logo
Hamas calls for pressure to end Israel's aid block on Gaza

Hamas calls for pressure to end Israel's aid block on Gaza

Observer18-04-2025
GAZA: Hamas on Friday urged the international community to exert immediate pressure to end Israel's complete blockade of the Gaza Strip that has been in place since March 2. The appeal from the Palestinians comes after the United Nations warned of worsening conditions; and shortages of medicine and other essentials. "The international community is required to intervene immediately and exert the necessary pressure to end the unjust blockade imposed on our people in the Gaza Strip," Hamas's chief negotiator Khalil al Hayya said in a statement. The Palestinian group on Thursday signalled its rejection of Israel's latest truce proposal and called for a "comprehensive" deal to end the 18-month-long war.
The United Nations warned that Gaza, which has a population of about 2.4 million, is facing its most severe humanitarian crisis since the war began in October 2023. "The humanitarian situation is now likely the worst it has been in the 18 months since the outbreak of hostilities," said the UN's Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. In a statement, OCHA said no supplies had reached Gaza for a month and a half. Medical supplies, fuel, water and other essentials are in short supply, the UN has specified.
Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz on Wednesday said the country would keep preventing humanitarian aid from entering the Gaza Strip. "Blocking this aid is one of the main pressure levers preventing Hamas from using it as a tool with the population," Katz said in a statement. A Hamas source said that the group sent a written response on Thursday to mediators on Israel's latest proposal for a 45-day ceasefire. Israel had wanted the release of 10 living hostages held by the group, according to Hamas. It also called for the freeing of 1,231 Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails and the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza. The proposal called for Hamas to disarm to secure a complete end to the war, a demand the group rejects.
Red Cross members take part in a campaign to raise people's awareness about the danger of approaching ordnance, in Khan Yunis. — Reuters
Meanwhile, Gaza's civil defence rescue agency said on Friday that Israeli strikes killed at least 24 people, including 10 from the same family, after Hamas signalled its rejection of Israel's latest ceasefire proposal. Civil defence reported at least 14 others killed in multiple Israeli strikes across the territory, including at least two strikes which hit tents sheltering displaced people.
Hundreds of thousands of people have taken refuge in such shelters while trying to escape from the war, which began on October 7, 2023. The Israeli military has intensified its aerial bombardments and expanded ground operations in the Gaza Strip since resuming its offensive on March 18. A previous ceasefire and hostage release deal began on January 19 but collapsed two months later. Israel wanted to extend the first phase, while Hamas insisted that negotiations be held for a second phase as outlined by former US President Joe Biden last year.
A source from Hamas said that the militants sent a written response on Thursday to mediators on Israel's proposal for a 45-day ceasefire. Israel had wanted the release of 10 living hostages held by the group, according to Hamas. It also called for the freeing of 1,231 Palestinian prisoners from Israeli jails and the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza. A Hamas official said the proposal further sought Hamas's disarmament to secure a complete end to the war, a demand the group rejects. He said Hamas "seeks a comprehensive deal involving a single-package prisoner exchange in return for halting the war, a withdrawal of the occupation from the Gaza Strip and the commencement of reconstruction" in the territory. — AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oman supports UN effort for treaty on plastic pollution control
Oman supports UN effort for treaty on plastic pollution control

