
A nuclear fusion power plant prototype is already being built outside Boston. How long until unlimited clean energy is real?
In an unassuming industrial park 30 miles outside Boston, engineers are building a futuristic machine to replicate the energy of the stars. If all goes to plan, it could be the key to producing virtually unlimited, clean electricity in the United States in about a decade.
The donut-shaped machine Commonwealth Fusion Systems is assembling to generate this energy is simultaneously the hottest and coldest place in the entire solar system, according to the scientists who are building it.
It is inside that extreme environment in the so-called tokamak that they smash atoms together in 100-million-degree plasma. The nuclear fusion reaction is surrounded by a magnetic field more than 400,000 times more powerful than the Earth's and chilled with cryogenic gases close to absolute zero.
The fusion reaction — forcing two atoms to merge — is what creates the energy of the sun. It is the exact opposite of what the world knows now as 'nuclear power' — a fission reaction that splits atoms.
Nuclear fusion has far greater energy potential, with none of the safety concerns around radioactive waste.
SPARC is the tokamak Commonwealth says could forever change how the world gets its energy, generating 10 million times more than coal or natural gas while producing no planet-warming pollution. Fuel for fusion is abundant, derived from deuterium, found in seawater, and tritium extracted from lithium. And unlike nuclear fission, there is no atomic waste involved.
The biggest hurdle is building a machine powerful and precise enough to harness the molten, hard-to-tame plasma, while also overcoming the net-energy issue – getting more energy out than you put into it.
'Basically, what everybody expects is when we build the next machine, we expect it to be a net-energy machine,' said Andrew Holland, CEO of the Fusion Industry Association, a trade group representing fusion companies around the globe. 'The question is, how fast can you build that machine?'
Commonwealth's timeline is audacious: With over $2 billion raised in private capital, its goal is to build the world's first fusion-fueled power plant by the early 2030s in Virginia.
'It's like a race with the planet,' said Brandon Sorbom, Commonwealth's chief science officer. Commonwealth is racing to find a solution for global warming, Sorbom said, but it's also trying to keep up with new power-hungry technologies like artificial intelligence. 'This factory here is a 24/7 factory,' he said. 'We're acutely aware of it every minute of every hour of every day.'
Perhaps most urgently, Commonwealth and other western companies are also racing to beat Chinese scientists at achieving net energy amid a rapid fusion buildout in China, where one enormous facility has emerged in satellite images.
Virginia Gov. Glenn Youngkin nodded to that while speaking alongside Commonwealth's CEO, Bob Mumgaard, at a March energy conference.
'China is building fusion plants, and therefore we've got to get moving,' Youngkin said. 'There's a race to lead the world in power generation.'
Why fusion is so safe
Fusion science is mostly settled. The hard part is maintaining a reaction long enough to generate electricity out of it.
For tokamaks, like the one being built at Commonwealth, the name of the game is building powerful magnets strong enough to contain plasma – a superheated cloud of charged gas in which fusion reactions happen. Plasma is very hot and very light; it's a million times less dense than the air we breathe.
'I won't call the plasma clever, there's no intelligence there, but the plasma has many, many ways in which it can thwart your abilities to confine it,' Jerry Navratil, a professor of fusion energy and plasma physics at Columbia University, told CNN.
That is where the wall of magnets comes in, which restrains the unruly plasma.
Plasma is delicate and ephemeral — it can't even be seen until it's cooled. And that's what makes it so safe; it can be turned off, so to speak, as easily as blowing a candle.
'If you were to blow a breath of air onto the plasma, you would kill it,' Sorbom said. '(If) a meteor hits the plant and ruptures the vacuum vessel, everything just shuts down. It's not like you have something like Fukushima or Chernobyl where there's this runaway chain reaction.'
Small but mighty
Even though it will tower 30 feet, about three stories, when built, the SPARC tokamak is much smaller than conventional power plants running on coal, gas or nuclear energy, a key advantage that will allow it to fit into power plants in the future. It is petite compared to ITER, the monster French research tokamak that is as tall as a 22-story building.
'ITER is so big that it requires things like the world's largest cranes just to move some of the pieces around,' Sorbom said. 'This is now small enough that we have standard equipment to move things around – something that you'd find in any auto manufacturing facility. You don't have to invent a totally new industrial supply chain for everything.'
