ICE Kidnappings Are Terrifying. Trump's Bill Will Supercharge Them
Masked agents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other federal agencies jump out of unmarked cars. They wear masks and are often irregularly uniformed, in a slapdash assemblage of jeans and security vests. Some may have labels reading POLICE. Some may have badges. Others dress in t-shirts and baseball caps. They often refuse to identify themselves or produce warrants.
These squads are snatching individuals off the streets, and out of federal courthouses, and wrestling them into vehicles to be spirited away in a spectacle that even a U.S. senator has likened to 'being kidnapped.'
This anarchic authoritarianism is playing out in isolated pockets, for now. But if the budget reconciliation legislation known as President Donald Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' becomes law, the horror will spread nationwide.
'This bill is a force multiplier for ICE,' Nayna Gupta, Policy Director of the pro-immigrant American Immigration Council tells Rolling Stone. 'It allows them to hire 10,000 more agents around the country,' she says, 'while simultaneously deputizing state and local police departments to do things like interrogate, arrest, detain and deport immigrants.'
The Senate's version of the bill steers an astonishing $130 billion into immigration enforcement, detention, and border security, according to the American Immigration Council's tally, which includes funding for Trump's border wall. In the buildup to passage in the Senate, this funding became the central MAGA sales pitch. 'Everything else' — including the bill's staggering cuts to the social safety net — 'is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions,' Vice President J.D. Vance posted on X Monday night, Vance's post preceded, by hours, his casting the tie-breaking vote in the Senate.
Stephen Miller, Trump's nativist policy chief, touts the 'Big Beautiful Bill' for the same reason Gupta blasts it: 'The BBB will increase by orders of magnitude the scope, scale and speed of removing illegal and criminal aliens,' Miller posted on X in June, branding the bill, with a chauvinistic flourish, 'the most essential piece of legislation… in the entire Western World, in generations.'
Building the case for the bill, Trump's so-called Border Czar, Tom Homan, appeared last week at a conference in Washington D.C. held by the Faith & Freedom Coalition, a right-wing organization led by the scandal-tainted evangelical power broker Ralph Reed. Homan got raucous cheers from the Christian audience for a profanity-laced speech, in which he touted the administration's agenda to arrest and remove the strangers among us. 'If I offend anybody today,' Homan said, 'I don't give a shit.'
In his speech, Homan advanced a version of the Great Replacement conspiracy theory. He baselessly alleged that Democrats under Joe Biden 'unsecured the border on purpose' to build a new political power base of immigrants. 'They knew exactly what they're doing,' Homan said. 'They saw future political benefit on doing it. They thought millions of people coming into the country are going to be future Democratic voters.' Homan continued: 'They sold this country out for future political power. And to me, that's treasonous.'
Homan talked up congressional passage of the 'Big Beautiful Bill' as a countermeasure: 'They pass that bill, we're gonna have more money than we ever had to do immigration enforcement,' he said, adding gruffly: 'You think we're arresting people now? You wait till we get the funding to do what we got to do.' (Homan's comments were first highlighted by Right Wing Watch.)
The bill will swell the ranks of ICE agents. The Senate bill earmarks about $30 billion for recruiting and retention; the House version specifies the hiring of nearly 10,000 new agents, or 'boots on the ground,' as Homan described them, militaristically. The bill also has more than $45 billion to ramp up detention facilities and detainee transportation — to turn the Trump deportation machine into what acting ICE director Todd Lyons envisions as an Amazon-like logistics operation: 'Like Prime, but with human beings.'
Gupta, the immigrant-rights policy advocate, tells Rolling Stone: 'The dollar numbers that we're seeing here will have the effect of creating an immigration detention system as large, or larger, than the U.S. federal prison system.' She adds that the law would create an 'enforcement regime that militarizes American communities in a much more extreme way than what we've already seen in the first six months of the Trump administration.'
Homan, in his speech, pointed to current ICE detention capacity as limiting arrests, with the administration playing a constant 'chess game' to clear out enough beds to then jail more migrants. 'We need 100,000 beds. So I can fill 100,000 beds,' Homan said. 'We should be coming to work every day saying, Get everybody you can get. And we got the bed waitin'.'
Homan's current 'game' has deadly consequences for detainees held in crowded conditions: 'We've already seen 10 deaths in immigration facilities in just five months,' says Gupta, citing reports of 'horrific conditions inside the facilities, including starvation, lack of gynecological care for women, [and] delayed insulin treatment for diabetic patients.' In a press availability Monday, Homan responded with indifference to the report of the recent in-custody death of a 75-year-old Cuban immigrant who'd first arrived in the United States in 1966: 'People die in ICE custody,' Homan said. 'People die in county jails. People die in state prisons.'
