logo
Global plastic pollution treaty talks extended

Global plastic pollution treaty talks extended

RTÉ News​19 hours ago
Talks on striking a global treaty on combating plastic pollution were extended an extra day with no clear endgame in sight.
Ten days of negotiations at the United Nations in Geneva were due to wrap up yesterday but with 23 minutes of the day left, the talks were prolonged.
However, after a day of frantic negotiations, there were few signs that rival country blocs were any closer to bridging their differences and striking a text on dealing with the scourge of plastic that pollutes land, oceans and people's bodies.
"As consultations of my revised draft text are still ongoing, this plenary is therefore adjourned, to be convened on 15 August 2025, at a time to be announced," talks chair Luis Vayas Valdivieso said before gavelling the session closed.
The plenary session - bringing all 185 negotiating countries together in the UN Palais des Nations' main assembly hall - lasted less than a minute, with shocked reactions among the delegates packing the room.
'Complete haze'
"It's such a mess. I've never seen that. The room is full of people standing, trying to understand what's going on," Aleksandar Rankovic from The Common Initiative think-tank, told AFP.
"It smells like no deal. The room is very discontented," he said, but "even if people don't believe that a deal is achievable this time, they also might want to be pushing the text in their direction up to the very last minute".
Throughout the day, Ecuadoran diplomat Mr Vayas was doing the rounds between regional delegations, trying to stitch together a consensus agreement following a botched attempt on Wednesday.
"We are in a complete haze. We've got the impression something is missing," a diplomatic source in one of the regional delegations told AFP.
During the long hours of waiting, backroom negotiations and informal meetings, one head of delegation told AFP they were convinced there would be another "compromise" text coming, while another, from another continent, despaired at seeing "neither text nor process", fearing a complete failure of the long negotiations that began more than two years ago in Nairobi.
Elusive middle ground
After three years of negotiations, nations wanting bold action to turn the tide on plastic garbage were trying to build last-minute bridges with a group of oil-producing states.
"We need to have a coherent global treaty. We can't do it on our own," said Environment Minister Deborah Barasa of Kenya, a member of the High Ambition Coalition seeking aggressive action on plastic waste.
Ms Barasa told AFP that nations could strike a treaty now, then work out some of the finer details down the line.
"We need to come to a middle ground," she said. "And then we can have a step-wise approach in terms of building up this treaty and ending plastic pollution."
"We need to leave with the treaty," she added.
Back-to-back regional and cross-regional groups huddled in meetings throughout yesterday.
The High Ambition Coalition, which includes the European Union, Britain and Canada, and many African and Latin American countries, wants to see language on reducing plastic production and the phasing out of toxic chemicals used in plastics.
A cluster of mostly oil-producing states calling themselves the Like-Minded Group - including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Russia, Iran, and Malaysia - want the treaty to focus primarily on waste management.
Macron's call to action
The plastic pollution problem is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peaks, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body.
On current trends, annual production of fossil-fuel-based plastics will nearly triple by 2060 to 1.2 billion tonnes, while waste will exceed one billion tonnes, according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
With 15 million tonnes of plastic dumped in the ocean every minute, French President Emmanuel Macron asked: "What are we waiting for to act?"
"I urge all states gathered in Geneva to adopt an agreement that truly meets the scale of this environmental and public health emergency," he posted on X.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New compromise but no deal at plastic pollution talk
New compromise but no deal at plastic pollution talk

