
Inside Laura Loomer's hunt for disloyalty in Trump's government — and where she's looking next
In an interview with CNN last week, the Trump confidante touted her role in ousting the country's chief vaccine regulator, a senior national security lawyer and a decorated cybersecurity expert tapped for a post at West Point. It was a remarkable display of influence for someone with no formal government experience and whose online antics once resulted in a ban by social media companies.
She said it's not nearly enough — and she's grown frustrated with White House officials ignoring her offers to help vet candidates.
'If I have to do it on the outside because of internal resistance, then so be it,' Loomer said in a phone call.
Armed with more than 1.7 million followers on X and Trump's cell phone number, Loomer has taken on the self-appointed role of 'loyalty enforcer,' scrutinizing the backgrounds of various administration officials for any inkling they once harbored doubts about the president. She then amplifies her findings online, keeping up the drumbeat until White House officials — many of whom see her overtures as doing more harm than good — can no longer ignore it.
'She's a loose cannon,' said one Trump adviser who shares that view and was granted anonymity to speak candidly. 'But she has a following. It is what it is.'
Inside the administration, recent episodes have only reinforced the growing perception that Loomer, despite aides' best efforts to limit her access within the White House, is nevertheless finding increasing success in influencing its decision-making from the outside. Her influence underscores the persistent personnel challenges, internal conflicts and frequent dismissals that have come to define the Trump administration since he first stepped foot in the White House.
Trump, who values loyalty above all else, publicly praised Loomer's efforts on Sunday, describing her as a 'patriot.'
Loomer sees disloyal operatives scattered throughout the administration, Cabinet officials misleading the MAGA faithful and a president who has yet to deliver on promises of retribution from his campaign.
'I'm not blaming Trump, but people will probably start to blame Trump if he doesn't use these opportunities to fire some Cabinet members,' she said.
In a statement to CNN, White House spokesman Kush Desai did not engage on Loomer specifically, but asserted Trump 'has assembled the best and brightest talent to put Americans and America First.'
'It is not only appropriate, but critical for the Administration to recruit the most qualified and experienced staffers who are totally aligned with President Trump's agenda to Make America Great Again,' Desai said.
Attorney General Pam Bondi may sit at the top of her blacklist — Loomer has publicly called for her firing several times — but she's not alone. Loomer also has doubts about Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins, blaming her for Trump's softer tone of late toward undocumented farm workers. And Loomer has turned her sizable megaphone against people now working at the Department of Health and Human Services under Robert F. Kennedy Jr., a former Democrat whose alliance with Trump remains a source of her skepticism.
Neither Bondi, Rollins nor Kennedy appear in immediate danger of becoming Loomer's next victims; Trump has expressed support for all three. Loomer said they have not reached out to her about her concerns, despite her ongoing efforts to dig up dirt on their hires.
But one embattled Cabinet head has: Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth. Loomer said she recently spoke with Hegseth, whom she's known for a decade, about her work finding disloyal employees within the Pentagon. Defense Department spokesman Sean Parnell confirmed the two spoke, telling CNN in a statement that Hegseth 'appreciates Laura Loomer's outside advocacy.'
'Personnel is policy, and Laura has taken that motto to heart,' Parnell said, adding: 'Qualified individuals who love our country and support the Administration's priorities will continue to be integral to our efforts.'
Loomer has presented three more targets to her audience: Miami Republican Rep. Carlos Gimenez, whom she sparred with online, US Ambassador to Turkey Tom Barrack, due to his sprawling overseas businesses; and Trump's nominee to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, David LaCerte, over his legal work for big banks.
The recent ouster of a top public health official served as a window into how she pushes to oust Trump administration officials — what has become known in Washington as getting 'Loomered.'
On July 20, Loomer began a relentless campaign against Vinay Prasad, the head of the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the US Food and Drug Administration, over his handling of key drug approvals and a series of years-old tweets expressing support for Democratic politicians and policies, claiming it was proof he was a 'leftist saboteur.'
Within hours of posting her research online, Loomer sent it to the White House, she told CNN. A week later, Loomer unearthed audio of Prasad from a 2021 podcast where he joked he had stabbed a voodoo doll of Trump, along with other disparaging remarks about the president. Loomer said she sent the clip to Sergio Gor, the director of White House personnel. Prasad has not disputed the authenticity of the audio.
Loomer's posts ricocheted quickly among Trump allies and heightened scrutiny of Prasad inside the administration. On day 10 of her crusade, the White House decided it'd had enough.
White House chief of staff Susie Wiles told FDA Commissioner Marty Makary on Tuesday that he needed to let go of Prasad, his chief science officer and close confidant, putting an abrupt end to his tenure after less than three months, two people familiar with the matter said.
