Juventus thump Al Ain in club world cup after Trump visit
RANDAL KOLO MUANI and Francisco Conceicao both bagged braces as Juventus hammered Al Ain 5-0 on Wednesday in their Club World Cup opener following a trip to the White House.
The Italian giants, who sent a delegation to visit US President Donald Trump earlier in the day, cruised to the top of Group G above Manchester City, who beat Wydad AC.
Some Juventus players and staff were asked by Trump, whom they presented with a club shirt, whether they thought a woman would be able to make their first team.
Trump appeared to be making a point against transgender athletes.
Juve general manager Damien Comolli replied that the club had a 'very good women's team'.
The Juventus players stayed silent but were far more comfortable speaking on the pitch as they dismantled UAE's Al Ain at Audi Field in front of 18,000 fans.
'You don't go to the White House every day, so it was a real pleasure to go there,' said Juventus coach Igor Tudor.
'(In the game) we did a number of excellent things, we played at a good tempo... all things considered it's a good start.'
Kolo Muani, who extended his loan from Paris Saint-Germain to play in the tournament in the United States, opened the scoring after 11 minutes with a header from Alberto Costa's cross.
Juventus doubled their lead 10 minutes later when Conceicao, on loan from Porto, skipped away from one defender in the box before firing home with the help of a deflection.
Turkish forward Kenan Yildiz netted the third after 31 minutes, carving out some space on the edge of the box and drilling in at the near post.
French striker Kolo Muani grabbed his second with a deft finish in first-half stoppage time to pile on the misery for Al Ain.
Kouame Autonne had a goal disallowed for offside for the UAE side before Conceicao struck again, benefitting from another slight deflection.
Kolo Muani might have completed his hat-trick when sent through but goalkeeper Rui Patricio shut him down well, and Douglas Luiz blasted narrowly off-target late on.
- 'Great game' -
Juventus, who finished fourth in Serie A, are hoping to make up for a trophyless season with success in the United States this summer.
'The team had a great game, we're happy, we'll get ready for the next game,' said Kolo Muani.
'I just want to play well for my team-mates, for the club, and we'll see (how many I can) score.'
It is unlikely to get any easier for Al Ain as they next face Pep Guardiola's Manchester City in Atlanta.
'We respected (Juventus) more than we needed to at the beginning and this was something that let them score two or three goals easily,' said Al Ain's Serbian coach Vladimir Ivic.
'We're at the World Cup and we played against such a good team... what (is there) to do? We have to think about the next one.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Soccer-Crespo returns for second spell as Sao Paulo coach
Soccer Football - Intercontinental Cup - Second Round - Al Ahly v Al Ain - Cairo International Stadium, Cairo, Egypt - October 29, 2024 Al Ain coach Hernan Crespo REUTERS/Amr Abdallah Dalsh/File Photo (Reuters) -Hernan Crespo has returned to Sao Paulo as coach, four years after leading them to the Brazilian Serie A championship, the club said on Wednesday. Former Argentina striker Crespo, who represented Chelsea, Inter Milan and AC Milan among other European clubs as a player, replaced compatriot Luis Zubeldia who parted ways with Sao Paulo after winning only two of their first 12 league games. "(Crespo) is a great professional who already knows the club, has won a title here and the time has come for him to return. We're delighted to have him back," club president Julio Casares said in a statement. The 49-year-old's first spell as Sao Paulo coach ended in October 2021, less than five months after winning the league, following a disappointing start to their title defence. Crespo led Emirati club Al-Ain to the Asian Champions League Elite title in May last year, earning them a place at the ongoing Club World Cup. He was sacked in November following a poor run of results. (Reporting by Chiranjit Ojha in BengaluruEditing by Christian Radnedge)
Malay Mail
2 hours ago
- Malay Mail
Israel's early triumphs impressed Trump to lull him into pushing for Iran's unconditional surrender — Phar Kim Beng
JUNE 19 — The world is teetering on the edge of a strategic delusion. With the early tactical success of Israel's air campaign against Iran, and the muted or supportive reactions from G7 capitals, a dangerous overconfidence has begun to shape the logic of war. What was originally conceived as a limited strategic strike is rapidly transforming into a maximalist doctrine of total victory, with growing pressure for Iran's unconditional surrender. Trump has been the first to jump on board. This is a moment where military hubris, not prudence, is steering policy—and the global fallout could be severe. The mirage of early success Israel's military achievements in the opening salvos of this conflict are significant. Supported by US intelligence, satellite coverage, and logistical coordination, the Israeli Air Force successfully degraded large segments of Iran's air defense systems, radar infrastructure, and command centers. Cyber operations have reportedly paralyzed segments of Iran's communications grid, leaving key military sites exposed and vulnerable. These gains, however, risk being misread. Their data are too slim. Yet in the corridors of power in Washington, London, Rome, and Berlin, a narrative of imminent triumph is taking