RTÉ News​

timean hour ago

  • RTÉ News​

New compromise but no deal at plastic pollution talk

Countries trying to break the deadlock and strike a landmark global treaty on combating plastic pollution negotiated through the night on a last-minute revised proposal. The new draft, issued by the talks chair after the original deadline passed, contains more than 100 unresolved passages of text - but constitutes an "acceptable basis for negotiation", two sources from different governments said. However, several environmental NGOs said the new text still did not go far enough to protect human health and the environment. After three years of negotiations, nations wanting bold action to turn the tide on plastic rubbish were trying to build last-minute bridges with a group driven by oil-producing states. Talks chair Luis Vayas Valdivieso issued his revised draft text after countries from all corners shredded his previous version issued Wednesday, plunging the talks into disarray. The Ecuadoran diplomat spent in frantic negotiation with multiple regional groups, resulting in a new text that went some way towards appeasing both major blocs. The High Ambition Coalition, which includes the European Union, Britain and Canada, and many African and Latin American countries, wants to see language on reducing plastic production and the phasing out of toxic chemicals used in plastics. A cluster of mostly oil-producing states calling themselves the Like-Minded Group - including Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Russia, Iran, and Malaysia - want the treaty to focus primarily on waste management. The new text "is far from what is needed to end plastic pollution," however, "it can be the springboard to get there, if we sharpen it in a next round", Panama's negotiator Juan Carlos Monterrey said. A diplomatic source from another country told AFP it was an "acceptable basis for negotiation". In search of 'middle ground' A total of 185 countries have been negotiating since 5 August at the United Nations headquarters in Geneva. Five previous rounds of talks over three years failed to land a treaty. One country's chief negotiator said the new draft felt like a "more balanced text - not too bad but not too good either". "At least it feels like the chair is listening. But many of us are asking what's going to be the next steps," they said. As for whether there was much movement from the Like-Minded Group, the negotiator said: "Nothing. It's the same ... I'm not so sure if there's momentum." The plastic pollution problem is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peaks, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body. On current trends, annual production of fossil-fuel-based plastics will nearly triple by 2060 to 1.2 billion tonnes, while waste will exceed one billion tonnes, according to the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. With 15 million tonnes of plastic dumped in the ocean every minute, French President Emmanuel Macron asked: "What are we waiting for to act?" "I urge all states gathered in Geneva to adopt an agreement that truly meets the scale of this environmental and public health emergency," he posted on X. "We need to have a coherent global treaty. We can't do it on our own," said Environment Minister Deborah Barasa of Kenya, a member of the High Ambition Coalition seeking aggressive action on plastic waste. Ms Barasa said that nations could strike a treaty now, then work out some of the finer details down the line. "We need to come to a middle ground," she said. IPEN, a global network aimed at limiting toxic chemicals, said the level of ambition in the new draft text "cannot become the new normal for these negotiations". And the World Wide Fund for Nature said: "Efforts to pull together a treaty that all parties will accept has amounted to a text so compromised, so inconsequential, it cannot hope to tackle the crisis in any meaningful way."

Israel moves to ‘bury' Palestinian state with illegal 3,400-home build in West Bank settlement
Israel moves to ‘bury' Palestinian state with illegal 3,400-home build in West Bank settlement

The Journal

time5 hours ago

  • The Journal

Israel moves to ‘bury' Palestinian state with illegal 3,400-home build in West Bank settlement

ISRAEL'S FAR-RIGHT Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich announced yesterday that he intends to approve plans for more than 3,400 homes in the long-delayed E1 settlement area of the occupied West Bank, a move which he said could effectively 'bury' the idea of a Palestinian state. Speaking at the illegal site near the settlement of Maale Adumim east of Jerusalem, Smotrich hailed the project as 'Zionism at its best' and said the construction would send a clear message to countries considering recognition of a Palestinian state. 'Anyone in the world who tries today to recognise a Palestinian state will receive an answer from us on the ground,' he said, referring to roads, neighborhoods, and Jewish families building their lives in the area. Israeli far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo The E1 plan, first proposed in the 1990s, would connect Jerusalem with the existing settlement of Maale Adumim, cutting off the northern and southern West Bank from each other and undermining the possibility of a contiguous Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital. The area spans roughly 12 square kilometres, and has remained frozen for decades amid strong international opposition. All settlements in the West Bank, occupied since 1967, are considered illegal under international law. They violate the Fourth Geneva Convention, which bans an occupying power from transferring its population to the area it occupies. An Israeli army bulldozer demolishes homes in the Palestinian West Bank. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Smotrich, who also holds a role in Israel's Ministry of Defence overseeing settlement approvals, called for Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank, using the Biblical term 'Judea and Samaria.' 'On this important day, I call on Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to abandon once and for all the idea of partitioning the country,' Smotrich said. Advertisement The announcement comes amid growing international support for a two-state solution, with countries including Britain and France planning to recognise a Palestinian state later this year. Israel's settlement expansion has drawn sharp criticism from the United Nations, European Union, Germany, Saudi Arabia, and Palestinian officials. Stephane Dujarric, spokesperson for UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, warned that advancing construction in E1 'would put an end to the prospects of a two-state solution' by severing the northern and southern West Bank. The Palestinian foreign ministry described the project as a continuation of 'the occupation's plans to destroy the opportunity for the establishment of a Palestinian state,' calling for international intervention. The EU's chief diplomat Kaja Kallas called the plan 'a breach of international law' that further undermines a two-state solution, while Germany urged Israel to 'stop settlement construction.' Israel's decision to further advance settlements in the West Bank is a breach of international law and will damage the viability of the two-state solution. My statement here: — Kaja Kallas (@kajakallas) August 14, 2025 Norway's foreign minister Espen Barth Eide described the move as an attempt to 'appropriate land owned by Palestinians to prevent a two-state solution.' Israeli NGOs monitoring settlement activity, including Peace Now, condemned the E1 plan as 'deadly for the future of Israel and for any chance of achieving a peaceful two-state solution.' Peace Now noted that the final approval hearing is scheduled for next Wednesday and warned that infrastructure work could begin within months, followed by housing construction within about a year. The West Bank is home to roughly three million Palestinians and approximately 500,000 illegal Israeli settlers. Last month, a prominent Palestinian activist and teacher Awdah Hathaleen was shot dead by an Israeli settler in the West Bank . Additional reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