Speaking to the religious audience in D.C., the border czar insisted that President Trump's orders to target 'the worst first' is still in effect. But he made clear that anyone without legal status should live in fear of what's coming. 'The media has been hitting me up lately saying, Homan is lying. They're not arresting just criminals and public safety threats. They're arresting non-criminals. What they're afraid to tell you is: Yeah, they're in a country illegally. So they're on the table too.'The bill also provides, Gupta says, $10 billion in funding to deputize local law enforcement into the detention and deportation ranks — a move that seems destined to exacerbate the rag-tag optics of armed men wearing face gaiters jumping out of cars and tackling alleged undocumented immigrants.In a recent TV interview, ICE's Lyons said he would prefer that officers not mask, because it is 'hot' and 'dangerous.' But he justified the practice, because 'ICE agents are being doxed at a horrible rate.' Doxing refers to making personal details public. The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to questions about Lyons' definition of doxing, in what circumstances it is a crime (there is a narrow federal anti-doxing provision), or what horrific metric Lyons was referring to.
However DHS makes no apologies for the fact that 'undercover' federal officers on immigration duty look like irregular combatants. 'When our heroic law enforcement officers conduct operations, they clearly identify themselves as law enforcement while wearing masks to protect themselves from being targeted,' Assistant DHS Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement to Rolling Stone.
In a separate statement, DHS maintained that its agents always 'verbally identify themselves as with ICE or Homeland Security,' that they 'wear vests that say ICE/ERO or Homeland Security,' and that they're 'flanked by vehicles that also say the name of the department.' Such claims are contradicted by viral videos and Senate hearings.
Consider the case of Brad Lander, the New York City mayoral candidate who was tackled and detained after trying to accompany a New Yorker through the hallway of a federal court courthouse after an immigration proceeding. One of the apparent under-cover agents who nabbed Lander wore jeans and a shirt branded 'Rogue' — from a clothing company whose motto is: 'We do not come in peace.'In a recent Senate hearing Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.) pressed Attorney General Pam Bondi on the dangers of masked ICE agents who do 'not follow required protocol to identify themselves as law enforcement.' Peters told Bondi he was 'deeply concerned' about the 'lack of identification' by federal agents, calling it 'dangerous both to the public as well as to the officers themselves.' He told Bondi that 'the public risks being harmed by individuals pretending to be immigration enforcement which has already happened.' He added that federal agents 'also risk being injured by individuals who think they're basically being kidnapped or attacked by some unknown assailant.'
In the face of this questioning, the attorney general struck a pose of ignorance. 'Senator Peters, that's the first time that issue has come to me.' But Bondi countered that agents 'are being doxed,' adding: 'They're being threatened; their families are being threatened.'
In his speech to Faith & Freedom, Homan talked up how the feds are arresting those who challenge ICE and its irregular operations — making plain that legal peril awaits any would-be Good Samaritan who misapprehends an authorized ICE arrest as violent crime: 'You can't impede our enforcement efforts. That's a felony, and we will prosecute,' Homan said. 'You cannot put your hands on an ICE officer. We're prosecuting two judges. We're prosecuting a member of Congress,' he bragged. 'You can't cross the line.'
ICE's current director, Lyons has blamed the city of Portland, Oregon, for the agency's masking imperative, telling an interviewer: 'We had ICE officers' names, addresses, and family Instagrams [and] Facebook posted and spread all around the city of Portland, saying 'No Rest For Ice.''It will not come as any surprise that ICE agents are not celebrated in the biggest, bluest city in Oregon, a sanctuary state, where law enforcement is largely prohibited from participating in immigration enforcement. Portland has been ground zero for confrontations between protesters and the feds in recent years. Trump pioneered a militarized crackdown on protesters in Portland in 2020, when citizens were snatched off the sidewalk into unmarked cars, and feds shot chemical munitions and less-lethal projectiles against people protesting police violence.Though they have not matched the intensity of the conflict in Los Angeles, where Trump federalized the National Guard and deployed the Marines, anti-ICE protests here have been smoldering here for weeks.
The ICE facility in Portland is catty corner to the city's main Tesla dealership — itself the target of incessant protests in recent weeks. The ICE building resembles a minimum security prison, and it occupies an odd-angled city block hemmed in by a freeway and overgrown trolley tracks. The three-story taupe concrete structure is currently up-armored in plywood, its windows and doors covered to the second floor.
