Democrats' path to power Is ‘climate populism', US representative says
SEATTLE – Populist messages on climate change, including the potential for cleaner energy to lower electricity bills, are crucial as the Democrats seek to win back control of Congress in 2026's midterm election, according to Representative Yassamin Ansari.
'This climate populism message is one that we really need to lean into,' the Arizona Democrat said at the Bloomberg Green Seattle conference on July 15. 'When it comes to the cost of living, there is a clear connection between your utility prices and your energy costs and, in Arizona, your AC bills being higher than ever.'
Republicans 'are entirely focusing our energy portfolio on oil and gas', explained Ms Ansari, warning that getting rid of renewables 'is a mistake when you're talking about energy costs'.
Before entering Congress in 2025, Ms Ansari spent her career working on climate both internationally and locally.
Now, she's spending much of her time calling out President Donald Trump's administration and the Republican-controlled Congress for cutting climate funding and rolling back climate policies. 'Some of the legislation in recent weeks, especially the Trump budget Bill – it represents some of the worst environmental rollbacks we've ever seen,' she said at the conference.
Instead of focusing solely on the risks these Bills pose to the climate, Ms Ansari said Democrats should focus on how the legislation impacts people. Inflation ranks as one of the top three issues most concerning to Americans, while climate change ranks near the bottom, according to recent Pew Research Centre polling.
The recent tax legislation signed into law by Mr Trump earlier in July, which pulls back federal support for new clean energy production, could cause electricity rates to increase between 9 per cent to 18 per cent by 2035, according to an analysis by the environmental think tank Energy Innovation.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore July BTO launch to have over 4,600 balance flats, 2 BTO projects with under than 3-year wait
Singapore Acute psychiatry services to be expanded across all healthcare clusters: MOH
Singapore 'Kpods broke our marriage, shattered our children': Woman on husband's vape addiction
Business US tariffs may last well after Trump; crucial for countries to deepen trade ties: SM Lee
Multimedia Telling the Singapore story for 180 years
Asia Indonesia police detain 12 suspects over baby trafficking ring linked to Singapore
Life Walking for exercise? Here are tips on how to do it properly
Singapore 'Nobody deserves to be alone': Why Mummy and Acha have fostered over 20 children in the past 22 years
Beyond focusing on the impacts the Bill will have, Ms Ansari said, Democrats need to refine their vision for the future.
'Now is a really important time for Democrats to plan when it comes to what is the legislation that we want to push forward when we have the House, and again when we have the trifecta' of both chambers of Congress and the presidency. Bloomberg
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Judge who drew calls for impeachment over DOGE ruling assigned to Maxwell transcript case
Find out what's new on ST website and app. Ghislaine Maxwell appears via video link during her arraignment hearing in Manhattan Federal Court, in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York, U.S. July 14, 2020 in this courtroom sketch. REUTERS/Jane Rosenberg/File Photo NEW YORK - A federal judge who faced Republican demands for impeachment after blocking Elon Musk's government review team from accessing sensitive Treasury Department records will consider whether to release grand jury testimony from the criminal case of Jeffrey Epstein's associate Ghislaine Maxwell. U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer in Manhattan was assigned to the case on Monday. Maxwell's trial judge, Alison Nathan, is now a federal appellate judge. The assignment came three days after the U.S. government sought to unseal grand jury transcripts related to Epstein, the disgraced financier and sex offender who died by suicide in 2019 in jail after being charged with sex trafficking. In a Friday court filing, the Department of Justice said the criminal cases against Epstein and Maxwell are a matter of public interest, justifying the release of associated grand jury transcripts. Backers of conspiracy theories about Epstein have urged President Donald Trump to release a broad array of investigative files related to Epstein, not just grand jury transcripts. Separately, U.S. District Judge Darrin Gayles in Miami was assigned on Monday to preside over Trump's $10-billion lawsuit accusing The Wall Street Journal of defaming him by claiming he created a lewd birthday greeting for Epstein in 2003. Dow Jones, which publishes the Journal and is part of Rupert Murdoch's News Corp, said it will defend against the lawsuit, and had "full confidence in the rigor and accuracy of our reporting." News Corp and Murdoch are also defendants. