Israel's army says it will fire air force reservists who condemned war in Gaza
Israel's military has said it will fire air force reservists who signed a letter condemning the war in Gaza and accusing it of only serving political interests and not bringing the hostages home.
In a statement to The Associated Press, an army official said there was no room for any body or individual, including reservists in active duty, 'to exploit their military status while simultaneously participating in the fighting', calling it a breach of trust between commanders and subordinates.
The army said it decided that any active reservist who signed the letter will not be able to continue serving.
It did not specify how many people that included or if the firings had begun.
Nearly 1,000 Israeli Air Force reservists and retirees signed a letter, published in Israeli media on Thursday, demanding the immediate return of the hostages, even at the cost of ending the fighting.
The letter comes as Israel ramps up its offensive in Gaza, trying to pressure Hamas to agree to free hostages, 59 of whom are still being held, more than half of which are dead.
Israel's imposed a blockade on food, fuel and humanitarian aid that has left civilians facing acute shortages as supplies dwindle.
It has pledged to seize large parts of the Palestinian territory and establish a new security corridor through it.
While the soldiers who signed the letter did not refuse to keep serving, it is part of a growing number of Israeli soldiers speaking out against the 18-month conflict, some saying they saw or did things that crossed ethical lines.
'It's completely illogical and irresponsible on behalf of the Israeli policy makers… risking the lives of the hostages, risking the lives of more soldiers and risking lives of many many more innocent Palestinians, while it had a very clear alternative,' Guy Poran, a retired Israeli Air Force pilot who spearheaded the letter told The AP.
He said he is not aware of anyone who signed the letter being fired, and since it was published, it has gained dozens more signatures.
Soldiers are required to steer clear of politics, and they rarely speak out against the army.
After Hamas stormed into Israel on October 7 2023, Israel quickly united behind the war launched against the militant group.
Divisions here have grown as the war progresses, but most criticism has focused on the mounting number of soldiers killed and the failure to bring home hostages, not actions in Gaza.
– Advocates for hostage return keep up the pressure
Freed hostages and their families are doing what they can to keep attention on their plight, and urge the government to get everyone out.
For Holocaust Remembrance Day this year, Agam Berger, a military spotter who was taken hostage and freed in January, will perform at a March of the Living Ceremony in Poland — a yearly memorial march at the site of Auschwitz that honours the six million Jews killed by Nazi Germany and celebrates the state of Israel.
Ms Berger will play a 130-year-old violin that survived the Holocaust and was brought to Israel, at the main ceremony in the Birkenau concentration camp.
She will be accompanied by singer, Daniel Weiss, a resident of Kibbutz Be'eri whose parents were murdered on October 7.
Still, the war in Gaza shows no signs of slowing.
Since Israel ended an eight-week ceasefire last month, it said it will push further into Gaza until Hamas releases the hostages.
More than 1,000 people have been killed in Gaza since the ceasefire collapsed, according to the United Nations.
The Israeli military on Friday issued an urgent warning to residents in several neighborhoods in northern Gaza, calling on them to evacuate immediately.
Strikes earlier this week killed at least 23 people, health officials said, including eight women and eight children.
– Brazil pushes for the release of body of teen who died in Israeli custody
Also this week, Brazil's Embassy in the West Bank said it had requested the immediate release of the body of a 17-year-old Palestinian prisoner who died in Israeli custody.
A representative from Brazil's office in Ramallah, told the AP it was helping the family speed up the process to bring Walid Ahmad's body home.
Mr Ahmad had a Brazilian passport.
According to an Israeli doctor who observed the autopsy, starvation was likely the primary cause of his death.
Mr Ahmad had been held for six months without being charged.
He was extremely malnourished and also showed signs of inflammation of the colon and scabies, said a report written by Dr Daniel Solomon, who watched the autopsy, conducted by Israeli experts, at the request of the boy's family.
