Elon Musk is ripping the GOP and Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' again. Here's how it all went down.
Musk started criticizing Trump's spending bill on June 5 but walked back the attacks just days later. Musk said in an X post on June 11 that some of his remarks on Trump had gone "too far."
But the detente did not last long. The Tesla and SpaceX CEO reignited his attacks on the bill over the weekend and hasn't stopped since.
On Saturday, Musk wrote on X that the president's signature tax bill "will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country."
"Utterly insane and destructive. It gives handouts to industries of the past while severely damaging industries of the future," he continued.
GOP lawmakers hope to send the bill, which is pending a vote in the Senate, to Trump's desk by July 4. Musk, however, said he would defeat politicians who voted for the bill if it passed and form his own political party.
"It is obvious with the insane spending of this bill, which increases the debt ceiling by a record FIVE TRILLION DOLLARS that we live in a one-party country — the PORKY PIG PARTY!!" Musk wrote in an X post on Monday.
"Time for a new political party that actually cares about the people," he said.
Musk said in a follow-up post, published just an hour later, that any politician who voted for the bill despite campaigning on cutting government spending should "hang their head in shame."
"And they will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth," he added.
Musk said later that a new party, the "America Party," will be formed the day after the "insane spending bill passes."
"Our country needs an alternative to the Democrat-Republican uniparty so that the people actually have a VOICE," Musk added.
Musk had long opposed Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill." In an interview with CBS that aired last month, Musk said he was " disappointed to see the massive spending bill."
Musk said the bill "undermines the work that the DOGE team is doing," the government cost-cutting outfit he led when he was a part of the Trump administration. Musk announced his departure from the White House DOGE office on May 28.
"I think a bill can be big, or it could be beautiful. I don't know if it could be both," Musk told CBS.
Musk's disagreement with Trump over the bill marks a rare break between the two men. Musk had been a prominent backer of Trump's presidential campaign last year, where he spent at least $277 million backing Trump and other GOP candidates in the 2024 elections.
When Musk criticized Trump's bill earlier in June, he took credit for Trump and the GOP's electoral victories in 2024. That was also when he first floated the possibility of forming his own political party.
"Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate," Musk wrote on X on June 5.
"Such ingratitude," he continued.
Musk said in an interview with Bloomberg on May 20 that he had "done enough" political spending and planned to " do a lot less in the future."
"Well, if I see a reason to do political spending in the future, I will do it," he added.
Trump initially expressed disappointment at Musk's behavior but has since taken a more conciliatory tone with Musk. Trump said last week that he still views Musk positively but has not spoken to him much.
"He's a smart guy. And he actually went and campaigned with me and this and that," Trump said in an interview with Fox News' Maria Bartiromo that aired Sunday.
"But he got a little bit upset, and that wasn't appropriate," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Legislation for Mecklenburg County transit plan takes vital step in NC House
RALEIGH, N.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — The bill that could eventually lead to the funding of Mecklenburg County's transit plan easily passed its second reading on Wednesday. The P.A.V.E. Act allows Mecklenburg County to hold a ballot referendum for voters to decide on a one-cent sales tax increase to improve roads, buses, and rail transit. After the second reading passed 102-6, it will go to a third reading and then to the State Senate. PREVIOUS: CATS board approves transit plan with expanded rail service, 'better bus' program The bipartisan bill's primary author is Republican Mint Hill Rep. Tricia Cotham, who is joined by Mecklenburg County Democrats Mark Belk, Becky Carney, Carla Cunningham, Aisha Dew, Beth Helfrich, Jordan Lopez, Nasif Majeed, and Julia Greenfield. 'Just like any good piece of legislation where others have had an input, it's not perfect, but it is a tremendous start,' said Rep. Tricia Cotham. Cotham took the House floor Wednesday afternoon to explain why she believes her fellow lawmakers should proceed with the P.A.V.E. Act. 