‘Ambush': Anti-Enforcement Militants Allegedly Shot Officer, Targeted Detention Center
'It was a planned ambush with the intent to kill ICE corrections officers,' Acting U.S. Attorney Nancy Larson said at a July 7 press conference attended by The Dallas Express.
Larson said a group dressed in black body armor surrounded the ICE Prairieland Detention Facility in Alvarado late on July 4. Gunmen took position and ambushed a responding Alvarado police officer, shooting him in the neck.
Suspects reportedly carried a flag that read 'resist fascism, fight oligarchy' flyers that said 'fight ICE terror with class war' and 'free all political prisoners.' Officers also recovered anarchist literature titled Organizing For Attack – Insurrection Anarchy.
'Make no mistake, this was not a so-called 'peaceful protest,'' Larson said. 'It was indeed an ambush.'
Ten suspects were charged with attempted murder of a federal officer and three counts of discharging a firearm during a violent crime. An eleventh suspect was charged with obstruction of justice and conspiracy for allegedly attempting to destroy evidence.
If convicted, the ten charged could face 10 years to life in prison, while the eleventh could face up to 10 years. Officials did not directly identify the suspects.
FBI-Dallas Special Agent in Charge Joe Rothrock said, 'Let me be clear, this appears to be a coordinated and targeted attack against law enforcement.' He asked the public to call 1-800-CALL-FBI with any tips.
A group of 10 to 12 suspects in 'black military-style clothing' surrounded the ICE facility in Alvarado at 10:37 p.m., according to Larson. They began 'shooting fireworks' and vandalizing the facility.
'This was part of an organized attack,' she said.
The attackers used vandalism to draw ICE personnel out of the facility, damaging vehicles and a guard structure, and writing words like 'traitor, ICE pig' in graffiti, according to Larson. Their plan worked. The facility made a 911 call, and two unarmed corrections officers went outside to confront the vandals.
A gunman had split off from the group and was hiding in the woods. Another was across the street. Then the Alvarado police officer arrived at the scene.
'An assailant who was positioned in the woods shot him in the neck area, another assailant who was across the street – nowhere near the corrections officers – shot 20 to 30 rounds at these unarmed corrections officers,' Larson said. 'The assailants fled.'
The wounded officer is expected to recover, said Josh Johnson, special agent in charge of Dallas ICE-Enforcement and Removal Operations. No ICE employees were injured.
Officers found an AR-style rifle at the scene, jammed and 'apparently discarded,' according to Larson. Officers also found 'Faraday bags,' which are supposed to prevent law enforcement from tracking one's electronics, and a total of 12 sets of body armor.
The Johnson County Sheriff's Office stopped a vehicle with a 'single driver,' and found two guns and two Kevlar 'ballistic-style vests,' Larson said. Separately, deputies stopped seven suspects 300 yards from the apparent attempted murder. The suspects were 'mostly from this area.'
'Some were wearing body armor, some were covered in mud, some were armed, and some had two-way radios on them,' Larson said. 'Due to the rapid response of local law enforcement, these individuals were quickly apprehended.'
Additional searches recovered more weapons, tactical gear, and anarchist propaganda, officials said.
Larson called this a 'stark and horrifying' example of how law enforcement protects the public. She said it was an 'egregious attack' on law enforcement, and part of an 'increasing trend of violence against them.'
Larson cited rising annual assaults on officers: seven in 2021 and 2022, 11 in 2023, 18 in 2024, and nine so far this year.
According to Johnson, ICE officers have seen a 700% increase in assaults.
