logo
Online age-verification laws are reasonable, effective and long overdue

Online age-verification laws are reasonable, effective and long overdue

The Hill4 days ago
In recent weeks, headlines have claimed Americans are being 'dangerously misled' about age verification laws for online pornography. But what's truly misleading is the suggestion that these laws are a threat to free speech or doomed to fail. In truth, they are a long-overdue update to bring online adult content in line with offline protections for minors.
Laws such as Texas's age verification law, which the Supreme Court determined last week to be constitutional, simply require websites with a substantial amount of pornographic content to verify that users are adults before granting them access. Eighteen other states have passed similar laws and more are considering them.
This isn't radical or unprecedented. We already ask for ID to buy alcohol, enter a casino or watch an R-rated film in a theater. Why would watching sex online be treated differently from watching it in person?
Critics argue that these laws are ineffective because tech-savvy teenagers will find workarounds using VPNs. But no state law creates an exemption that says children can access porn if they just disguise their locations. The legal obligation remains on the website to prevent access when it cannot confirm that a user is outside of a state that requires age verification. Just as online gambling platforms restrict access based on state laws, porn sites can and should use the same geolocation tools.
Others suggest that age verification poses an unacceptable risk to user privacy. That may have been a legitimate concern in the past, but the technology has evolved. Today's methods — whether scanning a government ID, using facial age estimation or checking reusable credentials — can be performed entirely on the user's device, with no need to transmit or store any personal information. Even if private data is used, it is not kept. As many cybersecurity experts will tell you, the only truly un-hackable database is no database at all.
It's also worth noting that age verification need not be a repeated task. Interoperable, reusable systems already exist (e.g. AgeAware). In many cases, a user can complete a check once and then reuse the result across multiple websites. And these checks take just seconds — comparable to unlocking a phone with Face ID or scanning a boarding pass. Framing this as an 'undue burden' is out of step with how people already interact with technology every day.
Some critics point to education as a better solution. But this is not an either-or choice. Of course we should educate teens about healthy relationships, consent and digital safety. But education alone isn't enough. No public health strategy relies solely on education. We combine it with reasonable safeguards — seat belts, warning labels, firewalls, vaccinations.
Porn literacy might help a teenager interpret what they're seeing, but it doesn't stop a 10-year-old from stumbling into violent or degrading content before he or she is ready to process it. Admittedly, the goal of age verification is not perfection. It is to stop most children from seeing most pornography most of the time. That is a reasonable benchmark. And it works, especially when combined with enforcement.
Parents also have a role to play. Age verification is one layer of protection but not the only one. Families should still take advantage of parental controls provided by internet service providers, home routers, device operating systems and app stores. But these tools have limits and many parents either don't know how to use them or find them difficult to set up. That's why we need a consistent enforceable standard at the website level where the content originates.
There is strong bipartisan support for these measures. A national poll by RMG Research found that 83 percent of Americans support a federal requirement for age verification on pornographic websites. That's not culture war politics. That's a mainstream consensus that children deserve basic protections online. Age verification laws aren't about banning speech. They're about updating our digital infrastructure to reflect values we already hold — that some content is for adults only and that children should be protected from harm, especially when it's preventable.
Done well, age verification laws can protect children, preserve privacy and uphold adult freedoms. The real threat is not age verification — the real threat is pretending that the status quo is good enough.
Iain Corby is executive director of the Age Verification Providers Association, the global trade body representing providers of privacy-preserving age assurance technologies. He is regularly called as an expert witness to advise legislators around the world on how the latest online age checks operate.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump urges Brazil to spare its former president over attempted coup
Trump urges Brazil to spare its former president over attempted coup

Politico

timean hour ago

  • Politico

Trump urges Brazil to spare its former president over attempted coup

Jair Bolsonaro is on trial for attempting to overthrow the government to stay in power. Former President Jair Bolsonaro addresses the crowd during a protest against his Supreme Court trial, in which he is accused of involvement in a 2022 coup attempt, in Sao Paulo on June 29, 2025. | Ettore Chiereguini/AP By Gregory Svirnovskiy 07/07/2025 01:02 PM EDT President Donald Trump is coming to the defense of Brazilian former President Jair Bolsonaro as he faces a trial for his role in trying to overturn the results of his country's 2022 election. Bolsonaro is accused of participating in a plot to prevent the return of Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva to the presidency of the largest nation in South America, an attempt that echoed Trump's own earlier efforts to stay in office despite losing an election. 'Brazil is doing a terrible thing on their treatment of former President Jair Bolsonaro,' Trump wrote Monday on Truth Social. 'I have watched, as has the World, as they have done nothing but come after him, day after day, night after night, month after month, year after year! He is not guilty of anything, except having fought for THE PEOPLE.'

