
Corry mayoral candidates once campaigned as a team. Now they're rivals for nomination
They have since parted ways on city issues, including the return of grant funding for public trail improvements and for a fiber optics network.
Now the two men are facing each other for the Republican nomination for mayor in the May 20 municipal primary.
Fike, an Air Force veteran and retired state trooper, had been attending council meetings and said that he was dissatisfied with council's unwillingness to answer questions about topics that were of interest to the public.
"Before I stomped my feet and jumped up and down, I decided I would do something about it, and two weeks before the general election started a write-in campaign along with Mike Baker and Kristen Lindstrom," Fike said. Lindstrom also won a council seat in 2021.
"They had agreed and decided to run on transparency and putting a stop to micromanaging, but as soon as they took office, that changed with them," Fike said. "And for about the last year and a half I've been a man on an island; all I can do is make sure the public has knowledge of what the other four (council members and mayor) are doing, and why I oppose a lot of the things that they're doing."
Fike opposed council's decision to return a $73,000 grant for trail improvements to the state Department of Conservation and Natural Resources last year and this spring opposed council's decision to decline an $875,000 Appalachian Regional Commission grant for a fiber network for high-speed internet service.
City Council previously had voted to partner with Impact Corry for the grant to improve a rail trail on city property and to commit $14,000 and the use of city equipment and manpower for the project.
The previous city administration also had agreed to partner with Impact Corry on creating a fiber broadband network.
Council voted to return the DCNR trail grant last summer after some residents who owned adjacent properties raised concerns about privacy, noise, property values and possible vandalism.
"It's a public nuisance, period," Baker, a business owner, said of the trail in June. "Having it in your backyard is an invasion of privacy."
Improving the long-used trail as a connection in the Pittsburgh to Erie Trail would only compound problems, Baker said.
"This is just the beginning of the trails they want to put in. If there are this many problems with one-third of that, what would we have when it's all done," Baker said.
Many more residents supported the trail project than opposed it, Fike said.
"I think nine families opposed the trail, and about 500 people in a poll favored it," Fike said.
The city not only returned the grant to improve the trail along a former rail line. It also barricaded entrances to the trail without council authorization, Fike said.
What's being built?: Corry Rails + Trails park will be for more than biking
City officials voted to return the fiber grant because they weren't comfortable being the grant recipient and could not transfer the grant to Impact Corry as requested, Baker said. Impact Corry — a nonprofit organization dedicated to community, economic and civic development — can reapply for the funding on its own, Baker said.
Further, a fiber network is not needed and the grant money could have been better used to address other city issues, Baker said.
"We have three internet (providers) in Corry," Baker said. "We're not under-served or not served. Fiber would be a duplication."
Even with three providers, internet service is not available in some areas and not reliable in others, Fike said.
"It's not the kind of internet we need for people working from home. It's not the kind of internet we need for business expansion. And it's certainly not the kind of internet we need for kids to do their studies at home," Fike said.
More: Barb Nichols, longtime Corry Memorial Hospital CEO, oversaw massive changes on her watch
Corry is moving forward under the current administration, Baker said.
The city has been remediating stormwater flooding and is working to address the issue long-term, Baker said.
The city also is working with the Erie County Land Bank to address blight and with the Corry Redevelopment Authority to help residents repair and maintain properties, Baker said.
A planned $40 million wastewater treatment plant will benefit residents and businesses, and a new road maintenance program is among more city accomplishments during his term as mayor, Baker said.
"We started a better program to take care of our streets and we're spending money a little more wisely rather than patching a road and watching it fall apart," Baker said. "We're trying to do main thoroughfares on a more permanent basis."
Fike said that other improvements that have been rejected by the city are taking a toll.
"Residents, business owners — everyone's morale is down," Fike said. "Because every time it looks like we're taking a few steps forward, a project gets cancelled and the money gets sent back. And we're back to square one."
No matter who wins a four-year term as mayor this fall, the Corry city administration is almost certain to change dramatically. Impact Corry Executive Director Chuck Gray and former Corry mayor and councilman Charles Campbell are the only candidates for two available Republican nominations for council. Bill Roche, another former city councilman and current member of the Impact Corry board of directors, is the sole candidate for two available Democratic nominations for council.
Corry City Council is comprised of just four members, plus the mayor.
Contact Valerie Myers at vmyers@timesnews.com.
This article originally appeared on Erie Times-News: Mayor, councilman face off for party's nomination for Corry mayor