'As you all know, traffic adds to frustration, congestion, and just grumpy people, we see it every day, and I believe and I know this will help,' she said. North Mecklenburg communities are celebrating the latest step on Wednesday as they prepare for a commuter rail from Uptown. Cornelius Mayor Woody Washam calls the bill a 'game-changer' that will bring 'real improvements that folks will feel right away.' The funding would create a new governing authority and allow for the construction of the Red Line, Silver Line, extension of the Blue Line, a 'better bus' program, and road improvements. The bill requires that the net proceeds of the bill be distributed as follows: 40% to the county's eligible municipalities, which can only be spent on roadway systems 60% to the metropolitan public transit authority to be used only for a public transportation system, specifically including microtransit services All of the county's municipalities but Matthews have shown support for the plan. 'I wish that we could go back to the drawing board and renegotiate a better deal on behalf of our residents,' said Matthews Commissioner Ken McCool. Matthews leaders have been outspoken against the idea from the beginning because there likely won't be enough funding to bring the light rail east. Commissioner McCool took his concerns to Raleigh this week. 'I'm disappointed, but at the end of the day, if this passes the Senate and goes to the governor's desk, the voters will ultimately decide and the voters of Mecklenburg County will have their choice to see what they want to do with this,' he said. The commissioner plans to challenge Cotham for her District 105 seat in 2026, saying the transit bill played a role in motivating him. Queen City News reached out to Cotham for comment on the transit bill's progress and McCool's announcement. We are waiting to hear back. The House will take one more vote before the bill makes its way to the Senate for approval. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lara Trump is 'thinking' about a US Senate bid. What's her connection to North Carolina?
Following North Carolina Republican Sen. Thom Tillis' announcement that he will not run for reelection, Lara Trump is reportedly considering a campaign for his seat. In a statement on the subject, Tillis, who has served as a key holdout on President Donald Trump's sweeping legislation on taxes, Medicaid, border resources and more, stated leaders who want bipartisan solutions have become an "endangered species" in Washington. "It's not a hard choice, and I will not be seeking re-election," Tillis said in a statement. Trump advisers told news outlet Axios that Lara Trump is "thinking" about a campaign for Tillis's seat. Here's what we know about Lara Trump and the possibility of a campaign. Lara Trump, whose birth name was Lara Lea Yunaska, was born Oct. 12, 1982, in Wilmington, North Carolina, and raised in Wrightsville Beach. Previous reporting: Lara Trump speaks in Wilmington Lara Trump also attended college in North Carolina, graduating from N.C. State University with a degree in communications. Lara Trump is married to Eric Trump, Donald Trump's second-oldest son. The couple met in 2008 and were married in November 2014 in a ceremony at Mar-a-Lago. Lara and Eric Trump had their first child, Eric "Luke" Jr., in 2017 and their second, Carolina Dorothy, in 2019. 'Vote for grandpa': Trump introduces grandchildren at rally in Wilmington Currently, Lara Trump hosts the Fox News television show "My View with Lara Trump." New York Magazine explained that previously, Lara Trump was a producer for the show "Inside Edition" until she left to help with Donald Trump's presidential campaign in 2016. Lara originally joined Fox News as a paid contributor in 2021, but was let go in 2022 after the network stated it would not employ people connected to an active presidential campaign. In March 2024, Lara was unanimously elected co-chair of the Republican National Committee, along with N.C. GOP chair Michael Whatley. She resigned from the role in early December. 'Remove every Democrat': Lara Trump campaigns for the president in Wilmington Tillis announced on Sunday, June 29, that he would not be running for reelection. 'Thom Tillis is making a BIG MISTAKE for America, and the Wonderful People of North Carolina!' Trump said on his social media platform, Truth Social. As well as stating Lara Trump is "thinking" about a campaign, Trump advisers also told Axios that Lara Trump "would have a hard time saying no if asked by her father in law," though they'd be surprised if "she wants to leave the amazing gig she has at Fox." Iris Seaton is the trending news reporter for the Asheville Citizen Times, part of the USA TODAY Network. Reach her at iseaton@ This article originally appeared on Wilmington StarNews: Is Lara Trump from North Carolina? How is she related to Donald Trump?
