Odisha Man Kills 2 By Sending Parcel Bomb As Wedding Gift, Gets Life Term
Bhubaneswar:
A lecturer was sentenced to life imprisonment by a court in Odisha's Bolangir district on Wednesday for killing two persons, including a groom, by sending a parcel bomb as a wedding gift.
Punjilal Meher, a lecturer at Jyoti Vikas College in Bhainsa, had a professional enmity with the groom's mother at the college where she worked as the principal. Due to this reason, Punjilal hatched the conspiracy to kill her son Soumya and sent the bomb as a wedding gift in 2018, the police said.
The Patnagarh Additional District Judge (ADJ) court has convicted the accused Punjilal Meher in the case and sentenced him to life imprisonment, government counsel Chittaranjan Kanungo said.
The court convicted him under Sections 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder) and 201 (destroy evidence of a crime) of IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, he said.
The court sentenced life imprisonment under two sections, 10 years of imprisonment under two charges and seven years imprisonment under another charge. Kanungo said that all the sentences would run concurrently.
"Our submission was to treat it as a rarest of rare cases. However, the court did not observe it as a rarest of rare cases because all heinous crime cases cannot be treated like that," the public prosecutor said.
He said the quantum of punishment pronounced by the court is very encouraging. It will give a positive message to the society at large.
The court also imposed a fine of Rs 1.70 lakh on the convict. He will remain behind bars for the rest of his life, Kanungo informed media persons outside the court.
Soumya Sekhar, a man in his mid-twenties, and his 85-year-old grandmother were killed in the blast. His wife, Seema Sahoo, suffered critical injuries when a parcel bomb, disguised as a wedding gift, exploded at their Patnagarh home in Bolangir district on February 23, 2018.
The blast had taken place when the groom opened the gift.
Following a request by the new bride and her family, the then chief minister Naveen Patnaik had ordered the Crime Branch to probe into the incident.
The Crime Branch took over the investigation on March 23, 2018, and arrested Meher in April 2018. He is currently lodged in the Patnagarh sub-jail.
The Crime Branch, in its charge sheet, has accused Punjilal Meher an English lecturer at the college where the victim Soumya Sekhar's mother Sanjukta Sahu was the principal.
The investigating agency has said that revenge was the motive behind the crime.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
19 minutes ago
- Hans India
CI, Head Constable in ACB net
Kurnool: In a major crackdown against corruption in the police department, officials of the Anti-Corruption Bureau (ACB) arrested Circle Inspector (CI) Madhu Sudhan Goud and Head Constable G Ravi Kumar of Kurnool IV Town Police Station while accepting a bribe of Rs 80,000 on Sunday. According to ACB DSP Somanna, the accused officers were caught red-handed while accepting the bribe from two complainant, identified as Besta Ravi and Besta Ragha. The duo had approached the police station in connection with a case, during which the CI and Head Constable allegedly demanded money to settle or influence the proceedings. ACB sleuths laid a trap and apprehended Head Constable G Ravi Kumar while he was accepting the bribe. During interrogation, Ravi confessed that he was collecting the amount under the instructions of CI Madhu Sudhan Goud. Acting swiftly on this information, ACB officials arrested both the Head Constable and the CI. ACB DSP Somanna confirmed that a case has been registered against both officials under relevant sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act, and they have been taken into custody. Further investigation is underway.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Siblings found dead in Delhi's Dilshad Garden flat, both MBAs and reclusive
Image used is for representational purposes only NEW DELHI: A man and his sister were found dead, suspected to have ended their lives by suicide, in their rented flat in north-east Delhi's Dilshad Garden on Sunday. Neighbours and family described the siblings as reclusive, rarely venturing out. The deceased were identified as Viresh Kumar and Preeti Tomar, who were residents of Baghpat. Both were MBA graduates. Viresh worked in the IT sector. The police are investigating possible motives, including financial difficulties and depression. Police received a PCR call around 8.21 am, and a team rushed to the spot, which was a flat on the ground floor in D Pocket, Dilshad Garden. "The flat was found locked from inside, and on opening, the bodies of the two were found. They were tenants in the flat since 2021," deputy commissioner of police (Shahdara) Prashant Priya Gautam said. They lived in a one room set, paying around Rs 1,4000 as rent. The crime and forensic teams went to the spot. The crime scene was videographed. The DCP said they had not found any foul play yet. The owner of the flat said the duo kept to themselves. "They never interacted with anyone in the society, so most people didn't know much about them," the landlord said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo He added that they were always paid the rent on time, except for the previous month. "The last time I spoke to him was regarding the rent. He said his sister wasn't well, so I told him not to worry and