Sam Kerr apologises for ‘expressing myself poorly' after not guilty verdict
Chelsea striker Sam Kerr has apologised 'for expressing myself poorly on what was a traumatic evening' after being found not guilty of racially aggravated harassment for calling a Metropolitan Police officer 'stupid and white'.
The Australia international made the comments to Pc Stephen Lovell during an incident in south-west London in the early hours of January 30 2023.
Kerr, 31, and her partner, West Ham midfielder Kristie Mewis, had been out drinking when they were driven to Twickenham Police Station by a taxi driver who complained that they had refused to pay clean-up costs after one of them was sick and that one of them had smashed the vehicle's rear window.
At the police station, Kerr became 'abusive and insulting' towards Pc Lovell, calling him 'f****** stupid and white'.
A jury returned the not guilty verdict on Tuesday after deliberating for around four hours and 17 minutes at Kingston Crown Court since the previous day.
On Tuesday evening, Kerr issued a statement which read: 'Following today's not guilty verdict, I can finally put this challenging period behind me.
'While I apologise for expressing myself poorly on what was a traumatic evening, I have always maintained that I did not intend to insult or harm anyone and I am thankful that the jury unanimously agreed.
'I would like to thank my partner Kristie, my family, friends and all the fans for their love and support, especially those who attended court each day.
'I am fully focused on getting back on to the pitch and look forward to an exciting year ahead for me and my family.'
During the trial, the court heard how Kerr had accepted later calling Pc Lovell 'stupid and white' during a heated exchange but denied that it amounted to the charge.
While I apologise for expressing myself poorly on what was a traumatic evening, I have always maintained that I did not intend to insult or harm anyone and I am thankful that the jury unanimously agreed
Sam Kerr
She said she regretted the way she expressed herself but added: 'I feel the message was still relevant'.
She denied using 'whiteness as an insult' and claimed: 'I believed it was him using his power and privilege over me because he was accusing me of being something I'm not… I was trying to express that due to the power and privilege they had, they would never have to understand what we had just gone through and the fear we were having for our lives.'
Asked if she was saying Pc Lovell was 'stupid because he was white', Kerr said: 'No'.
Kerr and Mewis told the court how they felt 'dismissed' by Pc Lovell after explaining how they had been 'trapped' in the back of a taxi and 'held against our will'.
Mewis smashed the taxi's rear window before the pair climbed out of the vehicle, which was parked near Twickenham Police Station.
At the station, Kerr, Mewis and Pc Lovell got into an exchange, described in court as a 'heated argument', and Kerr told police 'this is a racial f****** thing'.
She told the jury: 'I believed they were treating me differently because of what they perceived to be the colour of my skin – particularly Pc Lovell's behaviour.
'The way he was accusing me of lying, and later arresting me for criminal damage even though Kristie said it was just her (who smashed the taxi's window). At the time, I thought they were trying to put it on me.'
The Crown Prosecution Service originally decided not to charge Kerr, the court heard.
It can now be reported that Kerr's legal team attempted to get the case thrown out at a preliminary hearing, arguing there had been an abuse of process by crown prosecutors.
Speaking during the hearing on January 14, Kerr's lawyer Grace Forbes said the CPS had violated its own guidance, adding that a 'loophole' in the victims' right of review scheme was used to justify prosecution proceedings a year after the alleged offence.
During the trial, it was put to Pc Lovell that he only provided a statement alleging that Kerr's comments had caused alarm or harassment after that decision.
In his first statement to the CPS, the officer made no mention of the 'stupid and white' comment having an impact on him, the jury was told.
Police submitted a request to review the CPS decision not to prosecute, and it responded that the outcome would be limited to an apology, the court heard.
Prosecutors later requested further evidence and a second statement from Pc Lovell was provided in December 2023, mentioning the alleged impact.
He read a section of the statement to the court, which said the comments made him 'shocked, upset, and (left) me feeling humiliated'.
The charge was authorised later in December 2023, nearly a year after the incident.
Forbes said to Pc Lovell during cross-examination: 'You were determined to pursue this person, weren't you?'
Pc Lovell said 'yes' and Forbes asked, 'through the criminal courts?'
The officer replied 'yes' again.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
43 minutes ago
- BBC News
Met officers face misconduct hearing over strip-search of boy, 15
Three Metropolitan Police officers are facing disciplinary action after a child was allegedly strip-searched in his home without an appropriate adult force said the incident took place on 2 March, 2022, where officers arrested and searched a 15-year-old boy, known as Child A, on suspicion of robbery at knife point. It is alleged that Child A was taken home, where his bedroom was searched and a strip-search took place before he was placed into Jordan McGovern, PC Kieron Grant and Acting Sgt Jake Simpson are facing allegations amounting to gross misconduct, relating to duties and responsibilities; authority, respect and courtesy and orders and instructions. After searching the room, Acting Sgt Simpson called his supervisor for authorisation to conduct a further search of the boy. That was granted provided an appropriate adult was to the Met, it is alleged that Acting Sgt Simpson did not tell his colleagues the search was allowed only if an appropriate adult was present. No arrangements were made for one to be there. The force said there was no reasonable basis to conduct a strip-search before he was in custody. It added: "It is also alleged that none of the officers made any record of the strip-search of Child A, nor did they ensure that a record of the strip-search had been made by any other person."It is also claimed by the police that none of the officers made a record of the hearing will be held at Sutton Police Station from 13 to 24 October.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Police hunt man in his 50s after woman reports attempted rape at cinema
Police are hunting a man in his 50s after a woman was 'seriously sexually assaulted' in a London cinema. A woman in her 30s said the alleged assault happened in a cinema in South Hampstead at around 3.45pm on Wednesday, June 11. Metropolitan Police say they have specialist officers supporting the woman following the claims of sexual assault. They have also released an image of a man they say 'they wish to speak to' following the report of the incident. The man is believed to have left the venue and headed in the direction of Swiss Cottage. He is described as being in his 50s and around 5ft 6in with a slim build. He has dark hair on the sides of his head and was captured on CCTV wearing a North Face coat and glasses following the alleged offence. Detectives say they are looking to hear from anyone who knows the man or believes that they saw him. Those with information are urged to contact 101 quoting investigation reference 5365/11JUN. Once a rape or sexual assault is reported, the Met say they do 'everything we can' to gather evidence and build a case. Their website reads: 'If you decide that you don't want to be involved in an investigation, making a formal statement can still be helpful. Every report is valuable to us.