Thus far, the scientific conventional wisdom has been the bigger the tokamak, the more powerful its performance. Sorbom and his team have disrupted that idea with new magnet technology. The magnets are big, but their secret weapon is an unassuming piece of thin, highly-conductive metal tape layered into each one – maximizing its power in a relatively small space. This tape can carry 200 amps of electrical current – as much as a house's electrical breaker.
Navratil said SPARC is using the most tested form of technology with their magnetic tokamak. However, a lot of questions remain on how well it will work.
'They're pushing the technology to places we've never been before, which obviously entails risk,' Navratil said. 'Once the thing is going then the question is, can the surrounding structures withstand any kind of energy bombardment that comes from the plasma?'
A person works on the cryostat base inside the tokamak hall at Commonwealth Fusion Systems.
For instance, Navratil noted if the electrical current running through the magnet does something unexpected, it could sustain damage. But, he said, if the first runs of SPARC prove the magnet technology works, it would be a major advancement for the field.
'If those magnets function as expected properly, that'll be a major step forward,' Navratil said. 'If that's all they do, they will have actually contributed quite a bit to the development of fusion energy.'
Beyond technology breakthroughs, the US also needs to think about the kind of supply chains needed to breed more tritium fuel for fusion, which require access to lithium reserves, Jean Paul Allain, who leads the US Energy Department's Office of Fusion Energy Sciences, told CNN in an interview last year. The Chinese have been particularly adept at securing those supply chains, Allain noted.
'Access to lithium deposits around the world are in high demand,' Allain said. 'The Chinese have been establishing themselves in Latin America for a long time, precisely because they're looking at some of these raw materials.'
Powering 'the next age of civilization'
Inside a sprawling Houston ballroom in March, Mumgaard, Commonwealth's CEO, spoke to hundreds of fossil fuel CEOs and lobbyists about the future of an energy that could eventually replace oil and gas.
At that CERAWeek conference, Virginia's Youngkin also noted he is keenly interested in getting energy wherever he can find it to support the state's growing data center industry, advanced manufacturing and population growth.
'We need a lot more power,' Youngkin said. 'Whoever wins this power race is going to unleash the economic opportunity that comes quickly.'
Oil and gas companies are among the investors in Commonwealth Fusion and other fusion startups, Holland, the CEO of the Fusion Industry Association, said.
'I think that other energy companies, companies that want to be not oil companies, or not renewable companies, are looking at fusion,' Holland said. 'Physically, fusion is decoupling energy from resources, from something that you have to pull out of the ground or rely on weather. It makes energy something that you can manufacture.'
Sorbom said that although he thinks fusion could eventually 'replace' a 'whole bunch of things,' he also sees it as a way to provide 'way more energy for everybody.'
'One of the things that's always excited me about fusion is that if you look at quality of life metrics, they all get better when you add energy to the system,' he said.
Holland emphasized fusion will be 'the next part of the energy industry.'
'And ultimately, it will be the thing that powers humanity into kind of the next age of civilization.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
21 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Threatens Musk Contracts as Feud Escalates
President Trump threatened to cut billions of dollars in federal contracts and tax subsidies for Elon Musk's companies on Thursday, the latest escalation in the growing feud between the two men. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts,' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Last year, Mr. Musk's companies were promised $3 billion across nearly 100 different contracts with 17 federal agencies. Most of the contracts were for SpaceX, Mr. Musk's space technology company. Tesla, his electric vehicle company, also has contracts with the federal government. But the relationship between the two men very publicly dissolved Thursday. Mr. Musk until last week was a top presidential adviser and has since turned into a critic of one of Mr. Trump's priorities. Mr. Musk has called the president's signature legislation currently moving through Congress a 'disgusting abomination.' The two lashed out at each other from on their own social media platforms on Thursday. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Mr. Trump wrote on Truth Social. Mr. Musk responded on X, the social media platform he owns, 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.'