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Subsidies and grants for some 20,000 people miscalculated due to processing issue: MOH Asia At least 19 killed as Bangladesh air force plane crashes at college campus Singapore ST Explains: What does it mean for etomidate to be listed under the Misuse of Drugs Act? Business Why Singapore and its businesses stand to lose with US tariffs on the region Singapore NTU to have compulsory cadaver dissection classes for medical students from 2026 World US authorities probing passenger jet's close call with B-52 bomber over North Dakota Singapore Jail for man who conspired with another to bribe MOH agency employee with $18k Paris trip Singapore New research institute will grow S'pore's talent in nuclear energy, safety Engelmayer and Gayles were appointed to the bench by Democratic President Barack Obama. U.S. District Judge Richard Berman, an appointee of Democratic President Bill Clinton, will oversee the government's request for transcripts in Epstein's criminal case. NEWEST TRUMP CASE FOR FLORIDA JUDGE Many Trump supporters view the judiciary as an impediment to the Republican president's policy and personal goals. Each case could take several months or longer to resolve, followed by possible appeals. Engelmayer, 64, came under fire and drew Musk's scorn in February after temporarily blocking Musk's Department of Government Efficiency from accessing Treasury systems. Congressman Derrick Van Orden, a Wisconsin Republican, said impeachment was justified because the judge played politics in his decision, "demonstrating clear bias and prejudice against the president and the 74,000,000 Americans who voted for him." Judicial impeachments are rare and normally reserved for serious misconduct, not disapproval of individual rulings. Any unsealed transcripts are likely to be redacted, reflecting privacy or security concerns. Gayles, 58, has been on the federal bench since 2014, after the U.S. Senate approved his nomination by a 98-0 vote. The Wall Street Journal case is at least the second Trump lawsuit he has overseen. Gayles presided in 2023 over Trump's $500-million lawsuit accusing former personal lawyer and fixer Michael Cohen of breaching fiduciary duties by revealing confidences and spreading falsehoods in books, podcasts, and media appearances. Trump voluntarily dismissed that case after six months. The lawyer who filed that case also filed the Journal lawsuit. REUTERS
International Business Times
7 hours ago
- International Business Times
US President Donald Trump Posts AI-Altered Video of Barack Obama Arrest, Sparks Outrage and Conspiracy Claims
U.S. President Donald Trump has courted yet another controversy by sharing a doctored video that depicts former President Barack Obama getting arrested in the White House. The doctored video, which was posted to Trump's Truth Social platform on Monday, shows Obama handcuffed by two FBI agents as Trump smiles from nearby. US president Donald Trump posts I-generated video of former president Barack Obama's arrest X The one-minute spot opens with a voice that sounds like Obama saying, "No one, not even the President, is above the law," and features other Democrats, including former President Joe Biden, stating the same. The video then segues to a doctored image of Obama in a prison jumpsuit and behind bars. Trump did not add a disclaimer to the clip that this time the video was created with artificial intelligence and was not real. The video was originally posted to TikTok before it went out on Trump's platform. Critics, media experts, and watchdogs have described the post as "irresponsible" and dangerous, particularly in today's politically charged environment. The release comes as Tulsi Gabbard, the U.S. Director of National Intelligence, is set to make explosive claims in a video. In a series of tweets on X (formerly Twitter), Gabbard accused Obama and his top aides of being part of a "treasonous conspiracy" to throw the 2016 election. She alleged that officials intentionally distorted intelligence reports to force a narrative about Trump's links to Russia. Gabbard said that her office has handed over the documents to the Department of Justice and called for a complete investigation. "Everyone involved needs to be prosecuted within the rule of law," she wrote. But a report recently declassified by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) suggests that Gabbard is untrue. The 114-page report says U.S. intelligence agencies had made that assessment before the 2016 election that Russian cyber activity had a certain outcome, meaning it likely did not affect final vote tallies. An intelligence briefing from December 2016, likewise, found no significant evidence of vote manipulation. But Trump's post and Gabbard's allegations have rekindled a fight over the legitimacy of the 2016 election and whether politicians can use artificial intelligence to generate political messages. Experts caution that such videos can amplify misinformation at a rapid pace and undermine public trust. More and more people are calling for new guidelines when it comes to AI-forged content, particularly when public figures are involved.