'This will not be tolerated,' Larson said. 'Those who use violence against law enforcement officers will be found and they will be prosecuted with the toughest criminal statutes and penalties that we have available to us.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Is Turning Us Into a Doddering Industrial Giant
The American economy seems to be slowing. Although the unemployment rate remains low, the jobs report released this month showed that the U.S. labor market has essentially been stalled since President Trump foisted 'Liberation Day' on us in April. Yes, it's true, the artificial intelligence sector remains white-hot, but once you look beyond it, the weather is chillier — the manufacturing sector may be shrinking, home building is slowing and most employment growth is happening in just one industry: health care. Perhaps this slowdown will soon reverse. But nearly seven months into his presidency, it's now clear that Mr. Trump and his officials' tax and trade policy — and their hatred for next-generation energy technologies — is distorting and, increasingly, robbing the economy of its complexity. And if he keeps at it, Mr. Trump will demote America into a deindustrialized power that relies on technology developed elsewhere and doesn't know how to sell much more than crypto, soybeans and petroleum products. You can see this, first, because Mr. Trump and his officials are waging a war on electricity infrastructure. This campaign is primarily driven by their opposition to the solar and wind farms that they associate with their foils, the Democrats. Even as electricity has clearly become more important to the economy — and even as the country's biggest technology firms strive to secure any spare electron for their new metropolis-size data centers — Mr. Trump and his team have begun a regulatory coup to smother new power development. That war began, of course, with Mr. Trump's signature domestic policy law, which pinched off long-running tax credits for wind and solar energy. But it does not stop there. In the past few weeks, the Trump administration has started an all-out war on renewable energy. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum has weaponized his department's permitting process to slow down wind, solar and battery projects nationwide — every step of every federal permit for renewable energy must now pass under the eye of some political appointee. Another recent order has suggested that the federal government may essentially ban wind and solar farms from public land. A separate Transportation Department policy could even restrict companies' ability to build private wind farms on private land. At the same time, Chris Wright, the energy secretary, has killed federal financing for the Grain Belt Express transmission project, an electricity megaproject that was set to zip 5,000 megawatts of power across the Great Plains. Although the power line was fully permitted and approved, it had grown unpopular with some Missouri farmers, and thus with the Republican senator Josh Hawley. In other moods and moments, Mr. Wright has said that the country must build more power lines, not fewer. But in stranding the project, Mr. Wright has endangered a cheap new power supply and damaged the government's credibility. As long as he governs, executives cannot trust the Energy Department to keep its promises. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Fox News
30 minutes ago
- Fox News
NYC man pushed onto tracks at Midtown subway station
A New York City man was pushed onto the train tracks at a Midtown subway station Saturday night but was able to climb back onto the platform before making contact with a train. (via WNYW)
New York Times
30 minutes ago
- New York Times
There Is a Specter Haunting Trump's Economy: Stagflation
Since President Trump took office, economists have been waiting for his policies to work their way through the U.S. economy and reveal their consequences. The soft data, mostly surveys of consumers and businesses that track how people feel about the economy, turned down sharply months ago, while the hard data — jobs, G.D.P. growth, inflation — all seemed fine. But recently, a telling series of hard economic data rolled in that has rightfully raised alarm bells about slowing growth and increased inflation — a dreaded economic combination known as stagflation. Mr. Trump's tariffs are now clearly fueling inflation, particularly in goods such as home appliances, cars and food. In the first six months of the year, real (that is, inflation-adjusted) consumer spending, the main driver behind business cycles and robust economic expansion, barely grew, after rising 3 percent last year. G.D.P. growth slowed by about half, to 1.2 percent this year from 2.5 percent last year. When overall growth falls that sharply, the labor market tends to follow, which is precisely what happened: Job growth, at 35,000 per month on average between May and July, is dangerously close to stall speed. While presidents always take credit for good economic news and try to deflect bad news (in this president's case, by firing the messenger who delivered it), it's often hard to link what's going on in the economy to the current administration. Not this time. Whether it's historically high tariffs that never quite seem to stabilize, deportations that threaten to seriously disrupt labor supply in sectors like construction and health services, or a reverse-Robin Hood, budget-busting bill that takes money away from those most likely to spend it, Mr. Trump's policies have pushed economic uncertainty to levels last seen during the onset of the pandemic. This uncertainty has damped investment, hiring and consumption, while the tariffs increase prices. In other words: stagflation. For many American adults, the specter of stagflation may conjure thoughts of the 1970s. But if Mr. Trump's stagflation continues to grow, it will be different in one very important way: The economic damage will be almost entirely self-inflicted. In the '70s, stagflation was caused not by an unconstrained president but by 'exogenous shocks,' meaning big, unexpected disruptions originating from events outside the country and exacerbated by the inaction of the Federal Reserve to offset them. The biggest, and most famous, of these shocks involved the oil market. Because of the oil embargo the Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries imposed on the United States in 1973 and the Iranian Revolution in 1979, the price of oil increased more than tenfold. As a result, by 1980, the United States was spending roughly six times as much on oil as it was in 1970. That change reverberated throughout the economy and caused inflation to reach a high of nearly 15 percent by the end of the decade. In what is now a famous horror story of monetary policy gone wrong, the Fed not only failed to respond to the rising inflationary pressures in the '70s; it actively made them worse. The reason was in part political: Arthur Burns yielded to pressure from the Nixon White House to disregard concerns about rising inflation and keep interest rates low to hold down unemployment. (Sound familiar?) The resulting stagflation crisis ended only when a new Fed chair, Paul Volcker, raised rates to almost 20 percent in 1980, leading to a deep and painful recession. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