The building is also splashed with graffiti ranging from Zen-like scolding — 'LOOK INWARD' — to the bloodthirsty — 'Kill KKKops.' Many of the messages equate ICE with the 'Gestapo.' One grafito reads: 'NAZI CUCKS.' Across the street from the gates of the main driveway, a small group of protesters is gathered by a folding table and a sun tent. Some are yelling 'Fuck ICE!' They have a sign for passing motorists reading: 'YOU'RE NOT SAFE, YOU'RE NEXT.'
The air on a recent weekday afternoon is spicy with the scent of exploded pepper balls and 'green gas,' a crowd-control chemical, deployed against protesters the previous night when federal agents in riot gear emerged to confront a woman, whom DHS's McLaughlin alleges 'threatened officers with a large knife by swinging it and then throwing it at them.' (The woman has been charged with attempted assault of a federal officer.)
A 47-year-old protester who identified herself only as Jezzy told Rolling Stone that she'd been coming to the 'nonviolent encampment' most nights since the 'No Kings' rallies against Trump in mid-June, along with her 'Latina Aztec daughter,' who's 18. Jezzy says she left before the violent clash the previous night, but added that showdowns between protesters and the feds were commonplace.
'I don't know how many times we've been smoke bombed,' Jezzy says. 'We got gassed very badly our first night.' After dark, as Jezzy describes it, feds in riot gear often emerge from the gate and fire pepper balls against protesters. She accuses them of 'ripping up protester signs.'
She describes these federal agents as 'very, very angry' and 'abusive of all the fucking rights anybody has as a human — or as an American.' Despite a personal toll, Jezzy insists she's committed to showing up to defend community members at risk from Trump and his faceless forces. She describes her new daily ritual: 'I work. I protest. I do it all over again.'
More from Rolling Stone
El Salvador Admits U.S. Has Custody of Migrants Trump Sent to Prison There
Bowzer, the Guy from Sha Na Na, Is Trying to Protect Your Health Care From Trump
Texas Floods: At Least 100 Dead as Rescue Efforts Continue Amid New Flash Flood Warnings
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Solve the daily Crossword
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
12 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Largest Texas Newspaper Rebukes Greg Abbott Over Redistricting 'Power Grab'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The Houston Chronicle, Texas' largest newspaper, is criticizing Governor Greg Abbott in an opinion piece for what it calls his "Republican power grab" regarding his state legislature's push to vote and approve GOP-backed redistricting maps that could have drastic effects on and in the aftermath of the 2026 midterm election. Newsweek has reached out to Abbott's office via email for comment on Monday. Why It Matters Abbott had called a special session to address the flooding that killed 135 people last month in Texas Hill Country and the redistricting plan. Tensions have escalated between the governor, Republicans and Texas Democrats as 51 Democratic lawmakers in the Legislature fled the state to Illinois on Sunday to prevent Republicans from moving forward with a vote due to lacking a quorum. Two-thirds of members within the 150-member chamber must be present to pass legislation. In a letter, Abbott referred to the fleeing members as "derelict Democrats" and threatened to remove them from the Legislature altogether if they didn't return by 3 p.m. Monday, August 4. "Real Texans do not run from a fight. But that's exactly what most of the Texas House Democrats just than doing their job and voting on urgent legislation affecting the lives of all Texans, they have fled Texas to deprive the House of the quorum necessary to meet and conduct business," he wrote in part. Republicans have a slim majority in the U.S. House of Representatives and a slightly larger one in the U.S. Senate. Democrats hope to take back the House in next year's midterms, which traditionally have seen the party that is not in power in the White House gain a number of seats. During President Donald Trump's first term, Democrats picked up 41 seats in the midterms. Trump, meanwhile, has backed Abbott's move to redraw the state map. What To Know The Chronicle's editorial board published an op-ed piece on Monday, comparing Abbott's efforts during the recent deadly Texas floods to his political efforts to swiftly redraw and enact new districts across the Lone Star State. "The governor has followed his orders from Washington and put a Republican power grab before communities devastated by Central Texas floods," the editorial reads. "With a stroke of his pen, Abbott could have moved hundreds of millions of dollars by executive fiat. He could have called a session with the sole objective of addressing the still-unfolding crisis in the Hill Country." The editorial board continued: "But the lives of Texans come second to the desires of President Trump and his loyalists. When Trump utters the words 'very simple redrawing,' Abbott asks, how many seats do you want? And we end up with a Congressional map that puts Democrats on the endangered species list." Democrats have argued that if Republicans succeed in redrawing districts in Texas, Trump will push other states to do the same. The editorial also notes that both political parties, be it Republicans in Texas or Democrats in Illinois, have engaged in gerrymandering while in power to boost future prospects. The difference now, according to the Chronicle, is that Texas' bluest cities are being carved up and would hypothetically lead to a Republican majority on par with the nation's reddest state, Wyoming. Texas Democrats would safely hold about 21 