The 'Big Beautiful Bill' slashes food stamps. One map shows how much red states depend on them.
The 'Big Beautiful Bill' slashes food stamps. One map shows how much red states depend on them.

Business Insider

time2 hours ago

  • Business Insider

The 'Big Beautiful Bill' slashes food stamps. One map shows how much red states depend on them.

President Donald Trump's "big, beautiful" budget will shrink one of America's largest social safety nets. And it could have a big impact on red states. The spending plan outlines future funding for a slew of federal programs and was signed by the president on Friday, after passing both the House and Senate with overwhelming GOP support. The budget will slash nearly $200 billion from federal nutrition aid like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — which nearly 42 million Americans rely on to afford food — over the next decade. The most significant policy adjustment will require nondisabled adults without dependents to fulfill work requirements until they reach age 64 to qualify for aid, up from the current cutoff age of 54. The CBO estimated that over 2 million Americans could lose SNAP coverage due to this change. Some Republicans have defended the legislation, saying that it supports Trump's goal of reducing waste in government spending. It's unclear whether the budget cuts would reduce households' monthly grocery advocates for the program say less funding and stricter work requirements, alongside high grocery prices, will make it more difficult for millions of families to put meals on the table. In a July 4 statement, US Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins said, "While expanding programs to support the farmers who feed, fuel, and clothe America, this legislation also tackles the fraud and waste that has run rampant in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The bill holds states accountable for their error rates, strengthens work requirements, and prevents illegal aliens from receiving SNAP." Undocumented immigrants have long been ineligible for SNAP and other safety net programs, and newly-naturalized citizens must wait five years before they qualify for aid. In 2024, the national SNAP error rate (including both over and underpayments) was 10.9%. States with error rates over 6% by 2028 will have to begin paying toward federal SNAP costs under the new budget. A White House deputy press secretary, Anna Kelly, previously told Business Insider: "President Trump and Republicans are strengthening SNAP so it can be sustainable for generations to come." She added that the spending plan will prevent "waste and exploitation," encourage states to share nutrition program costs with the federal government, and "restore commonsense Clinton-era work requirements." Republican states could feel the brunt of SNAP cuts Scaling back SNAP could have real consequences for low-income households. While the money can't be used to buy household goods, it can be a parachute for families who need support affording produce, protein, and other grocery essentials. Monthly SNAP amounts can range from less than $25 to over $1,000, depending on a household's income and number of members. "We still have birthdays to celebrate," Judith Murray, a parent who receives $1,174 in monthly SNAP for her seven-person family, previously told BI. "We still have Thanksgiving to do and other holidays. When you see me out there buying a birthday cake with my SNAP benefit card, just try to understand that I don't want to let my little ones down any more than you do." According to data collected by the US Department of Agriculture, about 12% Americans were receiving SNAP benefits as of March 2025. In several states that voted for Trump and Republican representatives — such as Louisiana, Oklahoma, West Virginia, and Alabama — that enrollment figure rises up to nearly 18% of the state's population. This comes as Americans' overall reliance on government aid has been increasing. A 2024 report from the Economic Innovation Group, which analyzed Bureau of Labor Statistics data, said funds from programs like SNAP, Medicaid, and Social Security accounted for about 18% of total personal income in the US in 2022, a 9-percentage-point increase from 1970. Of course, regional economic disparities aren't new, and they don't fall neatly along political lines. Some predominantly Democratic-voting states like Oregon and New Mexico have above-average rates of SNAP enrollment. Food insecurity also isn't an isolated issue:States with high government aid use tend to have higher poverty rates, higher unemployment, and more limited healthcare access. Many of these financial disparities are long-standing and have a more severe impact on people of color and other marginalized communities. SNAP also isn't a perfect system. Americans with low income have told BI that they lean on other resources, including food banks, because their SNAP allocation isn't enough to pay their grocery bills. Others limit their work hours to ensure their income doesn't exceed the program's qualification threshold — which is about $15,000 annually for a single person but varies slightly by state. As the "Big Beautiful Bill" becomes law, government data shows that Republicans' constituents would feel the brunt of any SNAP changes more than other political parties. A group of eight GOP representatives led by Rep. Tony Gonzales of Texas wrote a letter to Johnson in February urging the party leader to advocate for "programs that support working-class Americans." "While we fully support efforts to eliminate fraud, waste, and abuse, we must ensure that assistance programs — such as SNAP — remain protected," they wrote.