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Zelensky Returning to White House With Backup After Trump Clash
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. European leaders and the NATO Secretary General will join Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in Monday's White House meeting, offering up a coordinated show of support for Kyiv after President Donald Trump failed to reach a ceasefire deal with Russia last week. Why It Matters European officials have looked on with concern as the Trump administration placed itself as the chief negotiator between Russia and Ukraine, jockeying to stay in the loop—and influential—as the Republican appears unwilling to strongarm Russia into concessions. European countries, many of which feel their own security is at stake with an agreement for Ukraine, have repeatedly echoed Kyiv's demands for a ceasefire deal that does not gift Russia territory recognized internationally as Ukrainian, and for Kyiv to have firm security guarantees to deter future Russian attacks. Ahead of Trump's meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, European leaders made it clear they did not support any change in borders by force. Trump had said in advance of the summit that both sides would need to cede territory. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, right, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky participate in a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, on August 17, 2025. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, right, and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky participate in a media conference at EU headquarters in Brussels, Belgium, on August 17, 2025. AP Photo What To Know British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and French President Emmanuel Macron will be among the leaders making the trip to Washington. Also expected to attend are Ursula von der Leyen, the head of the European Commission, and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, who has sought a tight relationship with Trump. Finnish President Alexander Stubb may attend, Politico reported on Sunday. The Finnish leader has broken the ice with Trump, bonding over a shared love of golfing while leading a country with a significant land border, and apprehension toward, Russia. Stubb is a "very good player," Trump previously said. Zelensky's previous visit to the White House in February ended in disaster, descending into a public show of fractured relations between Kyiv and Washington. "Most likely, there will be little mutual understanding between Trump and Zelensky," Oleg Dunda, a Ukrainian MP who is part of Zelensky's Servant of the People party, told Newsweek. "Zelensky has already firmly rejected any proposals regarding territories." Trump told European leaders after meeting Putin that he backed a plan in which Ukraine would cede territory it still controlled to Russia, The New York Times reported, citing two senior European officials. Reuters reported that Russia had said it would offer slivers of land it currently controls in Ukraine in exchange for Kyiv giving up chunks of land in the east that Russia does not currently control, citing sources briefed on the Kremlin's thinking. Under the proposal, Ukraine would fully withdraw from Donetsk and Luhansk, with the current front lines in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions to the south frozen in place, according to the report. Kyiv has said it will not reward Russia's invasion with territory, and to cede these areas would go against the country's constitution. Russia has tried to frame European nations as stumbling blocks to the peace agreement the Trump administration has pledged to broker. Following the Anchorage summit, Putin urged European politicians to "not make attempts to disrupt the planned progress through provocations and behind-the-scenes intrigues," or to become "obstacles." Trump's special envoy, Steve Witkoff, said on Sunday that despite the Alaska summit yielding no deal, Ukraine would have "Article 5-like" protections to ward off any future attempt by Russia to attack its neighbor. Article 5 is the provision in NATO's founding treaty that means that an attack on any member country in the alliance is treated as an attack on all. Moscow has insisted Ukraine cannot become a member of NATO, while Kyiv sees joining the alliance as a way to make sure Russia cannot attack the country again. "Now it is really up to President Zelensky to get it done," Trump told Fox News following the Alaska summit. "I would also say the European nations have to get involved a little bit." What People Are Saying Dominique Trinquand, a retired general who previously headed up France's military mission to the United Nations, told The Associated Press: "The Europeans are very afraid of the Oval Office scene being repeated and so they want to support Mr. Zelensky to the hilt." What Happens Next It's not clear how much concrete progress will be made in Monday's meeting, the Russian and Ukrainian demands remaining apparently irreconciliable.


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Europe needs to treat Putin like an ‘existential threat,' Sen. Schmitt warns
Sen. Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., discusses his take on the Trump-Putin summit in Alaska and more on 'Fox News Sunday.'

Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
States are trying to keep disasters apolitical in the new Trump era
'This decision was petty. This decision was partisan, and this decision was punishing.' Moore said. And after the Los Angeles wildfires in January, California Gov. Gavin Newsom was quick to propose that politics could play a role in Trump's approval or denial of funding for his state. 'He's done it in the past, not just here in California,' Newsom said on Pod Save America. 'The rhetoric is very familiar, it's increasingly acute, and obviously we all have reason to be concerned about it.' A review by Seattle-based public radio station KUOW in June found that FEMA denied six of the 10 major disaster requests that Democratic states filed between February and June, while denying just one of 15 requests from Republican states. Asked about the analysis, a White House official said that 'Democrat state requests were denied in the first six months because they were not disasters. In the past, states have abused the process. President Trump is right-sizing FEMA and ensuring it is serving its intended purpose to help the American people.' Democratic Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs became the rare governor to criticize the federal government's disaster management in mid-July when she called for an investigation following a destructive fire on federal land that burned down a beloved Grand Canyon lodge. Hobbs said that she does not intend her call for an investigation to be viewed as a criticism of the Trump administration. 'I don't, and I think it's really important,' Hobbs said in an interview, adding that good working relationships between officials managing tribal, federal and state land are key. 'This is not intended to undermine that collaboration, but … we need to look at what led to that decision being made.' Steve Ellis, former deputy director of the Bureau of Land Management who worked for the agency and the U.S. Forest Service under multiple administrations, said that any federal agency involved in managing a fire of the magnitude and destructiveness as the one in the Grand Canyon should be launching an investigation without a governor's need to call for it.