logo
University of Calgary launches initiative to study new relationship with the U.S.

University of Calgary launches initiative to study new relationship with the U.S.

Toronto Star16-05-2025

CALGARY - The University of Calgary is launching an initiative to study how Canada's relationship with the United States is changing with U.S. President Donald Trump in the White House.
Researchers at the New North America Initiative, based in the university's School of Public Policy, have been tasked with coming up with a vision of what the continental relationship could become at a time of increasing trade uncertainty and geopolitical turmoil.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S., China reach trade truce after two days of talks, Trump says
U.S., China reach trade truce after two days of talks, Trump says

Globe and Mail

time27 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

U.S., China reach trade truce after two days of talks, Trump says

President Donald Trump says the U.S. has reached an agreement with China to stand down on a series of punitive measures enacted over the past month, returning the two economic giants to the partial trade-war détente reached in May. The U.S. government said Wednesday that the deal involves China agreeing to stop restricting exports of rare earth minerals and related magnets to the U.S. in exchange for the U.S. reversing planned restrictions on Chinese students and lifting export controls on software. The full deal, reached after two days of talks at Lancaster House in London, was not immediately released. 'OUR DEAL WITH CHINA IS DONE, SUBJECT TO FINAL APPROVAL WITH PRESIDENT XI AND ME,' Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'RELATIONSHIP IS EXCELLENT!' He added that he and Chinese President Xi Jinping 'are going to work closely together to open up China to American trade.' Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told CNBC that China is now going to 'approve all applications for magnets from United States companies right away. Think of that language: right away. Very much like the same day.' The magnets and the minerals from which they are made are used in cars, military hardware and other products. Mr. Lutnick said tariffs between the two countries will remain unchanged. The U.S. will continue to levy 30-per-cent tariffs on Chinese goods, plus a 25-per-cent tariff on some products that was imposed during Mr. Trump's first term. China's tariff on U.S. imports will stay at 10 per cent. 'We like our position. We like the way things are working with China,' Mr. Lutnick said of the negotiations. 'Every inch of that room was gold-leafed. It was, like, the perfect place to negotiate a Donald Trump deal.' Not everyone was so excited. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told a congressional committee hearing Wednesday that 'China has proven an unreliable partner' and 'we will see' if Beijing fulfills the bargain this time. He said the text of the agreement wasn't available yet because 'we are in the midst of constructing it.' Mr. Bessent, who said he flew back to the U.S. capital from London at 4 a.m. after talks finished, cautioned that the agreement was narrowly focused on resolving the critical minerals issue and did not represent a full trade deal between the two countries. 'It will be a longer process. The trade deal today – or last night – was for a specific goal,' he said. Nor does the agreement represent a truce on the broadest front of Mr. Trump's global trade war. A large chunk of Mr. Trump's tariffs on China remains in place as does Beijing's lower tariff on Washington. How to win a trade war: Canada, Trump and a delicate dance in asymmetric warfare Beijing's official news agency, Xinhua, referred to the deal as an 'agreement in principle.' The agreement effectively restores the situation as it was in May, when the two countries agreed to dial back tariffs for 90 days while they worked on a broader trade agreement. Before that, Mr. Trump had imposed 145-per-cent tariffs on China, which retaliated with 125-per-cent levies. Those eyewatering figures had all but shut down trade and raised fears that the U.S. would soon face shortages of a wide range of consumer goods. After the May 12 deal in Geneva, however, the Trump administration accused China of breaking the agreement by withholding shipments of magnets and critical minerals. The U.S. retaliated with a plan to revoke the visas of Chinese students in 'critical fields' and a clampdown on exporting software for making semiconductors. Mr. Trump and Mr. Xi spoke by phone last week for the first time since Mr. Trump returned to office, a key step toward de-escalating tensions. The off-again, on-again trade restrictions have been a hallmark of the U.S. President's commercial policy in his second term. He imposed a sweeping set of tariffs on nearly every country and territory in the world on April 2, which he dubbed 'liberation day.' Within a week, he had rolled most of those back after a stock market rout. He next hiked tariffs on China in a bid to focus the trade attack on the U.S.'s primary economic adversary. But he eventually reversed many of those, too, amid fears of severely damaging the U.S. economy. Before 'liberation day,' he separately imposed 20-per-cent tariffs on China to punish it for Chinese-made fentanyl in the U.S. Those, plus the 10-per-cent remainder of the 'liberation day' levies and 25 per cent from Mr. Trump's first term, mean many Chinese goods face 55-per-cent tariffs in the U.S. even after the President's climbdowns.

Letters: Lowering the volume makes sense, and not just to appease the neighbours
Letters: Lowering the volume makes sense, and not just to appease the neighbours

Montreal Gazette

timean hour ago

  • Montreal Gazette

Letters: Lowering the volume makes sense, and not just to appease the neighbours

Neighbours of loud establishments are justifiably unhappy about the noise emanating from these venues. But what about the customers and employees inside? Prolonged exposure to excess noise levels is a well-known cause of hearing damage. Reducing sound to a safe level would benefit them, too. And there's no reason why they wouldn't enjoy the environment just as much. Tim Skene, Montreal Lift language barriers, too Quebec has introduced Bill 112, designed to ease some interprovincial trade barriers. However, I don't find it terribly encouraging to know that a tradesperson from another province can come to Quebec and start working immediately — yet much-needed family physicians from other provinces generally have to pass a French-language proficiency test before being permitted to start the practice of saving lives. This seems like another case of misplaced logic on the part of the CAQ. Let's encourage everyone to come to work in Quebec by eliminating language barriers. Allen Rubin, Westmount $61-billion dome helps us how? Re: ' Golden Dome? No, thanks; we don't want it ' (Opinion, June 10) So here's the deal on Donald Trump's Golden Dome as I see it: First scenario: North America gets attacked by nuclear weapons from whomever. The Americans, to save their cities, try to destroy the missiles over Canada before they reach the U.S. border. Result: All the fallout falls on Canadian cities. Second scenario: We have the Golden Dome covering the U.S. and Canada. The missiles start flying and, once again, the Americans try to destroy them over Canada before they obliterate some U.S. cities. Result: All the fallout lands on us again, with no assurance that any U.S. anti-missiles are targeting hostile missiles heading for Canadian cities. Third scenario: We invest $61 billion into our own defence and learn to take care of ourselves. Jerry Trudeau, N.D.G. What qualifies as rebellion in the U.S. In dispatching the National Guard to Los Angeles to quell federal immigration policy protests, President Donald Trump relied upon a legal provision allowing him to do so when there is a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the U.S. government. I assume then that the infamous Jan. 6 rioting at the Capitol in Washington did not qualify. Ian Copnick, Côte-St-Luc Submitting a letter to the editor Letters should be sent by email to letters@ We prioritize letters that respond to, or are inspired by, articles published by The Gazette. If you are responding to a specific article, let us know which one. Letters should be sent uniquely to us. The shorter they are — ideally, fewer than 200 words — the greater the chance of publication. Timing, clarity, factual accuracy and tone are all important, as is whether the writer has something new to add to the conversation. We reserve the right to edit and condense all letters. Care is taken to preserve the core of the writer's argument. Our policy is not to publish anonymous letters, those with pseudonyms or 'open letters' addressed to third parties. Letters are published with the author's full name and city or neighbourhood/borough of residence. Include a phone number and address to help verify identity; these will not be published. We will not indicate to you whether your letter will be published. If it has not been published within 10 days or so, it is not likely to be.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store