
How Indian democracy survived the Emergency
Tears streaming down his face, he recounted how a minor altercation a few days ago had taken an unexpected turn. He believed the matter had been settled, but he had gravely underestimated the situation. The person with whom he had quarrelled had a relative who was a police sub-inspector. A few days later, a police team raided the washerman's home. The charge: 'Conspiring to uproot railway tracks with the aim of bringing about armed revolution.' He struggled even to pronounce these words, terms that were entirely alien to him just 48 hours ago. Fortunately, on the day of the purported incident, he visited a distant relative. Had he been home, he would have been apprehended and incarcerated for months under the infamous Maintenance of Internal Security Act (MISA).
Surprisingly, those present at the bungalow that evening were initially sceptical. They assumed he was talking through his hat, taking everyone for a ride to avoid a minor inconvenience. However, his story proved chillingly true. After intervention from the district authorities, the matter was resolved. Yet, his case was a more common occurrence than people believed.
During those dark days of Emergency, approximately 35,000 individuals were detained under MISA, and over 75,000 under the equally notorious Defence of India Rules (DIR). Millions more were arrested under various other laws, ranging from as young as nine to over 90 years of age. The detainees spanned the entire political spectrum, with the exception of the Congress and the Communist Party of India. What drove the Indian system to such extremes?
During the Emergency, the bureaucracy, hand in glove with the government, had turned alarmingly autocratic. Despite the draconian measures, the initial days of the Emergency paradoxically brought a sense of order that many people welcomed. Trains began running on time. Buses adhered to strict schedules. Crime rates plummeted. Government employees were punctual, and the insidious practice of bribes to expedite files seemed to vanish. Classes in schools were conducted regularly, and street hooliganism largely disappeared.
Vinoba Bhave, a close associate of Mahatma Gandhi, even lauded the Emergency as anushasan parv (era of discipline). Middle-aged and elderly people often remarked that it felt as if the time of the British Bahadur had returned, an era where 'sher aur bakri ek hi ghat se paani peete the' (the lion and the goat drank water from the same place), implying a return to strict but fair governance. It might seem astonishing to read this in 2025, but many at the time indeed considered such actions necessary.
This week marks 50 years since the beginning of the so-called anushasan parv, and the memories of those days continue to stir me.
Apparently, Indira Gandhi imposed the Emergency after the Allahabad High Court annulled her election. However, other darker forces were at play. In the 1971 general elections, she coined the slogan garibi hatao and fielded 442 Lok Sabha candidates, winning 352 seats. But she failed to eradicate garibi (poverty) and unemployment, and a disillusioned student community and labourers took to the streets to vent their frustration. A woman who was likened to Durga during the Bangladesh campaign was now seen as a failed ruler and the Emergency was the last gambit of a cornered Prime Minister.
During this period, a campaign of nasbandi (forced sterilisation) was aggressively pursued, allegedly at the behest of her younger son, Sanjay Gandhi. It is widely alleged that this was an attempt to curb the growth of minority populations, with police reportedly raiding settlements of minorities and the vulnerable, forcing them into sterilisation. While isolated incidents may have occurred, I vividly recall family planning being promoted as a national campaign. Senior officials were given undeclared quotas, and they, in turn, pressured their subordinates, suggesting that those with three children should undergo sterilisation for their benefit.
Tragedies such as the Turkman Gate demolitions unfolded in New Delhi. The government machinery, armed with bulldozers and a large police contingent, descended upon the Turkman Gate area in the name of beautification' When residents resisted, they were shot at, resulting in an undisclosed number of deaths and injuries. The government never released the exact figures, and the media, already muzzled, could not effectively report on it. During that time, many newspapers were forced to get pre-publication approval from the district administration for their content.
Those were truly the dark days of the Indian Republic. Pupul Jayakar, Indira Gandhi's friend, later wrote in her book how even Indira was disturbed by these aberrations. She sought counsel from the philosopher J Krishnamurti, and it was only after this spiritual reflection that she decided to lift the Emergency and call for elections, according to Jayakar. The Congress lost the general elections in 1977, and the Janata Party won office. How Indira Gandhi later returned to power is another story, but 50 years on, while remembrance of those days brings regret, there is also immense pride that despite stumbling so badly, we Indians took the fall on our chin, brushed off the dirt and not only preserved our democracy but achieved new milestones of development over the following decades.
We can all be proud of this enduring democratic and never-say-die spirit of our countrymen.
