Sudan fails in attempt to make UAE accountable for acts of genocide
An attempt by Sudan's government to make the United Arab Emirates legally accountable for acts of genocide in West Darfur has been rejected by the international court of justice after the judges voted by 15 to 2 to declare they had no jurisdiction. By a narrower majority the judges voted 9 to 7 to strike the case entirely from the ICJ list.
The two year civil war in Sudan has seen repeated allegations that the UAE has been flying arms to the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in a bid to oust the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) led by Abdel Fattah al-Burhan.
However, when the UAE signed up to article IX of the genocide convention in 2005, it inserted a reservation stating it would not allow disputes about the interpretation, application and fulfilment of the convention to be resolved at the ICJ.
The ICJ ,president, Yuji Iwasawa, acknowledged that Sudanese government lawyers in presenting their case has claimed that the RSF had engaged in 'extra judicial killing, ethnic cleansing, rape, enforced disappearances and burning of villages as well as killing on an ethnic basis'.
The court was 'deeply concerned about [how] the unfolding conflict led to untold loss of life and suffering in west Darfur'. But, the president said, the UAE reservation had been formulated in clear terms, and was not incompatible with the purpose of the genocide convention.
The judges' ruling was largely expected but marks a second diplomatic victory in the UAE efforts to ward off allegations that it has been prolonging the bloody two-year civil war by arming the RSF. A UN panel of experts report on 29 April published no evidence that the UAE were arming the RSF.
Speaking after the ICJ ruling in the Hague, , deputy assistant minister for political affairs at the UAE Ministry of Foreign Affairs said: 'Quite simply, today's decision represents a resounding rejection of the Sudanese Armed Forces' attempt to instrumentalise the court for its campaign of misinformation and to distract from its own responsibility.
'The facts speak for themselves: the UAE bears no responsibility for the conflict in Sudan. On the contrary, the atrocities committed by the warring parties are well-documented.
'The international community must focus urgently on ending this devastating war and supporting the Sudanese people, and it must demand humanitarian aid reaches all those in need. The Sudanese Armed Forces and the Rapid Support Forces must stop fighting, must stop weaponising aid, and must endorse civilian leadership independent from military control as the only foundation for sustainable peace.'
The ICJ ruling that it had no jurisdiction is controversial for some. A group of prestigious international jurists last week backed a legal opinion from the Raoul Wallenberg Centre for Human Rights argued: 'While some narrowly tailored reservations to article IX of the genocide convention might be permissible, blanket reservations to the entirety of article IX should be rejected as invalid'.
They argued 'the utility of the genocide convention is not for states to adopt these principles in the abstract, which exist with or without the convention, but to bind states to comply with its terms.
'To allow states to exempt themselves from the genocide convention's only judicial mechanism not only undermines the integrity of the convention, but also the efficacy, foreseeability, and reliability of the international system as a whole.
Currently 153 states are party to the genocide convention, with 16 states inserting blanket reservations including the UAE. The UK has been one of a group of influential states that have argued such broad reservations may be incompatible with the convention.
In its opinion, the Wallenberg Centre concluded: 'The current expectation that the court bend to the will of outlier reserving states seeking to evade participation in cases as significant as genocide should be reversed. In 2025, these states should not have the final word before the judicial process even begins. They should be compelled to account for their actions in a court of law.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
Death of a soldier has flared Thailand and Cambodia border tensions
Tensions between Thailand and Cambodia have increased following the death of a Cambodian soldier in May during a gunfire exchange in a disputed border area. The two Southeast Asian neighbours have contested sovereignty over undemarcated points along their 817km land border for over a century, with the border initially mapped by France in 1907. Claims over historical sites, particularly the 11th-century Preah Vihear temple, have raised nationalist tensions, with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) awarding the temple to Cambodia in 1962, though Thailand continues to claim the surrounding land. Nationalist sentiment has risen in Thailand, especially after conservatives questioned the government's plan to jointly explore energy resources with Cambodia and after a group of Cambodians sang their national anthem at the disputed Ta Moan Thom temple. Despite promises to ease tensions and seek dialogue, both countries' militaries have been mobilising near the border, and Cambodia plans to refer disputes in four border areas to the ICJ, a move Thailand has not recognised.
Reuters
4 days ago
- Reuters
Thailand urges positive engagement after Cambodia threatens to take dispute to World Court
BANGKOK, June 5 (Reuters) - Thailand called on Cambodia to engage positively in efforts to settle a longstanding border dispute, stressing on Thursday it did not recognise the jurisdiction of the International Court of Justice after its neighbour said it would refer the issue to the World Court. The two countries have for days made statements committing to dialogue while vowing to protect their sovereignty following a May 28 border skirmish between troops in which a Cambodian soldier was killed. Deadly clashes between Cambodia and Thailand last erupted in 2011 over Preah Vihear, an ancient temple at the heart of a decades-long dispute that has stirred nationalist sentiment on both sides. "Thailand has not recognised compulsory jurisdiction of the ICJ since 1960. Thailand and Cambodia already have existing bilateral mechanisms to address these issues," Thailand's government said in a statement. Cambodia last week accused Thai troops of opening fire on a trench that had served as a Cambodian army base. Thailand's military described the incident as a misunderstanding at an undemarcated border area and said its soldiers were forced to engage after coming under fire. Although the two countries have a historic rivalry, their governments enjoy warm ties, partly due to the close relationship between their influential former leaders, Thailand's Thaksin Shinawatra and Cambodia's Hun Sen, whose daughter and son respectively are now prime ministers. Cambodia's government, in a statement late on Wednesday, said the recent clash underscored the limitations of their dispute resolution mechanisms in addressing "longstanding points of contention". It said ICJ referral to settle disputes over four border areas was therefore necessary. It did not say when it would initiate proceedings. "These four areas have long remained unresolved and sensitive, with the potential to escalate tensions if unaddressed," it said, stressing it was committed to dialogue and diplomacy. "Cambodia expresses its hope that Thailand will cooperate in jointly referring this case to the ICJ." The two countries are due to meet for talks on June 14. A small protest took place on Thursday outside Thailand's defence ministry and an activist group has planned a demonstration outside the Cambodian embassy on Friday "to protect the land of Thailand". Cambodia in its statement urged its people to show calm and restraint, underlining the importance of protecting relations with Thailand.
