
Immigrants Benefit Their Host Country While Seeking Better Lives
Refugee mature woman protesting in the street
getty
Pakistan, Peru, Macedonia, Trinidad and Tobago, Venezuela, Albania, Ecuador, Bulgaria, Jamaica, Ukraine, India, Philippines, El Salvador. Korea, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Poland.
Keep the names of those 18 countries in mind as I tell you this back story.
Two weeks ago, I fell and broke my hip. If you've never broken a hip, let me give you a piece of advice. Don't.
Anyway, after a luxury limo trip (translation: ambulance) to the ER that night and hip replacement surgery the next day, I was transported to a rehabilitation facility for what would turn out to be two weeks of intensive, rigorous therapy. This rehabilitation institute has a well-deserved reputation for being the best of the best, elite in their service and outcomes. It's where you want to be if you have to be where you don't want to be.
I'll be going home in two days and I'm confident all will be well. Which leads us to why I write today.
And here it is. It was those 18 countries from which people who cared for me came to the United States. They were doctors, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, nurses, aides, imaging techs, phlebotomists, physical therapists, occupational therapists, dieticians, food service workers, and transport personnel. They treated me, fed me, held me, dressed me, cleaned me, and encouraged me.
And they were immigrants, all doing their jobs so well and with such love, honor, and gratitude that it was plain to see why and how this institute is so very good at what they do. Perhaps they were not quite the destitute people to which Emma Lazarus referred in her immortal poem The New Colossus.
Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!" cries sheWith silent lips. "Give me your tired, your poor,Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,I lift my lamp beside the golden door!'
But I'll bet some were.
And while they all came here for a better life – the most commonly-recited mantra of the immigrant and, at the same time, the one most resented by anti-immigrants – in the process, they made my life better, too, especially in these last two dynamic weeks. That's what you call a fine example of symbiosis: interaction between two parties that works to the advantage of both. I assume you know this verse of Lazarus' poem is on a tablet held by the Statue of Liberty, for all to see. It is the most generous invitation ever extended on this earth, and my father accepted it in 1929, my mother's parents about 35 years earlier, Albert Einstein in 1933. And so did the people of this story.
Yet anti-immigrant sentiment and action continues to proliferate around the world, and one just crossed my desk, sent by an associate who monitors these things. Said the author, 'America should take that poem off the Statue of Liberty but keep Lady Liberty.' That sentiment is not new.
While the poem was heralded by John F. Kennedy in his book book A Nation of Immigrants (1958), it got quite the opposite reaction in 2019, during the first Trump administration. Ken Cuccinelli, Trump's acting director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, revised a line from the poem in support of the administration's 'public charge rule' which would have rejected would-be immigrants who lacked the wherewithal to support themselves. Cuccinelli suggested rewriting the caveat as, "Give me your tired and your poor who can stand on their own two feet, and who will not become a public charge." He later suggested that the "huddled masses" should be European, and he downplayed the poem as "not actually part of the original Statue of Liberty." The Trump administration rule was later blocked by a federal appeals court.
Perhaps a two-week stay in a hospital or rehab facility – with plenty of time to watch and think – would answer this big question: Tell me again; what, exactly, is wrong with immigration?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Geek Tyrant
12 minutes ago
- Geek Tyrant
Video Explores How 1920s Filmmakers Pulled Off Death-Defying Stunts Without Dying — GeekTyrant
A new video from Lost in Time dives into some of the wildest and most iconic movie stunts from the silent film era. This is a behind-the-scenes look at how legends like Buster Keaton, Harold Lloyd, and Charlie Chaplin pulled off seemingly impossible feats of physical comedy and danger… without modern safety gear or visual effects. 'In this video we're breaking down how they pulled off the craziest stunts in the 1920s from Hollywood legends Buster Keaton, Charlie Chaplin and Harold Lloyd. I have made 3D animations showing exactly how each scene was filmed, and it is amazing how creative they were back then.' And those animations really drive it home. Watching them reveals just how much thought and trickery went into making these death-defying moments is fascinating. This is just a reminder that the roots of modern movie magic were built with brains, not just bravery.


Fox News
14 minutes ago
- Fox News
Navy veteran's $500M defamation lawsuit against Associated Press advances with first hearing
Zachary Young's high-stakes defamation lawsuit against the Associated Press continues to inch along in Bay County, Florida, as the U.S. Navy veteran seeks to clear his name. Young successfully sued CNN for defamation earlier this year after saying the network smeared him by implying he illegally profited from helping people flee Afghanistan on the "black market" during the Biden administration's disastrous 2021 military withdrawal. When covering the trial in January, Associated Press media reporter David Bauder wrote that "Young's business helped smuggle people out of Afghanistan." Young's legal team has said that the Associated Press article "went even further than CNN's falsehoods," and the veteran is seeking nearly $500 million in a defamation suit against the AP. On Monday, Young's legal team responded to the AP's motion to dismiss the suit. The AP had insisted Young's complaint is "without merit" and unjustly challenges the outlet's free speech rights, but the Navy veteran's legal team believes the motion failed to address "core issues." "It does not dispute that the term 'human smuggling' implies criminal conduct, nor does it offer any valid explanation for its use of that term, even though a court previously ruled that Mr. Young committed no crime. AP's own Stylebook defines 'smuggling' as illegal," Young's attorney, Daniel Lustig, wrote. "Dozens of AP articles reflect that usage. Just days before this filing, AP published a story about a man sentenced to 25 years in prison for 'smuggling people,' reinforcing that understanding," Lustig continued. "Even after receiving notice, AP refused to retract or revise the statement, not even to use a more accurate term such as 'evacuate' or 'rescue.'" Young's attorney believes the most "notable" part of the AP's motion to dismiss is that it never denied that "smuggling" refers to a criminal act. "Instead, it argues that the statement, in context, was not defamatory. That is not a defense, it is a concession. Under Florida law, if a statement is reasonably capable of a defamatory meaning, it is a question for the jury, not one to be resolved on a motion to dismiss. AP's attempt to invoke the anti-SLAPP statute to shield such a statement is both legally unsupported and fundamentally flawed," Lustig wrote. Young's legal team has also filed a motion to amend the complaint to include punitive damages. The 242-page filing suggested this case "exemplifies the very scenario in which punitive damages are warranted to punish and deter such consciously indifferent conduct by a media organization." On Tuesday, each side appeared for the first hearing in front of 14th Judicial Circuit Court Judge William S. Henry, who also presided over the CNN trial. The Case Management Conference, conducted over Zoom, was largely procedural and offered a chance for each party to explain why respective motions should be heard. Judge Henry scheduled the next hearing for July 3. He is expected to rule on both the AP's motion to dismiss and Young's amended complaint. The AP has referred to the lawsuit as "frivolous" in past statements to the press.


Fox News
18 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trans athlete sparking uproar in California
All times eastern The Journal Editorial Report Fox Report with Jon Scott Fox Report with Jon Scott FOX News Radio Live Channel Coverage