
Starmer says vote on welfare cuts bill happening on Tuesday amid growing Labour revolt
Update:
Date: 2025-06-25T08:41:27.000Z
Title: Keir Starmer says he is going ahead with welfare benefits cuts as number of Labour MPs joining rebellion grows
Content: Good morning. MPs are due to vote on the universal credit (UC) and personal independent payments (Pip) bill next week, the legislation enacting the disability and sickness benefit cuts worth around £5bn. As Pippa Crerar and Aletha Adu report in our overnight story, Keir Starmer insisted yesterday that he was pressing ahead with the plans.
But this morning it seems all but certain that, if the government goes ahead with the vote without offering a colossal concession, it will lose. And, if governments know they are going to get defeated on flagship legislation, they normally pull the vote at the last minute.
Here are the key developments this morning.
The Labour rebellion is growing – even though some cabinet ministers spent yesterday trying to persuade rebel Labour MPs to back the bill. By last night, 123 Labour MPs had signed the amendment, up from 108, plus 11 MPs from opposition parties, all from Northern Ireland. You can read all their names on the order paper here. They are the MPs who have signed Meg Hillier's amendment, listed under business for Tuesday 1 July.
Starmer has failed to quell speculation that the vote will be postponed. Despite what he said publicly yesterday, the BBC is reporting a source close to government thinking saying: 'Once you take a breath, it is better to save some of the welfare package than lose all of it.' And the Times is reporting:
Privately, some close to the prime minister are preparing to delay next Tuesday's vote in an attempt to buy time and find concessions to win enough of the rebels around. One minister described the mood in government as one of 'panic'.
But Starmer has again confirmed the vote will go ahead. He told LBC:
There'll be a vote on Tuesday, we're going to make sure we reform the welfare system.
He said the welfare system had to change:
It traps people in a position where they can't get into work. In fact, it's counterproductive, it works against them getting into work. So we have to reform it, and that is a Labour argument, it's a progressive argument.
John Healey, the defence secretary, refused to rule out the government making further concessions before the vote in an interview on the Today programme this morning.
Kemi Badenoch has in effect confirmed that the Tories will not support the bill. She implied the opposite in a statement she released last night, saying:
The government is in a mess, their MPs are in open rebellion. If Keir Starmer wants our support, he needs to meet three conditions that align with our core Conservative principles.
The first condition is that the welfare budget is too high, it needs to come down. This bill does not do that.
The second condition is that we need to get people back into work. Unemployment is rising, jobs are disappearing, and even the government's own impact assessments say that the package in this bill will not get people back to work.
The third is that we want to see no new tax rises in the autumn. We can't have new tax rises to pay for the increases in welfare and other government spending.
We are acting in the national interest to make the changes the country needs. And if Keir Starmer wants us to help him get this bill through, then he must commit to these three conditions at the dispatch box.
There is no chance of the government committing to no tax rises in the autumn, and so, while sounding supportive, this statement is anything but. The bill also fails Badenoch's first condition, because it would not stop spending on disability benefits still rising (but by less than it would without the cuts). Ministers have made this point to Labour rebels in a bid to persuade them the bill is not as harsh as people suppose.
Here is the agenda for the day.
9.30am: Stephen Timms, minister for social security and disability, gives evidence to the Commons work and pensions committee about the proposed disability benefit cuts.
10am: Darren Jones, chief secretary to the Treasury, gives evidence to the Commons Treasury committee about the spending review.
Morning: Keir Starmer and other leaders arrive at the Nato summit in The Hague. Starmer is expected to hold a press conference in the afternoon, after the main meeting.
Noon: Angela Rayner, the deputy PM, takes PMQs.
Also, Wes Streeting, the health secretary, is giving a speech in Blackpool where he will say that England's poorest areas will get billions in extra health funding under new government plans to tackle stark inequalities.
If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line when comments are open (normally between 10am and 3pm at the moment), or message me on social media. I can't read all the messages BTL, but if you put 'Andrew' in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.
If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. You can reach me on Bluesky at @andrewsparrowgdn.bsky.social. The Guardian has given up posting from its official accounts on X, but individual Guardian journalists are there, I still have my account, and if you message me there at @AndrewSparrow, I will see it and respond if necessary.
I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos. No error is too small to correct. And I find your questions very interesting too. I can't promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
17 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Angela Rayner says welfare cuts vote will go ahead as Labour rebellion grows
Keir Starmer will push ahead with his plan for a vote on the government's welfare cuts next Tuesday, his deputy said on Wednesday, despite a large and growing rebellion from Labour MPs. Angela Rayner told the Commons the government would not back down on its proposals to cut nearly £5bn from the welfare bill by limiting access to disability payments. With more than 120 Labour MPs now having signed an amendment to put the cuts on hold, ministers are facing a growing possibility of defeat next Tuesday, or of relying on opposition votes to pass the measures. Labour has a majority of 165 MPs in the Commons. But during a session of prime minister's questions during which she was deputising for Starmer, Rayner told MPs the government would not delay or abandon the vote. 'We're investing £1bn into tailored employment support, a right to try to help more people back into work, and ending reassessments for the most severely disabled who will never be able to work,' she said. 'We won't walk away and stand by and abandon millions of people trapped in the failing system left behind by [the shadow chancellor, Mel Stride] and his colleagues.' Pushed by Stride to recommit to a vote on Tuesday, she added: 'I don't know if he listened to what I said … but what I can tell him, and I don't need a script, we will go ahead on Tuesday.' Rayner's message came a day after she and other senior cabinet colleagues mounted a frantic effort to save the bill, calling rebel backbenchers and urging them to vote with the government. Some MPs say they have been threatened with suspension and even de-selection in four years' time if they vote against the bill, while others say party managers have told them they see it as a vote of confidence in the government. Downing Street has denied those claims. The government's lobbying operation had borne little fruit by Wednesday morning, with the number of signatures to the amendment climbing from 108 to 123. They are being led by Meg Hillier, the respected head of the Treasury select committee. The Conservatives appear to have decided not to support the bill. Kemi Badenoch, the Tory leader, set preconditions for supporting it on Tuesday, none of which are likely to be met. Stride told MPs on Wednesday: 'We will help her [Rayner] to get their bill through, if they can commit to actually reducing the welfare bill and getting people off benefits and into work.' He later added: 'The bill will see the number of people on welfare rising for every single year.' Rayner's insistence that the vote would go ahead echoes the message of the prime minister on Tuesday on his way to the Nato summit in The Hague. 'There is a clear moral case, which is: the current system doesn't help those who want to get into work,' he said. 'It traps people. I think it's 1,000 people a day going on to Pip. The additions to Pip each year are the equivalent of a city the size of Leicester. That is not a system that can be left unreformed.'