to pay whenever he could," the landlord said. On Sunday morning, some neighbours smelled a strong odour. "When we reached and checked, it was unbearable. That's when the police were called," he said. Police are in contact with the family of the deceased. Ashok Singh, a neighbour, described them as reclusive and lacking a social circle. "I once went to invite them to my brother's wedding a few years ago, but they didn't even open the door," he said. He occasionally saw the sister cooking, but otherwise, the siblings kept to themselves. "The place where the incident took place was a LIG flat, and in the locality, more than 10 families live," he said. Their cousin, Vijay Tomar, shared that their father, who served in the army, passed away in 2011, followed by their mother in 2021 — both due to illness. The siblings moved from their native village in Baghpat to Delhi, initially living in Jhilmil Colony. "We made an effort to reach out, but they never responded," he said. Tomar mentioned that both were academically gifted and held MBA degrees. "I remember he was working at an IT company in 2020 but lost his job during the pandemic. I'm not sure if he found work afterward," he added. Family members tried to stay in touch, even inviting them to a wedding last year, but they declined. Relatives had also suggested matches for Preeti, but she said she wasn't interested, focusing instead on her studies. "They cut themselves off from everyone. If they were facing difficulties, they could have spoken to us," he said.
News18
38 minutes ago
- News18
Consumer Panel Slaps Rs 1.25 Lakh Fine On Saudi Airline For Lost Baggage
Last Updated: A consumer commission has directed Flynas Airlines, a Saudi Arabian low-cost carrier, to pay a compensation of more than Rs 1.25 lakh to a passenger for the loss of her baggage. A consumer disputes redressal commission has directed Flynas Airlines, a Saudi Arabian low-cost carrier, to pay a compensation of Rs 1.25 lakh to a passenger for the loss of her baggage. The commission also directed that the customer be paid Rs 10,000 towards compensation for mental agony. What's The Case? The incident dates back to January 2024 when the complainant, along with her family, had gone on a trip to Turkey from Mumbai between December 23, 2023 and January 3, 2024. Their return flight to the city was booked from Istanbul with a connecting flight from Riyadh. The complainant said that at the Istanbul airport, she handed over five bags for check-in, but only four of them had baggage tags attached. When the complainant pointed it out, she was given a physical tag for the fifth bag with the assurance that it would be sent to the destination along with the other bags. However, when they reached Mumbai, the complainant received only four bags at the airport. The complainant approached the airline, but the bag was not located. The complainant made multiple communications through personal meetings, emails, WhatsApp chats and written complaints to locate the lost bag, but got an 'unsatisfactory response" from the airlines. Ultimately, the complainant approached the consumer commission for the resolution against deficient service and unfair trade practice by the airlines. There was a "mala fide negligence" and the airlines "purposely avoided all the logical actions to find the lost bag," the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (Suburban) said in a recent order. The opposite party remained absent during the hearing, hence the complaint proceeded ex-parte. What The Consumer Panel Said? The commission, after perusal of all the facts related to the incident, held 'there was a mala fide negligence by the Flynas Airlines supporting staff as well as officials who were in communication with the complainant". 'The opposite party didn't give any conclusive reply to the complaint raised by the complainant. The actions of the opposite party were not satisfactory in the said incidence," the commission said. The commission pointed out that the airline could have checked the CCTV footage to confirm the incident and could have brought more factual reports on record. 'However, we do not find any genuine efforts taken by the opposite party to confirm the incidence to trace the lost bag," it said. The airline 'purposely avoided all the logical actions to find the lost bag," the commission added. The commission further stated that there are standardised rules on compensation in baggage loss claims, namely the Montreal Convention of 1999, applicable only to international flights between countries that have ratified the convention. The commission stated that while the complainant had followed the rules in filing the complaint, the airline remained absent during the proceedings, despite being aware of them. 'The opposite party remained absent in the whole proceedings of the case even though they have full knowledge of filing of the present complaint by the complainant," it said. 'Hence, we have no doubt in our mind about the negligent act of the opposite party/Flynas Airlines. The allegations of the complainant about loss of luggage by Flynas Airlines are genuine," the commission said. The complainant is entitled to claim the cost of goods due to the loss of luggage along with compensation, it said. The commission directed the Flynas Airlines to pay Rs 1.25 lakh to the complainant for the baggage loss with six per cent interest rate from January 15, 2025, till its realisation. (With inputs from PTI)