Israel's prison service said it operates according to the law and all prisoners are given basic rights.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
20 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Tucker Carlson Blasts Former Fox News Colleague Sean Hannity: 'Warmongers'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Right-wing commentator Tucker Carlson blasted his former Fox News colleague Sean Hannity on Friday, calling Hannity and other MAGA hawks "warmongers" for cheering Israel's missile strikes against the Iranian regime. The Context Israel launched a series of strikes against Iran early Friday, local time, which decimated the regime's military chain of command, hit critical nuclear facilities and took out top Iranian nuclear scientists. After the strikes, Iran pulled out of scheduled nuclear talks with the U.S. and retaliated against Israel with a wave of rocket attacks that struck Tel Aviv, Israel's commercial center and also home to the country's central military base. Israel and Iran have been engaged in an increasingly destructive array of tit-for-tat strikes against one another since Hamas—backed by the Iran-led Axis of Resistance—carried out its attack against Israel on October 7, 2023. But the strikes commenced by Israel early Friday marked the most serious escalation yet between Jerusalem and Tehran. What To Know When Israel struck Iran, it capped a long-running foreign policy battle being waged in President Donald Trump's inner circle. Carlson, a staunch isolationist, was among the voices urging against escalating tensions between Iran and Israel, which were at a tipping point before Israel's strikes against the regime early Friday. He also supported Trump's Middle East envoy, Steve Witkoff, as he spearheaded the nuclear discussions with Iran. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson gestures during an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow on February 6, 2024. Former Fox News host Tucker Carlson gestures during an interview with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the Kremlin in Moscow on February 6, 2024. Gavriil Grigorov, Sputnik, Kremlin Pool Photo via AP On the other side of the coin were Hannity and conservative media host Mark Levin, who, among others, were deeply skeptical that Iran would agree to end its nuclear program and expressed support for Israel taking military action. On Friday, Carlson tore into Hannity, Levin, conservative media mogul Rupert Murdoch and conservative megadonors Isaac Perlmutter and Miriam Adelson. "The real divide isn't between people who support Israel and people who support Iran or the Palestinians. The real divide is between those who casually encourage violence, and those who seek to prevent it — between warmongers and peacemakers," Carlson wrote on X, formerly Twitter. He added: "Who are the warmongers? They would include anyone who's calling Donald Trump today to demand air strikes and other direct US military involvement in a war with Iran. On that list: Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Rupert Murdoch, Ike Perlmutter and Miriam Adelson. At some point they will all have to answer for this, but you should know their names now." Newsweek reached out to Fox News for comment via email on Friday. Hannity and Levin took a victory lap on Fox News shortly after Israel carried out its first strike against Iran early Friday, with Hannity rattling off a list of Iran's provocations and nuclear threats and Levin saying that "the Iranians are about to get their asses kicked and it's been coming since Jimmy Carter." "They think this is Joe Biden's administration, that they would get away, get nuclear weapons and then the world would sit there, wouldn't know what to do about it," he said, adding that Israel "is not going to sit there and take it." Hours after the strikes, Carlson put out what he called his potential "final newsletter before all-out war" and accused Trump of being "complicit." "While the American military may not have physically perpetrated the assault, years of funding and sending weapons to Israel, which Donald Trump just bragged about on Truth Social, undeniably place the U.S. at the center of last night's events. Washington knew these attacks would happen," Carlson wrote. "They aided Israel in carrying them out. Politicians purporting to be America First can't now credibly turn around and say they had nothing to do with it. Our country is in deep." "Despite being complicit in the act of war, the president hopes last night's events will help his ongoing nuclear negotiations with Iran," Carlson added. "Steve Witkoff was scheduled to participate in the next round of talks on Sunday, but whether that will still happen is up in the air." Israel's strikes against Iran came after months of Trump urging Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to attack Tehran, saying that it would torpedo America's already tenuous negotiations with the Iranian regime. What People Are Saying On Friday, after Israel's strikes, Trump again pushed Iran to come back to the table, writing on Truth Social: "Iran must make a deal, before there is nothing left, and save what was once known as the Iranian Empire. No more death, no more destruction, JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE. God Bless You All!" After Iran initiated its retaliatory rocket attacks against Israel, a U.S. defense official told Newsweek: "Yes, the U.S. is assisting in shooting down missiles targeting Israel." What Happens Next Israel and Iran have been bombing each other since the first wave of strikes early Friday, with Israel saying it plans to "escalate" in response to Iran's retaliatory attack. Iran, meanwhile, has warned that it will target the military bases of any countries that assist Israel.


