Four arrests outside Parliament as Palestine Action protests against its ban
Thousands protesting outside Downing Street now to oppose the proscription of @Pal_action and defend the right to protest. 🇵🇸 pic.twitter.com/T64rQVNrK6
— Palestine Solidarity Campaign (@PSCupdates) July 2, 2025
The move, which also has to be considered by the House of Lords, would make it a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison to be a member of the direct action group or to support it.
Outside of Parliament, the police imposed Public Order Act conditions aimed at limiting the protest to an area off Whitehall.
'Public Order Act conditions had been imposed to prevent serious disruption, requiring anyone taking part in the protest to assemble on Richmond Terrace, off Whitehall,' a spokesperson for the force said.
One woman, who identified herself as Emma Kamio to the PA news agency, appeared to use the protest technique known as 'locking on' to cause an obstruction outside of Carriage Gates, one of the entrances to the parliamentary estate.
Her daughter Leona Kamio was among a group of pro-Palestine protesters who have appeared in court to deny breaking into the UK site of an Israel-based defence firm with sledgehammers, causing £1 million of damage.
BREAKING: Despite a protest ban outside Parliament, Emma Kamio, mother of a Palestine Action prisoner, is locked on outside to oppose the proscription of Palestine Action.
Her daughter has been in prison on remand since August 2024 for destroying Israeli weapons worth £millions. pic.twitter.com/JHGb7xThfW
— Palestine Action (@Pal_action) July 2, 2025
Police were seen speaking to Ms Kamio as she sat on the pavement outside Parliament with her arm inside what appeared to be a suitcase.
Listing the four arrests, a Met spokesperson said a woman 'who locked herself onto a suitcase outside the gates of Parliament' was among them for 'breaching the conditions and for being in possession of articles intended for locking on'.
'A man who was with her and refused to move to the conditioned area was arrested for breaching the conditions,' they added.
The spokesman also said: 'A man who blocked the gates of Downing Street with his mobility scooter and refused to move to the conditioned area was arrested for breaching the conditions.'
A fourth man was arrested for 'breaching conditions' of the demonstration, according to the Met.
A larger than usual number of officers could be seen in the area around Parliament.
The Met said the 'significant policing presence in the vicinity of Parliament' was because of its 'responsibility to take action to prevent serious disruption to the life of the community', including by ensuring MPs 'can go about their business free from intimidation or unreasonable interference'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Bid to temporarily block Palestine Action ban to be heard at High Court
A bid to temporarily block the banning of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation is set to be heard at the High Court on Friday, ahead of a potential legal challenge against the move. Huda Ammori, the co-founder of Palestine Action, is seeking to bring a legal challenge against the Home Office over Home Secretary Yvette Cooper's decision to proscribe the group under the Terrorism Act 2000. The motion could become law as early as this weekend once it has been signed off by Ms Cooper, which would make membership of, or support for, the direct action group a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. The move was announced after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident claimed by Palestine Action, which police said caused around £7 million worth of damage. At a hearing on Friday, Mr Justice Chamberlain is due to decide whether to grant 'interim relief' to Ms Ammori, which would temporarily block the legislation from coming into effect at midnight on Saturday as currently planned. The hearing is due to begin at 10.30am at the Royal Courts of Justice, with a further hearing to decide whether Ms Ammori will be given the green light to challenge the Government's decision expected to be held later in July. Ms Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action on June 23, stating that the vandalism of the two planes was 'disgraceful' and that the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'. MPs in the Commons voted 385 to 26, majority 359, in favour of proscribing the group on Wednesday, before the House of Lords backed the move without a vote on Thursday. Four people – Amy Gardiner-Gibson, 29, Jony Cink, 24, Daniel Jeronymides-Norie, 36, and Lewis Chiaramello, 22 – have all been charged in connection with the incident. They appeared at Westminster Magistrates' Court on Thursday after being charged with conspiracy to enter a prohibited place knowingly for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or interests of the United Kingdom, and conspiracy to commit criminal damage, under the Criminal Law Act 1977. They were remanded into custody and will appear at the Old Bailey on July 18. Counter Terrorism Policing South East said on Wednesday that a 41-year-old woman arrested on suspicion of assisting an offender had been released on bail until September 19, and a 23-year-old man who was arrested has been released without charge.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
I felt a lot safer in Israel under Iranian attack than I do back home in Britain
