Post Office scandal: Govt has not done enough to ensure compensation for victims, committee of MPs finds
The government has not done enough to ensure all victims entitled to compensation from the Post Office scandal have applied for it, a report has found.
Many current and former postmasters affected by Horizon IT failings and associated miscarriages of justice are not yet receiving fair and timely compensation, according to the report by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC).
Only 21% of the 18,500 letters the Post Office sent to postmasters to make them aware of the Horizon Shortfall Scheme had been responded to, figures provided by the Department for Business and Trade (DBT) show. About 5,000 further letters are expected to be sent in 2025.
Under the scheme, current and former postmasters who were financially affected by the Horizon IT system, but who were either not convicted or did not take the Post Office to the High Court, can either settle their claim for a final fixed sum of £75,000 or have it fully assessed.
There is also the Horizon Convictions Redress Scheme (HCRS), which is for sub-postmasters who had their convictions quashed after the passing of the Post Office (Horizon System) Offences Act last year.
The 800 or so sub-postmasters who are eligible to claim under the HCRS are entitled to a £600,000 full and final settlement, or the option to pursue a full claim assessment.
By the end of March, 339 had accepted the settlement sum, the report by the PAC, which is made up of MPs from all sides of the House of Commons, found.
But the PAC report states that the government has no plans to follow up with people who are, or may be, eligible to claim but are yet to apply.
3:09
The committee recommends that the DBT should outline what more it will do to ensure every affected postmaster is fully aware of their options for claiming.
A third scheme provides compensation to sub-postmasters who were wrongly convicted of fraud, theft and false accounting.
Of the 111 sub-postmasters eligible to claim for the Overturned Convictions Scheme and who are either entitled to a £600,000 full and final settlement, or to pursue a full claim assessment, 25 have not yet submitted a claim, some of whom represent the most complex cases.
The DBT has taken over the management of the scheme from the Post Office, and the PAC report recommends that the department should outline how it plans to handle the remaining cases under the scheme.
Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown MP, chair of the PAC, said thousands of people were "deeply failed" by the system during "one of the UK's worst ever miscarriages of justice".
He added: "This committee would have hoped to have found government laser-focused on ensuring all those eligible were fully and fairly compensated for what happened.
"It is deeply dissatisfactory to find these schemes still moving far too slowly, with no government plans to track down the majority of potential claimants who may not yet be aware of their proper entitlements.
"It is entirely unacceptable that those affected by this scandal, some of whom have had to go through the courts to clear their names, are being forced to relitigate their cases a second time."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
BBC Sport 'is in chaos' as staff go to HR over 'combative' new boss 'who thought British Lions played home and away'
BBC Sport is said to be in a state of 'chaos' after staff were forced to go to HR over their 'combative' new boss. Mark Hughes, who joined the corporation in March, has faced a flurry of concerns from his new employees, including particular unease regarding his 'pretty combative' leadership style. The journalist, previously head of news at the Daily Telegraph, also faces accusations of having a 'slight lacking in sport knowledge'. In the latest crisis for the corporation, a source has told the Sun of a few 'gaffes' the BBC sport leader has already experienced during his short tenure, including 'thinking the British and Irish Lions played home and away '. Concerns were also raised regarding his handling of Danny Care's retirement from professional rugby, announced in May. Describing Mr Hughes as an 'excellent journalist', they added: 'He doesn't suffer fools gladly and is pretty combative. 