logo
Trump asks Bondi to seek release of ‘any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony' around Epstein investigation

Trump asks Bondi to seek release of ‘any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony' around Epstein investigation

CNN18-07-2025
President Donald Trump has asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce pertinent testimony related to accused sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, seeming to bow to pressure to release more material on the case.
'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post Thursday night. 'This SCAM, perpetuated by the Democrats, should end, right now!'
Bondi quickly reposted Trump's comments on X and wrote, 'President Trump—we are ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts.'
The Department of Justice could ask judges to make such material public, but the process could be lengthy as the courts weigh privacy and other concerns.
Trump's announcement came hours after the Wall Street Journal published a report detailing a birthday letter sent to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003 bearing Trump's name.
The drawing, depicting a woman's breasts and a 'Donald' signature in the place of pubic hair, surrounded several lines of typewritten text, according to the newspaper, which reviewed the letter. It concluded with the line: 'Happy Birthday — and may every day be another wonderful secret.'
In a post responding to the story, Trump vowed to sue The Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch, saying that he and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt had warned them about publishing the story and that the letter was'fake.'
Trump's request to Bondi comes amid growing calls, including from members of Trump's own base, for more transparency surrounding the investigation into Epstein, a convicted sex offender who authorities have said killed himself while awaiting trial on federal charges.
The Justice Department said in a long-awaited memo last week that there is no evidence Epstein kept a 'client list' or was murdered. The department also released 10 hours of jailhouse security footage that shows no one entered Epstein's jail cell on the day he died by suicide.
'This systematic review revealed no incriminating 'client list,'' the unsigned memo states. 'There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.'
The memo infuriated an influential contingent of Trump supporters who believed the administration would make all of the Epstein files public. It failed to produce a smoking gun, undercutting Trump and his team's own words, leaving the MAGA world unhappy and pitting the president's closest allies against one another. Much of the ire was directed at Attorney General Bondi.
Some of Trump's most loyal allies in Congress were also not satisfied with his decision to not release additional files from the case, including House Speaker Mike Johnson and GOP Rep. Ralph Norman of South Carolina.
Trump was, however, laudatory of his attorney general, saying she could release any more 'credible' files. He also decried this week 'some stupid and foolish Republicans' who were focused on the issue and attacked Democrats for perpetuating a 'hoax' aimed at targeting him politically.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US lenders weighed reputation rules, not politics, in closing accounts, sources say
US lenders weighed reputation rules, not politics, in closing accounts, sources say

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US lenders weighed reputation rules, not politics, in closing accounts, sources say

By Nupur Anand and Saeed Azhar NEW YORK (Reuters) -Decisions by some major U.S. banks to close accounts were based on rules around reputational risk, people familiar with the matter said, pushing back on President Donald Trump's accusation that he and his conservative supporters were denied services for political reasons. Trump on Tuesday renewed his criticism of JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America, saying they discriminated against him by refusing to accept hundreds of millions of dollars in deposits. While banks have been careful not to contradict the president directly and provoke his ire, two industry sources cited regulations under the former President Joe Biden's administration that forced them to weigh reputational risks as the reason lenders have dropped clients or avoided others. The sources declined to be identified because of the sensitivity of the matter. One bank was concerned about this issue when dealing with Trump because of his legal woes during the Biden administration, the first source said. Spokespeople for JPMorgan and Bank of America both said they do not consider political affiliations in banking decisions and welcomed Trump's efforts to change regulations. A source familiar with the matter said that JPMorgan continues to have a banking relationship with members of the Trump family and it also banks a number of campaign accounts linked to Trump. The White House did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment. BIDEN ERA RULES Under the Biden era, regulators who oversaw the banks would judge the lenders' compliance with the rules, which banks said were based on subjective judgments by government supervisors, the first industry source said. Banks were also concerned about whether regulators would punish them for providing services to individuals who faced legal proceedings, like Trump, the first and second sources said. The main U.S. bank regulators -- the Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency -- have all directed its supervisors this year to stop considering reputational risk when examining banks, a metric that had drawn industry complaints for being too subjective. "The heart of the problem is regulatory overreach and supervisory discretion," the Bank Policy Institute, an industry group, said in a statement. A looming executive order expected as early as this week would instruct regulators to review banks for "politicized or unlawful debanking" practices, according to a draft reviewed by Reuters. Banks also plan to use the current debate to push the government to clarify anti-money laundering laws and establish a clear federal standard on fair access to financial services, the third source said. NOT ISOLATED Trump's criticism echoed longstanding "debanking" complaints from Republicans, who have accused Wall Street banks of "woke capitalism," as well as denying services to gunmakers, fossil-fuel companies and others perceived to be aligned with the political right. Earlier this year, the Trump organization sued Capital One for closing 300 accounts related to the group. The closures came after thousands of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021. Capital One declined to comment beyond its earlier legal filings. Trump also drew headlines in January when he blasted banks for debanking at a gathering of business leaders in Davos, Switzerland. Paul Chesser, director, corporate integrity project at the conservative-leaning National Legal and Policy Center (NLPC), cited former Kansas Governor and Senator Sam Brownback as among the conservatives who were debanked by JPMorgan and other banks. Brownback wrote in the New York Post that JPMorgan had abruptly canceled his newly opened account for the National Committee for Religious Freedom in 2022. The JPMorgan spokesperson said the decision to close the accounts was not related to politics. "The Senator is fully aware why his accounts were closed," the spokesperson said, without elaborating on the reasons for the closure. Brownback told Reuters he had been given five different reasons by the bank for the account closure and was not certain what the final explanation was. NLPC has raised debanking concerns with BofA and JPMorgan through shareholder proposals, which were not included in the banks' proxies, Chesser said. Bank supervision by government regulators is a mostly confidential process that limits banks from explaining to clients why they are declined services. "Customers should not be in the dark about why they are being de-banked," said Chesser. "Nobody got any explanation. They're totally left in the dark. And that is probably the number one priority." Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Trump's Global Tariffs Officially Kick In
Trump's Global Tariffs Officially Kick In

Bloomberg

time15 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump's Global Tariffs Officially Kick In

By Good morning. US tariffs come into force. Donald Trump looks set to meet with Vladimir Putin. And United resumes flights after a tech issue. Listen to the day's top stories. Donald Trump's new tariffs officially took hold, with higher rates for almost all US trading partners starting just after midnight. Switzerland, hit with the highest levies among developed countries, may hit back by cancelling a big order for fighter jets. Trump also announced plans to impose a 100% tariff on semiconductor imports, though he would exempt companies moving production into the country.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store