Visiting Israel during the recent Iranian attacks, several times I saw Israeli interceptors hurtling single-mindedly through the night sky over Tel Aviv towards an unseen Iranian ballistic missile. I'd been in active warzones before, but even so, in my experience it is a uniquely reassuring sight. The IDF Air Defence Command shot down around 86 per cent of some 500 missiles Iran fired during the twelve day war, and stopped 99 per cent of over 1,000 drones. If drones are the future of warfare, they were a busted flush in this conflict, when faced with the most sophisticated air defence system in the world. That system is made up of a wide range of expensive and precisely directed and coordinated interceptors including Arrow, David's Sling, Barak and Iron Dome, supplemented by US Thaad launchers and SM interceptors fired by US warships near Israel. Ever since Saddam Hussein fired 42 Scud missiles at Israel during the 1991 Gulf War, Jerusalem has been working assiduously to defend its people against all forms of air attack. Thirty four years of research and development and tactical and technical innovation accompanied by heavy financial investment has more than paid off in the face of missile and drone attacks from Iran, Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Iraq. Israel's strategy is not just to meet threats from the air but to overmatch them, and the IDF continues to work flat out to maintain its qualitative edge as its enemies learn from their own failures. Now I'm back home in Britain, and to be honest I don't feel nearly as safe as I did in Israel under active attack. The UK has made almost no effort in this sphere and today we are undefended against all but the most limited forms of attack. What defences we do have are too few to cover much of our territory. Our only protection against ballistic missiles is the Royal Navy's six Type 45 destroyers, armed with Sea Viper anti-air missiles – just two of these ships are typically available for duty. Even their capabilities are limited compared to the Israeli equivalent: HMS Diamond did shoot down an Iranian ballistic missile fired by the Houthis last year, but Sea Viper is not meant to be capable of ballistic intercept and the enemy weapon was probably quite basic: of the type often dubbed 'quasi ballistic'. If one of our aircraft carriers sails across the world, as is the case today, she takes a destroyer with her and we are down to one to protect the UK. Aside from our one available destroyer, a few RAF quick response fighters can be launched to intercept enemy planes, cruise missiles and drones. The Army has a few batteries of short-range air defence missiles. We do not have any up and running airborne radar systems, meaning that we have very limited ability to detect low-flying incoming threats. Our combined defences don't come anywhere close to meeting the threat we face today. The UK homeland can easily be struck by a range of Russian missiles – ballistic, cruise, hypersonics and drones – fired from Russia itself or from its aircraft, ships or submarines. There is a man in the Kremlin who has proved his willingness to use the weapons against military targets as well as population centres, and has already ordered lethal attacks of a different type against civilians in our country. I wonder if Keir Starmer realised that, and our inability to effectively defend against such strikes, when he led with his chin on heading a 'coalition of the willing' against Russia. Perhaps he has realised now and maybe that explains why he's gone so quiet. But it only gets worse. Within 15 years ballistic missiles fired from anywhere in the world will likely be able to hit targets anywhere else in the world: such systems have already been tested. Unless our capabilities improve dramatically, we will be comprehensively deterred from any unilateral action, no matter how vital it may be. The Israelis also understand something else we seem to have forgotten: attack is the best form of defence. During the twelve day war they didn't just rely on their interceptors but, using combat planes, ships and drones, they relentlessly struck at Iran's launchers, knocking out at least half of them – as well as missile and drone stocks and production facilities. Meanwhile our Attorney General, Lord Hermer, reportedly advised Starmer that Britain's participation in these operations would be illegal. Churchill received no such advice when he launched a 600 bomber raid against the German V-weapon missile development site at Peenemunde in 1943 and then, Israel-style, proceeded to pummel warehouses, storage facilities, rail tracks and launch sites connected with the V-weapons. As well as re-discovering the political spine necessary to defend ourselves, we need to rapidly build up our missile defences. That's not going to be achieved by decades of the glacial procurement processes for which the Ministry of Defence is infamous. It would be a good idea to follow the German example of buying Arrow off the shelf from Israel. But wait, the Government has an arms embargo against the Israelis. Perhaps, however, we should not be listening to the pro-Hamas hordes on our streets (just four per cent of Brits supported Hamas in a YouGov poll in March, while over half said they had at least some sympathy for Israel). We might rather consider our own national security interests instead of performatively attacking an ally in need – an ally that can also help us. It's past time for joined up strategic thinking plus some Churchillian 'action this day'.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
RAF nuclear jet base protected by 5ft fence