UPI
29 minutes ago
- UPI
Judge allows Columbia activist Mahmoud Khalil to remain detained
Pro-Palestinian protesters hold flags and signs at the Release Mahmoud Khaul, Hands Off Our Students, ICE off Our Campus rally in Lower Manhattan in New York City on March 10. ICE Immigration officers arrested Mahmoud Khalil, a leader of the protests at Columbia University against Israel's war in Gaza. File photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo June 13 (UPI) -- A federal judge on Friday ruled that the Trump administration can continue to detain Columbia University activist Mahmoud Khalil, two days after he said foreign policy grounds for his detention are insufficient and likely unconstitutional. Michael Farbiarz of the U.S. District Court for New Jersey in Newark made the decision after government lawyers presented a new filing. Farbiaz on Wednesday had stayed the preliminary injunction until Friday, giving the government time to appeal. The government said continuing to detain Khalil does not violate the injunction because he is now being detained based on "other grounds," such as being undocumented when he entered the United States. Also, they said Khalil could be held for failing to disclose all required information on his legal permanent resident application. The administration said that "an alien like Khalil may be detained during the pendency of removal proceedings regardless of the charge of removability. Khalil may seek release through the appropriate administrative processes, first before an officer of the Department of Homeland Security, and secondly through a custody redetermination hearing before an immigration judge." The judge, who was appointed by President Joe Biden, said Khalil can seek his release through a "bail application to the immigration judge. "To the extent the Petitioner requests relief from this Court, the request is denied," the judge ruled. In April, Secretary of State Marco Rubio released a memo, citing an obscure provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. The secretary of state can deport noncitizens if the secretary determines their presence in the country would result in "potentially serious adverse foreign policy consequences for the United States." On Wednesday, the judge said that while the Department of Homeland Security might have a stronger and enforceable claim to detain and deport Khalil, Rubio's determination is not enough to warrant his continued detention and eventual deportation. Brett Max Kaufman, a senior staff attorney for the American Civil Liberties Union, told NBC News: "The government practically never holds people in detention on a charge like this, and it's clear that the government is doing anything they can to punish Mahmoud for his speech about Palestine. We will not stop until he's home with his family." Khalil, who was born in 1995, grew up in a Palestinian refugee camp in Syria and was granted permanent U.S. resident status. He led pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University last year. In March, he was arrested outside his student housing on campus and detained before the Trump administration accused him of leading "activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization." He has not been charged with any crime.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How Israel Executed Its Surprise Assault on Iran
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. To pull off the most ambitious and sophisticated attack in the long history of antagonism between the Middle East's preeminent powers, covert Israeli agents set up a drone base deep inside Iranian territory. They recruited disaffected Iranians to aid their cause. They smuggled weapons systems across enemy lines. These are among the espionage tactics that allowed Israel to conduct its surprise attack on Iran last night, simultaneously eroding Tehran's defenses and limiting its capacity to retaliate as Israeli forces picked off senior commanders and struck sensitive nuclear sites. The operation, termed 'Rising Lion,' signals a new phase in Israel's efforts to transform extensive intelligence gathering into decisive military campaigns intended to outmaneuver its enemies throughout the Middle East. In recent years, Israel has used intelligence to assassinate top Iranian military officers and nuclear scientists, as well as the leaders of Iran-backed militias. Israel has also targeted sensitive locations within Iran for air strikes. The attacks begun this week, however, were more audacious both in the scope of the targeting and in the clear aim of arresting Tehran's nuclear ambitions. Among the sites struck was the Natanz Nuclear Facility, where Iran has generated most of its nuclear fuel. Fordow, a facility buried under a mountain, presents a more difficult target. A former U.S. intelligence official with expertise in the Middle East told us that Israel may need U.S. bunker-buster weapons to do more lasting damage to additional Iranian facilities. That makes Washington's potential support for what is expected to be a drawn-out campaign all the more important. Israeli and other Western officials said the campaign was in its initial stages, and Tehran has vowed a vigorous response, which began after sunset today when it fired dozens of missiles toward Israel—including some that made it through the Iron Dome defensive shield. But current and former U.S. and Israeli officials and analysts told us that the blow already dealt to Iran in the early hours of the attack makes manifest Israel's advantages. [Read: The war Israel was ready to fight] Iran's 'Axis of Resistance'—a network of militias expected to join in any war with Israel—is flat on its back, degraded by a series of U.S.