root. The war is no longer about containment or deterrence—it is about collapse. With G7 countries such as Italy and Germany expressing open or tacit support, the operation now carries the moral and political weight of Western backing. Germany, in particular, has gone further than most in affirming its solidarity with Israel, framing the campaign as a matter of existential defense. Demonstrators protest US involvement in the Israel-Iran conflict in Los Angeles, California on June 18, 2025. — AFP pic The erosion of Iran's proxy shield Iran's traditional deterrence strategy has long relied on a network of capable regional allies: Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the Houthis in Yemen. But this axis of resistance is showing clear signs of degradation. Hamas, battered by successive conflicts and unprecedented retaliation after October 7, 2023, has lost much of its senior leadership and key weapons caches. Israel's overwhelming use of force and blockade strategies have deeply diminished the group's operational effectiveness. Hezbollah, though still possessing thousands of rockets, is constrained by Lebanon's political paralysis and economic meltdown. The group faces Israeli intelligence penetration, targeted strikes on its supply chains, and growing domestic disillusionment within Lebanon's Shi'a communities. Its capacity for sustained warfare is greatly reduced, and its deterrent effect is no longer what it was a decade ago. The Houthis, after months of joint US-U.K. operations targeting their drone launch sites and missile stockpiles, are now operating under constant threat of pre-emptive strikes. Their ability to project force beyond Yemen has shrunk, and regional naval coordination has curbed their effectiveness in disrupting Red Sea shipping lanes. The result is clear: Iran's buffer zones have been punctured. The Islamic Republic stands more isolated today than at any time in the past two decades. Phased escalation and the pursuit of total war With this regional context in mind, Israeli and US military planners are reportedly advancing a phased strategy: Phase One: Eliminate Iran's air defense grid through cyberwarfare and coordinated drone/stealth bomber attacks to blind its surveillance and response systems. Phase Two: Obliterate nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz, Arak, and Isfahan using Massive Ordnance Penetrators and long-range precision-guided munitions also known as bunker buster bombs. Phase Three: Cripple Iran's conventional military, targeting naval bases, IRGC command centers, missile depots, and logistics hubs, while disrupting communication and power infrastructure to foment internal dissent. At this stage, the war would shift from military degradation to political disruption. Information warfare, satellite-fed psychological operations, and social media manipulation would aim to fracture Iran's ruling elite and ignite domestic opposition. The risks of strategic overreach Yet the belief that Iran can be reduced to total surrender through external bombardment is strategically naive. Iran may not possess nuclear weapons, but it retains a diverse range of asymmetric capabilities—cyber units, foreign operatives, and clandestine partners across West Asia and beyond. At 92 million people, Tehran has built redundancy into its political and military architecture; even if core institutions are destroyed, resistance may continue through irregular means. More dangerously, the use of overwhelming force may catalyze long-term instability. A shattered Iran could become a crucible for insurgent groups, sectarian strife, and proxy wars reminiscent of Iraq post-2003. Instead of regime change yielding regional peace, the result may be permanent state fragmentation and the rise of uncontrollable non-state actors. The global political backlash is already brewing. While NATO members appear divided on how far to follow Washington's lead, Germany has made its position clear: full support for Israel's right to defend itself. Others, such as Japan and France, remain concerned about the strategic wisdom and legal legitimacy of the campaign but have refrained from open condemnation. Across the Global South, however, the perception is starkly different. Leaders in ASEAN, the African Union, and Latin America view the unfolding war as a neo-imperial intervention devoid of multilateral legitimacy. With no United Nations mandate and no effort at collective security mechanisms, the campaign could further fracture global trust in Western-led international norms. Conclusion: When dominance breeds disorder Israel's military is capable. Its early strikes have been successful. Its adversaries are weakened. But these are precisely the conditions in which the temptation for overreach becomes most seductive—and most dangerous. With G7 support coalescing, particularly from countries like Germany, the campaign against Iran risks being transformed from a limited preemptive strike into a doctrine of regime obliteration. And in this shift lies the peril: a war that is technically winnable but strategically unsustainable. Victory cannot be defined solely by Iran's military collapse or political surrender. The real measure is whether regional and global stability can be preserved—or whether yet another Middle East war plunges the world deeper into division, disorder, and the decline of international law. * Phar Kim Beng is a professor of ASEAN Studies, International Islamic University Malaysia and a Cambridge Commonwealth Fellow * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Iran strikes Israel as Trump weighs US involvement
