Florida lawmakers give boost to ‘Schools of Hope'
The schools of hope proposal appeared to die before the scheduled May 2 end of this year's legislative session, but it resurfaced as part of a bill linked to a new state budget. Lawmakers late Monday also passed the budget for the 2025-2026 fiscal year after weeks of negotiations.
Charter schools are public schools often run by private operators. Lawmakers in 2017 created the schools of hope program to serve children in areas with 'persistently low-performing' traditional public schools.
The bill passed Monday night, in part, would change criteria for determining whether traditional public schools are persistently-low performing, which could increase the number that would receive the designation — and, as a result, open the door for more schools of hope.
The designation would begin to apply to traditional public schools that are in the bottom 10 percent of schools statewide for student performance on third-grade standardized English-language arts or fourth-grade math exams in at least two of the previous three years.
Also, the bill would give schools of hope the right to use vacant school facilities or 'co-locate' with other schools if space is available.
During a debate Monday night, House bill sponsor Jenna Persons-Mulicka, a Fort Myers Republican who chairs the PreK-12 Budget Subcommittee, repeatedly emphasized that charter schools are public schools.
'We're seeing these specialized charter schools coming in and transforming communities, changing children's lives, changing the metrics,' she said. 'They're working.'
But some Democrats blasted the bill, saying it would harm traditional public schools. For example, Rep. Anna Eskamani, D-Orlando, said lawmakers were changing the definition of persistently low-performing public schools 'to capture more schools for the sake of privatization.'
'Why don't we fund traditional public schools instead of creating these schemes that pull funding away from traditional public schools?' Rep. Kelly Skidmore, D-Boca Raton, said.
The Republican-controlled House voted 80-24 to pass the bill (SB 2510), after the Senate approved it in a 25-9 vote. It now will go to Gov. Ron DeSantis.
While lawmakers were scheduled to end the legislative session May 2, they had to extend it for more than six weeks to reach agreement on a budget and related bills. Before the scheduled end, they took other steps to bolster charter schools.
As an example, lawmakers passed a bill (HB 443) that included allowing charter schools to have stricter codes of conduct than traditional public schools and to increase enrollment to more than what was initially approved, though they could not exceed the capacities of their facilities. DeSantis signed that bill on May 30.
The House in April passed a bill that included the school of hope changes, but the measure was not approved by the Senate. The changes were included in a broader education bill passed Monday.
A House staff analysis this spring said Florida had approved seven school of hope operators that ran 12 schools. It said that during the 2023-2024 school year, 51 traditional public schools were considered persistently low performing.
More broadly, charter schools, which are not bound by the same regulations as traditional public schools, have grown dramatically over the years.
For example, 382,367 students were enrolled in charter schools during the 2022-2023 school year, up from 229,428 students during the 2013-2014 year, according to data posted on the Florida Department of Education website. The state had 726 charter schools in 46 districts in 2022-2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
39 minutes ago
- Fox News
Eric Swalwell rejects Michelle Obama's 'when they go low, we go high' message, vows to 'bury' Republicans
Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., dismissed former First Lady Michelle Obama's famous "when they go low, we go high" mantra on Saturday, instead threatening to "bury" Republicans "below the Capitol" during a redistricting fight. On "CNN Newsroom," host Omar Jimenez brought up Obama's old mantra after asking the congressman whether there were concerns that "fighting fire with fire" in redrawing congressional maps could backfire on the Democratic Party. "No, when they go low, we're going to bury them below the Capitol," Swalwell said. "That's what we're going to do, because this is about protecting democracy. And right now, as you see, D.C. has been militarized, and we were weak as Democrats." Swalwell called recent efforts by Texas Republicans to redraw the state's congressional districts a "grab for power" by President Donald Trump to make sure Democrats lose in the upcoming midterm elections. He argued that fighting fire with fire was the only way "to protect the most vulnerable" and defend democracy. "We have paid the price for our weakness in the past, and we can't be so weak next time we have power," Swalwell said. "Gavin Newsom is making Donald Trump react to him with the lawsuits with this new map to match what's happening in Texas. And the way I see it is, either we're on our heels, and the most vulnerable are on their heels reacting to Donald Trump, or he's on his heels reacting to us." Newsom has proposed a controversial initiative that would allow for mid-decade redistricting, aiming to eliminate five Republican-held seats in response to GOP-led map changes in Texas. However, such changes are currently prohibited by the California state constitution, which mandates nonpartisan redistricting through an independent commission. Newsom and California Democrats are pushing for a special election later this year to obtain voter approval to bypass the constitution. Swalwell didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. Swalwell is the latest in a long line of Democrats who have appeared to abandon the "when they go low, we go high" mantra in favor of harsher and sometimes violent rhetoric. Michelle Obama also amended the phrase in a 2020 DNC speech. "Let's be clear: going high does not mean putting on a smile and saying nice things when confronted by viciousness and cruelty," Obama said in 2020. "Going high means taking the harder path. It means scraping and clawing our way to that mountain top. Going high means standing fierce against hatred while remembering that we are one nation under God, and if we want to survive, we've got to find a way to live together and work together across our differences."