Muscat Daily

time6 hours ago

  • Muscat Daily

Oman supports UN effort for treaty on plastic pollution control

Muscat – Oman is participating in high-level United Nations negotiations in Geneva aimed at framing a legally binding global treaty to tackle plastic pollution, including in marine environments. The sultanate's delegation – led by Environment Authority – is attending the second part of the fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) from August 5 to 14. Involving nearly 180 countries, the talks are being held under the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) to develop a treaty to end the plastic pollution crisis. The negotiations are expected to shape a comprehensive agreement that addresses the entire life cycle of plastics, from design and production to disposal. 'The world wants and indeed needs a plastic conventional treaty because the crisis is getting out of hand – and people are frankly outraged,' said Inger Andersen, Executive Director of UNEP. She noted that plastic pollution has become widespread, affecting oceans, ecosystems and even human health. 'We know that plastic is in our nature, in our oceans and yes, even in our bodies. What is sure is that no one wants to live with the plastic pollution.' A 22-page draft document prepared by the INC, containing 32 articles, will serve as the basis for negotiations. The text outlines measures to promote plastic circularity, prevent leakage into the environment, and regulate production and waste management. 'Some countries will have to deal with reduction, others with mechanical recycling and others with alternatives,' Inger said. 'Let's see how we can get to this through the negotiations. I think there's a lot of good faith in the working group right now.' UNEP has warned that without coordinated global action, plastic waste is projected to triple by 2060, posing significant environmental and public health risks. The Geneva talks represent a critical step towards reaching a final agreement, with countries expected to work through the text article by article. If adopted, the treaty would be the first global legal instrument to comprehensively address plastic pollution.

The obstacles to UN reform
The obstacles to UN reform

Observer

time6 hours ago

  • Observer

The obstacles to UN reform

At the 80th United Nations General Assembly this September, participants will have to confront the escalating development finance crisis that is engulfing the UN system. So far, responses to financial pressures have focused on cutting costs, such as by reducing overhead and improving efficiency. But a lasting solution will require deeper changes, which begins with a fundamental question: What kind of UN does the world need today, and are current funding models fit for purpose? This year, a liquidity crisis created by non-paying or late-paying governments means that the UN faces a shortfall of $2.4 billion in regular UN budget dues, and $2.7 billion in peacekeeping contributions. Moreover, if the UN fails to spend any funds before year's end – say, because they were delivered late – it is required to return them to member states as credits, rather than rolling them over to the following year. Despite plans to cut spending by 30 per cent this year from its 2023 peak, the entire UN system is at risk of insolvency. Compounding the strain, aid cuts are undermining UN programmes, with the consequences being borne disproportionately by the world's most vulnerable people. Shrinking budgets among some of the world's largest donors – the OECD expects a 9-17 per cent year-on-year decline in foreign aid in 2025 – exacerbate these problems. While the scale of the UN's current funding and liquidity crisis is unprecedented, the underlying issues are not new. With its regular budget covering only a fraction of its needs, the UN is highly dependent on ad hoc, voluntary government funding. The UN Development System (UNDS) – comprising 43 funds, agencies and programmes that provide country-level development support and humanitarian assistance – is particularly dependent on voluntary contributions that can be quickly pulled back. Investment in the UNDS fell 16 per cent in 2023 (nearly $9 billion), with 93 per cent of total funding coming from voluntary sources and 7 per cent from assessed membership dues. To meet this crisis, UN Secretary-General António Guterres has launched the UN80 Initiative, which comprises three 'workstreams': finding ways to improve efficiency, reviewing implementation of the UN's mandates, and examining possible structural changes and programme realignments. The findings and proposals of the first two workstreams are supposed to inform thinking on the third. In fact, it is the third workstream that has the greatest transformative potential. If done right, the effort could mark a turning point for both the 'what' and the 'how' of the UN. But success will require the UN to avoid the mistakes of past reform efforts, which have sought to decentralise and improve coordination between agencies but avoided deeper questions about the UN's purpose and financing. As for purpose, the unique value of the UNDS lies in its power to advance and sustain globally agreed norms. Country-level activities that advance norms like gender equality, sustainability, and human rights should be at the top of the list. Fulfilling this function depends on the UNDS's technical competencies, convening power, international credibility and diplomatic relationships. But, importantly, it also rests on access to ample, predictable funding that sustains operations in support of these norms. While assessed contributions can provide this, in practice they currently account for a tiny fraction of total UNDS resources. As a result, cash-starved UNDS funds, agencies and programmes end up accepting contributions attached to narrowly defined projects, which can fragment efforts and reflect the whims and preferences of a handful of major voluntary donors. This effectively turns the UN into a contractor accountable to its paymasters, instead of a trusted adviser to host governments and a global agenda-setter. The UNDS is most effective when staff can steer policy strategically and deliver results where they are needed most, rather than where donors dictate. That is why two successive Funding Compacts called for more core financing for the UN's development activities, and less dependence on earmarked contributions. In return, the UN committed to improving transparency, strengthening reporting and boosting the efficiency of its operations. In 2023, UN agencies met 56 per cent of their Compact targets – more than twice the 24-per cent share met by member states. The inefficiency for which member states criticise the UN is thus at least partly the result of their own funding practices. Ultimately, the Compact failed to gain traction among UN member governments because it did not make a sufficiently compelling case for the UN's development role. One lesson of the Compact for the UN80 Initiative's third workstream is that a revitalised vision for the UNDS that member governments can broadly support is a necessary first step for successful reform. As for the financing itself, one solution would be to strengthen and expand the use of assessed contributions by re-examining the formula for allocating fiscal obligations among UN member states. The UN could also extend softer forms of earmarking, like joint and pooled funds; introduce more innovative forms of financing, such as replenishments and levies; and expand the scope for leveraging grant funds to crowd in additional investment. Whatever happens next, one thing should be clear: countries get the UN they fund. Only with a robust and predictable financing framework, guided by a strong consensus on goals, can the UN serve as a credible channel for members' investments in global development. These are the missing pieces of the UN reform jigsaw that must now be quickly found. @Project Syndicate, 2025

