning and ruthless player,' Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said on X. 6 The leaders met for over three hours in Alaska Friday. In Russia, the summit was seen as a clear win — the red carpet was even rolled out for Putin. The Russian strongman left the world stage facing no immediate sanctions despite not agreeing to calls for a long sought-after cease-fire. 'The President of Russia personally and in detail outlined to the President of the United States our conditions for ending the conflict in Ukraine,' Deputy Chairman of Russia's Security Council Dmitry Medvedev wrote on Telegram. 'Following a nearly three-hour conversation, the head of the White House refused to escalate pressure on Russia.' 6 Trump rolled out the red carpet for Putin, a gesture that didn't go unnoticed in Russia. REUTERS The meeting, where Putin received the red-carpet treatment, also signaled the end to Moscow's diplomatic isolation, a status the Kremlin had faced since beginning its war on Ukraine in 2022. In March 2023, the Russian strongman was convicted of war crimes by the International Criminal Court and a warrant for his arrest was issued. 'Western media are in a state that can be called insanity, bordering on complete madness,' wrote the foreign ministry spokesperson, Maria Zakharova, on Telegram. 'For three years, they have been talking about Russia's isolation, and today they saw the red carpet that greeted the Russian President in the United States.'

Summit puts Putin back on the global stage and Trump echoes a Kremlin position
Summit puts Putin back on the global stage and Trump echoes a Kremlin position

The Hill

time11 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Summit puts Putin back on the global stage and Trump echoes a Kremlin position

In Alaska, President Vladimir Putin walked on a red carpet, shook hands and exchanged smiles with his American counterpart. Donald Trump ended the summit praising their relationship and calling Russia 'a big power … No. 2 in the world,' albeit admitting they didn't reach a deal on ending the war in Ukraine. By Saturday morning Moscow time, Trump appeared to have abandoned the idea of a ceasefire as a step toward peace — something he and Ukraine had pushed for months -– in favor of pursuing a full-fledged 'Peace Agreement' to end the war, echoing a long-held Kremlin position. The 'severe consequences' he threatened against Moscow for continuing hostilities were nowhere in sight. On Ukraine's battlefields, Russian troops slowly grinded on, with time on their side. The hastily arranged Alaska summit 'produced nothing for Mr. Trump and gave Mr. Putin most of what he was looking for,' said Laurie Bristow, a former British ambassador to Russia. The summit spectacle Putin's visit to Alaska was his first to the United States in 10 years and his first to a Western country since invading Ukraine in 2022 and plunging U.S.-Russia relations to the lowest point since the Cold War. Crippling sanctions followed, along with efforts to shun Russia on the global stage. The International Criminal Court in 2023 issued an arrest warrant for Putin on accusations of war crimes, casting a shadow on his foreign trips and contacts with other world leaders. Trump's return to the White House appeared to upend all that. He warmly greeted Putin, even clapping for him, on a red carpet as U.S. warplanes flew overhead as the world watched. The overflight was both 'a show of power' and a gesture of welcome from the U.S. president to the Kremlin leader, 'shown off to a friend,' said retired Col. Peer de Jong, a former aide to two French presidents and author of 'Putin, Lord of War.' Russian officials and media revelled in the images of the pomp-filled reception Putin received in Alaska, which pro-Kremlin tabloid Komsomolskaya Pravda described as signalling 'utmost respect.' It called the meeting a 'huge diplomatic victory' for Putin, whose forces will have time to make more territorial gains. The reception contrasted starkly with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's March visit to the Oval Office, where Trump treated him like a 'representative of a rogue state,' said Roderich Kiesewetter, a member of the German parliament. Putin has 'broken out of international isolation,' returning to the world stage as one of two global leaders and 'wasn't in the least challenged' by Trump, who ignored the arrest warrant for Putin from the ICC, Bristow told The Associated Press. For Putin, 'mission accomplished' Putin 'came to the Alaska summit with the principal goal of stalling any pressure on Russia to end the war,' said Neil Melvin, director of international security at the London-based Royal United Services Institute. 'He will consider the summit outcome as mission accomplished.' In recent months, Trump has pressed for a ceasefire, something Ukraine and its allies supported and insisted was a prerequisite for any peace talks. The Kremlin has pushed back, however, arguing it's not interested in a temporary truce -– only in a long-term peace agreement. Moscow's official demands for peace so far have remained nonstarter for Kyiv: It wants Ukraine to cede four regions that Russia only partially occupies, along with the Crimean Peninsula, illegally annexed in 2014. Ukraine also must renounce its bid to join NATO and shrink its military, the Kremlin says. After Alaska, Trump appeared to echo the Kremlin's position on a ceasefire, posting on social media that after he spoke to Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders, 'it was determined by all that the best way to end the horrific war between Russia and Ukraine is to go directly to a Peace Agreement, which would end the war, and not a mere Ceasefire Agreement, which often times do not hold up.' In a statement after the Trump call, the European leaders did not address whether a peace deal was preferable to a ceasefire. The summit took place a week after a deadline Trump gave the Kremlin to stop the war or face additional sanctions on its exports of oil in the form of secondary tariffs on countries buying it. Trump already imposed those tariffs on India, and if applied to others, Russian revenues 'would probably be impacted very badly and very quickly,' said Chris Weafer, CEO of Macro-Advisory Ltd. consultancy. In the days before Alaska, Trump also threatened unspecified 'very severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to stop the war. But whether those consequences will materialize remains unclear. Asked about that in a post-summit interview with Fox News Channel, Trump said he doesn't need 'to think about that right now,' and suggested he might revisit the idea in 'two weeks or three weeks or something.' More pressure on Ukraine In a statement after the summit, Putin claimed the two leaders had hammered out an 'understanding' on Ukraine and warned Europe not to 'torpedo the nascent progress.' But Trump said 'there's no deal until there's a deal.' In his Fox interview, Trump insisted the onus going forward might be on Zelenskyy 'to get it done,' but said there would also be some involvement from European nations. Zelenskyy will meet Trump at the White House on Monday. Both raised the possibility of a trilateral summit with Putin, but Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov said it wasn't discussed in Alaska. The Kremlin has long maintained that Putin would only meet Zelenskyy in the final stages of peace talks. 'Trump now appears to be shifting responsibility towards Kyiv and Europe, while still keeping a role for himself,' Tatiana Stanovaya of the Carnegie Russia and Eurasia Center wrote on X. Fiona Hill, a senior adviser on Russia to Trump during his first administration, told AP that he has met his match because 'Putin is a much bigger bully.' Trump wants to be the negotiator of 'a big real estate deal between Russia and Ukraine,' she said, but in his mind he can 'apply real pressure' only to one side — Kyiv. Hill said she expects Trump to tell Zelenskyy that 'you're really going to have to make a deal' with Putin because Trump wants the conflict off his plate and is not prepared to put pressure on the Russian president. Far from the summit venue and its backdrop saying 'Pursuing Peace,' Russia continued to bombard Ukraine and make incremental advances on the over 600-mile (1,000-kilometer) front. Russia fired a ballistic missile and 85 drones overnight. Ukraine shot down or intercepted 61 drones, its air force said. Front-line areas of Sumy, Dnipropetrovsk, Donetsk and Chernihiv were attacked. Russia's Defense Ministry said it had taken control of the village of Kolodyazi in the Donetsk region, along with Vorone in the Dnipropetrovsk region. Ukraine did not comment on the claims. Russian forces are closing in on the strongholds of Pokrovsk and Kostiantynivka in the Donetsk region, which Moscow illegally annexed in 2022 but still only partially controls. 'Unless Mr. Putin is absolutely convinced that he cannot win militarily, the fighting is not going to stop,' said Bristow, the former ambassador. 'That's the big takeaway from the Anchorage summit.'

