Tightened rules to curb intoxication at Windsor-Essex restaurants
Waitress, Arianna Belanger, preparing and serving drinks at Chuck's Roadhouse and Grill on Huron Church Road in Windsor, Ont. (Stefanie Masotti/CTV News Windsor)
A local restaurant owner is working to curb intoxication, putting guidelines in place. He has enforced stricter guidelines on the number of alcoholic beverages a guest can be served.
'Every day we open the news. We hear a drunk driver hit some family,' said Karthikeyan Subramaniam, owner of seven Chuck's Roadhouse and Grill locations.
'As a businessman, I'm here to make money. But at the same time, I don't want to be an unethical human being. To ignore the safety of my staff, customers, and public just for another few drinks.'
Subramaniam distributed an internal note to staff last week called the 'Drink Reduction Rule' of only three drinks per person. If a guest wants a fourth drink, these rules need to be followed strictly without any excuses:
Order a food item after the third drink
The time between the first drink ordered (rang in) and the fourth drink (rang in) in the till should be a minimum of two hours apart
A schooner is considered two drinks
A pitcher should never be served to one person
If you serve a pitcher to two guests, consider it as two drinks per person
The change is meant to promote responsible drinking.
'We could eliminate 95 per cent of the problem by implementing this one simple policy,' said Subramaniam.
According to Windsor police, in 2024 there were 257 incidents related to impaired driving. As a result, 389 impaired driving related charges were laid. Of those, one charge of impaired causing death was laid.
Impaired Driving stats Windsor
Since the start of 2025, Windsor police have recorded 69 incidents related to impaired driving. As a result, 108 impaired driving related charges were laid. No charges of impaired causing death have been laid.
Impaired Driving stats Windsor
The new policy means fewer tips for servers.
'To me, that's totally irrelevant,' said Arianna Belanger, longtime server at Chuck's Roadhouse and Grill.
'I think we're going to save a lot of lives this way. We just want people to get home safe to their families.'
This article is part of a three-part series. Part two, Smart Serve struggles, will air on Thursday. CTV news spoke with the executive director of Smart Serve Ontario to discuss current rules in effect and whether the mandatory program goes far enough. Part three will air on Friday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBC
27 minutes ago
- CBC
Missing 17-year-old girl last seen in Winnipeg's North End
Social Sharing A missing girl was last seen in Winnipeg's North End on Monday afternoon. Faith-Lynn Hope Fontaine, 17, was last seen around 4:15 p.m. at the corner of McGregor Street and St. Johns Avenue. Fontaine is described as five feet, nine inches tall, about 110 pounds with a thin build, blond hair and hazel eyes. Anyone with information is asked to contact the missing persons unit at 204-986-6250.
CBC
30 minutes ago
- CBC
Sudbury long-term care home still can't admit new residents, six months after provincial order issued
Social Sharing A long-term care home in Sudbury has not been able to admit new residents for six months now, following a provincial order. The Ontario Ministry of Long Term Care issued what it calls a Cease Admissions Order on December 16, 2024. This means no new residents can move into the nursing home while the order remains in place. The order came after residents and families made numerous complaints about care at the home, which opened in May 2024 on Algonquin Road in the city's south end. Provincial inspectors issued six compliance orders after finding standards were not being met under Ontario's Fixing Long-Term Care Act. The those orders have since been lifted, but follow-up inspections at Extendicare Countryside since December have found some of the same issues are ongoing. The latest inspection report published by the ministry on June 4 comes from an on-site inspection between May 5 and May 9. These types of inspections are regular check-ins to identify any non-compliance with provincial standards and do not cover complaints or critical issues, which are investigated separately. Following the inspection, five written notifications were given to Extendicare Countryside for non-compliance. These include issues with skin and wound care, including failing to ensure that the care a resident received was documented. The home was also notified about staff not responding to the needs of a resident and not properly cleaning the dining area. In a statement to CBC News, Extendicare Countryside said the written notifications "are not unexpected or unusual for any Ontario long-term care home. This is helpful feedback that allows us to focus on areas that require additional effort or improvement." Extendicare added it continues to address gaps and improve care and is encouraged by the home's continued progress. Despite that, families and residents have continued to voice their concerns in recent months, with Sudbury-area New Democrat MPPs Jamie West and France Gélinas calling for a full inspection of the nursing home.
Globe and Mail
33 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
What asset mix minimizes your chances of a loss?
No one likes to lose money. But retirees are especially averse to investment losses, since they no longer have a continuing stream of employment earnings. Take Martha, a 65-year-old who expects to live at least until 94 thanks to good genes and a healthy diet. Apart from Canada Pension Plan and Old Age Security pensions, all her retirement income will have to be generated from her savings. She would like to avoid a capital loss, but how? Martha considers three asset mixes: 40/60, meaning 40 per cent in stocks (split evenly between U.S. and Canadian ones), and 60 per cent in long-term government bonds; 20/80; and 0/100, meaning everything in bonds. To improve her chances, she keeps her investment fees low, at 0.5 per cent, by investing in exchange-traded funds (ETFs). Martha's expected retirement period is 29 years, which is convenient for our analysis since there have been exactly three 29-year periods since 1938 (the first year with good statistics for all asset classes). There is a fair chance the future will resemble at least one of those three periods – we just don't know which one. As the chart shows, Martha would have lost money in at least four years out of 29 and as many as eight years. The most benign period investment-wise turned out to be 1996-2024, even though it included the dot-com bubble (which burst in 2000), 9/11 and the Great Recession of 2008-2009. Regardless of the period, we find that Martha could have minimized the risk of a loss by investing at least some assets in stocks. This may come as a surprise since stocks are traditionally considered riskier than bonds. The 20/80 asset mix proved to be the safest, and while the 40/60 mix was a little riskier, it did result in a higher average return. Coming in dead last was the strategy of putting 100 per cent in long-term bonds. If Martha was intent on avoiding a loss under any circumstances, she could have put all her money in a short-term bond fund, a money market fund or GICs. That strategy, however, would have resulted in a lower long-term return than any of the three asset mixes analyzed above. The moral here? Even the most risk-averse retiree needs to accept a little investment risk. Frederick Vettese is former chief actuary of Morneau Shepell and author of the PERC retirement calculator (
