Minnesota State Capitol will honor tribal nations with a Tribal Flag Plaza
MPR News
The state's Capitol Mall will see some changes over the next decade. The Capitol Mall Design Framework aims to develop the mall into a welcoming space for more Minnesotans and to represent the state's diversity better.
'It's looking at what has the Capitol Mall been and how could it best represent Minnesotans going forward,' said Erik Cedarleaf Dahl, the executive secretary of the Capitol Area Architectural and Planning Board.
Beginning in late 2023 and continuing through last year, the planning board worked with thousands of Minnesotans across the state to gather feedback and input on what would make the Capitol Mall more welcoming.
'We want people to utilize it as a space that is comfortable and theirs, really, because it really is Minnesota's front yard,' Cedarleaf Dahl said.
The design plan includes a Tribal Flag Plaza, located in the Lower Capitol Mall. The plaza will feature flags from each of the 11 federally recognized tribes in the state. He says the board worked with tribal liaisons from the Office of Gov. Tim Walz and Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan, White Earth Nation, to coordinate meetings with tribes.
The Tribal Flag Plaza is pictured under construction on April 23, on the Capitol Mall in St. Paul, Minnesota. (Ben Hovland, MPR News)
Patina Park is the executive director for tribal state relations in the office. She is a member of the Cheyenne River Sioux Tribe. Park says tribes raised the idea of having the plaza several years ago after Montana unveiled a Tribal Flag Plaza on its Capitol grounds in 2020.
'It was supported by the [planning board] that were looking at design ideas and ways to kind of make the Capitol grounds more accessible, both in access as well as inclusion of the variety and diversity of people we have here in the state,' she said.
Construction is currently underway on the flag plaza as part of the first phase of development. The initial phase also includes the planting of 171 trees, a pedestrian plaza and a street mural on Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard.
The Tribal Flag Plaza is part of a larger design that connects to other already existing commemorative works, like the Minnesota Vietnam Veterans Memorial. The plaza will have plantings at the base of each flagpole, which will be determined and chosen by tribes. Cedarleaf Dahl says a bench will be located nearby for visitors to sit and spend time or reflect.
Park emphasizes the importance of having the plaza and recognizing sovereign nations located in Minnesota.
The Tribal Flag Plaza is pictured under construction on April 23, on the Capitol Mall in St. Paul, Minnesota. (Ben Hovland, MPR News)
'It's not like you'll have to travel or go to the History Center or [make] an extra effort to even acknowledge that there are tribal communities here. It'll just be part of the permanent framework of the Capitol grounds,' Park said. She says the erasure and invisibility of Native people have led to many misunderstandings about who they are.
'If we just become part of the fabric of the state, it just becomes the norm,' she said.
She says learning about tribes that have been in the state will have long-lasting benefits and impact for younger generations, both Native and non-Native.
'It's this moment in time, which is exciting,' Park said. 'Future generations and Minnesotans who will come to the Capitol, it'll just be a part of their experience.'
The Tribal Flag Plaza's unveiling is expected to happen towards the beginning of summer with tribal leaders from across the state coming together at the Capitol for the occasion.
Correction (April 29, 2025): This story has been updated to correctly spell Erik Cedarleaf Dahl's name.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
8 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Letters: Op-ed about Boundary Waters misleads readers about mining in northeast Minnesota
While a U.S. senator, Russ Feingold was known and respected for his independent thinking; he was willing to weigh and evaluate the facts of tough issues. Unfortunately, his recent opinion piece about mineral development in my region ('Messing with Boundary Waters is bad politics,' Aug. 9) was a regurgitation of outdated thinking that has led our country to an alarming overreliance on adversarial nations with irresponsible practices for production of much-needed critical minerals. He was wrong on the facts — and the politics. I have represented northeast Minnesota in the U.S. House of Representatives for more than six years; this area is home to my constituents and me. We care deeply about ensuring future generations can continue to enjoy the natural beauty of our area. We also know how stringent our environmental standards are, with the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness (BWCAW) already having strict protections in place and a buffer zone surrounding the wilderness where industrial activity is not allowed. It's puzzling that mining opponents continue to hypothesize about whether a new mine will affect the environment when proposed mining projects must meet high standards through an exhaustive yearslong process before earning permits to construct a mine. Further, Minnesota agencies that oversee mining have upheld the stringency of those standards when challenged by mining opponents in court. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources stated in a 2023 order that the regulation that governs mining 'in conjunction with other existing state and federal environmental protection laws, is adequate to protect the BWCAW from potential water, air, and other impacts from nonferrous mining.' I've seen firsthand that companies like Twin Metals Minnesota have for decades made meticulous efforts to not simply comply with our rigorous regulations, but also to go above and beyond by investing in innovative technology for the next generation of mining. Mining in Minnesota is done in an environmentally sound way; it also benefits Minnesotans across the state through education funding and tax revenue, it provides the materials for technologies we all use in our everyday lives, and it helps us move away from relying on mining elsewhere in the world where child labor is used and environmental standards don't exist. Economic growth, less reliance on foreign adversaries for our supply chain needs, enforcement of strict environmental laws and no reliance on child labor? Those sound like good politics to for keeping the threat to Minnesota's Boundary Waters alive for your readers. Those who don't live in Minnesota perhaps are unaware of the problem with keeping groundwater clean. Unlike Illinois, northern Minnesota doesn't have layers of black dirt and deep recesses of clay underneath the land surface. Impurities don't percolate in the the soil as is the case in Illinois. My father-in-law was a utilities manager of a northern Minnesota city. He had a terrible time cleaning up waste water before releasing it downstream. When you flushed your toilet, the results could end up a few hours later in Minneapolis after passing through the sand and rock subsoil. Can you imagine the damage a copper mine could do!It was certainly appropriate for the Tribune Editorial Board to recognize escalating gerrymandering as a threat to democracy ('Gerrymandering now truly is a dangerous threat to American democracy,' Aug. 10). It's not good, and a positive move toward a national bipartisan solution is warranted. While gerrymandering has been going on for a long time, what we need is a solution, an escalation of the scourge and its threats to our democracy. Nevertheless, the editorial board needs to be taken to task for its obvious partisanship. First, let's recognize that parties have engaged in gerrymandering, including after the 2020 census. But the current crisis is caused by an escalation — to break norms and gerrymander mid-decade. And who does the editorial board choose to attack? Not the president, who is responsible for inserting himself into state matters and initiating this escalation. Not the Texas politicians who are doing this now because they can. Instead, the board criticizes a governor's 'fight fire with fire' verbal response to this ugly and dangerous Trumpian escalation, as if the response itself were causing the problem. Get real. Everyone knows what fight 'fire with fire' means. It means that when faced with serious escalation, you might have to respond in kind if there appears to be no better alternative. But the board just doesn't seem to be able to bring itself to criticize the ones truly responsible for initiating the current mess!Regarding the editorial ''God does not gerrymander' (Aug. 12): Why doesn't the Tribune Editorial Board say, 'God does not gerrymander,' to the Democrats, as they have done gerrymandering for decades? Just look at Illinois. It's obvious its odd-shaped districts are made to benefit Democrats. We're sick to death of the cheating, and we're so that the Republicans have finally grown a backbone to help us have our voices been much talk about gerrymandering by both Democrats and Republicans. Illinois is not immune to this political phenomenon. When we look at a map of the 3rd Congressional District, we see a district that stretches across two counties from Elgin to Chicago. There's no reason we should have congressional maps that look like ink has been carelessly spilled. There is a commonsense solution. Most states are divided into relatively square townships for land survey and taxation purposes. We need to combine these square townships into square congressional districts with population numbers as uniform as possible. End the gerrymandering. Give us all an equal and fair month marks the 60th anniversary of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, landmark legislation that secured the right to vote for millions of disenfranchised Americans and laid the foundation for more fair, inclusive and accessible elections across the country. For decades, the Voting Rights Act has guided election authorities such as the Cook County clerk's office in our ongoing mission to protect and expand access to the ballot. But today, the values at the heart of that legislation are under renewed threat. Across the nation, restrictive voting laws, voter roll purges and disinformation campaigns are chipping away at the hard-won progress of the past 60 years. The right to vote is facing mounting challenges, particularly for voters of color, seniors, people with disabilities, and young or first-time voters. In this climate, the role of local election officials has never been more critical, as county and municipal clerk's offices remain on the front lines of democracy. At the Cook County clerk's office, we are committed to leading by example. That means leaning in on our efforts to expand voter education and outreach, particularly in underserved communities. It also means making voting more accessible by increasing early voting locations and reducing language barriers to ensure that every eligible voter can make their voice heard, regardless of where they live or what language they speak. In next year's gubernatorial election, we are also planning a first-of-its-kind early voting initiative at several suburban high schools to engage and empower first-time voters. We also continue to work to protect trust in our elections through tools such as our Trusted Source webpage, which offers clear, accurate information about election integrity and how your vote is protected. And, as your clerk, I am also advocating for legislative reforms in Springfield that will make voting easier and safer for all eligible residents. Democracy doesn't just live in Washington — it lives right here in Cook County in every polling place and with every ballot cast.