Shashi Shekhar is editor-in-chief, Hindustan. The views expressed are personal
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Perpetrator of terrorism cannot be equated with victim of cross-border terrorism: Govt tells RS
New Delhi, The Indian government has made it clear that Pakistan, the perpetrator of terrorism, "cannot be equated" with India, the victim of cross-border terrorism, the Centre told Parliament on Thursday. Perpetrator of terrorism cannot be equated with victim of cross-border terrorism: Govt tells RS Minister of State for External Affairs Kirti Vardhan Singh said this in a written response to queries in the Rajya Sabha. The Ministry of External Affairs was asked how the government has countered claims of "India-Pakistan hyphenation in global diplomacy" and the diplomatic measures taken by the government to address "China's growing influence over Pakistan" in terms of intelligence and military cooperation. "The government of India has made it clear that the perpetrator of terrorism, i.e., Pakistan, cannot be equated with the victim of cross-border terrorism, i.e., India. This unequivocal message was consistently reiterated during interactions with interlocutors in the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor," Singh said. The seven all-party delegations, which visited various global capitals in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, also "emphatically conveyed" the above message while demonstrating India's strong national consensus and resolute approach to combating terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, the MoS said. "The issue of terrorism in all its forms and manifestations, including cross-border terrorism, was taken up with the Chinese Foreign Minister during his recent visit to India," he added. The MEA was also asked how the government plans to strengthen India's foreign policy narrative in 2025-2026. "The global community widely acknowledges India's robust democracy, economic progress, military might, technological prowess, civilisational heritage, and its contribution in addressing global issues," Singh said. The government's engagement with various stakeholders, including think-tanks and academic and research institutions, serves to highlight India's foreign policy achievements and priorities, he said. "Government undertakes a series of targeted public diplomacy initiatives to carry forward India's message to the world and continues to make all endeavours to further strengthen India's voice in global affairs. "It also constantly monitors all developments having a bearing on India's security and national interest and takes all required steps in this regard," Singh said. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Dream11, MPL, other fantasy apps face uncertain future as Online Gaming Bill clears Parliament
The Rajya Sabha on Thursday cleared the Online Gaming Bill, 2025, outlawing money-based fantasy apps, poker, rummy and other games, dealing a heavy blow to India's $3.8 billion gaming industry. Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Bill, 2025 prohibits 'harmful' real-money gaming services, along with related advertisements and financial transactions, with the government citing risks of psychological distress and financial loss. (Pic for representational purpose only) The bill prohibits 'harmful' real-money gaming services, along with related advertisements and financial transactions, with the government citing risks of psychological distress and financial loss. While it is not immediately clear which apps will be directly impacted, the move poses a threat to India's gaming industry, one that has attracted global investors and nurtured homegrown fantasy platforms such as Dream11, Games24x7 and Mobile Premier League, Bloomberg reported. The Online Gaming Bill was passed in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday without a debate as Opposition members raised slogans demanding a discussion on the special intensive revision of electoral rolls in Bihar by the Election Commission. An online money game is one in which a user deposits money in the expectation of winning monetary and other enrichment. Endorsements by top cricketers and film stars have incited interest in real money gaming apps such as fantasy sports betting games offered by Dream11, Games24X7, and Mobile Premier League. There is a realisation that online gaming has become a major problem for society, PTI quoted a senior official as saying, adding that the government has decided to keep the welfare of people above revenue loss from its ban. Indian apps which are expected to be impacted by Online Gaming Bill 2025 Dream11: Dream11 commands a valuation of $8 billion. In fantasy cricket games on Dream11, users create their teams by paying as little as ₹8 (10 US cents), with a total prize pool of 1.2 million Indian rupees ($14,000). The app becomes more popular during the Indian Premier League season. Mobile Premier League: MPL is valued at $2.5 billion, PitchBook data shows. Other apps likely to be impacted My11Circle Howzat SG11 Fantasy WinZO Games24x7 (parent of My11Circle and RummyCircle) Junglee Games (covers Rummy & Poker) PokerBaazi GamesKraft (also known as RummyCulture) Nazara Technologies (investor in PokerBaazi, though its direct RMG revenue is minimal) Bloomberg News reported that Dream11 and Mobile Premier League declined a request to comment. Why did government bring the bill? Union minister of electronics and information technology Ashwini Vaishnaw told PTI that online money gaming has become a serious social and public health issue, with a proven significant negative impact on society. "Our endeavour is to