Wiles and other top aides had determined that the Loomer-led campaign risked mushrooming into yet another distraction for the White House, those two people said. The sense was they needed to contain it before Trump faced the press after returning from a trip to Scotland.
'They knew that [Trump] was going to have to deal with this,' said one of the people familiar with the matter. 'So they made the decision to take him out.'
The departure came over the objections of Makary and Kennedy, who had vehemently defended Prasad — a controversial figure in health circles handpicked for his willingness to overhaul the nation's vaccine protocols — to White House officials, lawmakers and other Trump allies in recent days, the two people familiar and a third person briefed on the matter said.
The decision so significantly dismayed Kennedy and Makary that, even after Prasad's departure, they discussed enlisting Medicare and Medicaid chief Mehmet Oz — a longtime friend of Trump — to corner the president at a Wednesday health event and press him to reverse course, one of the people familiar with the matter said. But that plan was rendered moot once Prasad's ouster went public the night before.
'I understand the paranoia and the desire to root out bad people even if it involves taking out some good people,' one of the people familiar with the matter said. 'But it's just true: Laura Loomer fired the head drug regulator for the United States.'
HHS spokesman Rich Danker said in a statement to CNN that 'the FDA informed the White House on Tuesday that Dr. Prasad had stepped down.' He did not respond to several questions seeking to verify the above details. Prasad could not be reached for comment.
Other supporters of Prasad used their own online platforms to accuse Loomer of working in concert with the pharmaceutical industry and others who objected to FDA decisions he'd overseen on rare drugs.
Loomer denied to CNN that she was working with Prasad's other detractors. She said her concerns about Prasad grew out of the FDA's decision earlier this year to approve a new Covid-19 vaccine manufactured by Novavax. (It later emerged that Prasad had objected to the FDA's decision and had overridden the agency's experts to recommend against the broad use of two other Covid-19 vaccines.)
Loomer's inflammatory rhetoric toward Muslims and promotion of conspiracy theories have made her a controversial figure in Trump's orbit for years, and his advisers have long attempted to minimize her interactions with the president. She has said aides repeatedly step in to block her when Trump has attempted to hire her over the years. A self-described investigative journalist, Loomer has also pushed for a White House press credential, to no avail.
Loomer, who runs a small team of researchers, argued she would be more effective if the White House let her oversee hiring from the inside. She said that lately she's become inundated with tips, including from within the administration, about certain staffers. She said she vets them all.
'Aren't they supposed to know these people are a problem before Susie has to waste her time dealing with this lack of vetting?' Loomer said.
Prasad is just the latest of a growing collection of government officials to get 'Loomered.' In the administration's first six months, Loomer has claimed credit for helping spur the removal of several staffers at the White House and elsewhere in government, including a string of firings at the National Security Agency and on the National Security Council in early April that followed a phone call and an Oval Office meeting with Trump. Amid the fallout, national security adviser Michael Waltz, a regular target of Loomer's attacks, was pushed out of that position as well.
Just days before Prasad's ouster, the NSA removed another top official, general counsel April Falcon Doss, after Loomer amplified a report criticizing Doss for previously working for the Senate Intelligence Committee's Democratic staff.
On Wednesday, she celebrated after Trump's Army secretary ordered the US Military Academy at West Point to rescind its appointment of Biden-era cyber defense official Jen Easterly as a distinguished chair. Loomer had recently taken aim at Easterly on X, singling her out in a post that alleged without evidence that 'there are some serious moles' at the Department of Defense.
Very few have demonstrated such unflinching loyalty to Trump as Loomer. With thousands of jobs to fill across Trump's administration, she concedes that some appointees will inevitably have what she considers checkered records, including past criticism of the president. Some of the most prominent figures in Trump's administration — Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, for example — were once harsh Trump detractors.
She said the concerns she is raising about certain hires go beyond ideological disagreements. Rubio and Vance, she noted, have publicly made amends and earned back favor with Trump and his supporters.
Still, that doesn't mean they're immune from future scrutiny.
'I don't trust anybody. I'm not friends with anybody,' Loomer said. 'That's why I have four dogs.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
a minute ago
- Los Angeles Times
Of course Trump wants to flex on D.C. Where are the Democrats to stop him?
