'Reasonable force' used during arrest of actor
The use of force by Met Police officers during the arrest of the actor Reece Richards "was reasonable in the circumstances", the police watchdog has found.
The star of Netflix's Sex Education said he was pepper sprayed, thrown to the ground and kicked when he was arrested in Fulham, west London, in September. Officers had mistaken him for a criminal suspect.
The Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) also did not uphold a complaint by Mr Richards that he was treated in a discriminatory manner because he was black, and said no officers would be disciplined.
The Met Police said it was "pleased" with the decision but acknowledged the incident must have been "distressing" for the actor.
Mr Richards said he was on his way home from a West End performance of Hairspray the Musical on 4 September, when he said he witnessed a car crash and two men running away.
When he pointed out to police the direction in which the two men had fled, he was was restrained by four officers who sat on him, worsening some existing injuries, he said.
Mr Richards and his mother later complained to the IOPC, claiming false arrest and racial profiling.
The IOPC's director Amanda Rowe acknowledged that the incident would have had an impact on the actor.
"He was an innocent bystander and this would have been a frightening experience," she said. "Mr Richards' complaint detailed his understandable belief that he was detained and arrested because he was black, although the suspects were white.
"We found that officers were responding to a fast-moving incident and - given the only description of the suspects was that one was wearing dark clothing and their location - it was reasonable that the officer who saw Mr Richards and detained him thought he was a suspect.
"The evidence indicated that the officers' use of force was reasonable in the circumstances they encountered... and Mr Richards was de-arrested as soon officers confirmed he was not involved."
Officer investigated over Netflix actor's arrest
Sex Education actor's arrest to be investigated
Police probe actor's mistaken pepper-spray arrest
The officers were pursuing a car when the vehicle crashed and those inside ran off, the IOPC said.
The only description given to the officers was that one suspect was in dark clothing.
CCTV footage showed Mr Richards walking along Fulham Palace Road, near the collision, when one of the suspects ran past him, chased by an officer.
The actor dropped his backpack and ran, the watchdog said.
A lone officer then stopped Mr Richards, mistaking him for one of the suspects, before two more officers arrived and told him to get to the ground.
Following a "struggle", one of the officers used PAVA a synthetic pepper spray - on Mr Richards and he was handcuffed, the IOPC said, before being de-arrested a few minutes later.
The actor said on Instagram after the incident that he was the victim of an "unlawful arrest".
He added: "I was confused, unable to understand why I was suddenly being treated like a criminal.
"Calmly, I explained that I was a performer returning from a show, but one officer yelled, 'get to the floor or I'll pepper spray you'.
"Moments later, three more officers ran at me. They pepper sprayed me, kicked my legs out from under me, threw me to the ground and handcuffed me.
"In a flash, I was face down on the pavement with multiple officers holding me down, forcing my head into the ground."
Met Police Cdr Owain Richards said: "We are pleased the IOPC was able to determine the officers acted in good faith and appropriately.
"This was a fast-moving incident during which they were trying to detain three men who had fled from police during a pursuit. Their use of force was reasonable in the circumstances.
"Mr Richards was swiftly de-arrested as soon as officers confirmed he was not a suspect, but we absolutely acknowledge how distressing it must have been to be caught up in such an incident."
Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk
Sex Education actor's arrest to be investigated
Independent Office for Police Conduct
Metropolitan Police
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Leaders of sexual wellness company OneTaste convicted in forced labor case
Two former top executives of a women-focused sexual wellness company that offered hands-on 'orgasmic meditation' classes were found guilty of forced labor conspiracy, federal prosecutors announced Monday. OneTaste co-founder and former CEO Nicole Daedone, 57, and the company's former sales director Rachel Cherwitz, 44, were accused of using 'deception and abuse' to obtain the labor and services of employees in a years-long coercive scheme. Investigators say the two women and an undisclosed number of co-conspirators subjected 'multiple young women' to economic, sexual, emotional, financial and psychological abuse, as well as surveillance, indoctrination and intimidation between 2006 and 2018. Founded in San Francisco in 2004, OneTaste operated in cities across the U.S., including New York and Los Angeles, as well as in London. The sexual wellness education company generated revenue through coaching, events, and classes on sexual practices, including 'orgasmic meditation,' which involved stroking a woman's genitals for 15 minutes. Some of the women who had turned to OneTaste seeking healing and spiritual guidance were instead coerced into working long hours — seven days a week — for little or no pay, performing manual labor and providing sexual services, prosecutors said. Those allegations were depicted in the 2022 Netflix documentary, 'Orgasm Inc: The Story of OneTaste.' The defendants did so by using abusive and manipulative tactics to make their victims emotionally and psychologically dependent on OneTaste, which was sold in 2017 for $12 million. The two women were charged by federal prosecutors with forced labor conspiracy in June 2023, accused of grooming victims to engage in sex acts with investors, clients, employees and benefactors. On Monday, a federal jury in Brooklyn convicted Daedone, of New York, and Cherwitz, of California, following a five-week trial in which three witnesses testified about becoming 'handlers' for OneTaste's initial investor— who was also Daedone's boyfriend. The women recalled being required to live with him, cook for him, and 'perform demeaning sex acts at his direction,' prosecutors said. U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York, Joseph Nocella Jr., commended the witnesses who testified despite the trauma they endured at the hands of the defendants. 'The jury's verdict has unmasked Daedone and Cherwitz for who they truly are: grifters who preyed on vulnerable victims by making empty promises of sexual empowerment and wellness only to manipulate them into performing labor and services for the defendants' benefit,' he said following the verdict. Attorneys for the two women said they were 'deeply disappointed' with the jury's decision, adding that Daedone and Cherwitz maintain their innocence and plan to continue their fight on appeal. 'We find inspiration in our clients, Nicole and Rachel, who have shown incredible strength throughout this entire process,' the lawyers said in a statement Monday. 'This case raised numerous novel and complex legal issues that will require review by the Second Circuit.'