Daily Mirror
5 days ago
- Daily Mirror
Warning over nation 'staring into humanitarian abyss' - with direct impact on UK
Sudan is suffering a catastrophic humanitarian crisis "while the world stands by", with vulnerable children not knowing where their next meal is coming from, a new report has found War-torn Sudan is 'staring into a humanitarian abyss' as millions of children increasingly face violence, extreme hunger and disease, a report has found. Sudan is currently in the midst of the world 's worst humanitarian crisis as a result of a civil war that broke out in 2023. It is having a direct effect on the UK with swathes of Sudanese and South Sudanese migrants now filling refugee camps in northern France in a bid to make perilous dinghy journeys across the Channel. In the year to March, some 9% of the 36,000 small boat arrivals were from Sudan, according to Home Office data. While Sudanese made up 21% - the highest number - of the 2,585 'recorded detections' in the UK, meaning those believed by authorities to have evaded border controls to enter the UK irregularly, up to 72 hours beforehand. The Mirror witnessed first hand the horrifying stories of Sudanese and South Sudanese refugees in a camp in Dunkirk, northern France, in April. Many young men felt they had no option but to flee their East African home for fear of being forced to join murderous militias. A report by international aid agency World Vision says some 24.6 million people - 51% of Sudan's population - faces 'crises level food insecurity or worse'. While 38% of its child population is experiencing severe hunger, and 52% moderate hunger, the Sudan Crises and Migration Emergency Response (SCRAMER) analysis found. UN Children's agency UNICEF has previously said that armed men are raping and sexually assaulting children as young as one. The impact on children has seen widespread displacement, trauma and school disruption. While desperation for food has resulted in harmful coping strategies, the SCRAMER report said, including child labour and family separation. The wide-ranging assessment, spanning six countries in East and Central Africa, reveals a deepening crises, with Sudan and South Sudan 'at the epicentre of an unfolding catastrophe', said World Vision. 'We are staring at a humanitarian abyss,' said Simon Mane, World Vision's SCRAMER Multi-Country Response Director. 'When half the population of a country is unsure of their next meal, and hundreds of thousands are in catastrophe levels of food insecurity, it is no longer a crisis - it is a collapse. "The world is standing by while millions of children are at risk of malnutrition and hunger. Many people don't even know about it because it rarely makes the headlines.' After a 2021 coup, a council of generals ran Sudan, led by the two military men at the centre of this dispute - Gen Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, the head of the armed forces and in effect the country's president. And his deputy and leader of the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), Gen Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, better known as 'Hemedti'. But they disagreed on the direction the country was going in and the proposed move towards civilian rule, and war broke out between them. As well as sparking major displacement, both sides in the conflict have been accused of war crimes. The UN says the war has triggered the world's worst humanitarian crises. Cuts to US AID by Donald Trump in February had an immediate impact, sources said, with many aid groups struggling to provide the needs required. Organisations' ability to plan have also been hit by talk in Europe of international aid cuts, sources added. Sir Keir Starmer controversially cut the UK's foreign aid budget to fund defence spending, but Sudan has remained an aid priority, along with Gaza and Ukraine. Last week British filmmaker Steve McQueen, cookery legend Delia Smith and actor Will Poulter urged Starmer to take greater action to tackle the crisis. The trio are among celebs who have signed a letter to the PM calling for the government to help save lives in the war-torn African country. England footballer Lucy Bronze, Downton Abbey star Joanne Froggatt, chef Rick Stein and actress Dame Harriet Walter have also put their names to the call. The letter to Starmer says: 'Following over two years of violent conflict, Sudan is now the world's largest humanitarian crisis, with half of the country's population – a staggering 24.6 million people – already facing high levels of acute food insecurity. Together with a coalition of Sudanese civil-society and UK aid organisations, we are calling for rapid and scaled-up action from the UK Government to help save lives before it is too late. 'The conflict has had a horrifying impact on children's lives, with a staggering 16 million children now in dire need of support. These children have witnessed and been subject to brutal violence, have lost loved ones, have fled their homes and been forced to say goodbye to their schools and communities.' The letter, organised by charity Plan International UK, was handed in at Downing Street on Monday. In April, at a conference in London, Foreign Secretary David Lammy – who visited the border of Sudan earlier this year – announced an extra £120 million of support for the stricken country. But the letter urges the government to 'step up its efforts by… Announcing additional emergency funding for the Sudan crisis to help save lives, providing funding that has been promised so it reaches people who need it in the coming weeks, and urging other governments to scale-up their humanitarian efforts'.