Remember 'I alone can fix it'? Donald Trump, who made that laughable statement in his 2016 convention acceptance speech, is now testing the theory in Washington. Trump and his party have been threatening a D.C. takeover for years and made it part of the Republican platform last year. But it was all just empty talk and random uppercase words until a former staffer at the Department of Government Efficiency was reportedly attacked in an attempted carjacking in the wee hours of Aug. 3 in a busy area of bars and restaurants. It doesn't matter at all to Trump that D.C.'s violent crime rate fell to a 30-year low last year and is down another 26% so far this year compared with 2024, or that a police report suggests police saw the incident and intervened. This particular victim — a teenage Elon Musk protégé and notorious DOGE operative — gave this particular president the 'emergency' he needed to declare a 'public safety emergency.' Of course, he called it 'a historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse.' He has federalized the city's Metropolitan Police Department and deployed 800 members of its National Guard (to start). Over the weekend he sent 450 federal police officers from 18 agencies to patrol the city. It's the second time this year that Trump has played the National Guard card to show who's boss. He sent 4,000 Guard troops and 700 Marines to Los Angeles in June, over the objections of Gov. Gavin Newsom and Mayor Karen Bass, ostensibly to restore order amid immigration raids. But the move sparked new tensions, protests and at least one surreal foray by armed, masked agents into a park where children were attending summer camp. It also drew a legal challenge from Newsom, which is unfolding in court this week. There will be no similar lawsuit in D.C., where I've lived for decades. That's because the U.S. president controls our National Guard. The hard truth is that though Wyoming and Vermont each have fewer people than D.C.'s 700,000-plus residents, D.C. is not a state. It's still in a semi-colonial status, with a mayor and city council whose actions can be nullified by Congress, and with no voting representation in that Congress. In fact, Congress accidentally slashed $1.1 billion from D.C.'s budget — our own money, not federal dollars! — in its cost-cutting frenzy last spring. A promised fix never came, forcing cuts that affect public safety and much else. And yet the city's crime rate has continued to fall. Compared with California, an economic juggernaut of more than 39 million people located thousands of miles from Washington, D.C. is a minuscule and all too convenient target for an executive aiming to prove his manhood, show off to autocrats in other countries or create headlines to distract from news he doesn't like. I could go off on Trump for his lies, overreach and disrespect for D.C. and its right to govern itself. Or the various Republicans who have imposed conservative policies on D.C. for years and now are trying to repeal its home rule law. But what really enrages me is the lack of Democratic nerve — or even bravado — that has left D.C. so vulnerable to Trump and conservative-run Congresses. Where was the modern-day Lyndon Johnson (the 'master of the Senate,' in Robert Caro's phrase) in 2021, to whip support in the narrowly Democratic Senate after the House passed a D.C. statehood bill for the second year in a row? Trump has no mastery beyond bullying and bribery — but those tactics are working fine with Congress, corporations, law firms, academia and sovereign nations across the globe. As former House Speaker Newt Gingrich put it last week: 'You have this rock standing in the middle of history called Donald Trump. And he's saying: 'Do you want to do it my way, or do you want to be crushed? I prefer you do it my way, but if you have to be crushed, that's OK.' ' Gingrich correctly characterized most responses to Trump as 'You know, I've always wanted to be part of the team,' and added: 'If he can sustain this, he's moving into a league that, other than Washington and Lincoln, nobody has gotten to the level of energy, drive and effectiveness that we see with Trump.' Unfortunately, Trump is aiming to speed-raze what Washington and Lincoln built. (He keeps claiming it's 'Liberation Day' for D.C., but the last 'Liberation Day' — his April 2 tariff announcements — tanked the stock market.) The only conceivable antidote is to elect a mad-as-hell Democratic Congress in 2026 and, in 2028, an arm-twisting, strong-arming, terror-inspiring Democratic president who's in a hurry to get things done. Someone who's forceful, persuasive and resolved to use the power they have while they have it. The top priorities, beyond reversing as much institutional and constitutional damage as possible, should be structural: Supreme Court term limits and ethics rules with teeth, a national gerrymandering ban, a sensible and uniform national voter ID policy, and minimum national standards for early voting and mail voting — to protect the will of the people and the republic itself. Equally important, make D.C. the state of Douglass Commonwealth, named after the abolitionist Frederick Douglass rather than the colonizing Christopher Columbus. Rural America has wielded disproportionate power since the late 1800s, when Republicans added sparsely populated states and permanently skewed the Senate. Two new D.C. senators would help correct that imbalance. The problem is that the next president, or even the next Congress, might arrive too late for D.C. Trump has already begun the federal takeover he has threatened so often for so many years. He took over the Kennedy Center. He took over Congress. We should have expected we'd be next. Back in March, Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) proposed that D.C. seek temporary sanctuary with Maryland, which ceded most of the land to create the capital in the first place. 'You'd definitely be safer,' he said he told Mayor Muriel Bowser. That offer, joke or not, practical or not, is looking increasingly inviting by the day. Jill Lawrence is a writer and author of 'The Art of the Political Deal: How Congress Beat the Odds and Broke Through Gridlock.' @


CNN
2 minutes ago
- CNN
‘What gives you the right?': Tapper pushes back on Abbott over calls to remove Dem lawmaker
CNN's Jake Tapper presses GOP Texas Gov. Greg Abbott over why he took the unusual step of calling for Democratic leader state Rep. Gene Wu to be removed from office amid the ongoing redistricting fight.