Straits Times
7 hours ago
- Straits Times
Harvard, Trump administration to face off in court over canceled funding
FILE PHOTO: Students gather on the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S., May 23, 2025. REUTERS/Faith Ninivaggi/File Photo BOSTON - Harvard University will urge a federal judge on Monday to order U.S. President Donald Trump's administration to restore about $2.5 billion in canceled federal grants and cease efforts to cut off research funding to the prestigious Ivy League school. The court hearing before U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs in Boston marks a crucial moment in the White House's escalating conflict with Harvard, which has been in the administration's crosshairs after it rejected a list of demands to make changes to its governance, hiring and admissions practices in April. The Cambridge, Massachusetts-based university says hundreds of research projects including ones concerning cancer treatments, infectious diseases and Parkinson's disease will be in jeopardy unless the judge declares the grant cancellations unlawful. The country's oldest and richest university has become a central focus of the administration's broad campaign to leverage federal funding to force change at U.S. universities, which Trump says are gripped by antisemitic and "radical left" ideologies. "The Trump administration's proposition is simple and commonsense: Don't allow antisemitism and DEI to run your campus, don't break the law, and protect the civil liberties of all students," White House spokesperson Harrison Fields said in a statement. Among the earliest actions the administration took against Harvard was the cancellation of hundreds of grants awarded to researchers on the grounds that the school failed to do enough to address harassment of Jewish students on its campus. The Trump administration has since sought to bar international students from attending the school; threatened Harvard's accreditation status; and opened the door to cutting off more funds by finding it violated federal civil rights law. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Subsidies and grants for some 20,000 people miscalculated due to processing issue: MOH Singapore 2 workers stranded on gondola dangling outside Raffles City Tower rescued by SCDF Business Why Singapore and its businesses stand to lose with US tariffs on the region Singapore Medallions with Singapore Botanic Gardens' iconic landmarks launched to mark milestone-filled year Life WP chairwoman Sylvia Lim to publish memoir with Epigram Books in 2027 Business $1.1 billion allocated to three fund managers to boost Singapore stock market: MAS Singapore Jail for man who conspired with another to bribe MOH agency employee with $18k Paris trip Singapore Jail, caning for man who held metal rod to cashier's neck in failed robbery attempt As part of Trump's spending and tax bill, the Republican-led Congress increased the federal excise tax on Harvard's income from its $53 billion endowment to 8% from 1.4%. Income from the endowment covers 40% of Harvard's operating budget. Harvard President Alan Garber said last week that the various federal actions since Trump returned to office in January could strip the school of nearly $1 billion annually, forcing it to lay off staff and freeze hiring. Harvard has said it has taken steps to ensure its campus is welcoming to Jewish and Israeli students, who it acknowledges experienced "vicious and reprehensible" treatment following the onset of Israel's war against Hamas in Gaza in October 2023. But, Garber has said the administration's demands have gone far beyond addressing antisemitism and unlawfully seek to regulate the "intellectual conditions" on its campus by controlling who it hires and who it teaches. Those demands, which came in an April 11 letter from an administration task force, included calls for the private university to restructure its governance, alter its hiring and admissions practices to ensure an ideological balance of viewpoints and end certain academic programs. After Harvard rejected those demands, it said the administration began retaliating against it in violation of the free speech protections of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment by abruptly cutting funding the school says is vital to supporting scientific and medical research. Burroughs, an appointee of Democratic President Barack Obama, in a separate case has already barred the administration from halting its ability to host international students. Trump has expressed optimism that Harvard will eventually settle with his administration. Fields on Friday said a good deal was more than possible and that the administration is "confident that Harvard will eventually come around and support the president's vision." In court, the administration has argued that Burroughs lacks jurisdiction to hear the challenge and that the grant contracts made clear they could be canceled if the funded projects do not carry out federal government policy objectives. REUTERS