-enabled Israeli offensives over the past year and a half. Israel weakened Iran's air-defense systems and missile-production facilities in a pair of strikes conducted last April and October, while also revealing the limits of Iran's offensive capabilities by fending off drones and missiles in a coordinated effort with Western partners. As a former CIA station chief in Israel told us, the Mossad has 'a good network inside Iran, and they have the support of the U.S.' Iran, meanwhile, has shown that it possesses neither strategic foresight nor the technical ability to fend off Israeli operations, the former station chief said, pointing to the 2020 assassinations of Qasem Soleimani, Iran's senior security and intelligence commander, and Mohsen Fakhrizadeh, the country's top nuclear scientist. 'To add to it,' the former senior intelligence officer said, 'Iran has few friends, so it's hard for them to get supplies in.' Iran also has enemies within: A former Israeli intelligence official told The Atlantic that Iranians opposed to the regime make for a ready recruiting pool, and indicated that Iranians working for Israel were involved in efforts to build a drone base inside the country. Israel's operation drew on years of intelligence gathering against senior Iranian commanders and scientists and relied on extensive cooperation between the Mossad and the Israeli military. It showed not just technical prowess, homing in on key targets, but also creativity in executing covert action that has been a hallmark of Israel's multipronged campaign against its enemies in the region. The Mossad released video today of Israeli operatives deploying precision strikes on air-defense systems from inside Iran. Security officials briefed Israeli media on other aspects of the secretive operation, including the use of vehicles to smuggle weapons systems into the country. In a statement late yesterday, in the early hours of the strikes, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that the United States was not involved in the attack. But a former Israeli security official told us that there is 'no doubt' that Israel had U.S. backing for its actions, even if Donald Trump and his advisers had worked to avert a strike. The former official said that the apparent inability of the Iranians to mount a vigorous self-defense makes clear that there is 'less Iranian capacity than they wanted us all to believe.' Still, the former official said, Tehran will retaliate and 'can do much damage over time.' The central questions now are what role Trump intends to play, how severely Iran's nuclear program is stalled, and whether negotiations can be resumed. 'The Israelis are very tactically successful,' Ray Takeyh, a senior fellow for Middle East studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, told us. 'But they often confuse short-term success with long-term gain.' [Read: What Trump knew about the attack against Iran] A primary reason the Israelis were determined to act now, Takeyh said, is that they knew they had a limited window for success and needed to strike when Iran had reduced retaliatory capacity through its proxies—among them Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Hamas has been seriously diminished by nearly two years of fighting triggered by its October 7, 2023, assault on Israel. And Hezbollah has been depleted by a long-running conflict with Israel, whose intelligence services succeeded in penetrating the group so extensively that they were able to remotely detonate the militia's pagers and walkie-talkies last year, killing or maiming scores of fighters. Proxies still in a position to respond militarily, analysts told us, include the Houthis in Yemen and Shiite militias in Iraq. The Houthis are perhaps the strongest component of the Iranian-backed axis. The Islamist faction active in northwestern Yemen has continued launching drones and missiles at Israel even as Washington secured a cease-fire agreement with the group, whose attacks on ships in the Red Sea had snarled international trade. U.S. officials told us that Israel feared Iran's rapid efforts to improve its retaliatory capacities, which added to their feeling that they had a limited window to act. But the inclination for a military solution also reflects a long-held impulse of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Before his second inauguration, in 2009, Netanyahu told Jeffrey Goldberg, now The Atlantic's editor in chief, that he would have to act if then–President Barack Obama failed to stop Iran's nuclear program. Obama reached a deal with Iran over Netanyahu's objections in 2015—a deal that Trump tore up three years later. In the midst of Trump's attempts to secure a new agreement, Netanyahu has taken his long-promised action. 'Since the dawn of the nuclear age, we have not had a fanatic regime that might put its zealotry above its self-interest,' Netanyahu said in 2009. 'People say that they'll behave like any other nuclear power. Can you take the risk?' Article originally published at The Atlantic