'He wants the best from his staff but a few have found that intimidating and flagged concerns. 'HR are aware and parties have been spoken to but there have been no formal complaints'. The journalist, who previously worked as head of news at the Daily Telegraph, also faces accusations of having a 'slight lacking in sport knowledge'. Concerns were also raised regarding his handling of Danny Care's (pictured) retirement from professional rugby A BBC spokesperson said: 'While we do not comment on individual members of staff, we have robust processes in place to deal with any workplace-related concerns.' It comes following a difficult few years for the BBC, with Huw Edwards pleading guilty to having indecent images of children, Jermaine Jenas axed after a sexting scandal and Gary Linekar axed over Anti Semitism claims. Earlier this month, the corporation was reported to have launched a bullying probe into its flagship Breakfast show, which was branded 'toxic' behind the scenes. Tensions have been said to be 'rife' between hosts and Charlie Stayt and Naga Munchetty, who has already expressed her uneasiness about Frediani's behaviour, with the probe said to have left the newsroom 'divided'. A source told The Sun: 'To the viewer BBC Breakfast is a warm, gentle programme, one that is flourishing in the ratings. But beyond the cosy red sofa it is a very different picture. Several people — crew, production and even presenters — have been very unhappy'. 'Tension between Charlie and Naga is rife. Fredi is very old-school and has some slightly tyrannical tendencies. He is very cerebral but also quite aggressive in his methods. Some people think a recent promotion has gone to his head'. 'Meanwhile, Naga, who is passionate about speaking up if she believes something is wrong, has spoken to people who are unhappy. Formal complaints have been lodged, so the BBC has to be seen to act. The probe has really divided the newsroom'. They went on to claim that some believe Fredani, known as Fredi, is simply doing his job, while others think that his methods are 'too tough' for 2025. The ordeal began when media and entertainment industry news site Deadline alleged that Frediani (pictured) was the subject of at least two misconduct complaints, including one from a woman who had her grievance upheld after claiming that the Breakfast editor physically shook her during a heated newsroom exchange last year An insider told MailOnline in April that Munchetty is 'quite open' about her ill-feeling towards Frediani. Another said that she has an 'uneasy relationship' with him. The Mail also previously revealed that displeasure was intensifying at the BBC's northern base in Salford, where staff have watched Frediani's rise - from Breakfast boss to arguably the most powerful BBC editor outside London - with growing disbelief. One said: 'You have to wonder what on earth is going on. The BBC claims to be this no-nonsense, woke, kind place - yet Fredi has been able to keep climbing the ladder. HR and his bosses are aware of [past] bullying claims against him. 'He's still allowed to hire, as we saw with Nina [Warhurst, who has just been appointed a regular presenter] this week, and presumably fire. He has so much power, it doesn't feel right at all.' The ordeal began when media and entertainment industry news site Deadline alleged that Frediani was the subject of at least two misconduct complaints, including one from a woman who had her grievance upheld after claiming that the Breakfast editor physically shook her during a heated newsroom exchange last year. The Mail also previously revealed that displeasure was intensifying at the BBC's northern base in Salford, where staff have watched Richard Frediani's (pictured) rise - from Breakfast boss to arguably the most powerful BBC editor outside London Others also came forward with their experiences. One person claimed to have witnessed an incident in 2019, during which a 'clearly angry' Richard backed a Breakfast colleague up against a wall and was 'jabbing his finger' as he voiced displeasure about that morning's show. According to the site, two additional sources also alleged that Frediani is known for ' screaming' down the phone at other BBC News desks and complaining about the quality of content they hand over to the Breakfast show. Whether these allegations were upheld or dismissed is unknown.