100 days of Pope Leo XIV: A calm papacy that avoids polemics is coming into focus
100 days of Pope Leo XIV: A calm papacy that avoids polemics is coming into focus

Boston Globe

timean hour ago

  • Boston Globe

100 days of Pope Leo XIV: A calm papacy that avoids polemics is coming into focus

Leo seems eager above all to avoid polemics or making the papacy about himself, and wants instead to focus on Christ and peace. Advertisement That seems exactly what many Catholic faithful want, and may respond to what today's church needs. 'He's been very direct and forthright … but he's not doing spontaneous press hits,' said Kevin Hughes, chair of theology and religious studies at Leo's alma mater, Villanova University. Leo has a different style than Francis, and that has brought relief to many, Hughes said in a telephone interview. 'Even those who really loved Pope Francis always kind of held their breath a little bit: You didn't know what was going to come out next or what he was going to do,' Hughes said. Advertisement Leo has certainly gone out of his way in his first 100 days to try to heal divisions that deepened during Francis' pontificate, offering messages of unity and avoiding controversy at almost every turn. Even his signature issue — confronting the promise and peril posed by artificial intelligence — is something that conservatives and progressives alike agree is important. Francis' emphasis on caring for the environment and migrants often alienated conservatives. Closer to home, Leo offered the Holy See bureaucracy a reassuring, conciliatory message after Francis' occasionally authoritarian style rubbed some in the Vatican the wrong way. 'Popes come and go, but the Curia remains,' Leo told Vatican officials soon after his May 8 election. Leo, though, has cemented Francis' environmental legacy by celebrating the first-ever ecologically inspired Mass. He has furthered that legacy by giving the go-ahead for the Vatican to turn a 430-hectare (1,000-acre) field north of Rome into a vast solar farm that should generate enough electricity to meet Vatican City's needs and turn it into the world's first carbon-neutral state. He has fine-tuned financial transparency regulations that Francis initiated, tweaked some other decrees to give them consistency and logic, and confirmed Francis in deciding to declare one of the 19th century's most influential saints, John Henry Newman, a 'doctor' of the church. But he hasn't granted any sit-down, tell-all interviews or made headline-grabbing, off-the-cuff comments like his predecessor did. He hasn't made any major appointments, including to fill his old job, or taken any big trips. In marking the 80th anniversary of the U.S. atomic bombings on Hiroshima and Nagasaki last week, he had a chance to match Francis' novel declaration that the mere possession of nuclear weapons was 'immoral.' But he didn't. Advertisement Compared to President Donald Trump, the other American world leader who took office in 2025 with a flurry of Sharpie-penned executive decrees, Leo has eased into his new job slowly, deliberately and quietly, almost trying not to draw attention to himself. At 69, he seems to know that he has time on his side, and that after Francis' revolutionary papacy, the church might need a bit of a breather. One Vatican official who knows Leo said he expects his papacy will have the effect of a 'calming rain' on the church. Maria Isabel Ibarcena Cuarite, a Peruvian member of a Catholic charismatic group, said it was precisely Leo's quiet emphasis on church traditions, its sacraments and love of Christ, that drew her and upward of 1 million young people to Rome for a special Jubilee week this month. Ibarcena said Francis had confused young people like herself with his outreach to LGBTQ+ Catholics and approval of blessings for same-sex couples. Such gestures went beyond what a pope was supposed to do and what the church taught, she thought. Leo, she said, has emphasized that marriage is a sacrament between men and woman. 'Francis was ambiguous, but he is firm,' she said. From his very first appearance on the loggia of St. Peter's Basilica, Leo has insisted he is first and foremost a 'son of St. Augustine. ' It was a reference to the fifth century theological and devotional giant of early Christianity, St. Augustine of Hippo, who inspired the 13th century religious Augustinian order as a community of 'mendicant' friars. Advertisement Like the other big mendicant orders of the early church — the Franciscans, Dominicans and Carmelites — the Augustinians spread across Christian Europe over the centuries. Today, Augustinian spirituality is rooted in a deep interior life of prayer, living in community, and journeying together in search of truth in God. In nearly every speech or homily since his May 8 election, Leo has cited Augustine in one way or another. 'I see a kind of Augustinian flavor in the way that he's presenting all these things,' said Hughes, the theology professor who is an Augustine scholar. Leo joined the Augustinians after graduating from Augustinian-run Villanova, outside Philadelphia, and was twice elected its prior general. He has visited the Augustinian headquarters outside St. Peter's a few times since his election, and some wonder if he will invite some brothers to live with him in the Apostolic Palace to recreate the spirit of Augustinian community life there. Leo is also very much a product of the Francis papacy. Francis named Prevost bishop of Chiclayo, Peru, in 2014 and then moved him to head one of the most important Vatican jobs in 2023 — vetting bishop nominations. In retrospect, it seems Francis had his eye on Prevost as a possible successor. Given Francis' stump speech before the 2013 conclave that elected him pope, the then-Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio essentially described Prevost in identifying the church's mission today: He said the church was 'called to go outside of itself and go to the peripheries, not just geographic but also the existential peripheries.' Prevost, who hails from Chicago, spent his adult life as a missionary in Peru, eventually becoming bishop of Chiclayo. Advertisement 'He is the incarnation of the 'unity of difference,' because he comes from the center, but he lives in the peripheries,' said Emilce Cuda, secretary of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America. Cuda said during a recent conference hosted by Georgetown University that Leo encapsulated in 'word and gesture' the type of missionary church Francis promoted. That said, for all Leo owes to Bergoglio, the two didn't necessarily get along. Prevost has recounted that at one point when he was the Augustinian superior, the then-archbishop of Buenos Aires expressed interest in assigning an Augustinian priest to a specific job in his archdiocese. 'And I, as prior general, said 'I understand, Your Eminence, but he's got to do something else' and so I transferred him somewhere else,' Prevost told parishioners in his home state of Illinois in 2024. Prevost said he 'naively' thought the Francis wouldn't remember him after his 2013 election, and that regardless 'he'll never appoint me bishop' due to the disagreement. Bergoglio not only made him bishop, he laid the groundwork for Prevost to succeed him as pope, the first North American pope following the first South American.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store