percent of the state's congressional districts even though 46 percent of voters in last year's presidential election voted for Democratic nominee then-Vice President Kamala Harris. Abbott is also chastised for his threats of removal, with the editorial calling such an outcome "an attack on democracy itself." "None of this was necessary," the editorial concludes. "Abbott could've just made the special session all about flooding. Heck, lawmakers probably could've gotten a recovery package passed with plenty of time left over to sift through Lieutenant. Governor Dan Patrick's buffet of red-meat priorities. Instead, the well-being of Texans has once again come second to flagrant backroom partisan power-plays." George Strait, Greg Abbott, and Tom Cusick speak onstage for George Strait and Vaqueros del Mar's "Strait To The Heart": A benefit for Hill Country Flood Victims at Estancia at Thunder Valley on July 27... George Strait, Greg Abbott, and Tom Cusick speak onstage for George Strait and Vaqueros del Mar's "Strait To The Heart": A benefit for Hill Country Flood Victims at Estancia at Thunder Valley on July 27 in Boerne, Texas. More What People Are Saying Sergio Sanchez, a former Republican chairman and longtime radio host in Texas, told Newsweek: "This Texas GOP strategy is based on political reality. Almost the entire southern Texas border has shifted red. Red represents the traditional values, work ethic, economic opportunities, immigration controls and police protections no longer espoused by modern Democrats." He added: "The Democrats are again showing they have no values and solutions for Texas and the nation. Their cowardly response is laughable and sad. Democrats are clueless and lost." Former Democratic Texas Representative Colin Allred, also a past U.S. Senate candidate against Senator Ted Cruz, in a statement on Sunday: "This fight isn't just about maps—it's about power. When Republicans silence Black and Latino voters, they're not just rigging elections. They're rigging who gets health care, clean water, and a fair shot. "Let's be clear: they don't just want to rig the vote. They want to use that power to rig the economy — to keep helping the wealthy and well-connected while working families get left behind. Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton on X on Sunday: "I support the immediate arrest of these rogue lawmakers who've fled their duties. These radical Democrats are spitting in the face of every Texan they swore to represent. This is cowardice and dereliction of duty, and they should face the full force of the law without apology." Texas state Representative Gene Wu, the Texas House Democratic Caucus leader, said during a press conference in Chicago: "We will do whatever it takes. What that looks like, we don't know." What Happens Next? Republican State House Speaker Dustin Burrows said the chamber would still meet as planned at 3 p.m. on Monday. "If a quorum is not present then, to borrow the recent talking points from some of my Democrat colleagues, all options will be on the table...." he wrote on X. The lack of a quorum would also delay votes on flood relief and new warning systems in the wake of last month's catastrophic floods in Texas.

Los Angeles Times
13 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
State Department may require visa applicants to post bond of up to $15,000 to enter the U.S.
WASHINGTON — The State Department is proposing requiring applicants for business and tourist visas to post a bond of up to $15,000 to enter the United States, a move that may make the process unaffordable for many. In a notice to be published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, the department said it would start a 12-month pilot program under which people from countries deemed to have high overstay rates and deficient internal document security controls could be required to post bonds of $5,000, $10,000 or $15,000 when they apply for a visa. The proposal comes as the Trump administration is tightening requirements for visa applicants. Last week, the State Department announced that many visa renewal applicants would have to submit to an additional in-person interview, something that was not required in the past. In addition, the department is proposing that applicants for the Visa Diversity Lottery program have valid passports from their country of citizenship. A preview of the bond notice, which was posted on the Federal Register website on Monday, said the pilot program would take effect within 15 days of its formal publication and is necessary to ensure that the U.S. government is not financially liable if a visitor does not comply with the terms of his or her visa. 'Aliens applying for visas as temporary visitors for business or pleasure and who are nationals of countries identified by the department as having high visa overstay rates, where screening and vetting information is deemed deficient, or offering citizenship by investment, if the alien obtained citizenship with no residency requirement, may be subject to the pilot program,' the notice said. The countries affected will be listed once the program takes effect, it said. The bond would not apply to citizens of countries enrolled in the Visa Waiver Program and could be waived for others depending on an applicant's individual circumstances. Visa bonds have been proposed in the past but have not been implemented. The State Department has traditionally discouraged the requirement because of the cumbersome process of posting and discharging a bond and because of a possible misperceptions by the public. However, the department said that previous view 'is not supported by any recent examples or evidence, as visa bonds have not generally been required in any recent period.' Lee writes for the Associated Press.