promote eSports and social gaming, online social gaming, and we would like India to become a game-making hub. For that, a lot of efforts are already being made," he said. The minister said, so far, as digital technologies go, online gaming has emerged as a 'major secto' with three main segments. "Two segments, eSports and online social gaming, are good for society. We are promoting two out of three segments... These two will get legal recognition and they will be promoted. And this bill will create an authority which basically creates programs and schemes which promote eSports and online social gaming," Vaishnaw said. The third segment, online money gaming, is causing harm to the society, he said, adding that this has emerged as a major social and public health problem. There is a realisation that online gaming has become a major problem for society, PTI quoted a senior official as saying. The official added that the government has decided to keep the welfare of people above revenue loss from its ban. Is it punishable under the new law? Yes. With the nod from both houses of Parliament, offering or facilitating online money gaming will now be punishable by imprisonment of up to three years and/or a fine of up to ₹1 crore. The bill also seeks to prohibit advertisements related to online money games and bars banks and financial institutions from transferring funds for any of such games. Advertising of money games can attract imprisonment up to two years and/or fine up to ₹50 lakh. Facilitating financial transactions related to money games can lead to imprisonment up to three years and/or fine up to ₹1 crore. Repeat offences attract enhanced penalties, including 3-5 years' imprisonment and fines up to ₹2 crore. Offences under key sections are sought to be made cognizable and non-bailable. (With inputs from Reuters, Bloomberg and PTI)


Business Standard
9 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Asia Cup fixture with Pak to go as scheduled, ban on bilateral events stays
Indian government will not stop its cricket team from facing Pakistan in the upcoming Asia Cup 2025 next month. However, the government has reiterated its ban on bilateral sporting contests with the neighbouring country. The Sports Ministry, while announcing a revised policy on Thursday, said India's engagements in multilateral competitions will continue unaffected, but bilateral tours and series remain off the table. Officials explained that India's approach to sporting ties with Pakistan mirrors its broader diplomatic stance, emphasising that while the Olympic Charter requires participation in global and regional events, New Delhi will not host or travel to Pakistan for direct encounters. The clarity ends weeks of speculation about whether the Asia Cup fixture would be jeopardised by political considerations. Why the Asia Cup fixture was in question The fate of India's clash with Pakistan at the Asia Cup had been a matter of uncertainty ever since deliberations began on the government's new sports policy. Cricket encounters between the two sides attract some of the highest viewership worldwide but are also weighed down by political sensitivities. With the tournament drawing near, doubts persisted over whether India would permit its team to take the field against Pakistan after the Pahalgam terror attack earlier this year. Sources in the ministry clarified that while bilateral matches remain suspended, multilateral tournaments such as the Asia Cup, the World Cup and ICC events fall under a different category and will not be disrupted. India's ban on bilateral events with Pakistan According to the new guidelines, Indian teams will not participate in bilateral matches hosted in Pakistan, nor will Pakistani teams be allowed to tour India for similar contests. Officials noted that this stance reflects the government's broader policy of limiting direct sporting exchanges. The ministry pointed out that this has been the practice for several years, with the last full bilateral cricket series between the two countries played in 2012-13. Since then, interactions have been restricted to global tournaments, and the latest directive reaffirms that this position remains unchanged. The World Championship of Legends controversy The notion against India playing Pakistan in Asia Cup 2025 was fanned further when the Indian team of former cricketers, playing in the World Championship of Legends event in England earlier, refused to play Pakistan—first in the league stages and then in the semifinal—resulting in their elimination. Fans questioned whether it is acceptable for the national team to play the neighbours in the Asia Cup despite the ongoing geopolitical tensions with Pakistan. Government's take The Sports Ministry said that India's participation in multilateral competitions reflects its adherence to the Olympic Charter and international commitments. A senior source said the government would not stop athletes from fulfilling these obligations, as global and regional tournaments are beyond bilateral considerations. At the same time, officials stressed that Pakistan would not be permitted to host or participate in bilateral fixtures involving India on Indian soil. Bigger picture This dual-track approach underscores India's strategy of maintaining its sporting obligations without normalising bilateral exchanges. By separating multilateral tournaments from direct contests, the government seeks to balance international expectations with national policy. For fans, the reassurance means that high-profile encounters, such as the Asia Cup match, will go ahead as planned, though the larger freeze in bilateral ties remains firmly in place.