logo
Where other Opposition parties walked a tightrope, and Congress tied itself up in knots

Where other Opposition parties walked a tightrope, and Congress tied itself up in knots

Indian Express3 days ago

The Pahalgam terrorist attack, Operation Sindoor and the highly-publicised diplomatic tour of multi-party delegations to over 30 countries have thrown up a few surprises in the Opposition ranks.
AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi has smashed the stereotypical image his opponents had cast him into; Congress leader Shashi Tharoor has eclipsed his party, earning all-round praise for his authoritative explanation of the military action against Pakistan; while Trinamool Congress leaders Mamata and Abhishek Banerjee have deftly walked the tightrope between 'nationalism' and their opposition to the BJP, with the nephew drawing notice for his forceful denunciation of Pakistan, as part of his all-party team abroad.
Among the predictables, the Congress ranked the highest, its actions marked by typical confusion, leaving it familiarly tied up in knots.
Having handled the days following the Pahalgam terror attack well, standing in full solidarity with the government and reining in its motormouths, the Congress has let all that flow out of the window. The most glaring example has been the party's response to the all-party delegations chosen by the government to present India's case against Pakistan abroad.
If that was a canny move by a government not known to cede space to the Opposition, the Congress – rather than recognising when it is beat – has been churlish, starting with picking at names of its leaders chosen by the government for the teams.
The Congress could have looked in its own corner, at the TMC, for cues. The party that is in as bitter a battle of survival against the BJP as the Congress, with the poll war of Bengal looming months from now, has held its own when served the same fait accompli.
Mamata too put her foot down at the government's choice of TMC leaders to be part of the all-party delegations. But when she said Yusuf Pathan would stay out, he did. This, in turn, made the government reach out to the third largest party in Parliament to make amends, giving Mamata a chance to nominate her No. 2 and TMC general secretary Abhishek Banerjee, giving the young MP a national platform he has wanted.
Granted that the Congress could not count on its own leaders toeing the party line on the issue of staying out once picked by the government – which selected names that were not just among the best of Congress talent but also leaders who felt sidelined within its ranks. Given this reality, the Congress would have done well to handle this matter in-house, rather than in full public view.
The Congress did not let the matter rest even after this, making a barely concealed attempt at graciousness by saying its leaders would 'of course, go with the delegations and make their contributions'. No sooner had the teams left though, the party denounced the exercise as an attempt to 'divert attention' from the tough questions Prime Minister Narendra Modi is 'being called to answer'.
The most unseeming spectacle has been the sniping between the Congress's own leaders and Tharoor who, by all accounts, is the star speaker of the delegations. As this plays out publicly on social media, it is being amplified by the party's communications department, with apparently no efforts to check the same.
Many wondered why the party then allowed its leaders to be part of the all-party government exercise in the first place.
In the party's defence, Congress leaders argue that the comparison to others is misplaced as all other parties are single-leader entities. 'Sharad Pawar will never complain that his daughter was asked to head one of the delegations without consulting him. The same is the case with the DMK. M K Stalin would not have a problem with Kanimozhi leading a delegation. Owaisi need not ask anyone… Even Mamata… had the government nominated Abhishek (in the first place), she also would not have thrown a fit,' one Congress leader said.
However, the Congress is on thin ice here, as most parties – and that includes the Aam Aadmi Party, RJD, Samajwadi Party and the CPI(M), where party writ runs supreme – chose not to make an issue of the names chosen by the government. It was not a battle these parties perhaps wanted to pick.
Again, while Opposition parties other than the Congress too have been demanding convening of a special session of Parliament, most have thought it politically prudent to desist from seeming too persistent with questions on Operation Sindoor. It is an issue they have let pass at the moment, even though many believe Modi and the BJP are using Operation Sindoor politically.
For the TMC, the balancing act has been the toughest, given the elections ahead and given that Muslims are its big support base. So, Mamata has been clear in her rhetorical signal to the Muslim community that the Waqf (Amendment) Act will not be implemented in Bengal. Meanwhile, Abhishek, while representing the Indian government in the all-party delegations, is underlining that the TMC can be as aggressive on nationalism as the BJP. His remarks in Tokyo, saying, 'If terrorism is a rabid dog, Pakistan is its vile handler. We must first unite the world to tackle this wild handler – else it will continue to breed more rabid dogs', is being amplified by the TMC.
In Tokyo, Abhishek also made it a point to visit the memorial of Rash Behari Bose and raised its 'neglected and dilapidated state'. 'I have requested our Ambassador and the Indian Embassy in Tokyo to take up the matter with concerned authorities and ensure that this remarkable hero receives the honour he truly deserves,' he then said in a social media post.
Meanwhile, Congress sympathisers are ruing that yet again, the party's sorry state of affairs stands exposed, with those calling the shots not willing to acknowledge or accommodate leaders like Tharoor who are not in agreement with the way the party is being run, decisions and stands taken, or policies formulated.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Punjab BJP deletes post paying tributes to ‘martyrs' of Operation Bluestar
Punjab BJP deletes post paying tributes to ‘martyrs' of Operation Bluestar

