Why is sex so scary to book banners?
This week, the State Board of Education voted to ban 10 more books from all South Carolina public schools, including my National Book Award-winning young adult novel 'Last Night at the Telegraph Club.'
That means South Carolina has now banned 21 books statewide, making it the national leader in state-sanctioned book bans, a dubious distinction.
'Last Night at the Telegraph Club' is a historical coming-of-age novel about a 17-year-old Chinese American girl discovering her identity as a lesbian in 1950s San Francisco.
In addition to the National Book Award, it won the Stonewall Book Award, the Asian Pacific American Literature Award, a Printz Honor, a Walter Dean Myers Honor, and dozens more accolades.
And yet South Carolina's Board of Education has reduced it to a few paragraphs about sex. This is a fundamental misreading of the novel and a gross misunderstanding of the purpose of fiction.
In its decision to ban my novel, the board is following Regulation 43-170, which prohibits any books in schools that include 'descriptions or visual depictions of 'sexual conduct,'' as defined by the state criminal code.
This regulation deliberately sidesteps literary merit and the work as a whole in favor of focusing only on 'sexual conduct.'
So, let's talk about sex. Why is it so bad — so 'inappropriate,' in the words of the regulation — for a book to include descriptions of 'sexual conduct'?
The main character in 'Telegraph Club' is a teen named Lily who is coming to understand her sexual identity during the 1950s, a time in which sexuality was highly repressed.
The scenes in the novel that focus on sexuality are about Lily testing her own freedoms — both emotional and physical. They are about Lily claiming the freedom to be who she is.
Sexuality is a natural part of being human. As a writer, writing about sex and sexuality enables me to engage with questions about what makes us the people we become. It is an essential tool in a writer's creative toolbox, and it's one of the best ways we can get up and close and personal with a character and their emotions, desires, and fears.
Reading about sex and sexuality is just about the safest way possible for a young adult to gain insight into what sex means. It is such a complex and important part of life. We cannot become who we are without the freedom to explore our choices in the privacy of our own minds.
That is what reading gives us: the freedom to imagine different possibilities.
I believe it's that freedom to imagine that is so frightening to those who seek to ban books. Banning books that include descriptions of 'sexual conduct' is an attempt to curtail individual freedom in our own bodies and minds.
The 21 books that have been banned in South Carolina all approach sexuality from different perspectives.
Some of them explore sexual freedom and pleasure; others explore more difficult issues such as sexual assault and misogyny. Some, like 'Telegraph Club,' are about identity and its connection with sexuality.
None of them are right for every reader, but that doesn't mean they should be banned from all schools, from kindergarten through high school.
There are plenty of legal arguments for why this regulation is unconstitutional. There are plenty of reasons South Carolina parents should be angry that one parent has been behind most of these book bans.
Why does that one parent get to speak for all of you?
But I'm not a South Carolinian, and I'm not a lawyer. I'm a writer.
I believe these book bans are wrong because they attempt to limit our freedom to imagine different possibilities. We can't be fully human without that freedom.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
8 hours ago
- Fox News
Illinois changes benchmarks that proved proficiency in math, English on standardized tests
Print Close By Joshua Nelson Published August 13, 2025 Illinois education officials on Wednesday approved changes to their cut scores — the benchmarks used to determine proficiency — used for state standardized tests. "Prior performance levels mislabeled many students in elementary and high school, often indicating that students were less academically successful and prepared for college than they actually were. The new, unified levels correct long-standing misalignment between Illinois' state assessments and other real college and career readiness expectations," the Illinois State Board of Education announced on Wednesday. The Board maintained that its learning standards and assessments have not changed. The new policy changes the score that proves proficiency in core subjects on each state assessment in order to "align it to college and career readiness expectations." During the school board meeting, Illinois State Superintendent Tony Sanders said the move is not a lowering of standards, but rather an adjustment that appropriately fits with the reality of student outcome patterns. ILLINOIS PARENTS WARY OF SCHOOL MENTAL HEALTH SCREENING LAW, POTENTIAL FOR 'OVERREACH' The decision stems from the Board's 18-month-long process of consulting with over 100 educators and other local higher education stakeholders to establish new proficiency benchmarks. The Board said that such benchmarks are based on analysis of "college and university course placement data and student probabilities of passing college coursework" and success data from Illinois colleges and universities. The Illinois Assessment of Readiness decreased its cut scores, while increasing the cut scores for the Illinois Science Assessment. According to ChalkBeat, data shared in a presentation on Tuesday indicates that more students will be labeled as "proficient" than in the previous year. "Under the new cut scores, 53% of students would be considered proficient in English language arts, up from 41% last year; 38% would be proficient in math, up from 28% last year; and 45% would be in science, down from last year," ChalkBeat reported. SAN FRANCISCO SCHOOL DISTRICT DITCHES PROPOSED 'GRADING FOR EQUITY' STRATEGY AFTER BACKLASH FROM COMMUNITY "Illinois' students are nationally recognized for their academic achievements, but our proficiency rates have not reflected that reality," Sanders said in a statement released by the board. Sanders added that the state's proficiency benchmarks mislabeled students, inhibiting qualified students from accessing opportunities for accelerations and giving students the impression that they were not ready for college when they actually were. "Illinois' new performance levels bring much-needed alignment between grade levels, subjects, and actual college and career readiness expectations," Sanders said. Representative Mary Beth Canty, D-Arlington Heights, claimed that the new benchmarks will benefit rural students, low-income students and students of color. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP "These common-sense adjustments will align state testing benchmarks with college expectations and will particularly benefit rural students, low-income students, and students of color whose true capabilities and academic successes have not been reflected in our state's proficiency rates or in their own test results," Canty said. "I believe better data leads to better outcomes for all students. The Accelerated Placement Act can only achieve its goal of expanding access to advanced coursework and college preparation for all qualified students if we are using accurate measures of student achievement." Print Close URL
New York Post
a day ago
- New York Post
NY POSTcast Daily Debrief: Duffy on Buttigieg's mistakes, new details of Trump-Putin summit, peak inside Taylor Swift, Travis Kelce's relationship
Here is a brief recap of all the great stories you'll find in today's NY POSTcast. But there are so many MORE details in the pod (and even more headlines!) Click the links below to listen or subscribe where you get your podcasts! Sec. Sean Duffy on fixing air traffic control Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is revealing more details about his department's plan to fix the nation's air traffic control system – and a big part of it is getting the highest performing student in the nation's control towers. Advertisement Duffy says his predecessor Pete Buttigieg lowered the standards for new controllers which led to a 'washout' of failed candidates at the training academy. President Trump's Alaskan 'listening exercise' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt tempered expectations that this week's meeting between President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin could end with a peace agreement. Instead she called the summit a 'listening exercise' during which President Trump hopes to get a 'better understanding of how we can hopefully bring this war to an end.' Taylor and Travis: It's a love story In a well-timed media blitz Taylor Swift confirmed that she is indeed the mystery guest on tonight's episode of the 'New Heights' podcast, that she has a new album called 'The Life of a Showgirl,' and then GQ dropped an interview with Travis Kelce that sheds some new and 'awww'-inducing light on the couple's romance. Advertisement Hosted by acclaimed Emmy-winning journalist Caitlyn Becker, the NY POSTcast sets you up to tackle your weekdays with insight into the biggest news stories impacting your life all in one neat little podcast your day with the news only the New York Post can deliver. You'll get the headlines you need and the stories you want. Every episode includes a deep dive into a headline impacting your world plus, the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime, and everything in between. It's smart, it's fast, and it's fearless. Your daily news download from the New York Post — keeping you informed AND entertained. Find the NY POSTcast wherever you get your podcasts.
Business Insider
2 days ago
- Business Insider
Senate Democrats say a new crypto bill raises the risk of 'financial meltdown'
Republicans in Congress are trying to extend a winning streak of crypto legislation that kicked off last month, but Democrats are ringing more alarm bells over the latest proposed bill. In July, a group of Senate Republicans introduced a draft discussion of the Responsible Financial Innovation Act of 2025 (RFIA). It was originally introduced in 2023 by Senators Cynthia Lummis and Kirsten Gillibrand. The bill seeks to build on the recently passed CLARITY Act, which establishes a regulatory framework for digital assets. However, the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs' democratic staff recently released a fact sheet on the bill, laying out key concerns. In stark contrast to Republican lawmakers who have touted the economic benefits of crypto, Democrats see it as potentially destabilizing and riddled with potential conflicts. In a letter from Democrats on the Senate Banking Committee, lawmakers flagged risks to Americans' retirement savings, which they say are created by compromising the Securities and Exchange Commission's authority to regulate the sector, instead, assigning responsibility to the "chronically under-resourced CFTC." "Most concerningly, the bill provides a superhighway for traditional assets to escape the SEC's authority simply by converting stocks and other non-crypto securities into tokens." The letter says that the proposed legislation would use the concept of an "ancillary asset," allowing companies to sell crypto to investors without the protections under securities law. Sellers could "self-certify," avoiding the SEC oversight meant to protect investors. "Even for Americans who invest in non-crypto companies, this would mean exposing their retirement accounts and investments to greater volatility while stripping away existing federal and state enforcement tools to protect and help investors who get scammed." They also argue that the bill raises the risk of a "financial meltdown" as FDIC-insured institutions engage with crypto and are exposed to its risks. "The bill would bring crypto activities firmly within the taxpayer safety net, threatening the Deposit Insurance Fund, the safety and soundness of the banking system, and the ongoing availability of the critical non-crypto banking services that businesses and households rely on." Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the committee's ranking member, previously outlined the principles she believes are necessary to establish a crypto market framework that effectively regulates the market. "Ancillary assets draw the clearest legal line between securities and commodities and provide consumers with the disclosures they need to make informed decisions."