Elle
7 hours ago
- Elle
You've Finished 'Dept. Q' On Netflix, But Did You Know There's A 'Dept. Q' Film Series Too?
If you're finding that you have a Dept. Q-shaped whole in your life at the moment, then fear not — for there's plenty more where the Netflix adaptation came from (and no, a season two hasn't been confirmed yet). Dept. Q, which is based on the Jussi Adler-Olsen novel series, tells the story of Detective Morck in the wake of his attack being assigned to lead a newly-assembled cold case unit. With a Mötley Crüe of unlikely peers, Detective Morck is tasked with his unit's first investigation: the mysterious disappearance of prosecutor Merritt Lingard (Chloe Pirrie) several years earlier. FIND OUT MORE ON ELLE COLLECTIVE In case you've already binged the nine-episode series though, there is, in actual fact, another adaptation. A few years after the Adler-Olsen's first book was originally published in 2007, a Scandinavian film adaption was made of the novel, meaning there's another way to get your Dept. Q fix. Adler-Olsen published his first Dept. Q novel in 2007, and in the intervening years, he has published 10 more novels in the same cannon. The most recent novel in the series, Locked In, was published in 2021 and sees Detective Morck himself behind bars. Six years after the release of the first novel in the Department Q book series Mercy, a film adaptation was released in Denmark called The Keeper of Lost Causes. The film, which was released in 2013, stayed true to the plot of the book and Netflix series, starring Nikolaj Lie Kaas as Detective Morck, Fares Fares as Assad and Sonja Richter as Merritt Lingard. The following year, another film adaptation was released in Scandinavia. The Absent One, based on Adler-Olsen's novel of the same name, and followed Carl and Assad investigating the murder of a pair of twins whose death was meant to have been solved 20 years prior. Two years later, in 2016, another film adaptation was released. A Conspiracy of Faith explored the fall-out from what happens after an old message in a bottle turns up. And there was also a fourth film The Purity of Vengenace, too, which was released in 2018 and focused on what happened when the duo discovered three mummified bodies in an apartment. All of the Dept. Q film series are available to watch through ViaPlay on Prime Video. New users are eligible for a seven-day free trial of ViaPlay, which will then auto-renew for £4.99 a month if the subscription isn't cancelled. WATCH THE DEPT. Q FILMS HERE ELLE Collective is a new community of fashion, beauty and culture lovers. For access to exclusive content, events, inspiring advice from our Editors and industry experts, as well the opportunity to meet designers, thought-leaders and stylists, become a member today HERE. Naomi May is a freelance writer and editor with an emphasis on popular culture, lifestyle and politics. After graduating with a First Class Honours from City University's prestigious Journalism course, Naomi joined the Evening Standard as its Fashion and Beauty Writer, working across both the newspaper and website. She is now the Acting News Editor at ELLE UK and has written features for the likes of The Guardian, Vogue, Vice and Refinery29, among many others.
Elle
7 hours ago
- Elle
Netflix's 'Dept. Q' Wasn't Filmed Where the Book Series Is Set
Minor spoilers below. Dept. Q is currently taking over Netflix. Helmed by Scott Frank, the intensely sharp crime thriller sees a police detective tasked with the responsibility of forming a unit of officers to solve a cold murder cases. Adapted for TV and based on the book series by Danish writer Jussi Adler-Olsen, the story was initially located in Copenhagen, however Frank decided to swap the Scandinavian scenery for Scotland, earning the increasingly popular series countless fans not only for its stellar storytelling, but also its refreshing backdrops in Edinburgh and East Lothian. To find out exactly where filming took place, keep on reading below. Much of the series takes places throughout the streets of Edinburgh, Scotland's capital city, and many of its landmarks can be seen in a number of episodes. For example, we see St. Mary's Episcopal Church, the Royal Mile, and the City Chambers throughout the show. At the beginning of the series, we see a glimpse of the shootout which scarred Carl and resulted in the death of his fellow officer. This takes places in a housing estate in The Calders, in Wester Hailes. In addition to this, scenes that show the outside of Carl's home were filmed in Link's Place, in Leith. If you've already watched the series, you'll know that Merritt and William's house was pretty luxurious. This was filmed in Lysander House in Dirleton, which used to be a former radar station, but was transformed to portray the wealthy pair's home. Another East Lothian location featured in the series was the Staggs Bar in Musselburgh, which was shown when Carl and Akram meet the journalist who voices a number of accusations against Sam Haig.
