Channel migrants who claim to be children given benefit of the doubt despite over HALF turning out to be adults
MIGRANT 'KID' BLUNDERS Channel migrants who claim to be children given benefit of the doubt despite over HALF turning out to be adults
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
SMALL boat migrants who claim to be children are being given the benefit of the doubt by immigration staff - despite more than half turning out to actually be adults.
A report has found that workers show a 'lack of curiosity' about the real age of asylum seekers arriving across the Channel.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
2
Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, said: 'Accurately assessing the age of individuals is an incredibly complex and difficult task'
Credit: Richard Townshend Photography
AI tech is set to be rolled out in 2026 which can accurately assess how old a person really is.
Currently, anyone who says they are under 18 are treated as minors unless they look 'significantly' older.
In one case highlighted by Independent Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration David Bolt, an Iranian national who had grey hairs was treated as a child despite assessors thinking he was probably around 22.
In 2024, over half - 56 per cent - of the individuals who claimed on arrival to be children were either later assessed to be adults or admitted that they were 18 or over.
READ MORE ON IMMIGRATION
RULING FEARS Palestinian gran wins right to come to UK for medical treatment sparking fears
The two-day training given to assessors 'instructs officers that they should always give the benefit of the doubt to the individual where they are not sure about someone's claimed age and do not judge them to be significantly over 18'.
The report states that a Vietnamese national was 'initially given the benefit of the doubt' as a child because workers said he had a 'soft face'.
Another officer then raised concerns about his age because of his 'developed shoulders', 'huge hands' and a 'tiny bit of stubble'.
In other assessments 'arrogance' was used as a sign that a migrant was an adult.
One Iranian national presented with some grey hairs and black stubble on his face and claimed to be 17.
Despite being assessed as actually 22 years old, he was 'given the benefit of the doubt' and treated as a child pending further assessment.
Man believed to be running meet and greet service arrested in dawn raid as part of Channel crackdown
It is acknowledged by the report that it is not always possible to assess the age of a young person through their physical appearance or demeanour, because different life experiences can stunt growth or change behaviours.
David Bolt made eight key recommendations to the Home Office on the age assessment process, including reviewing the training given to officers by the end of year.
In response, the Government accepted all recommendations and pointed out that they are rolling out Facial Age Estimation technology next year pending a trial.
It has been trained on millions of images where an individual's age is known.
Dame Angela Eagle, Minister for Border Security and Asylum, said in a written statement: 'Accurately assessing the age of individuals is an incredibly complex and difficult task, and the Home Office has spent a number of years analysing which scientific and technological methods would best assist the current process, including looking at the role that Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology can play.
'In a situation where those involved in the age assessment process are unsure whether an individual is aged over or under 18, or do not accept the age an individual is claiming to be, Facial Age Estimation offers a potentially rapid and simple means to test their judgements against the estimates produced by the technology.'
A procurement process is currently underway with the new tech set to be integrated into the current system 'over the course of 2026'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
a few seconds ago
- Reuters
UK plans to recognise Palestinian state in September unless Israel takes action
LONDON, July 29 (Reuters) - Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Tuesday Britain was prepared to recognise a Palestinian state in September at the United Nations General Assembly unless Israel takes a number of steps to improve life for Palestinians. Britain, if it acts, would become the second Western power on the U.N. Security Council to do so after France last week, reflecting Israel's deepening isolation over its conduct in its war against Hamas in Gaza, where a humanitarian disaster has set in and the Palestinian death toll has risen above 60,000. Starmer said Britain would make the move unless Israel took substantive steps to allow more aid to enter Gaza, made clear there will be no annexation of the West Bank and commits to a long-term peace process that delivers a "two-state solution" - a Palestinian state co-existing in peace alongside Israel. "The Palestinian people have endured terrible suffering," Starmer told reporters. "Now, in Gaza, because of a catastrophic failure of aid, we see starving babies, children too weak to stand, images that will stay with us for a lifetime. The suffering must end." Starmer said his government would make an assessment in September on "how far the parties have met these steps", but that no one would have a veto over the decision. He took the decision after recalling his cabinet during the summer holidays on Tuesday to discuss a new proposed peace plan being worked on with other European leaders and how to deliver more humanitarian aid for Gaza's 2.2 million people. Successive British governments have said they will formally recognise a Palestinian state when the time is right, without ever setting a timetable or specifying the necessary conditions. With warnings from international aid agencies that people in Gaza are facing starvation, a growing number of lawmakers in Starmer's Labour Party have been asking him to recognise a Palestinian state to raise pressure on Israel. The issue came to the fore after President Emmanuel Macron said on Thursday France would recognise Palestine as a state in territories Israel captured in the 1967 Middle East war. Israel and staunch supporter the United States blasted France's move, branding it a reward for Palestinian Hamas militants who ran Gaza and whose attack on Israel on October 7, 2023 triggered the current war. At the start of the Gaza war in October 2023, when Starmer was the opposition leader, he fully backed Israel's right to defend itself. But his stance has shifted over the years to a tougher approach to Israel, especially since his election as prime minister just over a year ago. His government dropped the previous government's challenge over arrest warrants issued by the International Criminal Court for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and has suspended some weapon sales to Israel. Last month, Britain sanctioned two far-right Israeli cabinet ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, accusing them of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians.