Hindustan Times

time31 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Punjab BJP deletes post paying tributes to ‘martyrs' of Operation Bluestar

The Punjab BJP has deleted a social media post in which it paid tributes to "martyrs" of Operation Blue Star, the Army operation which was carried out in June 1984 to flush out armed militants from the Golden Temple. The post on X was shared on Sunday but it was taken down later without assigning any reason for the same. In the post, the Punjab BJP had condemned the then Congress government for "attacking the Golden Temple" and expressed solidarity with the families of those who lost their lives. The post, which has now been deleted, read, "June 1, 1984'”' 'Saka Neela Tara'. A humble tribute to all the martyrs of the day one of the attack on the Darbar Sahib by the Congress government." The BJP had also shared pictures of the damage suffered by the Akal Takht, which is the highest temporal seat of Sikhs, and an armoured vehicle with deflated tyres. The post, which was shared on Facebook as well, was deleted a few hours later. Meanwhile, officiating Jathedar of Akal Takht, Giani Kuldip Singh Gargaj has appealed to the Sikh community to commemorate the first week of June, which he described it as 'Shaheedi Hafta' (martyrdom week), with the "spirit of Panthic unity and pay respectful homage to the martyrs." In a statement, Gargaj stated, "In June 1984, when Sikh devotees had gathered to observe the martyrdom day of the fifth Guru, Guru Arjan Dev, the then Congress-led government launched a military assault using tanks, artillery, and bullets on the central Sikh religious place, Sachkhand Sri Harmandar Sahib, and Sri Akal Takht Sahib." He said, "the Sikh community can never forget the military attack of June 1984. "The first week of June each year is a deeply emotional and solemn time for the 'Panth', when martyrs are remembered," he said. The jathedar urged that from June 1 to 6, special 'Gurmat Samagams' (religious congregations), lectures, and seminars should be organised globally by Sikhs. He also instructed all gurdwara management committees to hold special Sri Akhand Path Sahib recitations and invite historians and preachers to gurdwaras to educate 'sangat' (congregation) about the events of June 1984 and November 1984 (anti-Sikh riots).

Unease around Akash Anand's political journey natural, says Mayawati
Unease around Akash Anand's political journey natural, says Mayawati

Business Standard

time33 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Unease around Akash Anand's political journey natural, says Mayawati