Poll: Zohran Mamdani's policies are popular with Americans outside New York — even if Mamdani is not
Poll: Zohran Mamdani's policies are popular with Americans outside New York — even if Mamdani is not

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Poll: Zohran Mamdani's policies are popular with Americans outside New York — even if Mamdani is not

On July 1, Zohran Mamdani, a 33-year-old New York state assemblyman from Queens, upset former Gov. Andrew Cuomo in New York City's Democratic primary for mayor, instantly making him the frontrunner to win the general election in November. Mamdani's surprise victory also made him an instant lightning rod for Democrats and Republicans nationwide. Some of the conversation has centered on Mamdani's identity — he is a Muslim who was born in Uganda to Indian-origin parents — and his pro-Palestinian views. (The New York Times reported last week that Mamdani checked the boxes for 'Asian' and 'Black or African American' on his application to Columbia University in 2009.) But perhaps the more interesting debate — or at least the one with wider implications — is whether Mamdani's unapologetically populist agenda can serve as a blueprint for Democrats elsewhere as they struggle to regain power in the Age of Trump. A new Yahoo News/YouGov poll suggests that wouldn't necessarily be the worst idea. The survey of 1,597 U.S. adults — which was conducted from June 26 to 30, just before Mamdani's primary win — did not find the candidate himself to be particularly popular (or well known). Overall, just 22% of Americans say they have a favorable opinion of Mamdani. A greater share (31%) see him unfavorably — and an even greater share than that (46%) say they don't know what to think. Even among Democrats, Mamdani's favorability rating (47%) is under the 50% threshold, and a full 42% don't have an opinion about him yet. But the Democratic Party as a whole is in worse shape (60% unfavorable vs. 32% favorable) than the Republican Party (56% unfavorable vs. 36% favorable), so it can use all the help it can get. The poll shows that Mamdani's ideas are much more popular than Mamdani himself. Asked whether they 'approve or disapprove of the following proposals to lower the cost of living' — none of which were attributed to Mamdani — Americans approved by wide margins in every instance: 62% approved and 24% disapproved of implementing free child care for every child aged 6 weeks to 5 years (a +38-point margin) 60% approved and 22% disapproved of freezing rent for lower-income tenants (a +38-point margin) 51% approved and 31% disapproved of creating a network of government-owned grocery stores focused on keeping prices low rather than making a profit (a +20-point margin) 49% approved and 34% disapproved of raising the minimum wage to $30 by 2030 (a +15-point margin) 46% approved and 36% disapproved of permanently eliminating the fares on public buses (a +10-point margin) And 65% approved and 22% disapproved of raising taxes on corporations and millionaires to pay for these proposals (a +43-point margin) While Democrats are the most supportive — predictably so — Mamdani's policies still garner significant support among Republicans, with roughly 4 in 10 saying they approve of freezing the rent (38%), implementing free child care (38%) and raising taxes on corporations and millionaires to foot the bill (40%). Asked whether they would 'vote for a candidate whose platform included all of these proposals,' half of Americans say yes (50%) — and just a quarter say no (26%). This doesn't mean that Mamdani would win an election outside NYC. Like Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and New York Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, the city's new mayoral nominee identifies as a 'democratic socialist' — and far fewer Americans say they would support a candidate who embraces that label (30%) than say they would not (43%). __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,597 U.S. adults interviewed online from June 26 to 30, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.2%.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store