2025 BYD Denza D9 review: Quick drive
Kia Carnival
,
Zeekr 009
and
Lexus LM
buyers.
The luxury offshoot of Chinese mega brand BYD is looking at bringing the D9 people mover to Australia as a luxury offering with some high-tech powertrain options on the table.
At a preview drive in China I tested out the Denza D9 DM-i plug-in hybrid (PHEV), and while it mightn't look like a cutting-edge option, the powertrain and drive experience were surprising.
There is no confirmation yet that the D9 is coming to Australia, but in China it is priced between 339,800 and 600,600 yuan, or approximately A$72,750 to $128,500.
The former pricing is for the DM-i plug-in hybrid model, while the high-end option is the fully electric model. It is understood that, if the D9 was released in Australia, it would be a plug-in hybrid first and foremost, with a limited market for $130,000-pus electric people movers here…
That space is currently occupied by the Zeekr 009, and the
LDV Mifa 9
– neither of which have seen significant cut-through or sales volume in Australia. Oh, and the Lexus LM range, which kicks off at $160,000 or so for a plug-free hybrid.
The big-name in the Aussie market, though, is the Kia Carnival, which accounts for more than 80 per cent of all new people movers sold in the market.
But that is the official new-vehicle number, and doesn't include the grey-import market for Toyota Alphard and Vellfire vehicles – reportedly tallying 599 units in 2024.
That, according to BYD/Denza insiders, could be the market segment that this car will aim at. In other words, above a high-spec Carnival hybrid ($76,630 plus on-roads) but below the aforementioned six-figure electric MPVs.
In China, it has a heap of standard equipment, and comes with a 2+2+3-seat layout with middle-row captain's chairs.
Have your say in the comments – what should the D9 cost, if it comes Down Under?
Up front there are screens aplenty.
The driver gets an older-style 10.25-inch instrument display with a heap of at-a-glance information on offer, while the central touchscreen is a decent 15.6 inch unit with a number of key controls managed through it.
There is climate control adjustment for all three rows of seating available through the screen, and handily that part of the menu system stays docked at the bottom as well.
It is a deep tech setup with dozens of menus on offer, but I didn't have much time to play with it.
The test vehicle had a second 10.25-inch touchscreen for the front passenger, with connected services allowing live streaming (and the back seat screens have that, too).
Thankfully there are numerous useable physical controls as well, including buttons for the sliding rear doors and a number of other features. One that might get a lot of use is the button on the steering wheel to bring up the surround-view camera.
It feels plush and comfortable, but also practical. There are cupholders between the seats, a console storage area, and a hidden shelf below the 'bridge' between the seats.
The test vehicle featured down pillows for front and middle-row occupants, and the driver gets a digital camera mirror system to see out the back, as the rear-view mirror can appear crowded with a few faces on board.
Second-row riders are spoiled.
There are 50W wireless charging smartphone docks, USB-C charging ports, and touchscreens to adjust heating, cooling, massage and media settings. It's a very plush place to sit.
There is a fridge that opens to second-row occupant too, with temperature adjustable between -6°C and +50°C – so you can keep your choccy milks cool or your sausage rolls hot.
There are media screens for rear riders as well, and the overall comfort and entertainment experience is clearly aimed at the two in the middle row of seats.
The biggest concern for potential buyers of this car could be that very seat layout.
It has a 2+2+3 design, with the centre row seating being focused on luxuriousness rather than outright practicality, and that means those buckets don't slide forward to allow third-row access.
Instead, you're expected to (be small enough to) slither between the captain's chairs to access the very back. It's manageable, but it certainly makes the slide/fold setup of MPVs like the Carnival seem simply elegant.
Admittedly, no Carnival has the level of plushness the captain's chairs here have. But I'm not so sure that is as important as easy third-row access.
Once in the very back row, the space is decent but not mindblowing. With the middle-row seating set for me to have a good amount of room, I was a bit cramped in the very back (at 182cm/6'0').
My knees were just brushing the lovely leather-accented trim and my toes were tightly positioned under the seat, but there are great amenities in the back.
Third-row passengers get things like cupholders (x4), pockets on the middle-row seatbacks (x6), USB-C ports (x2), electric sliding and reclining for the seats, and even third-row seat heating and cooling!
There's also a flip-down armrest, and it would make a more comfortable six-seater than seven-seater, I'd say. Additionally, there are ISOFIX child seat anchor points in the window seats for both rear rows, and top-tethers, of course, too.
Boot space varies between 390 litres with the third row upright to a claimed 2310L with the rear rows of seating folded away.
Again, it isn't as cleverly packaged as a Carnival when it comes to the boot area, as those very rear seats cannot be folded down into the floor area, meaning you'll have to plonk stuff on top if you need to take a lot of stuff with you.
Here are the specs of the Denza D9 DM-i, which is the model we had a chance to test… which probably wasn't by accident.
And if you're curious, here are the EV version's specs:
Which would you be keener to see here? Have your say in the comments.