The Guardian
23 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Starmer says vote on welfare cuts bill happening on Tuesday amid growing Labour revolt
Update: Date: 2025-06-25T08:41:27.000Z Title: Keir Starmer says he is going ahead with welfare benefits cuts as number of Labour MPs joining rebellion grows Content: Good morning. MPs are due to vote on the universal credit (UC) and personal independent payments (Pip) bill next week, the legislation enacting the disability and sickness benefit cuts worth around £5bn. As Pippa Crerar and Aletha Adu report in our overnight story, Keir Starmer insisted yesterday that he was pressing ahead with the plans. But this morning it seems all but certain that, if the government goes ahead with the vote without offering a colossal concession, it will lose. And, if governments know they are going to get defeated on flagship legislation, they normally pull the vote at the last minute. Here are the key developments this morning. The Labour rebellion is growing – even though some cabinet ministers spent yesterday trying to persuade rebel Labour MPs to back the bill. By last night, 123 Labour MPs had signed the amendment, up from 108, plus 11 MPs from opposition parties, all from Northern Ireland. You can read all their names on the order paper here. They are the MPs who have signed Meg Hillier's amendment, listed under business for Tuesday 1 July. Starmer has failed to quell speculation that the vote will be postponed. Despite what he said publicly yesterday, the BBC is reporting a source close to government thinking saying: 'Once you take a breath, it is better to save some of the welfare package than lose all of it.' And the Times is reporting: Privately, some close to the prime minister are preparing to delay next Tuesday's vote in an attempt to buy time and find concessions to win enough of the rebels around. One minister described the mood in government as one of 'panic'. But Starmer has again confirmed the vote will go ahead. He told LBC: There'll be a vote on Tuesday, we're going to make sure we reform the welfare system. He said the welfare system had to change: It traps people in a position where they can't get into work. In fact, it's counterproductive, it works against them getting into work. So we have to reform it, and that is a Labour argument, it's a progressive argument. John Healey, the defence secretary, refused to rule out the government making further concessions before the vote in an interview on the Today programme this morning. Kemi Badenoch has in effect confirmed that the Tories will not support the bill. She implied the opposite in a statement she released last night, saying: The government is in a mess, their MPs are in open rebellion. If Keir Starmer wants our support, he needs to meet three conditions that align with our core Conservative principles. The first condition is that the welfare budget is too high, it needs to come down. This bill does not do that. The second condition is that we need to get people back into work. Unemployment is rising, jobs are disappearing, and even the government's own impact assessments say that the package in this bill will not get people back to work. The third is that we want to see no new tax rises in the autumn. We can't have new tax rises to pay for the increases in welfare and other government spending. We are acting in the national interest to make the changes the country needs. And if Keir Starmer wants us to help him get this bill through, then he must commit to these three conditions at the dispatch box. There is no chance of the government committing to no tax rises in the autumn, and so, while sounding supportive, this statement is anything but. The bill also fails Badenoch's first condition, because it would not stop spending on disability benefits still rising (but by less than it would without the cuts). Ministers have made this point to Labour rebels in a bid to persuade them the bill is not as harsh as people suppose. Here is the agenda for the day. 9.30am: Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability, gives evidence to the Commons work and pensions committee about the proposed disability benefit cuts. 10am: Darren Jones, chief secretary to the Treasury, gives evidence to the Commons Treasury committee about the spending review. Morning: Keir Starmer and other leaders arrive at the Nato summit in The Hague. Starmer is expected to hold a press conference in the afternoon, after the main meeting. Noon: Angela Rayner, the deputy PM, takes PMQs. Also, Wes Streeting, the health secretary, is giving a speech in Blackpool where he will say that England's poorest areas will get billions in extra health funding under new government plans to tackle stark inequalities. If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word. If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @ The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary. I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
BBC News
24 minutes ago
- BBC News
Harper Adams students could learn at planned £6m chicken farm, firm says
A proposed new £6m chicken farm with 180,000 birds would be used to help teach university students, according to a planning four proposed poultry units would be built on land near Harper Adams University, close to Newport, Farming, a Lilleshall-based firm, submitted the plans to Telford and Wrekin Council and a public consultation has begun on university itself "expressed strong support for the scheme", planning agent Ian Pick said, in his report for the council's planners. Harper Adams will not build or run the farm but it favours the plans due to their "significant value as a teaching and research resource for both agricultural and veterinary students", he university specialises in agriculture and the rural proposed farm includes a teaching facility and a viewing area which will be able to be used by students from schools, colleges, and universities, Mr Pick Farming also has a poultry unit at Deepdale Farm in nearby Chetwynd. The proposed farm will see about £6m spent on the buildings and other facilities at the site, planning documents business will also need an Environment Agency permit in order to Farming proposed that the water on its new site would drain through a sealed network, filter drains and filter strips "in order to minimise the risk of contamination to the final watercourse".Their plans come as river campaigners in Shropshire and Herefordshire have in recent years called for action to protect local waterways from the potential effects of chicken farming and chicken in June won a High Court battle to overturn planning permission for an industrial-scale chicken farm in Felton Butler, near Shrewsbury. This news was gathered by the Local Democracy Reporting Service, which covers councils and other public service organisations. Follow BBC Shropshire on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