BBC News
a few seconds ago
- BBC News
UK to recognise Palestinian state unless Israel meets conditions
The UK will recognise a Palestinian state in September unless Israel takes "substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza", Sir Keir Starmer has prime minister said Israel must also meet other conditions, including agreeing to a ceasefire and allowing the United Nations to restart the supply of aid, or the UK would take the step at September's UN General government has previously said recognition should come as part of a peace process and at a point when it can have maximum the PM has been under growing pressure - including from his own MPs - to act more quickly. Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
Starmer shows no guts or compassion on Gaza
You published a photograph of aid being airdropped into Gaza by the United Arab Emirates and Jordan (Palestinians wary as Israel begins military pauses to allow 'minimal' aid into Gaza, 27 July). Any aid is welcome, but they dropped 25 tonnes in one day, about 11 grams per Palestinian, barely a couple of teaspoonfuls. That's not going to keep people alive, and neither are a few truckloads delivered over a limited period. In 1984-85, I served with Operation Bushel, the RAF detachment in Ethiopia that flew aid into areas of famine. The operation was approved by Margaret Thatcher, despite Ethiopia's government being a brutal regime propped up by the Soviet Union. Delivering aid by air is difficult, risky and expensive; it's appropriate only when there is no other option. In Gaza, the so-called safe area of al-Mawasi is only 10 miles by road from the Rafah crossing; just north of Gaza is a major Israeli port, with road access into Gaza just a few miles away. This is one of the worst aspects of the famine in Gaza: unlike in Ethiopia, where access was extremely difficult, in Gaza there is a mountain of aid sitting close by, but kept inaccessible by Israel's actions. That Benjamin Netanyahu is allowing a trickle of aid into Gaza is a sign that international pressure has an effect. Most of the pressure here is coming from the public while our government spouts platitudes. Mrs Thatcher might have had the compassion and guts to take difficult decisions. Sir Keir Starmer clearly hasn' MaughanDunblane, Perthshire I agree with Nesrine Malik (Protesting over Gaza's starvation feels like screaming into a void – but we mustn't stop, 28 July), but unfortunately we have allowed pro-Israel pressure groups to redefine criticism of Israel as antisemitism, and the government to redefine expressing support for Palestine as terrorism. The former can be brushed away, but an arrest under anti-terrorism laws, even if no charges are brought, can have serious affects on someone's employment prospects and freedom to travel for the rest of their lives. If the proscription of Palestine Action is ever reversed, we must demand that any related arrests, charges and convictions are expunged from people's PerryIckenham, London Nesrine Malik powerfully expressed the true nature of the catastrophe, the true horror of its outcomes and the true failure of governments to halt Israel's wanton destruction of Palestine and its people. But her words, and these few, are wasted unless governments come together to halt military and trade relations, and institute sanctions that will force Israel to end military action, withdraw from Gaza, allow meaningful aid to reach its people, restore infrastructure and agree to a two-state solution. I have been a passive, if horrified, observer. I am now an active BoohanLondon My country can't single-handedly stop what's happening, but we could at a stroke cut off every atom of support, every shred of legitimacy to the perpetrators. And by choosing not to, my government is making me and all my fellow citizens accessories to an atrocity. How can I make it clear that I do not consent to this? Being ignored is what drives desperate law-abiding citizens first to be paint-sprayers and eventually to more violent forms of JennisonWitney, Oxfordshire Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