My drive of the D9 was brief, so this part of the review will be, too.
What I learned after a couple of laps of a carpark with a marked course and hundreds of witches hats was that this is a better handling thing than you'd think. It's a 2.7-tonne bus after all, but it hustles.
With a MacPherson front suspension setup and multi-link rear-end with adaptive damping, there was a level of driveability that I wasn't expecting from the D9.
Of course it exhibits some body roll – in fact, it exhibits a lot of body roll. But the way that it ties corners together is impressive, with steering that is involving and direct, with trustworthy responsiveness.
I had more fun than I expected to while pushing it through a slalom and attempting some tighter twists and turns.
And the powertrain is superb, too. With a strong surge of torque from the electric motors at low speeds, the petrol engine kicks into life at about 70km/h, making for strong continued progress as pace climbs.
There is a positive feel to the brake as well, despite it possessing a less aggressive regenerative braking system than you might expect – there's no single-pedal driving option.
I didn't really attempt any parking manoeuvres, but the camera and sensor array made me feel confident it would be a simple thing to pilot into a spot, despite its size.
Full specs and details aren't known yet, but below is a guide as to what the Chinese-spec model has.
2025 Denza D9 equipment highlights:
The Denza D9 has a heap of standard safety gear fitted, as you'd expect – but it hasn't been tested by ANCAP or Euro NCAP, naturally.
It runs the DiPilot 300 ADAS system, with the following sensors included:
It also has dual front, driver's knee, front side, rear side, and full-length curtain airbags.
It is expected that Denza will hit our market with a strong warranty offering – possibly mirroring that of parent company BYD at six years or 150,000km.
Battery pack warranty will be eight years, as is the industry standard. Servicing details and roadside coverage are yet to be determined.
The Denza D9 is a plush and premium feeling people mover.
It perhaps isn't as practical as a Kia Carnival, but it has a plug-in hybrid system that sets it apart.
Should it make its way Down Under with competitive price positioning, the Denza D9 could be very intriguing for families and fleet customers alike.
MORE:
Everything BYD
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
EV real-world range testing finds popular models falling short by up to 23pc less than advertised
A popular Chinese-made electric vehicle has a real-world driving range of nearly one quarter less than advertised under laboratory conditions, according to testing conducted by the Australian Automobile Association (AAA). The AAA on Wednesday released results of five EVs from the latest round of its Real-World Testing Program, which found driving ranges between 5 per cent and 23 per cent less in real driving conditions than recorded in mandatory lab tests conducted by the manufacturers. The 2023 BYD Atto 3 was the worst performer with a driving range of 369km on a single charge — 23 per cent less than the 480km recorded in its lab test. The 2024 Tesla Model 3 had a real-world range of 441km, 14 per cent less than the 513km achieved in the lab. The 2022 Kia EV6 and the 2024 Tesla Model Y both had driving ranges of 8 per cent less than their lab tests — 484km for the EV6 and 490km for the Model Y. The best performer was the 2024 Smart #3, which recorded a real-world driving range of 432km, only 5 per cent below its mandatory lab test. Polling conducted by the AAA last month found 60 per cent of likely EV buyers identified range and recharging as 'the main concerns or hesitations that might prevent you from choosing an electric vehicle (not a hybrid) for your next car purchase'. 'As more EVs enter our market, our testing will help consumers understand which new market entrants measure up on battery range,' AAA managing director Michael Bradley said in a statement. 'Our program will bring confidence to Australian fleets and families looking to buy an EV.' BYD and Tesla have been contacted for comment. Speaking on Seven's Sunrise on Thursday, host Nat Barr questioned whether manufacturers should be forced to be more upfront. 'Just looking at the reasons why you get less than advertised on the battery — hot weather can change it, cold weather can change it, driving on different terrain can change it, stopping and starting can change it, braking can change it,' Barr said. 'A lot can change the amount [of power] you get from the standardised testing. Basically, everything can change it. Do you think they should maybe change what they advertise?' Sunshine Coast Mayor Rosanna Natoli said while the technology was improving 'in regional areas it's a really big concern, and the range anxiety is a real thing'. 'So, I guess for the moment, it is a wait and see with that, particularly when you get outside of the cities it's a real danger,' she said. 'They offer the ability to drive short distances on electric power while retaining the flexibility and range of a conventional engine.' It comes after similar test results released by the AAA this week showed 25 of 30 cars consumed more fuel than advertised. The Real-World Testing Program, funded by the federal government to the tune of $14 million, has tested 114 fuel-powered cars, vans, and utes since it began in August 2023, finding that more than 77 per cent exceeded fuel consumption recorded in lab tests. One in five also exceeded noxious emissions limits from lab tests. Mr Bradley said the program had established that consumers could not always rely on a carmaker's laboratory tests as an indicator of real-world performance. The program was created following the 2015 Volkswagen scandal, when it was revealed the German auto giant had been optimising its vehicles for laboratory performance to meet emissions regulations targets. The Real-World Testing Program uses a 93km circuit in and around Geelong in Victoria. It uses strict testing protocols based on European regulations to ensure results are repeatable and to minimise the influence of human factors such as driving style and changing traffic flows. The program measures EV range by quantifying both the energy needed to drive a vehicle around the test route, and the energy needed to recharge each vehicle's fully depleted battery. It also measures each vehicle's energy consumption, which determines the cost of operating the vehicle, and which carmakers are legally obliged to report at point of sale. BYD still trails behind Tesla in the battery electric only market, with 8556 units sold in the first six months of the year across its Atto 3, Dolphin, Seal and Sealion 7 models. Tesla sold 14,146 of its Model 3 and Model Y in the same period. Including BYD's plug-in hybrids (PHEVs), the Shark 6 and the Sealion 6, the Chinese manufacturer sold 23,335 total units. The Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) notes EV sales have stalled, remaining below 8 per cent of new vehicle sales in 2025, while PHEVs have experienced rapid growth with sales up 183 per cent year-to-date. 'With more than 50 models available in 2025, plug-in hybrids have emerged as an important transition technology for many Australians, particularly those in regional areas or those with limited access to charging,' FCAI chief executive Tony Weber said in a statement this week.
