Medics objecting to Sandie Peggie's return warned of culpability, tribunal told
She was placed on special leave after Dr Upton made an allegation of bullying and harassment and cited concerns about 'patient care'.
Ms Peggie has lodged a claim against NHS Fife and Dr Upton, citing the Equality Act 2010, including sexual harassment; harassment related to a protected belief; indirect discrimination; and victimisation.
The tribunal resumed in Dundee on July 16 after an initial set of hearings in February.
On Monday, service manager Charlotte Myles, who made a decision to lift the suspension on March 7, told the tribunal that two senior consultants and two senior nurses 'weren't happy' at her decision to allow Ms Peggie to return to work.
Ms Myles said that Dr Kate Searle and Dr Maggie Currer both objected to her decision, while senior nurse managers Esther Davidson and Louise Curran 'similarly expressed' objections, but were not able to give an 'accurate response' regarding alleged patient safety concerns.
She said she told Ms Peggie verbally on March 7 and in writing on March 12 that the suspension would be lifted. However, it was later reinstated due to issues with looking after the nurse's dog, and she returned to work around April 12 2024.
Ms Myles said that 'usually we don't like to suspend' and she believed there were no patient safety issues, the tribunal heard.
However she said that she 'wasn't impressed' by allegations made by senior medics and warned them to comply with correct protocols and policies.
Ms Myles said: 'When I explained to staff members they weren't particularly happy with my decision initially.'
She said she visited Dr Searle's office to co-ordinate a rota and was met with further objections, but warned the consultant she was 'culpable' if allegations were not reported correctly, the tribunal heard.
Ms Myles said: 'Kate Searle expressed unhappiness that we were taking Ms Peggie back into the workplace and made a comment saying there had been patient safety issues, there had been other behaviours towards a doctor. I asked if this had been investigated and reported appropriately, and she said no.
'I said that if these events had happened and they had not been reported, you were culpable.'
She added: 'They weren't happy but it was my sole responsibility to review the suspension. My primary concern is to make sure patients are getting seen.'
The witness said she did not know 'what the indicators were… to be suspended in the first place' and felt there 'was no risk', the tribunal heard.
Ms Myles said: 'I wasn't impressed; if someone wants to raise patient safety concern it should go through correct process and be escalated at the time the incident happened. My stance was: 'If you have not followed correct protocol and policy you are culpable'.'
She said that Ms Davidson alleged that a doctor had been subject to a racist slur by Ms Peggie, and branded allegations by Ms Curran that the nurse shared Donald Trump's views on gender 'tittle-tattle', the tribunal heard.
Ms Myles said: 'It was very similar, tittle-tattle of being a supporter of Donald Trump and sharing his views on gender. That's somebody's personal view and as long as it doesn't impact on workforce or patients or cause harm, people are entitled to have their private views.'
She said she perceived Dr Upton to be 'a female colleague', but said: 'I do believe we should make alterations to support everybody, but how we do it is completely out of my remit.'
During re-examination by Jane Russell KC, representing NHS Fife and Dr Upton, the witness was asked about the alleged comments.
Ms Myles said: 'I was told Sandie Peggie had called a member of the medical team a P**i but that was not reported formally; when I asked Esther which member of the team it was directed at, it took a while to get a response. I believe the person who was supposed to have had the comment directed at them doesn't recall the comment being directed at them.'
Judge Alexander Kemp asked if she had seen a previous risk assessment for suspending Ms Peggie, and the witness said she had not, despite asking for previous documentation prior to March 7.