Boston Globe
13 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
August recess can't hide tensions ahead for Congress on spending and Trump nominations
Lawmakers will use much of September to work on spending bills for the coming budget year, which begins Oct. 1. They likely will need to pass a short-term spending measure to keep the government funded for a few weeks while they work on a longer-term measure that covers the full year. It's not unusual for leaders from both parties to blame the other party for a potential shutdown, but the rhetoric began extra early this year, signaling the threat of a stoppage is more serious than usual. Advertisement On Monday, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries sent their Republican counterparts a sharply-worded letter calling for a meeting to discuss 'the government funding deadline and the health care crisis you have visited upon the American people.' Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up They said it will take bipartisanship to avert a 'painful, unnecessary shutdown.' 'Yet it is clear that the Trump Administration and many in your party are preparing to go it alone and continue to legislate on a solely Republican basis,' said the letter sent to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and House Speaker Mike Johnson. Republicans have taken note of the warnings and are portraying the Democrats as itching for a shutdown they hope to blame on the GOP. Advertisement 'It was disturbing to hear the Democrat leader threaten to shut down the government in his July 8 Dear Colleague letter,' Thune said on Saturday. '... I really hope that Democrats will not embrace that position but will continue to work with Republicans to fund the government.' Different approaches from the House and Senate So far, the House has approved two of the 12 annual spending bills, mostly along party lines. The Senate has passed three on a strongly bipartisan basis. The House is pursuing steep, non-defense spending cuts. The Senate is rejecting many of those cuts. One side will have to give. And any final bill will need some Democratic support to generate the 60 votes necessary to get a spending measure to the finish line. Some Democratic senators are also wanting assurances from Republicans that there won't be more efforts in the coming weeks to claw back or cancel funding already approved by Congress. 'If Republicans want to make a deal, then let's make a deal, but only if Republicans include an agreement they won't take back that deal a few weeks later,' said Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass. Rep. Chuck Fleischmann, R-Tenn., a veteran member of the House Appropriations committee, said the Democratic minority in both chambers has suffered so many legislative losses this year, 'that they are stuck between a rock and their voting base.' Democrats may want to demonstrate more resistance to Trump, but they would rue a shutdown, he warned. 'The reality would be, if the government were shut down, the administration, Donald Trump, would have the ability to decide where to spend and not spend,' Fleischmann said. 'Schumer knows that, Jeffries knows that. We know that. I think it would be much more productive if we start talking about a short-term (continuing resolution.)' Advertisement Republican angry about pace of nominations Republicans are considering changes to Senate rules to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Thune said last week that during the same point in Joe Biden's presidency, 49 of his 121 civilians nominees had been confirmed on an expedited basis through a voice vote or a unanimous consent request. Trump has had none of his civilian nominees confirmed on an expedited basis. Democrats have insisted on roll call votes for all of them, a lengthy process than can take days. 'I think they're desperately in need of change,' Thune said of Senate rules for considering nominees. 'I think that the last six months have demonstrated that this process, nominations is broken. And so I expect there will be some good robust conversations about that.' Schumer said a rules change would be a 'huge mistake,' especially as Senate Republicans will need Democratic votes to pass spending bills and other legislation moving forward. The Senate held a rare weekend session as Republicans worked to get more of Trump's nominees confirmed. Negotiations focused on advancing dozens of additional Trump nominees in exchange for some concessions on releasing some already approved spending. At times, lawmakers spoke of progress on a potential deal. But it was clear that there would be no agreement when Trump attacked Schumer on social media Saturday evening and told Republicans to pack it up and go home. 'Tell Schumer, who is under tremendous political pressure from within his own party, the Radical Left Lunatics, to GO TO HELL!' Trump posted on Truth Social. Associated Press writers Mary Clare Jalonick and Joey Cappelletti contributed to this report. Advertisement