Courier-Mail
an hour ago
- Courier-Mail
Japanese automakers face crisis as Trump imposes 15% US import tariffs
Don't miss out on the headlines from Motoring. Followed categories will be added to My News. Japanese automakers are set to be hit hard after US President Donald Trump imposed sweeping new tariffs on Japan. The 15 per cent tariff, reduced from a 25 per cent tariff, was part of a new trade agreement that also forced Japan to pour US$550 billion into a US strategic investment fund in exchange for continued access to the American market. The new tariffs, which come into effect on August 7, have sparked concern among the Japanese automotive industry, once a global powerhouse. The sector, which employs nearly six million people, has faced a steady decline, hit hard by plummeting US sales and rising Chinese competition. Mazda alone estimates the tariffs will wipe 145.2 billion yen (AUD$1.41 billion) from its operating profits this year. MORE: Massive car companies stop all US imports Japanese automakers are bracing fur huge losses as a result of the tariffs. Picture: AFP MORE: Aussie car prices set to crash Exports from Mexico will be charged an even higher 25 per cent. Mazda, which produces vehicles in both Japan and Mexico, said it was rolling out cost-saving measures, including rerouted shipping, increased output at its Alabama plant, and adjustments to product volume. Without these changes, the company could have faced a loss of 233.5 billion yen (AUD$2.44 billion). Other automakers such as Toyota, Honda, Subaru and Nissan are also reassessing operations. The White House claims the deal will strengthen American manufacturing, especially steel and vehicle production. MORE: $9.1bn slide: Car giant hits the wall US President Donald Trump's new tariffs are now in effect. Picture: AP Photo MORE: Trump's war on 'world's worst car feature' But industry observers say the real winners may be US-based foreign automakers - like Toyota and Honda - who already have plants in North America. AutoForecast Solutions expects US light vehicle output to remain flat at 10.3 million units in 2025, with Japanese automakers investing further in local production rather than increasing imports. Mazda may consider producing the CX-5 domestically, while Toyota could bring 4Runner manufacturing to the US. Originally published as Trump tariffs hit Japanese automakers
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Locksley bags global advisor to boost US critical minerals assault
Locksley Resources has snagged the strategic backing of corporate advisory heavyweight Tribeca Capital and put away a heavily oversubscribed $5.3 million capital raise, adding serious muscle to the company's ambitions to boost its place in the United States critical minerals revival. The company says it is now locked and loaded to become a central player in America's push to secure domestic supply chains for rare earth elements and antimony - two metals currently dominated by Chinese supply. Tribeca will provide strategic advice on commercialising its antimony and rare earth-rich Mojave project in California. In particular, the global advisory group - with deep ties across the natural resources and technology sectors - has pledged to plug Locksley into a network of strategic collaborators, government bodies and downstream technology groups focused on rare earths, energy transition and advanced materials. Tribeca's appointment as a strategic advisor to our critical minerals strategy marks an important step.′ Locksley Resources chairman Nathan Lude Locksley Resources chairman Nathan Lude said: 'Tribeca Capital's appointment as a strategic advisor to our critical minerals strategy marks another important step in positioning Locksley at the forefront of the US and global push for secure, sustainable supply chains.' Tribeca Capital director Scott Clements added that the collaboration has come at a crucial moment in global critical mineral reshuffling. Locksley's Mojave tenure sits in the epicentre of America's critical minerals push, lying just a stone's throw from the famed Mountain Pass rare earths mine, which is operated by mining giant MP Minerals and is the only one of its kind in the US. Spanning 250 claims, the project delivers a double shot of critical mineral firepower. To the north, its historic Desert antimony mine has rock samples grading up to 46 per cent antimony and more than one kilogram per tonne of silver.