The tribunal continues.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
9 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Museums Scotland warn venues may close over toilet guidance
The EHRC closed a consultation on proposed changes to statutory guidance last month, following the Supreme Court ruling in April that "sex" in the Equality Act 2010 refers to biological sex, and a Gender Recognition Certificate does not change a person's sex for the purposes of the act. An interim update from the EHRC, published in May, said that "trans women (biological men) should not be permitted to use the women's facilities and trans men (biological women) should not be permitted to use the men's facilities, as this will mean that they are no longer single-sex facilities". READ MORE: Responding to the consultation, Museums Galleries Scotland (MGS), which supports around 455 non-national museums and is funded by the Scottish Government, said EHRC's proposals may "force some museums to close", or "risk leaving trans people with no facilities at all" if changes could not be made. It urged the UK-wide watchdog to "understand the impacts and needs of trans individuals and organisations committed to trans inclusion". The consultation response from MGS said: "We have concerns that the content and process of the EHRC Code of Practice does not uphold the spirit of inclusion. "There is no guidance on how to include trans people, there is only information on how to exclude them. This has not made sufficient effort to offer advice to organisations who wish to remain or become trans inclusive." It warned that due to "lack of clarity" from EHRC, "there is a significant potential that human rights of trans people will be impacted for example, being banned from toilets that align with lived gender", and also raised concerns about the responsibilities of front-of-house staff. The response said: "When there is a need to 'prove' your sex, what proof will be acceptable given gender recognition certificates are not, nor are altered birth certificates. It is likely this role would fall on front-of-house staff, which we believe puts undue pressure on them." It added: "To avoid discrimination, it would require every person using toilets to be checked, adding substantial workload and staff costs. "The guidance implies that to allow trans people to use toilets that fit their identity would put organisations at risk of legal consequences. Yet, to not check everyone could lead to individuals in museums taking decisions to exclude trans people based on subjective tests, related largely to appearance." It warned this could "potentially put trans and non-trans people in humiliating and offensive situations", and that some museums may be forced to close "while they invest time and resources to ensure adequate facilities", and if changes could not be made "this risks trans people having no facilities to use at all". The response said it was aware of the public "policing toilets at heritage sites by making assumptions based on stereotypes", and said this created an "environment of suspicion and policing of everyone's gender presentation, and increases the risks of harassment, distress, and offence". It added: "For some museums, they may need to change their toilet facilities to avoid the higher risk of legal consequences, however, there is unlikely to be capacity or resource for many of them to do this, putting them in a difficult position." The response concluded: "We strongly encourage the EHRC to review their processes around this guidance and take the necessary time to understand the impacts and needs of trans individuals and organisations committed to trans inclusion." Scottish Conservative shadow equalities minister Tess White MSP said: "Museums Scotland seem to be following the Scottish Government in their mistaken bid to avoid implementing the Supreme Court's verdict. The judgment from the UK's highest court was crystal clear. "By criticising the EHRC's guidance, Museums Scotland are flouting the law, putting women and girls in danger and laying themselves open to legal challenge. There is no excuse for evasion on this issue. "Instead of trying to pander to the gender extremists, John Swinney must act now and order all public bodies immediately to comply with the law and provide single-sex spaces." A spokesperson for analysts MurrayBlackburnMackenzie said: "It is deeply concerning that a major national institution signed off and submitted such an ill-informed response to the EHRC consultation. The response fails to consider the needs of women and instead repeats trans activist talking points." PA reported that the Scottish Government, EHRC and Sex Matters have been contacted for comment.
Scottish Sun
12 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
SNP health chief Neil Gray told to ‘grow a backbone' after dodging trans changing rooms row at NHS meeting
Critics slammed Mr Gray for backing NHS bosses amid claims they are pursuing a witch hunt against Ms Peggie CASE SNUBBED SNP health chief Neil Gray told to 'grow a backbone' after dodging trans changing rooms row at NHS meeting Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) NEIL Gray was last night told to 'grow a backbone' after dodging the trans changing rooms row at a summit with NHS chiefs. Nats' Health Secretary is said to have only chatted to bosses about dental care three days after Sandie Peggie was cleared of misgendering a male-born medic Dr Beth Upton. Sign up for the Politics newsletter Sign up 5 Neil Gray was told to 'grow a backbone' after dodging the trans changing rooms row Credit: Andrew Barr 5 Critics slammed Mr Gray for backing NHS bosses amid claims they are pursuing a witch hunt against Sandie Peggie Credit: Getty 5 Ms Peggie was cleared of misgendering a male-born medic Dr Beth Upton Credit: Alamy NHS Fife issued a 1,700-word statement the day after the meeting alleging the nurse's lawyers used the media to discredit them in a furore over the use of female-only spaces at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy. Last night, the Scottish Government insisted ministers were not consulted on the statement — and that board chiefs had not sought permission to release it. Asked if Mr Gray discussed the case at the July 17 meeting in Glenrothes — also attended by local MSP and Education Secretary Jenny Gilruth — a spokesman replied: 'No. Discussion at the meeting focused on NHS dental care in Fife.' Critics slammed Mr Gray for backing NHS bosses amid claims they are pursuing a witch hunt against Ms Peggie. She alleges victimisation at a tribunal which has so far cost taxpayers £220,000. Tories' equalities spokeswoman Tess White said: 'It beggars belief that Neil Gray didn't use this meeting to confront NHS Fife chiefs over their shocking handling of this case. 'He should have had the guts to demand they apologise to Sandie for the disgraceful way she's been treated. Instead, hours later, the health board churned out a shocking statement. It's time Neil Gray grew a backbone and demanded resignations.' A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Health Secretary met with NHS Fife to discuss dental care in the area.' We told how NHS Fife chiefs said they had called cops to probe trolls threatening staff with 'sexual violence' over the case. It said: 'Online debate has evolved into much more worrying behaviour.' Trans women are NOT women, Supreme Court rules in win for anti-woke campaigners after battle over female-only spaces But their statement was condemned by Information Commissioner David Hamilton. Scots Tory chief Russell Findlay has called for NHS Fife chief Carol Potter and the board to step down. 5 Tories' equalities spokeswoman Tess White Credit: Alamy