Britain's new nuclear-capable fighter jets will be protected by a 5ft-high fence that could be scaled by saboteurs, The Telegraph can reveal. Following an investigation, The Telegraph found that a number of the Royal Air Force's most important bases are susceptible to potential attacks by determined activists and foreign agents. Among them are a mooted future home of Britain's F35 fighters and two bases that were named as targets by soon-to-be proscribed Palestine Action last week. At points, the 'vulnerable' airstrips are protected by hedges, wooden fences or nothing at all – which insiders admitted was 'not perfect'. The potential security weaknesses are publicly available using Street View software, which experts said Palestine Action and hostile foreign powers would already have been able to use to assess their weaknesses. A dossier of findings has been shared with the Ministry of Defence. The Telegraph has also chosen not to name the bases visited or to detail precisely where weaknesses are along their perimeters. Palestine Action has pledged to raid air bases across the country after demonstrators made their way in and out of RAF Brize Norton, in Oxfordshire, last month without being detected. But the RAF appears to have made few attempts to strengthen the physical perimeters of its bases since the incursion, in which two military planes were vandalised. At bases visited by The Telegraph, patrols were infrequently observed, barbed wire was absent for large distances, and CCTV did not appear to cover their entire perimeters. Mark Francois, the Conservative shadow defence minister, said the RAF needed to rapidly review base security following the 'serious revelations'. He said: 'The MoD has announced a review of security at all military installations, which must be thorough but also conducted at pace. These serious revelations underline just how crucial that security review now is.' At one site, the RAF's main intelligence and surveillance base, a 700-metre section of perimeter near its runway is made up of hedges and metal and wooden fences that only reach 6ft high. The area is devoid of barbed wire and offers would-be infiltrators a quick getaway onto the A15. Nearby, another base is protected only by a 6ft-high, garden-style wooden fence for almost 1.5 miles along its north and eastern perimeter. The major base is home to RAF Typhoon fighter squadrons. Reporters also visited another site, which will house the latest generation F35 fighter jets. It is also under consideration to house new nuclear-capable F35s bought last month. But for one 200-metre stretch of its perimeter, all that stands in the way of would-be infiltrators is a 5ft chain-link fence with no barbed wire. Perimeters are also vulnerable at two RAF bases named as targets by Palestine Action in a meeting last week that was accessed by the Telegraph. One of these was the RAF's officer training school. The base's perimeter is relaxed, with one four-mile section consisting of drystone walls, broken wooden fences, hedges or nothing at all. The base also has a series of weakly defended emergency access points – two of which are left completely open and one protected by movable metal barricades and a sign that reads: 'Keep off'. The perimeter of another site named by Palestine Action – much of which is hedgerows – contains three unmanned gate barriers, which are not wide enough to cover their respective gaps in the fence. New, 10ft-high black metal fences appear to have recently been installed to replace three other such gate barriers, however. Palestine Action has claimed these two bases have links to Elbit Systems UK, a military manufacturer that it has repeatedly targeted before. It is understood that the two bases are used for cadet and basic flying training. Ed Arnold, a former British Army officer who was previously in charge of security at a UK base, said the RAF had left itself 'vulnerable' to infiltration by activists and foreign agents. Mr Arnold, a senior research fellow at the Royal United Services Institute, said: 'Palestine Action has shown just how vulnerable the bases are. 'If more dangerous actors followed their example, it could be a hand grenade thrown into a plane's engine – not just red paint. 'Russia and Iran will be watching closely and thinking that they could sabotage these bases too. Palestine Action has revealed how easy it would be and it is certainly a threat we should worry about.' Failure of leadership Richard Tice, the deputy leader of Reform UK, said the RAF was guilty of a 'clear failure of leadership'. He said: 'Our bases need to be made fully secure.' It is understood that enhanced measures are in place following the infiltration at Brize Norton and that security at all bases is under review. Further 'layered' security measures are also in place inside the bases and other non-visible security measures being used include electronic motion sensors. Sources also said there were air safety limits on the height of fences that can be erected immediately next to runways. The majority of the five bases' perimeters consist of barbed wire-topped metal fencing and main gates are guarded by uniformed personnel. Frequent patrols are conducted by the RAF, police and dog units,and signs warn people to keep out. The MoD said: 'We take security extremely seriously and operate a multi-layered approach to protect our sites, including fencing, patrols and CCTV monitoring. 'Following the security incident at RAF Brize Norton, we are urgently reviewing security procedures across the Defence estate and have immediately implemented a series of enhanced security measures at all sites. 'After years of hollowing out and underfunding of the Armed Forces, the Strategic Defence Review concluded that we need to invest more in this area, backed by the largest sustained increase in defence spending since the end of the Cold War.'