Japan marks 80 years since the Hiroshima atomic bombing
Japan marks 80 years since the Hiroshima atomic bombing

Muscat Daily

time8 hours ago

  • Muscat Daily

Japan marks 80 years since the Hiroshima atomic bombing

Hiroshima, Japan – The Japanese city of Hiroshima held a silent prayer at 8:15am (2315 GMT) on Wednesday. That was the moment when US aircraft Enola Gay dropped the atomic bomb called 'Little Boy' over the Japanese city on August 6, 1945. Hundreds of officials, students and survivors laid flowers at the memorial cenotaph. The ruins of the Genbaku Dome, the only structure left standing in the area where the bomb exploded, were visible in the background – a stark reminder of the horrors that unfolded. Before dawn on Wednesday, survivors and their families came to pray at the peace memorial park as the sun rose over Hiroshima. Hiroshima, a warning of horrors Hiroshima Mayor Kazumi Matsui warned in a speech against the growing acceptance of nuclear weapons and the 'accelerating trend toward military buildup around the world', against the backdrop of Russia's invasion of Ukraine and the conflicts in the Middle East. 'These developments flagrantly disregard the lessons the international community should have learned from the tragedies of history,' he said. Dozens of white doves, a symbol of peace, were released after the mayor's speech. Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said it was Japan's mission 'to take the lead … toward a world without nuclear weapons'. Pope Leo XIV said in a statement that 'in our time of mounting global tensions and conflicts', Hiroshima and Nagasaki remained 'living reminders of the profound horrors wrought by nuclear weapons'. The US dropped an atomic bomb on Nagasaki three days after the bombing of Hiroshima. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres warned that 'the very weapons that brought such devastation to Hiroshima and Nagasaki are once again being treated as tools of coercion'. The United States, which has never formally apologised for the bombings, was represented by its ambassador to Japan. It was among some 120 countries and regions who sent representatives to the ceremony. By the end of 1945, it's estimated that the death toll from the uranium bomb detonated over Hiroshima was around 140,000 people. The explosion flattened more than two-thirds of the city. A further 74,000 people were killed by the plutonium bomb dropped on Nagasaki. In the years that followed, survivors faced side effects from the radiation such as leukemia or other cancers and chronic diseases. Imperial Japan surrendered on August 15, bringing an end to World War II. The attacks on Japan remain the only time atomic bombs have been used in wartime. Nine countries hold nuclear weapons: the United States, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, China, India, Pakistan, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (North Korea) and Israel. Russia and the United States together account for nearly 90% of the world's more than 12,000 warheads, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, better known as SIPRI. On the release of SIPRI's most recent arms report in June, the organisation warned that 'we are now in one of the most dangerous periods in human history'. 'The abyss is beckoning and it is time for the great powers to step back and reflect. Preferably together.' DW

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store