Digital Trends
21 minutes ago
- Digital Trends
Want a Copilot+ PC? The Microsoft Surface Pro 11 is $500 off today
Microsoft's Copilot is making waves, and it's not a surprise that Microsoft itself is making some of the top devices to maximize the powerful AI assistant. One of them is the Microsoft Surface Pro 11, which you can get from the Surface Laptop and Surface Pro deals of Best Buy with a huge $500 discount that slashes its price from $2,100 to $1,600. It's an extremely reliable machine that would prove to be a trustworthy companion, but you'll have to complete your purchase immediately if you want to get it for a lower price than usual. Why you should buy the Microsoft Surface Pro 11 The Microsoft Surface Pro 11, which received an amazing score of 4.5 stars out of 5 in our review, is tagged as a Copilot+ PC. This means they've integrated Microsoft's Copilot at a systemwide level and equipped the computer with components to efficiently run the AI assistant. The Microsoft Surface Pro 11 is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite processor, the Qualcomm Adreno GPU, and 32GB of RAM, which also make it a tool that will give a massive boost to your daily productivity. The 13-inch PixelSense Flow touchscreen of the Microsoft Surface Pro 11 offers 2880 x 1920 resolution and a dynamic refresh rate of up to 120Hz for sharp details and vibrant colors. The device also comes with a 1TB SSD for enough storage space for all of your apps and files, and Windows 11 Home pre-installed. The Microsoft Surface Pro 11 also tops our list of the best 2-in-1 laptops, but you'll have to buy the Surface Pro Keyboard if you want to use it as a laptop alternative. The Microsoft Surface Pro 11 is an excellent way to access Copilot, and it's a very tempting purchase right now because it's available from Best Buy at $500 off. From $2,100 originally, you can get it for a much lower price of $1,600, but only if you hurry, because we're not sure how much time is remaining before this offer expires. Go ahead with your transaction for the Microsoft Surface Pro 11 as soon as you can so that you won't miss out on the fantastic savings.


Gizmodo
21 minutes ago
- Gizmodo
ISS Conference Scrapped as NASA Budget Cuts Threaten Crew and Cargo
The International Space Station (ISS) still has a few years left in orbit before it's due for retirement, but the future of the orbital lab is looking a little shaky as NASA is forced to tighten its purse strings. The Center for the Advancement of Science in Space (CASIS), which operates the ISS National Lab, is canceling an upcoming space station research conference, SpaceNews reported. The ISS Research and Development Conference was due to be held at the end of July in Seattle, but CASIS announced this week that, after consulting with NASA, 'the current regulatory and budgetary environment does not support holding' the annual conference this year. The announcement comes a little over a month after the release of the current administration's so-called skinny budget, which included funding for NASA in 2026. The budget proposes a $6 billion cut to the agency, 24% less than NASA's current $24.8 billion budget for 2025. The budget also proposes reducing the size of the ISS crew ahead of its planned retirement in 2030, when it's expected to be replaced by multiple commercial space stations. Funding for the ISS could be reduced by a quarter, from $1.24 billion to $920 million, according to the proposed budget for 2026. 'Crew and cargo flights to the station would be significantly reduced,' the budget proposal read. 'The station's reduced research capacity would be focused on efforts critical to the Moon and Mars exploration programs.' During a briefing held in late May, Dana Weigel, NASA's ISS program manager, revealed that the space agency had already been facing resource issues regarding the space station before the 2026 budget proposal. 'The station has been faced with a cumulative multi-year budget reduction,' Weigel is quoted in SpaceNews as saying. 'That's the challenge that I've had that we've been managing through today. That has left us with some budget and resource challenges that result in less cargo.' The cargo includes supplies for onboard crew members. For more than two decades, the space agency has maintained a crew of at least four NASA astronauts on board the ISS, along with international crew members from Russia, Japan, Canada, and other countries. NASA has previously flown four or five cargo missions a year, but the agency has only planned for three drop-offs in 2025. 'We're evaluating the potential for moving to three crew,' Weigel said during the briefing. 'That's something that we're working through and trying to assess today.' NASA is also considering extending the duration of missions on the ISS from six to eight months, Ars Technica previously reported. Meanwhile, five commercial space stations, including Orbital Reef, Axiom Station, and Starlab, are currently in the works but nowhere near being ready to host astronauts in low Earth orbit. The ISS maintains a steady presence of orbital science above Earth's surface, which would leave behind a major gap to fill.