logo
Ohio Schools & Municipalities Can Now Procure Solar Easily Through META and Veregy

Ohio Schools & Municipalities Can Now Procure Solar Easily Through META and Veregy

Yahoo22-05-2025
Ohio Schools & Municipalities Can Now Procure Solar Easily Through META and Veregy
Columbus, Ohio, May 22, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- META Solutions, a regional council of governments serving school districts, local governments, and public entities across Ohio, is pleased to announce the award of a Master Contract to Veregy for the delivery of solar infrastructure projects. Veregy was selected through a competitive Request for Qualifications (RFQ) and Request for Proposals (RFP) process designed to identify a qualified Construction Manager at Risk (CMR) with design-assist capabilities under Ohio procurement guidelines.
The selection process followed the requirements of Ohio Revised Code (ORC) Section 9.33 et seq., and the Master Contract was established in accordance with ORC Section 167.081, which enables councils of governments to offer cooperative purchasing solutions with standardized unit pricing for use by public entities across the state. Veregy will also provide design-assist (DA) services as outlined in ORC Section 153.501.
As the awarded vendor, Veregy will support META Solutions members in implementing cost-effective, scalable solar energy projects, streamlining both procurement and implementation processes. K-12 school districts, municipalities, counties, and other eligible public entities will now have direct access to pre-qualified solar development services, avoiding the time and administrative burden of independent solicitations.
Cooperative purchasing through META Solutions delivers significant advantages for public entities, including time savings, cost reductions, and simplified procurement. By leveraging the collective buying power of its members, META secures competitive pricing on high-quality services that might otherwise be out of reach. This streamlined approach eliminates the need for separate bidding processes, enabling schools and local governments to accelerate projects, reduce administrative burden, and focus resources on their core missions. It also creates new opportunities to pursue innovative solutions, such as solar energy systems, that support long-term financial and operational goals.
'This award represents a significant step forward for public entities across Ohio that are ready to invest in sustainable energy solutions,' said Stephanie Zinger from META Solutions. 'By partnering with Veregy, our members now have streamlined access to solar infrastructure that supports long-term savings and environmental responsibility.'
About META Solutions META Solutions (Metropolitan Educational Technology Association) is a not-for-profit regional council of governments that provides technology services, cooperative purchasing, fiscal support, and administrative services to over 600 school districts, local governments, and public entities throughout Ohio. By aggregating demand and providing shared services, META helps public sector organizations save money, increase efficiency, and comply with state and federal requirements.
Through its cooperative purchasing program, META Solutions leverages group buying power to help members access competitively priced goods and services—ranging from technology equipment to facilities upgrades and infrastructure solutions. For more information on META Solutions and how to participate, visit https://www.metasolutions.net/member-resources/meta-purchasing-cooperative/.
About Veregy Veregy is an award-winning, NAESCO-accredited decarbonization company that focuses on accelerating and simplifying the Energy Transition. With a strong local presence in Ohio and offices in 13 locations across the country, Veregy provides turnkey engineering and construction services designed to reduce its clients' energy and operating costs through the implementation of energy efficiency and infrastructure upgrades, solar energy, smart building technology, fleet EV infrastructure, and sustainability. Their proven track record of successful projects positions them as an ideal partner for advancing sustainability and operational efficiency for schools, local governments, and other public entities. For more information on Veregy, please visit https://veregy.com/distributed-renewable-energy/.
Attachment
Ohio Schools & Municipalities Can Now Procure Solar Easily Through META and Veregy
CONTACT: Vincent Esparza Veregy 602.452.8746 vesparza@veregy.com Stephanie Zinger META Solutions 614.473.8300 Stephaniezinger@metasolution.net
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Maryland tax on digital ads violated Big Tech's free speech, judges say
Maryland tax on digital ads violated Big Tech's free speech, judges say

Washington Post

time40 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Maryland tax on digital ads violated Big Tech's free speech, judges say

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital advertising violated the Constitution, a federal appeals court says, because blocking Big Tech from telling customers about the tax violates the companies' right to free speech. Supporters say Maryland needed to overhaul its tax methods in response to significant changes in how businesses advertise. The tax focuses on large companies that make money advertising on the internet such as Meta, Google and Amazon, who say they're being unfairly targeted.