The Guardian
12 hours ago
- The Guardian
‘A slap in the face': Grenfell officials still working in housing eight years after fire
The survivors of the Grenfell fire have condemned 'a deep and bitter injustice' that many of the officials criticised in the public inquiry in connection to the tragedy have continued working in related fields. 'We relive the pain every day. They are carrying on with life, careers intact, while we are still here – grieving, waiting and fighting for justice,' said a spokesperson for Grenfell United shortly before the eighth anniversary of the fire. 'The fact that some of the people involved are still working in housing is a slap in the face to every survivor and bereaved family. If there are no consequences for decisions that cost lives, what does that say about this country's values? Justice delayed is justice denied – and we will not stop until those responsible are held to account.' Dozens of the individuals implicated in the Grenfell disaster, from civil servants, government ministers, councillors and corporate executives have gone on to have successful careers, many of them still involved in housing and local government. Laura Johnson, who was director of housing at Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (RBKC) at the time of the fire, is now an interim director of property and development at Barnet Homes, which manages and maintains 13,000 council homes. The inquiry found she had slowed down the installation of self-closing mechanisms on fire doors for 'financial and practical reasons', despite being urged to do so by the London fire brigade. It was found that inadequate fire doors, particularly those lacking self-closing mechanisms, allowed smoke and fire to spread more quickly than expected on the night of the fire. She also pushed for a new contractor to carry out renovation works on the block on a lower budget, which ultimately meant metal cladding was swapped for combustible plastic-filled panels to save money. Johnson has continued working in the housing sector since the fire, including as a consultant at two housing associations and a council. Her LinkedIn profile states that in her current role she has 'overarching responsibility' for delivering health and safety compliance 'including fire and building safety'. Johnson has not responded to a request for comment. Brian Martin, a civil servant who admitted to being a 'single point of failure' on the run-up to the fire, has since gone on to act as a fire safety expert witness and testified in the first UK cladding tribunal case in 2023. He allegedly said: 'show me the bodies' – an accusation he has denied – when he was advised to tighten fire safety rules to prevent a tower block disaster, and was in charge of official building regulations for almost 18 years prior to the fire, which killed 72 people. The inquiry found that in January 2016, 18 months before the Grenfell blaze, he had written that when ACM cladding was exposed to fire, 'the aluminium melts away and exposes the polyethylene core. Whoosh.' He was then urged to tighten the rules on ACM panels in the UK but failed to do so. He continued working within the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government with a role in the planning directorate until at least 2022, although he no longer works in the department. He gave evidence as a 'fire safety expert' at a cladding tribunal in 2023 in which he was praised for 'being balanced, knowledgable and thoughtful'. The Grenfell inquiry found he had no formal fire safety or engineering qualifications at the time of the fire. The Guardian has attempted to contact Martin for comment. Deborah French was a sales manager at Arconic – the multibillion-dollar US company that made the combustible cladding panels on Grenfell Tower – and has admitted she knew the cladding she was selling could burn but did not tell customers. Before the fire, in 2015, she began working at the building materials supplier Taylor Maxwell, where she became their national cladding director, a role she held until 2023. During the public inquiry she said she knew the polyethylene product could burn but she didn't 'specifically explain' this to her customers, although if she had been asked the question, she would have. She also said she had not seen the building regulations guidance on fire safety. Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion Taylor Maxwell said French's work during the course of her employment with them did not relate in any way to Grenfell Tower. The Guardian has attempted to contact French for comment. Nicholas Paget-Brown, who was the leader of RBKC at the time of the blaze and initially resisted calls to resign in the face of mounting criticism of his authority's response, now runs a consultancy firm on public policy issues. He resigned weeks after the fire, after accusations of badly organised relief efforts and little support for residents who were left homeless. The inquiry report found he was 'unduly concerned for RBKC's reputation', with the council's response described as 'muddled, slow, indecisive and piecemeal'. According to Paget-Brown's LinkedIn profile, he is a managing director of Pelham Consulting, which tracks manifesto commitments and offers briefings on public policy issues. He did not respond to a request for comment. A Metropolitan police investigation into the Grenfell fire continues. Survivors and bereaved families have criticised the pace of the inquiry. Stuart Cundy, a deputy assistant commissioner at the Met, said: 'The Grenfell Tower fire is one of the most complex investigations ever undertaken by any UK law enforcement agency. We are investigating a range of very serious criminal offences including corporate manslaughter, gross negligence manslaughter and fraud, as well as health and safety offences. 'We cannot begin to imagine the impact that waiting for the outcome of our investigation must have on those who lost loved ones, those who survived, and all those affected by the tragedy.' He added that investigators had spent over a year forensically examining the tower, taking more than 13,000 witness statements and gathering more than 153m documents and files, with 195 dedicated investigators on the case. Barnet Homes have been approached for comment.