‘Instead of hope, Palestinians were back in prison': How Israel's withdrawal from Gaza 20 years ago went sour
‘Instead of hope, Palestinians were back in prison': How Israel's withdrawal from Gaza 20 years ago went sour

Irish Times

time8 hours ago

  • Irish Times

‘Instead of hope, Palestinians were back in prison': How Israel's withdrawal from Gaza 20 years ago went sour

Friday's 20th anniversary of the beginning of Israel 's 2005 withdrawal from the Gaza Strip has, for Palestinians , been overshadowed by last week's Knesset approval to extend Israeli control in the strip. Israel already holds 75 per cent of Gaza. Under the plan, it will reoccupy Gaza City and an area on the coast near Rafah in the south where half of the 2.3 million displaced Palestinians have settled in tent camps. The United Nations has warned that this campaign, which could last until October, could have 'catastrophic consequences'. I was there two decades ago when Palestinians marked Israel's planned withdrawal by decking Omar Mukhtar Street, Gaza City's main thoroughfare, with red, black, green and white flags. READ MORE Referred to as 'disengagement', Israel's withdrawal was engineered by Ariel Sharon, then prime minister, who sought to focus on expanding Jewish settlement of the West Bank. His rival, Binyamin Netanyahu , who was finance minister, opposed the Gaza plan and resigned from the government. Hamas responded to the announcement of the withdrawal by holding a prayer meeting at a mosque and staging a small flag-waving rally on the steps of the media office. Hamas spokesman Ismail Haniyeh said Israel's withdrawal from the Strip after 38 years of occupation was a 'victory for God and the resistance'. He said this was the 'first step in the liberation of the homeland. Gaza is not first and last'. He said 'the occupation will not end' until Israel staged a complete and comprehensive withdrawal 'from all Palestinian territory captured in 1967″. Also speaking at the time, Palestinian president Mahmoud Abbas called the disengagement a 'historical moment, as Israel is leaving settlements for the first time since the beginning of the Arab-Israeli conflict'. However, Gazan legislator Rawiya Shawwa told me: 'Nothing will improve unless we have economic development. For this we need freedom to travel and trade and control over our resources.' And Palestinian deputy prime minister Nabil Shaath warned: 'Israel retains control by land, sea and air.' On August 15th, 2005, Israel's army issued evacuation orders to the 8,000 Israelis living in 21 settlements who were promised compensation if they vacated voluntarily. Those who resisted were evicted forcibly and by September 12th all residential and public buildings had been demolished. Flag-bearing Palestinians flocked to the settlements, firing shots into the air and detonating fireworks. Celebrations were muted as the Palestinian Authority had designated October 15th for popular rejoicing. By that time Palestinians had hoped they would have regained control over their lives, land, and sea. Restricted to five nautical miles from the coast, fisherman said they must be able to cast their nets further out where fish were plentiful. A plan was put forward to allow fishermen to move five nautical miles from the coast, expand the small port, restock the sea with fish and build a new fish market. None of this happened. One of the first steps to create optimism among Palestinians was the removal of Israeli army checkpoints which had slowed traffic and caused jams along the main north-south road, forcing Palestinians to divert to a rough track above the coast. After showing me the route, gynaecologist Omar Ferwana said his patients in the south would be able to drive directly to Gaza City instead of risking arrest with the detour. Ferwana, his wife Sabah, daughter Aya and five grandchildren were killed in an Israeli air strike on October 15th, 2023. Before leaving, settlers destroyed scores of greenhouses which were meant to be transferred to the Palestinian Authority. United States Jewish donors, led by former World Bank head James Wolfensohn, had raised funds to buy remaining greenhouses to promote economic advancement in the Strip. However, due to the authority's failure to impose order after the Israeli withdrawal, Palestinian farmers looted pumps and other equipment from the greenhouses. But their structures survived and $20 million (€17m) was invested to restore production and resume exports of vegetables and fruit. But this was slowed by Palestinian mismanagement, US interference and then blocked by Israel, citing security concerns. The well-meaning Wolfensohn plan was scrapped and revenue-generating exports were blocked. 'Instead of hope, the Palestinians saw that they were put back in prison,' he said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store