BBC News
21 minutes ago
- BBC News
Mandaric no longer pursuing Sheff Wed return
Former Sheffield Wednesday owner Milan Mandaric is no longer pursuing a return to a statement to BBC Radio Sheffield, Mandaric said that after considering putting together a 'rescue package', he had decided it would not be in the club's best interest if he was to try to assist at this Mandaric understands that there are several parties interested, external in a takeover of the Owls. The 86-year-old Serbian-American businessman owned Wednesday between 2010 and 2015 before selling to current proprietor Dejphon Chansiri, the Owls have been given spending restrictions over the next three transfer windows by the English Football League following failures to pay wages on time. Mandaric had hoped to meet Chansiri during a brief visit to the UK this week, but the current Wednesday owner is not in the on reflection, Mandaric, who also owned Portsmouth and Leicester City before Wednesday, does not believe that he could devote sufficient time to "return the club to the healthy condition I left it in".He also believes that with other parties involved, his potential interest would not be constructive. "At such an important time, I would not want my involvement to either slow down or hinder these discussions," he stated, however, that he would be happy to offer help to Chansiri or any new owner if added: "Nothing would give me greater pleasure than seeing our team competing again for promotion in the coming seasons."Wednesday finished 12th in the Championship last season, 10 points outside the play-off places - they have not played in the top flight since 2003.


The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
What are the government's welfare proposals that have split MPs?
Labour MPs are divided over the government's controversial plans to cut welfare spending, as a growing backbench rebellion threatens to halt the measures. More than 120 Labour MPs have signed a 'reasoned amendment' to the bill which would deliver the measures. If passed, this would effectively stop it in its tracks for the time being. The plans have received fierce backlash from charities and campaign groups since their introduction in March, when Rachel Reeves announced: 'The Labour Party is the party of work. We believe that if you can work, you should work. But if you can't work, you should be properly supported.' Ministers have revealed more details about their plans for welfare spending since this, but of those only two key measures are up for a vote on Tuesday. Entitled the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill, this legislation comprises changes those two benefits exclusively. Here's what you need to know: Cutting back PIP eligibility Currently claimed by 3.7 million people, PIP is designed to help with extra costs incurred by living with an illness or disability. The plans see the 'daily living' element of the benefit effectively become harder to claim as the eligibility criteria is tightened. Applicants are currently assessed based on how limited their ability is across ten activities, and awarded points between zero and eight for each based on severity. Under current rules, an applicant needs to be scored at least eight points in any combination to be awarded the lowest rate of PIP. Following the changes, they would need this and to have scored four of these points in a single activity. The planned changes would form the bulk of savings from Labour's welfare reforms, at an estimated £4.1 billion. Under these rules, around 1.5 million current claimants would be found ineligible, the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) says. However, the spending watchdog also estimates that this number is closer to 800,000 when accounting for a 'behavioural response,' but acknowledges this is a 'highly uncertain judgement'. Changing Universal Credit rates The other key change in the bill sees the rates of Universal Credit rebalanced, with the standard rate rising while the health-related rate is cut back. Labour said it will 'rebalance payment levels' in Universal Credit to 'promote work and address perverse incentives' in the system, beginning in April 2026. The plans would bring in an across-the-board increase to the standard Universal Credit allowance for new and existing claims from April 2026. This will be a boost of £7 a week, to £106. At the same time, the payment rate for the health-related element of Universal Credit will be frozen. Those already receiving it, will still get £105 a week until 2029/30. Meanwhile, new claimants for this element will get just £54 a week – almost half. These claimants will continue to receive the standard Universal Credit allowance alongside this entitlement, and be eligible from the uplift to that as with any other claimant. Around 2.7 million families are forecast to be in receipt of the health element when the changes come into effect, the OBR says, with all of them affected. What issues have the Labour rebels raised? Several issues are listed in the amendment, with the text highlighting the Office for Budget Responsibility's (OBR) stark analysis that the plans would push 250,000 into poverty, including 50,000 children. Another concern listed is that the government's decision not to conduct a formal consultation with disabled people regarding the two crucial reforms the bill entails. The amendment also notes that members are set to vote on the bill months before the OBR is due to publish its crucial employment impact assessment in autumn 2025, which would detail how many people the reforms are expected to help into work. It also raises the concern is that the additional employment support which has been pledged by the government alongside the reforms is not due until the end of the decade, up to four years after these measures come into effect. Alongside these, no assessment has been published on the impact the changes could have on health or care needs. Despite these issues, the amendment's text also acknowledges "the need for the reform of the social security system" and expresses agreement with "the government's principles for providing support to people into work and protecting people who cannot work."