Washington Post
4 days ago
- Washington Post
US judge denies request to halt Oak Flat land transfer to copper mining company
A U.S. district judge on Friday denied the latest request by a Native American tribe, environmentalists and other plaintiffs to stop the federal government from transferring land in Arizona for a massive copper mining project. The ruling by Judge Dominic Lanza triggered an immediate appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals as a deadline fast approaches for the federal government to move ahead with the transfer next week. Lanza outlined the 'stark trade-offs' at the heart of the fight over Oak Flat, an area considered sacred . He pointed to the economic and national security benefits that would come from the land transfer and the indescribable hardships that would result from the permanent destruction of the Apaches' historical place of worship. Lanza wrote that the nation's political branches are responsible for weighing competing objectives and determining how to balance them. 'Here, Congress chose to pursue the land exchange despite the existence of many significant trade-offs and the president chose to ratify Congress's choice by signing the law into effect,' he wrote. 'As a result, the Court must accept that this choice advances the public interest and operate from that premise.' Conservation groups that are appealing the decision acknowledged that the clock was ticking but said they were not giving up. The San Carlos Apache Tribe, the group Apache Stronghold and other plaintiffs having been fighting in court for years to save what tribal members call Chi'chil Bildagoteel, which is dotted with ancient oak groves and traditional plants the Apaches consider essential to their religion. The plaintiffs have taken aim at a required environmental review that was released by the U.S. Forest Service earlier this summer. They contend the federal government did not consider the potential for a dam breach, pipeline failure or if there was an emergency plan for a tailings storage area. Before the land exchange can happen, they argued that the federal government must prepare a comprehensive review that considers 'every aspect of the planned mine and all related infrastructure.' The plaintiffs also raised concerns that an appraisal failed to account for the value of the copper deposits underlying one of the federal parcels to be exchanged The fight over Oak Flat dates back about 20 years, when legislation proposing the land exchange was first introduced. It failed repeatedly in Congress before being included in a must-pass national defense spending bill in 2014. The project has support in nearby Superior and other mining towns in the area. Resolution Copper — a subsidiary of international mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP — estimates the mine will generate $1 billion a year for Arizona's economy and create thousands of jobs. The tribe and the advocacy group Apache Stronghold sued the U.S. government in 2021 to protect Oak Flat. The U.S. Supreme Court in May rejected an appeal by the Apache group, letting lower court rulings stand.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
US judge denies request to halt Oak Flat land transfer to copper mining company
A U.S. district judge on Friday denied the latest request by a Native American tribe, environmentalists and other plaintiffs to stop the federal government from transferring land in Arizona for a massive copper mining project. The ruling by Judge Dominic Lanza triggered an immediate appeal to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals as a deadline fast approaches for the federal government to move ahead with the transfer next week. Lanza outlined the 'stark trade-offs' at the heart of the fight over Oak Flat, an area considered sacred. He pointed to the economic and national security benefits that would come from the land transfer and the indescribable hardships that would result from the permanent destruction of the Apaches' historical place of worship. Lanza wrote that the nation's political branches are responsible for weighing competing objectives and determining how to balance them. 'Here, Congress chose to pursue the land exchange despite the existence of many significant trade-offs and the president chose to ratify Congress's choice by signing the law into effect,' he wrote. "As a result, the Court must accept that this choice advances the public interest and operate from that premise.' Conservation groups that are appealing the decision acknowledged that the clock was ticking but said they were not giving up. The San Carlos Apache Tribe, the group Apache Stronghold and other plaintiffs having been fighting in court for years to save what tribal members call Chi'chil Bildagoteel, which is dotted with ancient oak groves and traditional plants the Apaches consider essential to their religion. The plaintiffs have taken aim at a required environmental review that was released by the U.S. Forest Service earlier this summer. They contend the federal government did not consider the potential for a dam breach, pipeline failure or if there was an emergency plan for a tailings storage area. Before the land exchange can happen, they argued that the federal government must prepare a comprehensive review that considers 'every aspect of the planned mine and all related infrastructure.' The plaintiffs also raised concerns that an appraisal failed to account for the value of the copper deposits underlying one of the federal parcels to be exchanged The fight over Oak Flat dates back about 20 years, when legislation proposing the land exchange was first introduced. It failed repeatedly in Congress before being included in a must-pass national defense spending bill in 2014. The project has support in nearby Superior and other mining towns in the area. Resolution Copper — a subsidiary of international mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP — estimates the mine will generate $1 billion a year for Arizona's economy and create thousands of jobs. The tribe and the advocacy group Apache Stronghold sued the U.S. government in 2021 to protect Oak Flat. The U.S. Supreme Court in May rejected an appeal by the Apache group, letting lower court rulings stand. Susan Montoya Bryan, The Associated Press