BSP chief Mayawati on Monday said it was "natural" that there was some unease regarding the "ups and downs" of party leader Akash Anand's political journey and his recent appointment as the chief national coordinator of the party. The Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP) president cautioned against rival parties that align with the Congress, BJP and the Samajwadi Party, saying her party was the only true Ambedkarite party. In a post on social media platform X, Mayawati said, BSP is the only true Ambedkarite party committed to the welfare of the Bahujan community. It has a tradition of taking action in the party interest and taking them back if they show remorse." "It is natural for some people to feel uneasy about the ups and downs in Shri Akash Anand's political journey and his appointment as the party's chief national coordinator, she added. Mayawati's remarks come amid internal reshuffling within the BSP. A month after he was brought back into the party fold, Anand was appointed as the chief of national coordinators. As chief national coordinator, Anand will function above the three national coordinators. The post has been created especially for Anand, making him virtually the party's second in command. Mayawati expressed confidence that Anand would now fully commit himself to carrying forward the message of BR Ambedkar and BSP founder Kanshi Ram. The party has no place for opportunistic and self-serving individuals, she said. Taking a dig at rival political parties, Mayawati cautioned supporters against organisations and leaders whom she described as seasonal frogs attempting to weaken the BSP and "Bahujan unity" by aligning with parties like the Congress, BJP and Samajwadi Party. Leaders who, for personal gain, may become MLAs, MPs or ministers by aligning with such parties will not bring any real benefit to the community. People must stay alert, she warned. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Op Sindoor should not be used to derive political mileage
Op Sindoor should not be used to derive political mileage

Hans India

timean hour ago

  • Hans India

Op Sindoor should not be used to derive political mileage

The political class will do better if it stops desisting from trying to derive electoral mileage from the highly successful Operation Sindoor that was executed recently. The military aspects of the operation have been largely praised (even by objective western experts), but the political aftermath has proven far more complex. The ruling party has come under scrutiny for allegedly using the operation's success to enhance its nationalistic image ostensibly for electoral gains. On its part, the Opposition has done little better. Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge called for a special parliamentary session to discuss the operation in detail. He raised concerns about inconsistencies in official narratives, particularly surrounding reports regarding the number of Indian aircraft lost during the strikes. He also accused the government of 'misleading the nation.' His statement came after the Chief of Defence Staff Gen Anil Chauhan acknowledged the loss of some Indian aircraft but emphasised that the armed forces had adapted quickly to changing tactical scenarios, ultimately achieving the mission objectives. Chauhan categorically refuted Pakistan's assertions of shooting down multiple Indian jets, labelling them as propaganda meant to distort facts. His remarks highlighted the critical role of clear and truthful communication in sustaining public trust and countering misinformation. The political discourse triggered by Operation Sindoor reflects a broader tension between safeguarding national security and navigating partisan interests. While it is natural for political parties to discuss significant national developments, it is imperative that such dialogues remain constructive and rooted in the national interest. Exploiting military operations for electoral advantage not only undermines the integrity of the armed forces but also erodes public confidence in the nation's democratic institutions. As India continues to assess the long-term implications of Operation Sindoor, there is a pressing need for political maturity and a unified stance on issues of national security. Recognising and honouring the courage and competence of the armed forces should transcend political divides. National security must remain above the realm of party politics, treated with the seriousness and dignity it deserves. Also, our political leaders must come to terms with a sobering reality: Operation Sindoor, while tactically successful and symbolically significant, was not a war that we won—nor even a full-scale battle. At best, it was a well-executed skirmish, a calibrated military response to the horrifying Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 innocent lives. Its importance lies not in territorial gains or dramatic military victories, but in the message it has sent loud and clear-Pakistan will have to pay a heavy price for supporting and harbouring terrorist outfits. Precision strikes on terrorist camps disrupted their operations and showcased India's strategic capabilities. However, this operation must not be mistaken for closure. The war on terror is a long and evolving struggle, requiring constant vigilance, strategic foresight, and, above all, national unity. True victory will come not with a single strike, but through sustained efforts to dismantle the networks of extremism to be assured of lasting peace and security. Operation Sindoor stands as a testament to India's strategic capability and resolve in the face of terrorism. However, its legacy will be defined not just by military precision but by the manner the nation's political leadership chooses to engage with it. By fostering transparency, encouraging responsible dialogue, and prioritising unity, India can ensure that such operations serve their true purpose—protection and security of all its citizens.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store