CNN
2 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump has federalized DC's police force. Now what?
Donald TrumpFacebookTweetLink Follow The Metropolitan Police along with federal agencies tasked with helping curb crime in the nation's capital are scrambling to figure out roles and strategy following President Donald Trump's decision to declare a crime emergency and federalize DC's police force, multiple sources told CNN. 'We're going to restore the city back to the gleaming capital that everybody wants it to be,' Trump said at the White House on Monday. 'It's going to be something very special.' But little communication seems to have been done before Trump's news conference – the Washington, DC, mayor and police chief hadn't been told about the takeover until they watched Trump say it live. It's led to confusion over who now leads the MPD, how their policing strategy will change and in what ways federal agents – many who aren't trained for community policing – are going to interact with local officers. During a separate news conference, Mayor Muriel Bowser said she was trying to set up a meeting with Attorney General Pam Bondi, who Trump said would be overseeing the implementation of his order. She also maintained that Chief of Police Pamela Smith would still run the department and report to Bowser up through the deputy mayor. 'Nothing about our organizational chart has changed,' Bowser said. 'And nothing in the executive order would indicate otherwise.' This is the first time a president has used Section 740 of the Home Rule Act to federalize the DC metro police, said Dr. Heidi Bonner, chair of the Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology at East Carolina University. 'It's definitely difficult to say what that means,' she said, including it being 'an open question' as to who's in charge. 'Is the chief of police still in charge of the department once it's become federalized?' Bonner asked. 'And of course, all this is mixed up in the unique nature of DC as a district and not a state. There are different authorities – the president acts as the governor for all intents and purposes when it comes from the National Guard.' Bowser seemed resigned to the fact that Trump's decision would go into effect given the city's status. Prominent Democrats called Bowser and her office Monday to offer support but indicated there was little they could do to stop the takeover. 'I don't want to minimize what was said and I don't want to minimize the intrusion on our autonomy,' Bowser said. The mayor also called the move 'unsettling and unprecedented' and advocated for DC statehood to prevent such unilateral action from the president. Police Chief Smith said she was scheduled to meet with federal liaisons following the news conference for the first time regarding Trump's announcement in order to start to 'create an operational plan.' Trump activated 800 soldiers from the DC National Guard, with up to 200 members being assigned to supporting law enforcement, according to the Defense Department. 'Duties for those personnel include administrative and logistical roles, as well as providing a physical presence in support of law enforcement,' the DOD said. The unilateral move contrasts heavily with how Trump blamed others, including Bowser and then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi for not deploying the National Guard on January 6, 2021, before Trump-supporters broke into the US Capitol. Over the weekend, Trump had already moved officers from several federal agencies to begin assisting MPD in policing certain areas in DC, including as many as 130 FBI agents to patrol with DC police as part of the increased federal presence, according to two people familiar with the deployment. It's not typical for FBI agents to patrol with local police, and agents are often not trained for community policing and operate under different policies – including for use of deadly force – that could create issues on the ground, two federal law enforcement sources told CNN. Because of this, pairing federal agents with officers to patrol DC could present a situation where each member of the team must respond differently to a potential threat based on the respective agency's policy. In the FBI, the plan to deploy agents to patrol the streets of Washington has been met with concern over strained resources and the safety of agents who are not trained in routine police patrols, according to multiple sources. Taking agents away from their daily investigations to patrol DC would risk not adequately addressing other serious crimes like terrorism, foreign counterintelligence threats, cyber intrusions and the nation's fentanyl epidemic, sources said. 'This isn't hard: If we're doing (policing) we're not covering down on those other threats,' said one source. Federal agents are also typically only minimally trained in conducting vehicle stops, which remains one of the most dangerous aspects of a police officer's job. Unlike routine police encounters with suspects, which may only involve one or two officers, when agencies like the FBI conduct an arrest, they typically plan out the operation methodically in advance and execute it with a complement of agents that far outnumbers the suspect. During the two sparring news conferences Monday, Trump remained adamant that crime in Washington is out of control despite data suggesting that it has decreased in recent years, and Bowser said firmly that DC is 'not experiencing a spike in crime but a decrease in crime.' Regardless of the current crime rates, Bonner noted that Trump's order has a 30-day limit and said any long-term impact on crime is doubtful. 'You can't have a long-term effect on crime with fast actions like this because it doesn't get to the root causes,' Bonner said. 'At the end of 30 days, it will be interesting to see what it has done in terms of reducing the crime rate further, or whatever the goals of this operation are, and what they might try to do moving forward to affect some long term fixes.' 'Because, again, you're not going to affect crime in the long term without addressing the symptoms of crimes,' Bonner said.