Opp seeks CJP's intervention in May 9 trial proceedings
The Opposition in the Punjab Assembly has called upon Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi to personally intervene in the trial procedures being adopted by Anti-Terrorism Courts (ATCs) in the May 9 cases involving PTI lawmakers, workers and supporters.
The demand was made through a formal letter addressed to the CJP, in which the opposition highlighted various alleged loopholes and violations in the legal process.
The letter contended that PTI leaders and supporters have been deprived of their constitutional right to a fair trial under Article 10-A of the Constitution.
Speaking to journalists at the Punjab Assembly, Deputy Opposition Leader Muhammad Moeenudin Riaz said that the letter had been sent to draw the CJP's attention to "sheer violations" committed during the trials.
He claimed that PTI lawmakers and supporters were sentenced despite these procedural flaws being overlooked.
He further stated that the Opposition has also urged the CJP to review the verdicts handed down by the ATCs in connection with the May 9 incidents.
"No PTI leader, worker or supporter was granted a fair opportunity to engage proper legal defence in the May 9 cases," Riaz asserted.
He added that even the lawyers representing the accused were not given sufficient time to prepare their cases.
Under Article 10-A of the Constitution, every accused individual is entitled to a fair trial and due process, he emphasised.
The deputy opposition leader also called for the formation of a judicial commission to investigate the May 9 cases. He further demanded that media personnel be allowed access for proper coverage of the court proceedings.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
13 minutes ago
- Business Recorder
NICOPs of Imran's sons missing, says Aleema
Incarcerated Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founding chairman Imran Khan's sister Aleema Khan on Saturday said National Identity Cards for Overseas Pakistanis (NICOPs) of Imran's sons were missing, hence, they had applied for NICOPs as well along visas for Pakistan. Speaking to media outside the Adiyala jail in Rawalpindi, Aleema said, 'One of the (Imran's) child has lost the NICOP, while the other has misplaced it.' She said this in response to a query that why Sulaiman and Kasim need visas when they hold NICOPs. She said NICOPs of Imran's sons were still valid for next 6-7 years. How they can snatch their right to travel to Pakistan, we have tracking numbers of their applications, she said, repudiating the claim allegedly made by some authorities that the brothers did not apply for visas at the London high commission. Aleema said they are utilising both the options to reach Pakistan to meet their father in the jail. 'If they (the authorities) wanted to grant them permission they could do so in no time,' she added. A day ago, she had said Sulaiman and Kasim have applied for Pakistani visas. In a post on X, Aleema had said, 'A few days ago Suleiman and Kasim applied for their visas with the Pakistan high commission in London. The ambassador has intimated that he is awaiting approval from the ministry of interior in Islamabad.' In a statement last week, Aleema had said that Kasim and Sulaiman held NICOPs and were expected to visit Pakistan soon to meet their imprisoned father. Imran Khan's sons appear on Piers Morgan show Speaking to reporters outside Adiala Jail, she had confirmed that both the sons of the ex-prime minister possessed valid travel documents and 'will come to see their father anytime soon.' However, she had withheld specific dates, hinting at the fluidity and uncertainty surrounding their planned visits amid a politically charged environment. Government ministers have suggested the possibility that visa refusals might prevent the young men from entering the country. But Aleema had dismissed such claims as a transparent ploy – a calculated attempt by authorities fearful that the presence of Imran's sons could galvanise public support and intensify demands for his release. 'This is nothing but political harassment and an infringement upon the rights of a Pakistani citizen,' she had lamented. 'They want to isolate my brother, weaken his morale, and prevent the masses from seeing his condition. But we will not be intimidated.' She had revealed that her sisters, Noreen Khan and Uzma Khan, were denied permission again to meet Imran. Previously, the Adiyala jail had allowed six visitors at a time; this was subsequently reduced to just two.
Business Recorder
8 hours ago
- Business Recorder
LHC put objection to PTI's plea for public rally
LAHORE: The Lahore High Court office on Friday put an objection to a petition of Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) seeking permission to hold a public rally at Minar-e-Pakistan on August 5. The office objected that the petitioner had not approached the grievance redressal committee of the government before filing the petition. Petitioner a PTI MPA Imtiaz Mehmood Sheikh stated that an application was submitted to the deputy commissioner of Lahore for no-objection certificate (NOC) for the rally. However, he said, the NOC had not been issued yet. The petitioner asked the court to order the authorities to issue the NOC for the rally or provide an alternative venue for the gathering. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
10 hours ago
- Business Recorder
PTI's Nov 26th protest: ATC rejects petition of accused in hit-and-run case
ISLAMABAD: The Anti-Terrorism Court (ATC) on Friday rejected a petition filed by the main accused of the hit-and-run case of Rangers personnel during the Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI)'s November 26, 2024, protests seeking to halt the trial. The ATC judge, while hearing the case, rejected the petition of the main suspect, Muhammad Hashim Abbasi, who had allegedly run over the Rangers personnel with a vehicle during PTI's November 26 protest, requesting to halt the trial as he [the suspect] is mentally unfit to stand trial. The petition says that the accused, Hashim Abbasi, is mentally unfit; therefore, the trial cannot proceed. However, the prosecutor, Raja Naveed and Jawad Adil, objected to the petition, arguing that no credible evidence had been presented to support the claim of mental illness. According to the court's decision, no official medical history was provided to substantiate Abbasi's claim of mental instability. Instead, a certificate from a private clinic regarding the use of narcotics was submitted, which the court deemed insufficient. The ruling further noted that Abbasi did not cite any medical grounds or ongoing treatment during his bail period. The court consequently dismissed the request and adjourned further proceedings in the case till September 2. The case registered at the Ramna police station under Section 302 (murder), Section 324 (murder attempt) Section 120B (punishment of criminal conspiracy), Section 114 (abettor present when offence is committed), and other sections of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC), Peaceful Assembly and Public Order Act, besides 7ATA of Anti-Terrorism Act. PTI founding chairman Imran Khan, his wife Bushra Bibi, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur, Omar Ayub, Sheikh Waqas Akram, Salman Akram Raja, Zulfi Bukhari, Hammad Azhar, Raoof Hassan, and other leadership have been nominated in the First Information Report (FIR). The FIR alleged that the PTI founding chairman continuously issued instructions to the party leadership, his wife Bushra Bibi, Gandapur and his sister Aleema Khan for making all-out efforts to get him released from jail and they could set anything on fire or kill anyone for this purpose. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