TEHRAN: Iran launched a fresh salvo of missiles at Israel on Thursday, with a hospital reported hit, as President Donald Trump warned he was weighing US military action in the conflict. AFP journalists heard violent, sustained explosions in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, and sirens sounded in several parts of the country to warn of incoming Iranian missiles. Shortly afterwards, the army said citizens could leave their shelters, while the foreign minister said the Soroka hospital in southern Israel's Beersheba had suffered 'extensive damage' in a strike. Israeli rescuers said at least 32 people were injured in Iran's latest missile attack. The explosions in Jerusalem were the loudest heard by AFP journalists since the conflict began last week. The barrage came after fresh Israeli strikes on Tehran and elsewhere, and with growing speculation about whether Washington would enter the fray. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei meanwhile rejected Trump's demand for an 'unconditional surrender', despite claims from the US leader that 'Iran's got a lot of trouble and they want to negotiate'. Trump has left his intentions on joining the conflict deliberately ambiguous, saying Wednesday: 'I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' 'The next week is going to be very big,' he added, without further details. 'Never surrender' The White House said Trump would receive an intelligence briefing on Thursday, a US holiday. Top US diplomat Marco Rubio is set meet his British counterpart for talks expected to focus on the conflict. 'I have ideas as to what to do, but I haven't made a final (decision),' Trump said. 'I like to make the final decision one second before it's due, because things change. Especially with war.' The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump had told aides on Tuesday he had approved attack plans but was holding off to see if Iran would give up its nuclear programme. Trump told reporters that Iranian officials 'want to come to the White House', a claim denied by Tehran. The US president had favoured a diplomatic route to end Iran's nuclear programme, seeking a deal to replace the 2015 agreement he tore up in his first term. But since Israel unleashed the campaign against Iran one week ago, Trump has stood behind the key US ally. The United States is the only country with the 'bunker buster' bombs needed to destroy Iran's Fordow nuclear plant, but US military action is deeply unpopular with parts of Trump's base. Khamenei on Wednesday insisted Iran 'will never surrender', and called Trump's ultimatum 'unacceptable'. 'America should know that any military intervention will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage,' Khamenei added. Dozens killed On Thursday morning, Israel said it was carrying out fresh strikes on Tehran and other parts of Iran, and warned civilians in two villages, Arak and Khondab, to leave ahead of new attacks. An Israeli military official, who asked not to be named, said Wednesday that Iran had fired around 400 ballistic missiles and 1,000 drones since the conflict began on Friday. About 20 missiles had struck civilian areas in Israel, the official added. Iranian strikes have killed at least 24 people and injured hundreds since they began, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's office said on Monday. Iran said Sunday that Israeli strikes had killed at least 224 people, including military commanders, nuclear scientists and civilians. Both countries have not issued an updated official toll since then. Israel says its surprise air campaign is aimed at preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Iran had been enriching uranium to 60 percent -- far above the 3.67-percent limit set by the 2015 nuclear death but still short of the 90-percent threshold needed for a nuclear warhead. Israel has maintained ambiguity on its own atomic activities, but the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute says it has 90 nuclear warheads. 'Immediate de-escalation' Israel's strikes have prompted mass evacuations and food and fuel shortages in Iran. 'There are shortages of rice, bread, sugar and tea,' a 40-year-old Iranian driver told AFP at the Iraqi border crossing of Bashmakh, seeking anonymity for fear of reprisals. There was also a 'near-total national internet blackout' in Iran on Wednesday, a London-based watchdog said, with Iran's Fars news agency confirming heavier internet restrictions after initial curbs imposed last week. The military campaign has sparked calls for a return to diplomacy. Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday that a deal to guarantee both Israel's security and Iran's desire for a civilian nuclear programme was possible. 'I believe it would be good for all of us together to look for ways to stop the fighting and seek ways for the participants in the conflict to find an agreement,' he told foreign journalists at a televised event. He said Iran had not asked Russia for military help. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said his country remains committed to diplomacy, noting Iran 'has so far only retaliated against the Israeli regime and not those who are aiding and abetting it'. But there were lingering questions about how the conflict could evolve, with Trump telling reporters that a change in Iran's government 'could happen', a day after he had boasted that Washington could assassinate Khamenei, but would not, 'at least not for now'.