The Herald Scotland
19 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Sandie Peggie: MSP urges probe into NHS Fife ‘vendetta'
Ms Peggie, who works in the emergency department at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy, is suing the board and Dr Beth Upton after she was suspended for raising objections to the trans woman doctor's use of a female changing room on Christmas Eve 2023. She was suspended on January 3, 2024, after Dr Upton submitted a complaint alleging bullying and harassment. READ MORE The case has led to significant criticism of NHS Fife. The employment tribunal resumed earlier this month after a five-month break. Just hours before it restarted, Ms Peggie was cleared of all four gross misconduct allegations following a separate internal disciplinary hearing. The allegations included two patient care failures, "misgendering" Dr Upton, and her Christmas Eve encounter in the changing room. The disciplinary panel insufficient evidence to support a finding of misconduct, concluding the 18-month internal process. The health board's legal costs had reached £258,831.31 by June 30, 2025, and are expected to rise substantially. While NHS Fife is liable for only the first £25,000 under the NHS Scotland Central Legal Office indemnity scheme, the full cost will ultimately be met by the taxpayer. Just three days after the tribunal resumed, NHS Fife released a statement noting that staff involved had faced threats of "physical harm and sexual violence". The health board's initial 1,700-word press release, addressing what it described as "misinformation" around the case, referenced the CEO of Sex Matters, Maya Forstater, who has already given evidence, and the group's chair, barrister Naomi Cunningham, who is leading Ms Peggie's case. The next paragraph stated that while the case had attracted "significant and very polarised debate" on social media, "what began as debate has evolved into much more worrying behaviour, including a threat of physical harm and sexual violence, which has required the involvement of Police Scotland". Ms Peggie's barrister, Charlotte Elves, told the tribunal the board was suggesting Sex Matters' involvement had resulted in "worrying behaviour." "It is a matter of some concern that a party to proceedings seems to link a witness in these proceedings with the conduct of members of the public, including threats of physical violence," she added. The statement was later amended to say that "NHS Fife was not seeking to suggest that anyone involved with Sex Matters have contributed to the behaviour or issues mentioned above". It was then edited again to remove mention of Ms Cunningham and Ms Forstater. By last Monday, all reference to Sex Matters had been wiped. Ms Peggie's lawyers have asked Fife Health Board to "confirm the names of those individuals who signed off the statement". Speaking to The Herald on Sunday, Ms Mochan said she had serious concerns about the way the case had been handled. "The case is ongoing and we should let that play out," she said. "But I think it is clear that NHS Fife have let this get out of control and that certain individuals did not treat Ms Peggie with the respect she and all NHS staff deserve." READ MORE Ms Mochan also criticised the Scottish Government's response. "From the offset it was one of trying to evade responsibility," she said. "As the case has gone on, they have failed to recognise the very clear injustice that has taken place. "We have seen with the [Gender Recognition Reform] Bill that the SNP seem incapable of approaching this issue in a common sense way, and I think the First Minister needs to review the Government's approach because it is looking increasingly ideological rather than guided by the best interests of the people of Scotland." Ms Mochan said public bodies needed to be absolutely clear on what the law now requires following April's Supreme Court ruling that sex in the Equality Act refers to biological sex. "We have clear judgments now from the Supreme Court and in other cases as to the correct approach. All public bodies must adhere to this and ensure that all staff who are enforcing rules and regulations are absolutely clear about what they are. I have seen far too many complaints from across Scotland that such rules are being interpreted in drastically different ways — that should never be the case." She said she wanted the board to explain how it planned to ensure such a situation could not happen again. "I would like to see very clear proposals about how they will ensure this does not happen again and what consequences there will be for anyone found to have overstepped their responsibilities," she said. "To the general public, it appears that some may have pursued a vendetta against Ms Peggie — and as a staunch trade unionist I find that intolerable." Both John Swinney and his Health Secretary Neil Gray have insisted they have full confidence in NHS Fife. Ms Mochan said the health board pursued a vendetta against Ms Peggie Ms Mochan's Labour colleague, Fife MSP Claire Baker, has called for an inquiry into the health board's handling of the tribunal and has written to Mr Gray to ask him to launch a probe. The Courier reported that Ms Baker told The Fist Minister and Mr Gray that it is becoming "increasingly evident" there should be "robust scrutiny" of NHS Fife's senior management decision-making and the culture inside the health board. A Scottish Government spokeswoman said ministers have been clear they have confidence in the board, but added: "It would be inappropriate to comment further while judicial proceedings in an employment tribunal are ongoing." Asked if the Health, Social Care and Sport Committee could examine the case, Ms Mochan replied: "I agree with my colleague Claire Baker that there should be an inquiry into what went on, and as such it would be perfectly reasonable for the committee to also look into it." Last week, JK Rowling described Ms Peggie as a "heroine" and said NHS Fife had treated the nurse "abominably."