New York Post
43 minutes ago
- New York Post
Charter schools offer hope AND deliver excellence in NYC's toughest neighborhoods
Charter schools deliver results for kids in the parts of New York City where 'the system' has given up: It's just obscene that supposed progressives like Zohran Mamdani keep selling out the charter sector to win the support of privileged special interests. The Post reports today on the stunning difference in The Bronx: Students at public charter schools excel on state K-8 reading and math exams, in stark contrast to the sad scores at Department of Education schools. Counting all 99 Bronx charters, 68.6% of students passed the reading exams in grades 3 to 8, vs. 43.6% in Bronx traditional public schools — a 25-point difference. Advertisement In math, it was nearly a 26-point gap: an average 69.2% of charter kids passing vs. 43.3% in regular 'district' schools. Students at the highest-performing charters were simply amazing; 95% or more passing in English and math at the four South Bronx Classical Charter schools; 90%-plus at the several Zeta Charter Schools, the five Success Academy schools and nearly as well at the Icahn network of seven schools. Advertisement Citywide, per an analysis by the New York City Charter School Center, charters led district schools by 11 points — in good measure because regular public schools aren't as terrible in the other four boroughs; indeed, a handful are nearly as high-scoring as the better charters. And no, the college-oriented approach of the Success network and others isn't right for all kids — but for a lot of lower-income families, charters offer the only access to a school culture of high expectations, academic excellence and accountability. And the sector's smaller independent schools focus on serving other kinds of kids — with some specializing in dual-language learners, children with autism or other special needs and so on. Advertisement Another key difference: A (very) few charters fail as badly as the worst Department of Education schools — but the terrible charters get shut down fast while DOE failure factories keep going year after year. The city's 285 charters enroll about 15% of all public-school students, 150,000 kids in all. Almost 90% of charter students are black or Latino; 83% come from low-income families; 19% have special needs. For these demographics, in the city's toughest neighborhoods, charters do exactly what everyone says public schools are supposed to do: offer real opportunity to all children. Teachers unions always claim to care about the kids, yet serve their own interests above all else; they relentlessly use their vast power in Albany against the charter sector. Advertisement That's why the Legislature refuses to lift the cap set in law to let more charters open in the city, why charters get far less per-pupil funding than other schools. And why Mamdani has promised to be hell on charters, looking to kick them out of their school buildings and otherwise squeeze the whole sector. With all the talk about 'affordability,' it sure seems like the mayoral race should acknowledge that charter schools make hope affordable in the city's most vulnerable communities.
The Hill
43 minutes ago
- The Hill
Texas state senators take first step toward redistricting
State senators in Texas launched a public hearing Sunday on a bill to redraw congressional voting districts in the state, a move that could win Republicans five more seats in the House if the GOP plan works perfectly. The public hearing is a required step before a bill can advance for a vote on the state Senate floor, Nexstar's KXAN reported. Democrats fled the state earlier this summer to prevent Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and Republicans from having the legislative quorum necessary to pass legislation. But Democrats are expected to attend the new special session after garnering attention with their walkout, and triggering more redistricting efforts around the country. 'We did exactly what we said we needed to do, and that is bringing a spotlight on this issue,' State Rep. Josey Garcia (D-San Antonio) said in an interview with KXAN one day before Abbott called the second special session. Most notably, California Gov. Gavin Newsom is spearheading an effort to change district lines in his state to make up for any potential losses for Democrats in Texas. Democrats released their proposed map on Friday evening. Newsom (D) is vying to hold a special election this fall on a ballot measure that would suspend the state's independent redistricting commission until the end of the decade in an effort to keep up with Republican gerrymandering. Newsom has stressed that bypassing the commission, which Californians approved back in 2008 and 2010, would be temporary, and that redrawing the lines would only be triggered by redistricting in red states. 'They do five seats, we do five seats,' Newsom has said. KXAN reported that Texas House leaders expect that the House will have enough members present Monday to conduct legislative business. GOP State Sen. Phil King told KXAN that the new mapy would be legal and will perform better for Republicans in the state. 'We heard a lot of testimony that the current map had a number of districts that were not compact, were not close together, were not tight, in in their in their design, and in this map, listening to that testimony, we applied it, and this map also is much more compact than the current congressional redistricting map.' The proposed changes target five districts in areas around Austin, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio, creating Republican-leaning seats. The Texas push was directed by President Trump, who has also been pushing other states where Republicans are in control of government to look at redistricting to gain Republicans seats. The states considering such options include Missouri and Indiana. Trump was impeached twice in his first term after Democrats regained control of the House. Because the GOP has a very narrow majority in the House and the president's party typically loses seats in the midterm elections, the possibility of Democrats regaining the House majority is a real possibility in 2026.