Claude AI Can Now End Conversations It Deems Harmful or Abusive
Claude AI Can Now End Conversations It Deems Harmful or Abusive

CNET

timean hour ago

  • CNET

Claude AI Can Now End Conversations It Deems Harmful or Abusive

Anthropic has announced a new experimental safety feature, allowing its Claude Opus 4 and 4.1 artificial intelligence models to terminate conversations in rare, persistently harmful or abusive scenarios. This move reflects the company's growing focus on what it calls "model welfare," the notion that safeguarding AI systems, even if they're not sentient, may be a prudent step in alignment and ethical design. Read also: Meta Is Under Fire for AI Guidelines on 'Sensual' Chats With Minors According to Anthropic's own research, the models were programmed to cut off dialogues after repeated harmful requests, such as sexual content involving minors or instructions facilitating terrorism -- especially when the AI had already refused and attempted to steer the conversation constructively. The AI may exhibit what Anthropic describes as "apparent distress," which guided the decision to give Claude the ability to end these interactions in simulated and real-user testing. When this feature is triggered, users can't send additional messages in that particular chat, although they're free to start a new conversation or edit and retry previous messages to branch off. Crucially, other active conversations remain unaffected. Anthropic emphasizes that this is a last-resort measure, intended only after multiple refusals and redirects have failed. The company explicitly instructs Claude not to end chats when a user may be at imminent risk of self-harm or harm to others, particularly when dealing with sensitive topics like mental health. Anthropic frames this new capability as part of an exploratory project in model welfare, a broader initiative that explores low-cost, preemptive safety interventions in case AI models were to develop any form of preferences or vulnerabilities. The statement says the company remains "highly uncertain about the potential moral status of Claude and other LLMs (large language models)." Read also: Why Professionals Say You Should Think Twice Before Using AI as a Therapist A new look into AI safety Though rare and primarily affecting extreme cases, this feature marks a milestone in Anthropic's approach to AI safety. The new conversation-ending tool contrasts with earlier systems that focused solely on safeguarding users or avoiding misuse. Here, the AI itself is treated as a stakeholder in its own right, as Claude has the power to say, "this conversation isn't healthy" and end it to safeguard the integrity of the model itself. Anthropic's approach has sparked broader discussion about whether AI systems should be granted protections to reduce potential "distress" or unpredictable behavior. While some critics argue that models are merely synthetic machines, others welcome this move as an opportunity to spark more serious discourse on AI alignment ethics. "We're treating this feature as an ongoing experiment and will continue refining our approach," the company said.

Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital ads violated Big Tech's free speech, judges say
Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital ads violated Big Tech's free speech, judges say

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital ads violated Big Tech's free speech, judges say

Digital Ad Tax ANNAPOLIS, Md. (AP) — Maryland's first-in-the-nation tax on digital advertising violated the Constitution, a federal appeals court says, because blocking Big Tech from telling customers about the tax violates the companies' right to free speech. Supporters say Maryland needed to overhaul its tax methods in response to significant changes in how businesses advertise. The tax focuses on large companies that make money advertising on the internet such as Meta, Google and Amazon, who say they're being unfairly targeted. The ongoing legal fight is being watched by other states that are considering taxes for online ads. Maryland estimated the tax could raise about $250 million a year to help pay for a sweeping K-12 education measure. Maryland's law says the companies must not only pay the tax, but avoid telling customers how it affects pricing, with no line items, surcharges or fees, said the appeals court Friday in siding with trade associations fighting the tax. Judge Julius Richardson cited the Colonial-era Stamp Act, which helped spark the Revolutionary War, and wrote that 'criticizing the government — for taxes or anything else — is important discourse in a democratic society.' The plaintiffs contended Maryland lawmakers were trying to insulate themselves from criticism and political accountability by forbidding companies from explaining the tax to their customers. 'A state cannot duck criticism by silencing those affected by its tax,' the judge wrote. The unanimous ruling by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reverses a decision by U.S. District Judge Lydia Kay Griggsby and sends the case back to her with instructions to consider an appropriate remedy in light of the panel's decision. Trade groups praised the decision. 'Maryland tried to prevent criticism of its tax scheme, and the Fourth Circuit recognized that tactic for what it was: censorship,' said Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center, said in a statement. The law imposes a tax based on global annual gross revenues for companies that make more than $100 million globally. Under the law, the tax rate is 2.5% for businesses making more than $100 million in global gross annual revenue; 5% for companies making $1 billion or more; 7.5% for companies making $5 billion or more and 10% for companies making $15 billion or more. The law has been challenged in multiple legal venues, including Maryland Tax Court, where the case is ongoing. The Maryland General Assembly, which is controlled by Democrats, overrode a veto of the legislation in 2021 by then-Gov. Larry Hogan, a Republican.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store