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump slams Elon Musk as megabill drops AI protections and hits snags in Senate
President Trump slammed Elon Musk's subsidies, and Republican senators struck down a plan to shield artificial intelligence from state regulations. These two middle-of-the-night developments on Tuesday reinforced a growing schism between Trump and Silicon Valley supporters over his "big, beautiful bill." The first development came at 12:44 a.m. ET, when Trump responded to Tesla (TSLA) CEO Musk's ongoing critiques of the package, focusing on the government grants that Musk's companies receive. "Without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa," wrote the president in a Truth Social post, adding, "perhaps we should have DOGE take a good, hard, look at this?" The president was referring to the government efficiency group that Musk ran until recently. The president's missive came after Trump's signature legislation underwent key changes in recent days that set off many in the tech industry, Musk most of all, with new measures to tax green energy companies and further support for fossil fuels, as well as a growing price tag. The divide between many in Silicon Valley and the "big, beautiful bill" has been evident for over a month. It appeared set to deepen further when, a few hours later, a closely watched artificial intelligence provision was stripped from the bill itself. This plan, which had many Silicon Valley supporters, was meant to shield the quickly growing AI industry from state and local regulations. But the idea now appears to be dead after Sen. Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee turned against a compromise plan Monday evening and stripped it from the bill. It wasn't close in the end, with the Senate voting 99-1 to adopt Blackburn's subsequent amendment in a count that wrapped up a little after 4:00 a.m. ET. Trump's overall package also appears to be teetering Tuesday morning after a series of overnight developments saw two key Republican senators — Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine — uncommitted to vote yes. Those two senators could join two Republicans already committed to voting no, which would be enough to sink the package. The drama between the president and the world's richest man has been up and down for weeks, but it escalated Monday afternoon when Musk offered new electoral threats against Republicans. Musk had already amplified Democrats' critiques and talked about the need for a new political party. He offered a striking promise Monday afternoon that lawmakers who vote for the bill "will lose their primary next year if it is the last thing I do on this Earth." Musk, of course, was the biggest donor during the 2024 campaign, spending at least $288 million, most of which was offered in support of Trump. Trump reiterated his critiques of Musk Tuesday morning, speaking to reporters and saying of Musk's objection to losing EV subsidies, "Elon can lose a lot more than that." The president also called the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) a "monster that might have to go back and eat Elon." And when asked by a reporter if he would consider deporting Musk, he demurred: "We'll have to take a look." What is unclear for the days ahead is how much the Trump-Musk fight will impact the actual chances of the bill's passage, with Senate amendment votes ongoing. Musk is clearly focused on a debate likely coming later this week, when the House is set to take up the amended measure if it passes. The House is where a vocal bloc of fiscal conservatives — who often vote as part of the "Freedom Caucus" — warily supported a previous version of the bill, saying a previous smaller price tag was too big. Musk even tagged some of these House Republican lawmakers in some of his latest posts, which continued throughout the night with dozens of messages. Musk also responded to Trump's comments about his subsidies by saying his companies like Tesla and SpaceX ( would be fine and that oil and gas subsidies should be removed as well. The back-and-forth over AI also came to a head overnight after the House passed a plan in May that included a complete ban on state regulations of AI for a decade. The little-noticed measure gained wider attention in the weeks that followed, with many of Trump's most loyal supporters opposing it. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene even admitted that she hadn't been aware of the provision when she voted yes. The Georgia lawmaker then announced her opposition and plans to vote no if this "violation of state rights" stayed in the bill. Trump himself doesn't appear to have taken a position on the measure, but it had the backing of his Silicon Valley-aligned aides, most notably the vocal support of AI and crypto czar (and longtime venture capitalist) David Sacks. But Republican opposition grew, and Sen. Blackburn of Tennessee became a leading voice of opposition in the Senate. She entered into negotiations over the issue and appeared to have found a compromise in recent days around the idea that instead of a decade-long ban, the provision would be amended to be a "temporary pause" of five years. States would be strongly discouraged from regulating AI, as lawmakers linked it to access to millions of dollars in AI infrastructure and deployment funding. But even that wasn't enough. Blackburn renounced the compromise, said a moratorium "could allow Big Tech to continue to exploit kids, creators, and conservatives," and teamed with a top Democrat to strike the provision entirely. Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders (a former Trump press secretary) congratulated Blackburn on the move in a post the senator quickly reposted. "This is how you take on big tech!" Sanders wrote. This story has been updated with additional developments. Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance. Click here for political news related to business and money policies that will shape tomorrow's stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio
