Crime boss James Harding guilty of murder plot and importing cocaine
A drug baron has been found guilty of importing millions of pounds of cocaine into the UK and planning the murder of a rival after police cracked his mobile phone messages.James Harding, 34, from Alton in Hampshire but who was based in Dubai, was the leader of a "sophisticated and successful" criminal syndicate that made more than £5m in just 10 weeks from distributing drugs across the UK in 2020.Harding, who gave his profession as a sales executive of luxury watches, lived a luxury lifestyle in the United Arab Emirates driving Lamborghini and Bugatti sports cars and staying at five star hotels, his Old Bailey trial heard.Sentencing has been adjourned for a date to be set.
Harding's second-in-command, Jayes Kharouti, 39, from Epsom, Surrey, was also convicted of conspiracy to murder, having already pleaded guilty to importing cocaine before the trial started.In April 2020 both men had discussed using a gunman to shoot an unnamed drugs courier from a rival crime network and to rob their drugs.The pair used "EncroChat" encrypted phones to communicate, believing they were "impregnable to any access by law enforcement", said prosecutor Duncan Atkinson KC.
Harding and Kharouti had used nicknames, known as "handles", during their EncroChat conversations, with Harding calling himself "thetopsking" and his right hand man Kharouti using the name "besttops".Seizures of cocaine to which the defendants referred in their EncroChat calls proved "the drugs being talked about were real, the stakes high and the communications serious," the trial heard.Approximately 50 importations of drugs were made into the UK, with a total weight of one tonne, between April and June 2020.EncroChat calls revealed that in April and May 2020 "thetopsking" and "besttops" discussed the robbery of a courier, locations and the use of a bike and a gun to carry it out.A hitman was recruited who was provided with a firearm and ammunition to carry out the "full M" - a murder - the court heard.A man was identified for the task who had a previous conviction for manslaughter."The fact he did so underlines that this was a true conspiracy to murder someone the drugs importers had a problem with and wanted to put permanently out of business," said Mr Atkinson.
Another man, Peter Thompson, aged 61, pleaded guilty on 4 November 2021 to the illegal importation of cocaine and possession of a firearm and ammunition.This showed that a firearm was available to be used in the murder planned by Harding and Kharouti, the prosecution alleged.The trial heard that in 2020 a French police force identified a way to capture information from the EncroChat communications system and information about "thetopsking" and his associates was provided to UK authorities.Harding was arrested at Geneva Airport in Switzerland on 27 December 2021 and then extradited to the UK in May 2022 to stand trial.Kharouti meanwhile fled to Turkey in 2020, but was also extradited back to the UK.
'Scared of being attacked'
Giving evidence in his defence, Harding claimed he was not "thetopsking", but was instead in a relationship with a man who used that handle.Harding claimed he had been too "ashamed" to admit to the relationship but said going on trial had forced him to reveal it and that the "thetopsking" was in fact the father of Harding's ex-partner's child.Harding also admitted that he had previously pleaded guilty to drugs offences and possession of fake ID documents and had been jailed in 2013.In 2019 Harding claimed he moved to Dubai where "thetopsking" was living.He told the trial he could not identify "thetopsking" because he was scared of being attacked.Two other men - Calvin Crump, 29, and Khuram Ahmed, 39 - pleaded guilty on 28 February 2024 to their involvement in a cocaine importation conspiracy.
You can follow BBC Hampshire & Isle of Wight on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
23 minutes ago
- Sky News
Post Office scandal: Govt has not done enough to ensure compensation for victims, committee of MPs finds
The government has not done enough to ensure all victims entitled to compensation from the Post Office scandal have applied for it, a report has found. Many current and former postmasters affected by Horizon IT failings and associated miscarriages of justice are not yet receiving fair and timely compensation, according to the report by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC). Only 21% of the 18,500 letters the Post Office sent to postmasters to make them aware of the Horizon Shortfall Scheme had been responded to, figures provided by the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) show. About 5,000 further letters are expected to be sent in 2025. Under the scheme, current and former postmasters who were financially affected by the Horizon IT system, but who were either not convicted or did not take the Post Office to the High Court, can either settle their claim for a final fixed sum of £75,000 or have it fully assessed. There is also the Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme (HCRS), which is for sub-postmasters who had their convictions quashed after the passing of the Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Act last year. The 800 or so sub-postmasters who are eligible to claim under the HCRS are entitled to a £600,000 full and final settlement, or the option to pursue a full claim assessment. By the end of March, 339 had accepted the settlement sum, the report by the PAC, which is made up of MPs from all sides of the House of Commons, found. But the PAC report states that the government has no plans to follow up with people who are, or may be, eligible to claim but are yet to apply. 3:09 The committee recommends that the DBT should outline what more it will do to ensure every affected postmaster is fully aware of their options for claiming. A third scheme provides compensation to sub-postmasters who were wrongly convicted of fraud, theft and false accounting. Of the 111 sub-postmasters eligible to claim for the Overturned Convictions Scheme and who are either entitled to a £600,000 full and final settlement, or to pursue a full claim assessment, 25 have not yet submitted a claim, some of whom represent the most complex cases. The DBT has taken over the management of the scheme from the Post Office, and the PAC report recommends that the department should outline how it plans to handle the remaining cases under the scheme. Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP, chair of the PAC, said thousands of people were "deeply failed" by the system during "one of the UK's worst ever miscarriages of justice". He added: "This committee would have hoped to have found government laser-focused on ensuring all those eligible were fully and fairly compensated for what happened. "It is deeply dissatisfactory to find these schemes still moving far too slowly, with no government plans to track down the majority of potential claimants who may not yet be aware of their proper entitlements. "It is entirely unacceptable that those affected by this scandal, some of whom have had to go through the courts to clear their names, are being forced to relitigate their cases a second time."
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Iran hangs three men for spying for Israel
DUBAI, June 25 (Reuters) - Iran executed three men on Wednesday, after they were convicted of collaborating with Israel's Mossad spy agency and smuggling equipment used in an assassination, the judiciary's Mizan news agency reported. The equipment they smuggled was used in the assassination of one unnamed personality, Mizan reported without giving further details. Entangled in a decades-long shadow war with Israel before the recent open conflict, Iran has put to death many individuals convicted of having links with the Mossad and facilitating the latter's operations in the country. These range from assassinations of nuclear scientists to acts of sabotage meant to undermine Iran's nuclear programme.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
From the archive: Speed traps and the 20mph limit
From The Times: June 25, 1925 Captain Brass and other members of Parliament had a meeting with the officials at Scotland Yard on the subject of police traps. The following agreed statement was issued last night: 'In compliance with the suggestion made by the Home Secretary to a recent deputation of members of Parliament on the question of police traps, a small committee consisting of Sir E Iliffe, Sir F Meyer, Mr Ben Smith, and Captain Brass visited Scotland Yard to discuss the efficacy of the present timing methods of the Metropolitan Police to put down dangerous driving and excessive driving speeds. The committee and the police officials were in complete accord in their desire to prosecute and punish the reckless driver.'The committee, while agreeing that the present method of timing cars acted to a certain extent as a deterrent to excessive driving speeds in certain areas, were of the opinion that this method was not really effective in preventing dangerous driving. They suggested that the police should be stationed in uniform on really dangerous cross-roads and dangerous bends and corners, where excessive speeds had been reported, pointing out that their presence would have the desirable result of preventing fast driving in these areas.'The police officials explained that, whatever may have been the intention of Parliament, a statute had been passed in the Motor Car Act which made excess of the speed limit an offence quite distinct from those of reckless, negligent, or dangerous driving. The Metropolitan Police had throughout refrained from enforcing the letter of the law, for they worked no controls in straight, open stretches free from dangers such as converging roads, nor did they work to 20 miles an hour, but allowed a substantial margin.'Members who have been following the question are particularly interested in the announcement made on behalf of the police that they allow a substantial margin beyond the 20 miles an hour limit. While members regard this as an admission that the existing limit is obsolete, they consider it as an unsatisfactory position that the margin allowed is not revealed and that the police are, therefore, working on what is practically a secret speed limit. Explore 200 years of history as it appeared in the pages of The Times, from 1785 to 1985:
